We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBranden Dubberly
Modified over 2 years ago
Chetek Lakes Diagnostic and Feasibility Study Barr Engineering Company August 2, 2009 Annual Meeting
Overview Lake Water Quality Basics Why Study? Study Details CLPA Volunteers Needed
How Does Phosphorus Affect WQ? Increase in Phosphorus Increase in Algae Lake gets Greener Secchi Disc reading Decreases
Phosphorus Sources Watershed Sediment Rainfall Groundwater
How Do Sediments Add Phosphorus to Lakes? Really low oxygen at bottom Phosphorus released from sediments Phosphorus mixed throughout lake from BoatsWind Fall Temperature Change
Watershed Phosphorus Loading Rain Runoff Phosphorus to Lake
Why Study? Secchi Disc readings Decreased Since 1996 – Why? Lake Sediment Study Needed Lake on 303d list of impaired waters
Study Details Phase 1 Habitat Study Monitoring Phase 2 Internal Load Study Modeling Management Plan
DNR Habitat Maps Aquatic Plant Sensitive Areas Coarse Rock Rubble Habitat Areas for Walleyes Coarse woody debris habitat Shoreline buffers/restoration areas
Sediment Monitoring - Barr Mud - 7 cores Prairie – 18 cores Pokegama – 7 cores Chetek – 8 cores Ten Mile – 6 cores Total of 46 cores
Sediment Monitoring - Barr Discover exactly how much phosphorus is in the lake sediments by measuring it
Tributary Monitoring - USGS Flow – 2 years Phosphorus – 1 year
Lake Monitoring 7 Times Per Year – USGS Volunteers – Weekly – June- Sept. Chetek – 2 years Other Lakes – 1 year
Other Monitoring - USGS Recording Stage Gage Recording Precipitation Gages 10 Groundwater Piezometers
Phase 2 – Internal Phosphorus Load Study Phosphorus release rates – low oxygen or high pH Boat propellor resuspension
Modeling Components How much Water enters the lake? How much Phosphorus enters the lake? Where does the Phosphorus come from? How much can Water Quality improve?
Management Plan Set Goals Watershed Management Internal Load Management Habitat Management Committee & Public Meetings CLPA Approval, WDNR Approval
What comes next? Projects from the management plan Projects that improve water quality
Schedule Phase 1 - 2010 to 2013 Phase 2 - 2011 to 2013
Study Cost About $290,000 for Phase 1 Estimate Similar Cost for Phase 2 About $580,000 for Study About $116,000 per lake
Funding Sources Two DNR Lake Protection Grants of $200,000 Each USGS Funds 35% of USGS Project CLPA $10,000 for Each Phase
CLPA Cost About $10,000 for Phase 1 About $10,000 for Phase 2
Volunteers Needed Lake Sampling Stream Sampling Sediment Sampling
Support Contact CLPA President John Plaza Support? Feedback?
Next Steps Meet With DNR Apply for Lake Protection Grant Funds Find Volunteers
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
WELCOME MEMBERS 2007 – 2008 ANNUAL MEETING. AGENDA In troduction of Officers and Directors - John Review Financial Statement – Don CLPA Accomplishments.
Water Quality Factors 2014 SCIENCE CLASS.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
SELF-HELP MONITORING — A WISCONSIN LAKE — Mary Jane Bumby Green Lake Green Lake County Wisconsin.
PowerPoint Development Tool For the Cooperative Lakes Monitoring Program Enabling YOU to make your own presentations.
Highlights A Study of Phosphorus Loading of Ballston Lake by Tributary Inflow Presentation to BLIA Annual Meeting June 16, 2014 Scott Miller, Bob Duncan,
Surface Water Includes: River Systems Ponds Lakes.
Loudoun County Water Resources Monitoring Presented to Loudoun Valley High School May 9, 2012 David Ward and Scott Sandberg Loudoun County Department of.
STATUS OF GREEN LAKE. Status of Green Lake Lake Management Plan Approved Lake Management Plan Approved Three Grants Awarded Three Grants Awarded.
Regional Critical Mass SLICE can wait no longer!.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
New Mexico Watershed Watch Your school name and river name This project funded by the NM Dept. Of Game & Fish and the Sports Fish Restoration Program.
Comprehensive Lakes Plan The Next Phase – Implementation 10/5/20151R.W. Garrett 19 slides Improving Storm Water Management.
Temperature Measured with a thermometer Units are ◦C
Jeff Weiss, Founder Marcy Knysz, Watershed Coordinator Buffalo Creek Clean Water Partnership.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.