Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMitchell Glasson Modified over 3 years ago

1
Modelo de Representación 2-tupla. Un enfoque computacional simbólico Charlas Sinbad 2 EXTENSIONES Y APLICACIONES EN TOMA DE DECISION LINGÜÍSTICA

2
OUTLINE INTRODUCTION –DECISION MAKING AND PREFERENCE MODELLING –FUZZY LINGUISTIC APPROACH AND CWW LINGUISTIC 2-TUPLE MODEL EXTENSIONS –MULTIGRANULAR LINGUISTIC INFORMATION –HETEROGENOUS INFORMATION –UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION HESITANT FUZZY LINGUISTIC TERM SETS CONCLUSIONS 2

3
INTRODUCTION DECISION MAKING Decision making Decision making is a core area of different research pursuits such as engineering, both theory and practice, management, medicine and alike. It tries to make the best selection among a set of feasible solutions –SELECTION PROCESS Aggregation phase Exploitation phase –Solution set of alternative/s AGGREGATIONEXPLOITATION PREFERENCESSOLUTION SET 3

4
INTRODUCTION Basic Elements of a Classical Decision Problem A set of alternatives or available decisions: A set of states of nature that defines the framework of the problem: A set of utility values,, each one associated to a pair composed of an alternative and a state of nature: A function that establishes the expert’s preferences regarding the plausible results. s1s1... s N Alternative 1u 11 u 12...u1Nu1N Alternative 2u 21 u 22...u2Nu2N … Alternative MuM1uM1 uM2uM2...u MN 4

5
INTRODUCTION DECISION PROBLEMS –EXPERTS PREFERENCES –ASPECTS OR CRITERIA NATURE –QUANTITATIVE »How tall is John ? –QUALITATIVE »How comfortable is that chair ? 5

6
INTRODUCTION DECISION PROBLEMS –QUANTITATIVE NUMERICAL INFORMATION –CRISP –INTERVALS –QUALITATIVE ASPECTS SUBJECTIVITY VAGUENESS IMPRECISION NUMBERS ARE NOT ADEQUATED HARD TO EXPRESS NUMERICALLY 6

7
INTRODUCTION REAL WORLD DECISION PROBLEMS –UNCERTAINTY PROBABILISTIC –PROBABILITY BASED MODELS –DECISION THEORY NON PROBABILISTIC –CHALLENGE –EXPERTS: LINGUISTIC DESCRIPTORS 7

8
INTRODUCTION DECISION MAKING Issues related to decision making have been traditionally handled either by deterministic or by probabilistic approaches. The first one completely ignores uncertainty, while the second one assumes that any uncertainty can be represented as a probability distribution. However in real-world problems (say, engineering, scheduling, and planning) decisions should be made under circumstances with vague, imprecise and uncertain information. Commonly, the uncertainty could be of non-probabilistic nature. Among the appropriate tools to overcome these difficulties are fuzzy logic and fuzzy linguistic approach. The use of linguistic information enhances the reliability and flexibility of classical decision models. 8

9
INTRODUCTION DECISION PROBLEMS –NON-PROBABLISTIC UNCERTAINTY –LINGUISTIC INFORMATION FUZZY LOGIC FUZZY LINGUISTIC APPROACH 9

10
INTRODUCTION FUZZY LINGUISTIC APPROACH Linguistic variables differ from numerical variables in that their values are not numbers but are words or phrases in a natural or artificial language (Zadeh, 1975). Very low Low Medium HighVery high Linguistic terms Semantic rule Variable Linguistic variable 10

11
INTRODUCTION COMPUTING WITH WORDS –LINGUISTIC COMPUTING MODELS Based on Membership Functions Based on Ordinal Scales 2-Tuple based computational model –INTERPRETABILITY –ACCURACY –EXTENSIONS LACK OF ACCURACY IN RETRANSLATION 11

12
FOUNDATIONS: LINGUISTIC 2-TUPLE REPRESENTATION MODEL 12

13
LINGUISTIC 2-Tuple BIBLIOGRAPHY –F. Herrera and L. Martínez. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8(6):746-752, 2000 –F. Herrera, L. Martínez. An Approach for Combining Numerical and Linguistic Information based on the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model in Decision Making. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge -Based Systems. 8.5 (2000) 539-562 –F. Herrera, L. Martínez. The 2-tuple Linguistic Computational Model. Advantages of its linguistic description, accuracy and consistency. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems. 2001, Vol 9 pp. 33-48 –F. Herrera, L. Martínez. A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranularity hierarchical linguistic contexts in Multiexpert Decision-Making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part B: Cybernetics, 2001, Vol 31 Num 2 pp. 227.234. –F. Herrera, L. Martínez. P.J. Sánchez. Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 166:1(2005) pp. 115-132 –F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, L. Martínez, A Fuzzy Linguistic Methodology To Deal With Unbalanced Linguistic Term Sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 2008. Page(s): 354- 370. Volume: 16, Issue: 2. –M. Espinilla, J. Liu, L. Martínez. An extended hierarchical linguistic model for decision-making problems. Computational Intelligence. In press. 2011 13

14
LINGUISTIC 2-Tuple Linguistic representation: – Model based on the symbolic approach. Linguistic Domain: Continuous –Linguistic representation any symbolic computation Arith_Mean(L,VL,VH,P)=(2+1+5+6)/4=3,25 14

15
LINGUISTIC 2-Tuple 15 Linguistic Representation based on pair of values Symbolic Translation

16
LINGUISTIC 2-Tuple 16 2-tuple Functions –From a numerical value in the interval of granularity into a 2-tuple –Example

17
LINGUISTIC 2-Tuple 17 2-tuple Functions –It inverse –Example

18
2-Tuple Computational Model Negation Operator Example LINGUISTIC 2-Tuple 18

19
2-tuple Computational Model Aggregation 2-tuple operators –To use and compute as in the numerical models –To use and transform in a 2-tuple –Aggregation operators Arithmetic mean Weighting average OWA operator LINGUISTIC 2-Tuple 19

20
2-tuple Computational Model Comparison: Lexico-graphic order Let and be two 2-tuples If k < l then is less than If k = l then: If then and are equal If then is less than If then is greater than LINGUISTIC 2-Tuple 20

21
LINGUISTIC 2-Tuple Applications –Decision Making and Decision Analysis Multi-Criteria Decision Making Group Decision Making –Consensus Reaching Processes Evaluation –Sensory Evaluation –Performance Appraisal –Internet Based Services –Recommender Systems –Information Retrieval –Genetic Fuzzy Systems 21

22
LINGUISTIC 2-Tuple Problems –Complex frameworks –Different degrees of knowledge Multiple linguistic scales –Information of different nature Quantitative aspects Qualitative aspects –Non-symmetrically distributed linguistic information Unbalanced Linguistic Information 2-tuple EXTENSIONS 22

23
LINGUISTIC 2-TUPLE EXTENSIONS 23

24
2-Tuple EXTENSIONS MULTIGRANULAR LINGUISTIC INFORMATION –FUSION APPROACH –LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES –EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES HETEROGENOUS INFORMATION UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION 24

25
MULTI-GRANULAR LINGUISTIC INFORMATION 25

26
MULTI-GRANULAR LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Real World Problems –Multiple Sources of information –Different degree of uncertainty –Different degree of knowledge Linguistic Information –Necessity of Multiple scales Different Approaches –Based on membership functions –Probabilistic –Symbolic 26

27
MULTI-GRANULAR LINGUISTIC INFORMATION BIBLIOGRAPHY 1.Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., and Martínez, L. (2000). A fusion approach for managing multi- granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 43-58. 2.Herrera, F. and Martínez, L. (2001). A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranularity hierarchical linguistic contexts in multiexpert decision-making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part B: Cybernetics, 31(2), 227-234. 3.Huynh, V. and Nakamori, Y. (2005). A satisfactory-oriented approach to multiexpert decision-making with linguistic assessments. IEEE Transactions On Systems Man And Cybernetics Part B- Cybernetics, 35(2), 184-196. 4.Chen, Z. and Ben-Arieh, D. (2006). On the fusion of multi-granularity linguistic label sets in group decision making. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 51(3), 526-541. 5.Chang, S., Wang, R., and Wang, S. (2007). Applying a direct multi-granularity linguistic and strategy- oriented aggregation approach on the assessment of supply performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 117(2), 1013-1025. 6.M. Espinilla, J. Liu, L. Martínez. An extended hierarchical linguistic model for decision-making problems. Computational Intelligence. In press. 2011 27

28
MULTI-GRANULAR LINGUISTIC FUSION APPROACH 28

29
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES MULTI-GRANULAR LINGUISTIC CONTEXTS PROBLEMS –Multiple Experts or criteria –Different degree of Knowledge –Linguistic modelling –Multiple Linguistic term sets INTERPRETABILITY –LINGUISTIC RESULTS 29

30
FUSION APPROACH FEATURES –MEMBERSHIP BASED COMPUTATIONS –LACK OF ACCURACY 30

31
FUSION APPROACH –MULTIPLE EXPERTS –DIFFERENT LINGUISTIC TERM SETS 31

32
FUSION APPROACH COMPUTATIONAL MODEL –SELECTING A BASIC LINGUISTIC TERM SET S T –UNIFICATION PHASE –COMPUTATIONAL PHASE –FUZZY ARITHMETIC 32

33
FUSION APPROACH COMPUTATIONAL MODEL –LINGUISTIC RESULTS 33

34
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES 34

35
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES MULTI-GRANULAR LINGUISTIC CONTEXTS PROBLEMS –Multiple Experts or criteria –Different degree of Knowledge –Linguistic modelling –Multiple Linguistic term sets INTERPRETABILITY ACCURACY –AVOID LOSS OF INFORMATION 35

36
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES Linguistic Hierarchies –LH: A set of levels –Level: A linguistic term set with different granularity to the remaining ones l(t,n(t)) –The linguistic term set of a LH of the level t: 36

37
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES Linguistic Hierarchy – The label sets of a hierarchy Semantics: triangular membership functions Uniformly and symmetrically distributed in [0,1] Odd granularity Middle label stands for indifference 37

38
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES Linguistic Hierarchy Basic Rules Rule 1: To preserve all former modal points of the membership functions of each linguistic term from one level to the following one. Rule 2: To make smooth transitions between successive levels. The aim is to build a new linguistic term set, S n(t+1). A new linguistic term will be added between each pair of terms belonging to the term set of the previous level t. To carry out this insertion, we shall reduce the support of the linguistic labels in order to keep place for the new one located in the middle of them. 38

39
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES l (1,3) l (2,5)= l (2,(2*3)-1) l (3,9)= l (3,(2*5)-1) 39

40
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES l (1,3) l (2,5)= l (2,(2*3)-1) l (3,9)= l (3,(2*5)-1) F. Herrera and L. Martínez. A Model Based on Linguistic 2-Tuples for Dealing with Multigranular Hierarchical Linguistic Context in Multi-Expert Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on SMC - Part B: Cybernetics 31 (2001) 227-234. 40

41
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES Computational Model COMPUTING WITH WORDS MULTIPLE LINGUISTIC SCALES 41

42
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES Transformation functions –One to One mapping –Without loss of information –Computing based on: 2-tuple computational model Transformation functions 42

43
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES Computational Model – Example 43

44
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES Computational Model –Translation Unification phase –Computations –Retranslation Transformation Different levels 44

45
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES Strong limitation!! To deal with some linguistic term sets LHl (t,n(t)) t=1l (1,3)l (1,7) t=2l (2,5)l (2,13) t=3l (3,9) 45

46
LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES LIMITATIONS – Definition framework It is not possible the use of any linguistic term set –5 and 7 linguistic term sets are not possible with a LH CHALLENGE – New structure able to deal with any linguistic term set EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES 46

47
Comparative Analysis –Fusion Approach for Managing MLI (Fusion) –A New Fusion Approach for Managing MLI (New Fusion) –Linguistic Hierarchies (LH) –Hierarchical Tree ( T LH ) New Approach Based on LH: Extended Linguistic Hierarchies FeaturesFusionNew FusionLHT LH AccuracyNo YesNo Results in the framework No YesNo Domain of final results Fuzzy Sets Linguistic TermNumerical Computational Model Extension Principle 2-tupleSatisfactory Principle Term SetsAny LimitedAny MULTI-GRANULAR LINGUISTIC INFORMATION 47

48
EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES 48

49
EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES MULTI-GRANULAR LINGUISTIC CONTEXTS Based on Linguistic Hierarchies Offer a greater flexibility –Definition Framework Keep LH properties –Computational model –Accuracy 49

50
EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES Extended Linguistic Hierarchies (ELH) –Flexible evaluation framework –Accuracy Desirable Features! –Results in the framework Flexible evaluation framework –3,5,7 –5,7,9 –Etc. l(1,3) l(2,5) l(3,7) M. Espinilla, J. Liu, L. Martínez. An extended hierarchical linguistic model for decision-making problems. Computational Intelligence. Computational Intelligence, Vol. 27, Issue 3, pp. 489-512 50

51
EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES Extended Hierarchical Rules Extended Rule 1 Include a finite number of the levels t={1,…,m} Not necessary to keep the former modal points one to another. Extended Rule 2 Add a new level t’ that keeps all the former modal points of all the previous levels Granularity level t’ n(t’) = (LCM( n(t)-1, n(t)-1, …., n(t)-1)+1 t={1,…,m} 51

52
l(1,3) l(2,5) l(3,7) LCM(2,4,6)+1=13 l(4,13) EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES 52

53
l(1,3) l(2,5) l(3,7) l(4,13) LCM(2,4,6)+1=13 EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES 53

54
l(1,3) l(2,5) l(3,7) l(4,13) LCM(2,4,6)+1=13 EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES 54

55
l(1,3) l(2,5) l(3,7) l(4,13) LCM(2,4,6)+1=13 EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES 55

56
CW in ELH –Without loss of information –Use 2-tuple computational model Transformation functions –The information cannot be unified in any level. –t={1,…,m} and t’=m+1 EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES 56

57
Unification of the information Transformation Functions Level t’ EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES 57

58
Computations and Results –Aggregation of the information –Results Initial linguistic term sets EXTENDED LINGUISTIC HIERARCHIES 58

59
HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 59

60
HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION Non Homogeneous contexts –Representation Structures point of view Preference Relations Utility Vectors Ordered preferences –Representation Models point of view Numerical Interval-Valued Linguistic 60

61
HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION Heterogenous framework: –Numerical –Linguistic –Linguistic-MG –Interval-valued –operate directly Different domains 61

62
To Operate with Non Homogenous Information –To Make information Uniform –Basic Linguistic Term Set (BLTS) –Fuzzy Sets (FSs) HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 62

63
Transformation Functions –Numerical Information into a FS in the BLTS –Linguistic Information into a FS in the BLTS –Interval-valued Information into a FS in the BLTS –FS in the BLTS to a 2-tuple in BLTS HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 63

64
SELECTING THE BASIC LINGUISTIC TERM SET It context dependent –It should keep the level of discrimination used by the experts Granularity: Maximum –Transformation Functions without loss of information: Fuzzy Partition Semantics: Triangular fuzzy membership functions –To make the information uniform in the BLTS that we note as S T Measures of comparison HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 64

65
Numerical Information into a FS in the BLTS –Let a numerical value in [0,1] –Its transformation into a FS in S T is carried out as: TRANSFORMATION FUNCTIONS HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 65

66
HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 66

67
Linguistic Information into a FS in the BLTS –Let a linguistic value in S –Its transformation into a FS in S T is carried out as : TRANSFORMATION FUNCTIONS HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 67

68
HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 68

69
Interval-Valued Information into a FS in the BLTS –Let be an interval valued in I([0,1]) –Before transforming in a FS. The interval-value will be represented as: TRANSFORMATION FUNCTIONS HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 69

70
–Its transformation into a FS in S T is carried out as: TRANSFORMATION FUNCTIONS HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 70

71
Unified Information –Fuzzy sets in the BLTS To operate over the FSs by means of the Extension Principle –Membership functions –Limitations, difficulties To Transform FSs into: –2-tuples HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 71

72
To Transform a Fuzzy set into a 2-tuple Information unified by means of 2-tuples 2-tuple computational model TRANSFORMATION FUNCTIONS HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 72

73
Example HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION INPUTS UNIFICATION AGGREGATION AND 2-TUPLE 73

74
Numerical and Linguistic Linguistic Multi-granular Numerical, Interval-Valued and Linguistic Numerical, Interval-Valued and Linguistic Multi-Granular CONTEXTS HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION 74

75
UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION 75

76
Linguistic Scales –Usually: Symmetrical –Sometimes: non-symmetrical Unbalanced How to manage, Representation and computations ? UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Total Absence Barely Perceptible Good AverageGreat Total Absence Barely Perceptible Slight AverageGreat F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, L. Martínez, A Fuzzy Linguistic Methodology To Deal With Unbalanced Linguistic Term Sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 2008. Page(s): 354-370. Volume: 16, Issue: 2 76

77
Methodology –Representation Semantic Algorithm – Linguistic 2-tuple – Linguistic Hierarchies –Computations: CW Symbolic Accurate Interpretable UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION 77

78
OUTLINE –Basic Ideas –Algorithm Representation –Computational model Computing with Words UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION 78

79
UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Semantic Representation Algorithm Basic ideas: Total Absence Barely Perceptible Slight Average Great Total Absence Barely Perceptible Slight Average Great 79

80
UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Semantic Representation Algorithm Basic ideas: Total Absence Barely Perceptible Slight Average Great Total Absence Barely Perceptible Slight Average Great One level Two levels 80

81
UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Semantic Representation Algorithm One level in the hierarchyBasic ideas: One level in the hierarchy Total Absence Barely Perceptible SlightAverageGreat What side? In Level (1,3) Represent and 81

82
Representation using one level: –It is analogous to : UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Semantic Representation Algorithm FDC B A 82

83
Representation using two levels: –What levels? –In Level (2,5) Level (3,9) UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Semantic Representation Algorithm 83

84
Representation using two levels: –The right side of the levels contains the assignable labels to UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Semantic Representation Algorithm 84

85
Representation using two levels: UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Semantic Representation Algorithm labels close to the centre labels close to the extreme 85

86
UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Semantic Representation Algorithm Assigning labels from two levels in the LH IF THEN is represented on ELSE is represented on 86

87
UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Semantic Representation Algorithm Assigning from two levels: Brigdes –S must be a fuzzy partition: Bridging Gaps Brigde IF THEN ELSE 87

88
UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Semantic Representation Algorithm Central labelAssigning from two levels: Central label –S must be a fuzzy partition: IF THEN ELSE 88

89
Algorithm UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Semantic Representation Algorithm 89

90
UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Computing with Words Outputs: Five subsets : Sets of levels: Table: {t LE, t LC, t RC,t RE } = {1,1,2,3} S LE = S LC = S L = {F} S c = {D} S RC = {C,B} S RE = {A} F D C B A I(i) label index G(i) level in the LH n(t) 90

91
Ouputs –Semantics and representation Total Absence Barely Perceptible Slight Average Great UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Computing with Words 91

92
Representation Model: –Semantics is represented using different levels of the LH Computational Model –Operate with unbalanced linguistic term sets Without loss of information. Context: –Linguistic Hierarchy –2-tuple Linguistic Accurate Computational Model UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Computing with Words 92

93
Define transformation functions: –Unbalanced term Linguistic term into LH UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Computing with Words 93

94
Define transformation functions F DC B A UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Computing with Words 94

95
Define transformation functions: –Unbalanced term Linguistic term into LH UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Computing with Words 95

96
Define transformation functions F DC B A UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Computing with Words 96

97
Computational Model Scheme 1. Unbalanced Linguistic Assessments in S 2. Unbalanced Linguistic Assessments in LH 3. Unbalanced Linguistic Assessments in S n(t’) 4. Result in S n(t’) 5. Result in S UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Computing with Words 97

98
Computational Model Scheme F DC B A Arithmetic Mean 2T UNBALANCED LINGUISTIC INFORMATION Computing with Words 98

99
HESITANT SITUATIONS IN DECISION MAKING 99

100
Hesitant Fuzzy Sets (HFS) Hesitant fuzzy sets (Torra 2010) –Fulfil the management of decision situations –Quantitative contexts Decision makers Among different values Assess criteria or alternatives –HFS A function that returns a subset of values in [0,1] In terms of the union of their membership degree to set a fuzzy sets 100

101
Linguistic Hesitant Situations Qualitative Setting –Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets (HFLTS) Objectives –Improve the flexibility of the elicitation –Experts hesitate among different linguistic values New linguistic expressions –Closer to human beings expressions –Context-free grammar 101

102
Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets (HFLTS) Similarly to the HFS Qualitative context –Decision makers –Among different linguistic values To manage such situations –HFLTS FLA and HFS 102 Let S={s 0,…, s g } be a linguistic term set, a HFLTS, Hs, is an ordered finite subset of consecutive linguistic terms of S Example: S={s 0 :nothing, s 1 :very_low, s 2 :low, s 3 :medium, s 4 : high, s 5 :very_high, s 6 :perfect} H S ={high, very_high, perfect}

103
Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets (HFLTS) Define two operators –Maximum and minimum bounds of a HFLTS –Compare two HFLTS Envelope of a HFLTS It is a linguistic interval 103 Upper bound Lower bound

104
Context-free Grammar Let G H be a context-free grammar and S={s 0,…, s g } a linguistic term set. The elemets of 104

105
Context-free Grammar Transformation function, –Obtain HFLTS from the linguistic expressions –Linguistic expressions are transformed: 105

106
Linguistic Information –Computing with words –Symbolic Approaches Linguistic 2-tuple –Accuracy –Interpretability Extensions Hesitant information CONCLUSIONS 106

107
THANKS A LOT FOR YOUR ATTENTION QUESTIONS 107

Similar presentations

OK

1 / 12 Michael Beer, Vladik Kreinovich COMPARING INTERVALS AND MOMENTS FOR THE QUANTIFICATION OF COARSE INFORMATION M. Beer University of Liverpool V.

1 / 12 Michael Beer, Vladik Kreinovich COMPARING INTERVALS AND MOMENTS FOR THE QUANTIFICATION OF COARSE INFORMATION M. Beer University of Liverpool V.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To ensure the functioning of the site, we use **cookies**. We share information about your activities on the site with our partners and Google partners: social networks and companies engaged in advertising and web analytics. For more information, see the Privacy Policy and Google Privacy & Terms.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.

Ads by Google

Download ppt on indian air force Ppt on formation of company Topics for ppt on technology Upload and view ppt online form Ppt on the road not taken interpretation Ppt on world sports day Ppt on cross docking definition Ppt on global warming for class 5 Ppt on resistance temperature detector manufacturers Ppt on cross-site scripting attack