We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJagger Starkes
Modified about 1 year ago
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Approaches to Economic Science Part 2: What is Social Science? (Module MW26.1) Winter term 2012/13 PD Dr. M. Pasche Prof. Dr. A. Freytag (section 2.7) 2.7 Social Science and the Society
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag “Her Majesty The Queen …Madam, when Your Majesty visited the London School of Economics last November, you quite rightly asked: why had nobody noticed that the credit crunch was on its way? The British Academy convened a forum on 17 June 2009 to debate your question, with contributions from a range of experts from business, the City, its regulators, academia, and government. when Your Majesty visited the London School of Economics last November, you quite rightly asked: why had nobody noticed that the credit crunch was on its way? The British Academy convened a forum on 17 June 2009 to debate your question, with contributions from a range of experts from business, the City, its regulators, academia, and government. …” …So in summary, Your Majesty, the failure to foresee the timing, extent and severity of the crisis and to head it off, while it had many causes, was principally a failure of the collective imagination of many bright people, both in this country and internationally, to understand the risks to the system as a whole….”* * Besley, Timothey et al. (2009), Letter to the Queen“ Homo Oeconomicus, 2010, forthcoming
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag “Her Majesty The Queen …Madam, We are writing both in response to the question you posed at the London School of Economics last November – concerning why few economists had foreseen the credit crunch – and the answer to you from Professors Tim Besley and Peter Hennessy dated 22 July. We agree with many of the points made by Professors Besley and Hennessy…but we regard their overall analysis as inadequate because it fails to acknowledge any deficiency in the training or culture of economists themselves… …the letter by Professors Tim Besley and Peter Hennessy overlooks the part that many leading economists have had in turning economics into a discipline that is detached from the real world, and in promoting unrealistic assumptions that have helped to sustain an uncritical view of how markets operate. …”* Hodgson, Geoffrey et al. (2009), Letter to the Queen, Homo Oeconomicus, 2010.
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag What do these letters tell us? 1) Social science is prone to extraordinary failure 2) This holds particularly if it becomes essentially self-referential! 3) Social science is not a monolith; its representatives differ from each other wrt methods and aims 4) Problems within social science reflect difficulties of social science to define its relationship with society 5) Social science has an obligation to deliver valuable research 6) Social science has to justify its existence (see the development of humanities in UK) See also: Symposium: Letter to the Queen, Homo Oeconomicus, Volume 27, No 3 (2010), contributions by Peter Skott, John Hudson, Andreas Freytag, Leif Helland, Gebhard Krchgässner, Alain Marciano and Heinz D. Kurz
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Social Science and the Society – the problems Problem #1: What is social science? Problem #2: Economics and other social sciences are dealing with very complex systems precision low, reason to criticize Problem #3:Researcher is part of the system endogeneity? Problem #4:What is the quality of science? Problem #5: What is and should be academic independence? Problem #6:Public financed academia and its freedom? Problem #7:He who pays the piper calls the tune? How to deal with external partners? Problem #8:Honesty Problem #9: Students
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Problem #1: What is social science? Economics belongs to social science as it deals with division of labor. This becomes clear when on looks for a sensible definition of “Economics is what economists do” (Marshall, Say and Viner) sense? “Economics is dealing with the economy” science as a collection of allotments! “Economics is dealing with scarcity and resource allocation” (Lord Robbins) social engineering as result? is economics another natural science? “Economics deals with chances and boundaries of human interaction in order to create mutual benefits” (Homann and Suchanek) refers to division of labor, transactions etc. economics as social science!
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Thus, it is important that Economics deals with social interaction. This implies the danger of arbitrary and non-rational behavior. It also implies that it cannot completely refrain from normative statements. Positive analysis (analyzing what is) Normative analysis (using a set of theoretical criteria) weak vs strong value judgement weak: allocation strong:distribution (not allowed); weakness or strength? What are the methodological implications? Complex theoretical relations need simple and clear language, i.e. mathematics however, economics is not a natural science, controlled experiments are still not possible no argument without a number internal division of labor
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Problem #2: Economics and other social sciences are dealing with very complex systems The fact that social interaction is subject of our analysis makes it difficult to get the full picture in theoretical and empirical models. Strict assumptions axioms ceteris paribus clause endogeneity problem feedback loops There is a need for simplification math is necessary. Some economists criticize the mainstream for using models critical realists. Others do not like the models for their pro-market approach (Letter #2) Others do not appreciate the neglect of institutions and the static nature of many models. Others do not believe in steady-state equilibria.
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Problem #3:Researcher is part of the system endogeneity? The problem is that the modeller herself is part of the model. Does this imply a bias? Can we imagine models without our own value judgements? Prognosis: own objectives? Consulting, policy advice: own objectives? In a television talk show, a leading German politician claimed that an economics professor, who is a civil servant should not give advice about wage flexibility. The professor is not able to judge it as he never is in such a situation, so the justification. Right? Hypothesis: since everyone is part of the economy, the respect for expertise is low.
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Problem #4:What is the quality of science? How to measure quality? Who measures quality? external benchmark? economic growth? (community as such) appearance in the media? (single scientists) official prizes? appointment in advisory councils etc? salary? students judgements? … internal benchmark? Nobel Prize, other prizes? quotations? rankings? hypothesis: Rankings mirror the inability of scholars to judge their colleagues! fundraising? administrative work? what about fashions and trends? (Kuhn: marginal revolution) publishing as prostitution?
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag mixture of both? Digression: The Economics of the Nobel Prize* The unofficial criteria of the Nobel Committee are: specificity, originality and importance. It seems that Economics has moved away from that group. In reality:Missionary or technician? Background: Chance or temptation? World views? Family background? Role of teachers? History’s heavy footprint Lone wolf or tribal animal? Puzzle solvers or system builders? Puzzlers or masters? The unlikely source of crucial ideas What fish in what pond? Notions of progress? Substitutive, cumulative and circular progress Science vs. scientism? * Horn, Karen (2009), Roads to Wisdom, Conversation with Ten Nobel Laureates in Economics, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Problem #5: What is and should be academic independence? In a television talk show, a leading German politician claimed that an economics professor, who is a civil servant should not give advice about wage flexibility. The professor is not able to judge it as he never is in such a situation, so the justification. So why should a professor be a civil servant? Compensation for high security?no Financial independence allows independent research? depends Civil servant status makes independent form government order?depends In effect, there is no need to grant professors the status of a civil servant.
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag However, academic independence can be very helpful for the academic work (both teaching and research) Imagine social science professors who argue scientificly funded about the role of government in education, the economy etc. If they are too dependent on the government and have very flexible work contracts at the same time, they might be subject to pressure to teach the “right” themes and lessons. Can they teach revolution (Problem #6)?* This is not the only aspect of academic independence: Financial independence vs. laziness! third interested parties (Problem #7) * James Buchanan (1979), What Should Economists Do?, Chapter 14: Public Finance and Academic Freedom, Indianapolis: Liberty Press.
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Problem #6:Publicly financed academia and its freedom? This problem is closely related to problems #5 and #7. What can the public expect from academia which it finances? obedience? critical minds? independent research? independent critical teaching? what is critical: can the public afford to pay teachers who call for marxist revolution? public universities and subsidized consulting? public universities and patents?
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Problem #7:He who pays the piper calls the tune? How to deal with external partners? Social scientist are involved in policy advice and consulting of private agents. This makes them vulnerable for corruption, media attention and bribery as well as hijacking. Corruption: the results are biased. Media attention: Professors are vein. Hijacking: interested parties claim that the results of research have certain policy implications (theory of strategic trade policy) To protect oneself from these dangers, it is sensible to base policy advice on peer reviewed research (cross-checking). The financial independence may help (Problem #6).
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Reputation and Commitment in Consulting Short term vs. long term Independence might be costly, as some attractive research and consulting projects will not be raised. Nevertheless, it may be very helpful to build up a reputation as being incorruptible. Reputation matters: An independent thinker may well be highly appreciated in the public and raise projects in the long run. Nota bene: it may be adverse to the interests of the consulted firm, government branch or the like to insist on certain results or their absence In particular, young scholars cannot afford to be too accomodating. There is the trade-off between research and personal money on the one hand and reputation on the other hand.
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Problem #8: Honesty 1) There have been a number of spectacular cases of plagiarism of PhDs in German politics. These people have: copied without citing and/or copied without citing and/or obviously hired ghostwriters. obviously hired ghostwriters. 2) In other cases, authors have submitted the same paper several times to different journals without cross-citations several publications of (exactly) the same content but different title (sic!) 3) Others “treat” their data until the results are fitting the expectations spectacular cases in natural science. 4) There also have been cases of applications for grants with “fake” publications. All forms of dishonesty have to be rejected and punished.
Andreas Freytag Social Science and the Society © Freytag Problem #9: Students Problem #9: Students Finally, we come to the objects of this class, this time treated as subject of the course. Universities offer higher education in an increasingly competitive environment. They are dependent on high enrollment as otherwise the public funding dries out.* students fee and the incentives Bologna-Reform accreditation niches transferability employability Rankings and their meaning (Cantines, grades etc.) Competition and the mass university Alumni and their tasks *Frey, Bruno S. (2010), Withering Academia?, Munich: CESIfo,
1 Approaches to Economic Science Part 2: What is Social Science? (Module MW26.1) Winter term 2013/14 Prof. Dr. A. Freytag (section 2.7) 2.7 Social Science.
Introductory Task 1. What term means a belief in the importance of traditional values and competition? 2. What term means the idea that human behaviour.
Good Research Questions. A paradigm consists of – a set of fundamental theoretical assumptions that the members of the scientific community accept as.
Class One Economics July. Decisions!!! A household and an economy face many decisions: Who will work? What goods and how many of them should.
Introduction to Economics CLASS 1. Scarcity Economics is the study of how society manages its scarce resources. “Scarcity – since there are limited resources.
Characteristics of the Ideal Classroom 1.Fun and Meaningful Activities 2.No Busy Work 3.Manageable Assignments 4.Energy and Enthusiasm 5.Humor 6. Varied.
The Nature and Method of Economics 1 C H A P T E R.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter One Basic Principles: Ethics and Business.
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE RELATIONSHIP WITH CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS MEDIA AND GENERAL PUBLIC: KEY TO EFFECTIVE ACCOUNTABILITY Presented by Hon. V.
INTRODUCTION Review of Key Topics from Micro Principles.
Basic Economic Concepts Chapters 1-2. What is Economics in General? Economics is the study of _________. Economics is the science of scarcity. Scarcity.
Mill believes liberty is needed for full development of human nature. Having liberty and being able to make your free choice will flourish your capacity.
TWINNING CONTRACT UA08/ENP- PCA/OT/14 «Support to the development and improvement of the civil servants training system in Ukraine »
11 Chapter 8 Tips For Organizing the Economic Research Paper – Part One 2013, Plamen Nikolov, Harvard University.
Excellence in scientific research Prof. Ladislau Nagy Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj, Romania
Which policies go under which heading? Which policies benefit m/c and w/c? Which policies do the following... reduce inequality, improve achievement, meritocracy,
Basic Economics Dr Ed Wright. What is Economics? “A science that deals with the allocation, or use, of scarce resources for the purpose of fulfilling.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
The Nature & Method of Economics Chapter One. Definition of Economics Social science concerned with the efficient use of limited resources to achieve.
AP Economics “Econ, Econ” Econ. Terms to know: Scarcity Economics Microeconomics vs. Macroeconomics Trade-off Marginal Costs Marginal Benefits Positive.
Chapter 1 Preliminaries Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Chapter 1 Exploring Economics CoreEconomics 2 nd edition by Gerald W. Stone 1 © 2011 Worth Publishers ▪ CoreEconomics ▪ Stone Slides By: Debbie Evercloud.
Economist or Econo-Mystery? Economists maintain a very focused perspective on human activity and as such are very analytical, preferring to use mathematics.
Copyright OSIconsult TTCOM-4.PPT/hoffmann/nov00/1 Criteria for a successful proposal Dr. Harald Hoffmann OSIconsult GmbH Simmeringer Hauptstrasse 24 A-1110.
Sustainability Metrics Lecture 1-Weak Sustainability Metrics Dr Bernadette O’Regan Lecture 2-Strong Sustainability Metrics Prof Richard Moles Lecture.
Economics as Social Science Economic Methodology Lecture 2 Dominika Milczarek-Andrzejewska.
1 THE DESIGN OF INTELLECTUAL MOVEMENTS Stuart Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.
Managing your client risks in difficult times Peter Scott PETER SCOTT CONSULTING.
I NTRODUCTION TO M ICROECONOMICS ECO 110M section 2345 Dr. Hamilton Lankford u Business Administration 111A u u Office hours:Tuesday 10:30-11:30.
Authorship conflict scenarios presence/absence and order Tom Little, Dan Nussey, Sue Healy and Neil Metcalfe.
APAP Economics “ Econ, Econ ” Econ. 3 FACTS! 1.Econ is a skills based course. Learning methodology resembles algebra more than history. 2.You MUST complete.
RECRUITING FROM STEM SUBJECTS Carl Gilleard, CEO, Association of Graduate Recruiters.
23th September 2004 Council of Europe Conference PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH – Review of the Economic Literature Alain M. Schoenenberger.
Getting Published in Quality Journals Simon Pierre Sigué, Ph.D. Athabasca University Dealing with Reviewers’ Comments.
In many countries in Europe, they do not censor nudity or language on television. Should the U.S. do the same? 1 Take out Spiral notebook. What will we.
OBSERVATIONS ABOUT HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE US PETER MAYER, CURRENTLY UW OSHKOSH 1.
GRADE 11 IB Economics First Theory Lesson. WHAT IS ECONOMICS? Economics is about how society uses its scarce resources to try to achieve maximum progress.
Emerging Economies, Emerging Leaderships; Arab Women and Youth as Drivers of Change.
19.0 Conclusion Debate over intervention vs. non-intervention goes back two hundred years Jean-Baptiste Say (1803) – market system can and does.
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nik Maheran Nik Muhammad, (CFP, CITM, IBBM)
The Development Impact of IP: Economic Studies Building Partnerships for Mobilizing Resources for Development, Geneva, November 5 & 6, 2009 Carsten Fink.
Natural and Human (Social) Sciences as Areas of Knowledge TOK II - Lang.
CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Evaluation Procedures at CUT Quality Assurance Seminar Organised by the Ministry of Education and Culture and.
PEOPLE RESOURCING Chapter Four The Regulatory Environment.
Module 4 Social Determinants of Financial Reporting.
1 MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS An Analysis of Business Issues Howard Davies and Pun-Lee Lam Published by FT Prentice Hall.
Research Fellowships. Overview Introduction Why apply for a fellowship Finding the right fellowship The application process Assessment criteria for funding.
Presentation on the draft framework for Personal, employability, learning and thinking skills for all 11- to 19-year-olds October 2005.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.