Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

P REGNANCY -R ELATED L OW B ACK P AIN AND THE EFFICACY OF CAM I NTERVENTION : A PILOT RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Caroline Peterson, DC, PhD, MPH, CPM.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "P REGNANCY -R ELATED L OW B ACK P AIN AND THE EFFICACY OF CAM I NTERVENTION : A PILOT RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Caroline Peterson, DC, PhD, MPH, CPM."— Presentation transcript:

1 P REGNANCY -R ELATED L OW B ACK P AIN AND THE EFFICACY OF CAM I NTERVENTION : A PILOT RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Caroline Peterson, DC, PhD, MPH, CPM Mitch Haas, DC, MA W. Thomas Gregory, MD

2 P REGNANCY -R ELATED L OW B ACK PAIN E PIDEMIOLOGY Insidious onset during pregnancy > 50% all pregnancies 1,2 Intensity and frequency increases 3 Only consistent predictor: Hx LBP 68% LBP unreported 1 25% of those reporting LBP are treated 1 2/3 require sick leave due to LBP 4 1/3 untreated LBP continues 1 year postpartum 1,5,6 at increased risk of comorbidities 7

3 P ILOT R ANDOMIZED C ONTROLLED T RIAL Participants Healthy 20-49 years old Pregnant with singleton LBP of insidious onset during pregnancy Comparison groups Exercise Spinal manipulation Neuro-emotional technique Enter study at any point in pregnancy Study visits parallel prenatal visits

4 S AMPLE C HARACTERISTICS ( N =57) M EAN OR F REQUENCY 29.7 years old (5.0 SD), range 20-40 77% White non-Hispanic 66% at least 4 year college degree 72% married 77% work outside home during pregnancy 3 times pregnant (1.9 SD), range 1-9 1 times given birth (1.1 SD), 0-5 25.4 wks entered study (6.4 SD), range 10-37

5 S AMPLE H ISTORY OF L OW B ACK P AIN M EAN OR F REQUENCY 54% history of low back pain prior to pregnancy 25.4 weeks gestation LBP began, range 2-28 12.3% taking medication for LBP at study start 25% took time off work due to LBP 27.9 BMI at study entry, range 21-35 93% health very or quite good prior to pregnancy 61% at least weekly exercise prior to pregnancy Location LBP: Lumbosacral (50.9%), Pelvis (21%), Lumbar (14%), Composite (10.5%)

6 S PECIFIC A IM #1 Determine the Feasibility of the Study Can 90 pregnant women be recruited within 12 months? Can participants comply with exercise expectation and treatment schedule? Can a completion rate of 90% be achieved? What is the average cost per participant? Does a qualitative component to the study further explain PRLBP?

7 C AN 90 PREGNANT WOMEN BE RECRUITED WITHIN 12 MONTHS ? Assessed for eligibility n=138 Excluded n=81 Randomized n=57 Discontinued prior to 37 weeks n=12 Exercise n=7 (32%) NET n=2 (10%) SMT n=3 (20%) Sample analyzed n=57 Exercise n=22 (n=16, 2+ data points) NET n=20 (n=19, 2+ datapoints) SMT n=15 (n=15, 2+ datapoints)

8 Can a completion rate of 90% be achieved? No: 80% achieved Stated Reasons for Attrition Swine Flu n=2 No improvement after 1 visit n=1 Wants physical therapy n=1 Lost faith in modality n=1 Politics n=1 Too busy n=1 MVA n=1 Too far n=1 Friend died n=1 No show/no response n=1

9 Can participants comply with exercise expectation and treatment schedule? Exercise Consistent & >50% Improvement n=7 Inconsistent & >50% Improvement n=5 Consistent & <50% Improvement n=2 Inconsistent & <50% Improvement n=2 Treatment schedule To some degree

10 What is the average cost per participant? Total cost $233/person Study visit cost $160/person Number of Study Visits 7.4 (3.14SD) Range 2-19 $20 per visit + $20 interview Recruitment costs $50/person Magazine ad $32/person Fliers, brochures, postage $18/person Lab costs $23/person

11 S PECIFIC A IM #2 Are the study questions appropriate? 1. Does intervention alter pain intensity or disability? 2. Does pain intensity or disability influence intra- uterine attachment? 3. Does pain intensity or disability influence heart rate variability? 4. Does pain intensity or disability influence labor & delivery complications? Disability = Roland Morris Disability Index Intensity = 11 point VAS Intra-uterine attachment = Prenatal Attachment Inventory

12 R OLAND M ORRIS D ESCRIPTIVE S TATS Group (SD) Start (SD) End % Improve % Improve 50% Exercise10.7 (4.9)6.1 (5.9)3855 NET9.3 (3.7)5.7 (4.7)2350 SMT8.7 (4.1)4.1 (4.3)5567

13 VAS P AIN I NTENSITY D ESCRIPTIVE S TATS Group (SD) Start (SD) End % Improve % Improve 50% Exercise3.9 (1.5)2.4 (1.8)2655 NET3.2 (1.4)2.4 (1.6)1035 SMT3.5 (1.1)1.9 (1.7)4453

14 L INEAR R EGRESSION M ODEL TermsRM Adjusted* Mean Difference (95% CI) VAS Adjusted* Mean Difference (95% CI) Ex vs. NET0.7 (-2.9, 4.2)0.1 (-1.0, 1.3) Ex vs. SMT0.01 (-3.2, 3.2)-0.3 (-1.5, 1.0) SMT vs. NET1.2 (-2.1, 4.5)0.5 (-0.8, 1.7) *Adjusted for gestational age at entrance into the study, outcome measure score at baseline, maternal age, and history of low back pain

15 L ABOR & D ELIVERY O UTCOMES Tx GrpRipen n (%) Induct n (%) Augmt n (%) Pain Med n (%) Mec n (%) Nuchal Cord n (%) Ex (n=13) 2 (15)4 (30)7 (54) 4 (30) NET (n=11) 004 (36)3 (27)02 (18) SMT (n=10) 2 (20)4 (40)6 (60)3 (30)1 (10)2 (20)

16 A NALYSIS N EXT S TEPS Heart Rate Variability Oxytocin Attachment Prenatal Attachment Inventory Adult Attachment Interview Postpartum Mommy/Baby Video

17 T HANKS TO O UR F UNDERS ! NCCAM/NIH 2T32AT0026888-06 The ONE Foundation The Tartar Foundation

18 R EFERENCES C ITED 1 Wang, S.M. et al. Low back pain during pregnancy: Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2004. 104:p. 65-70 2 Gutke, A., H.C. Ostgaard, and B. Oberg, Association between muscle function and low back pain in relation to pregnancy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2008 40(4);p. 304-311 3 Pennick, V. and G. Young, Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy., in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007 4 Mogren, I., Perceived health, sick leave, psychosocial situation, and sexual life in women with low-back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2006. 85: p. 647-656 5 To, W.W.K. and M.W.N. Wong, Factors associated with back pain symtoms in pregnancy and the persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2003 82. p. 1086-1091. 6 Mogren, I., BMI, pain and hyper-mobility are determinants of long-term outcomes for women with low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. European Spine Journal. 2006. 15: p. 1093-1102 7 Gutke, A., A. Josefsson, and B. Oberg, Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in relation to postpartum depressive symptoms. Spine, 2007. 32 p. 1430-1436.

19 R EFERENCES 8 Lombardi, F., Physiological understanding of HRV components, in Dynamic Electrocardiography, M. Malik and A.J. Camm, Editors, 2004, Blackwell: New York, p. 40-47. 9. Terkelsen, A.J., et al., Acute pain increases heart rate: Differential mechanisms during rest and mental stress. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and clinical, 2005. 121:p. 101-109. 10 Gockel, M. et al. Perceived disability but not pain is connected with autonomic nervous function among patients with chronic low back pain. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2008. 40(5): 355-358 11 Davies, K.A. et al. insecure attachment style is associated with chronic widespread pain. Pain, 2009. 143:200-205. 12 Meredith, P., J. Strong, and J.A. Feeney, Adult attachment, anxiety, and pain self- efficacy as predictors of pain intensity and disability. Pain. 2006. 123: 146-154 13 Ciechanowski, P., et al., The relationship of attachment style to depression, catastrophizing and health care utilization in patients with chronic pain. Pain. 2003. 104: p. 627-637 14 Evans, S. E.A. Shipton, and T. Keenan, The relationship between maternal chronic pain and child adjustment: The role of parenting as a mediator. The Journal of Pain, 2006 7(4): 236-243

20 R EFERENCES 15 Critchley, H. et al. Human cingulate cortex and autonomic control: converging neuroimaging and clinical evidence. Brain (2003) 126:2139-2152 16 Avery N.D., Wolfe, L.A, Amara, C.E., Davies G.A.L., McGrath, M.J. Effects of human pregnancy on cardiac autonomic function above and below the ventilatory threshold. Journal of Applied Physiology (2001) 90:321-328 17 Porges S.A. The polyvagal perspective. Biological Psychology (2007) 74:116-143 18 O’Conner M.F. et al. Craving love? Enduring grief activates brain’s reward center. NeuroImage (2008) 42:969-972 19 Bowlby, J. Attachment and Loss Vol 1. 1969 New York: Basic Books 20 Siegel, D.J. The Developing Mind: Toward a neurobiology of interpersonal experience. 1999. New York: The Guildford Press 22 Damato, E.G. Prenatal attachment and other correlates of postnatal maternal attachment to twins. Advances in Neonatal Care 2004. 4(5):274-291


Download ppt "P REGNANCY -R ELATED L OW B ACK P AIN AND THE EFFICACY OF CAM I NTERVENTION : A PILOT RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Caroline Peterson, DC, PhD, MPH, CPM."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google