Presentation on theme: "Spectacular Specular - LEAN and CLEAN specular highlights Dan Baker Firaxis Games."— Presentation transcript:
Spectacular Specular - LEAN and CLEAN specular highlights Dan Baker Firaxis Games
Motivation Observations from Movie folks “The most important aspect of rendering for a movie is anti-aliasing” “Games today still don’t look as good as animated movies 12 years ago.” “Why in video games does everything look so shiny?”
Reality Check Have a habit of comparing ourselves against other games Therefore miss the obvious: Some of our materials don’t look anything like they should And they alias And they sparkle
Shiny things Water, Metal, commonly seen in games Used for water in Civilization V, but metals suffer from similar problems Will tour two common lighting models, Phong and Blinn Phong Both have huge problems
Phong Simple to implement Since L is constant for environments, can turn specular part into a preconvolved environment
Sometimes accurate Good for perfect reflectors,like still water. But, perfect reflectors = high power
Problems with Phong Aliases Can’t get elongated reflections Pretty inaccurate – very plastic look to it No good way to add normals maps together Anisotropic (grooved) materials will lose there anisotropy at zoom Can’t use high powers or else!
Problems with Phong Classic Scene, sunset. Can’t get this with Phong lighting
Blinn Phong Much more accurate if we have real lights in our scene Can get elongated shapes Cheap to evaluate
Blinn Phong problems Aliases Shading becomes very wrong with roughness Highlights change based on pixel coverage, and become Anisotropic (groved) materials will lose there anisotropy at zoom Can’t do environments easily Can’t use high powers or else!
Spectacular Specular fail A very rough wave filters to a perfectly flat standing water, An example Down sampled of the final render What Blinn-Phong gives us
Bump Filtering Exactly the same substance, but one side is wrinkled. This completely changes the reflections. (Thanks to Chipotle for the foil)
Overviews problems “The shimmies”, “The speckles” Lots and lots of talks about this problem The more substantial the normal map, the higher the power, the more noise we get. Lots of artist tweaking, limits to our data Reflections are just plan wrong at distant scale, makes objects way over-shiny Can’t add normal maps together easily to get detail maps
Why this happens The integral of a function over a range of inputs isn’t the same as function with inputs integrated over a range Where R is a region of a texture, F is our shader (in this case, a Phong or Blinn Phong shader). The second version is a discrete version, where W is the sample weights from our hardware filtering.
How do Movies solve this? Typically use REYES, or more advanced techniques Roughly equivalent of shading every relevant texel and averaging the results Very expensive, potentially thousands of shader evals per pixel
Dreaming the dream Ideal lighting model: – Can use any power we want – Will deal with zooming in and out correctly – Won’t alias – Easy to use: compatible with our current pipeline – Relatively inexpensive – Can add normals together – Can use all of our MIP hardware
Formal definition What we really want is to build a replacement for Blinn Phong that has this property (where F is basically our shader):
LEAN Mapping Linear Efficient Antialiased Normal Mapping Considered Fast Antialiased Reflectance Texture Mapping Fast and flexible solution for bump filtering – Shiny bumps won’t alias – Distant bumps will change surface shading – Directional bumps will become anisotropic highlight Allows blending layers of bumps Works with existing Blinn-Phong pipeline
Prior Work Posed by Kajiya 1985 Monte-Carlo – Cabral et al. 1987, Westin et al. 1992, Becker & Max 1993 Multi-lobed distributions – Fournier 1992, Han et al. 2007 Single Gaussian/Beckmann distribution – Olano & North 1997, Schilling 1997, Toksvig 2005 Diffuse [Kilgard 2000]
Beckman Shading Model The math is simpler then it looks. We are raising the power based on the distance of the half angle from the normal. This second formulation rolls the power into a covariance matrix, thereby giving us anisotropic power (e.g. two powers, one for X and one for Y).
Probability Distributions in Shading Distribution of microfacet normals – Perfectly reflective facets – Only facets oriented with reflect to – Look up probability of in distribution Beckmann distribution – Gaussian of facet tangents = projection
Filtering Filter is linear combination over kernel Linear representation → any linear filter – Summed Area, EWA, … – MIP map, Hardware Anisotropic We need a BRDF that is linear
Filtering: Gaussians Gaussian described by mean and variance – Mean combines linearly Variance does not, but second moment does
Blinn-Phong ↔ Beckmann Blinn-Phong approximates Gaussian [Lyon 1993] Better fit as increases Variance, normalize with
Distributions & Bumps If the normal is changing our surface orientation, is there any way to add them together? Does that even meaning?
LEAN Mapping Beckman distribution can be broken into pieces that filter, but doesn’t deal with the normals. Key insight: We think of the normal instead as a shift of the distribution of microfacets
Distributions Beckman distribution works on a 2d plane. The blue discs represent the distribution of normals. Rather then change the orientation of the surface, we simply shift the center location of the distribution of normals by the x,y component of the normals. Thus, we interpret the normal as a shift in distribution, rather then a change in surface orientation
Filtering Bumps Rather than bump- local frame Use surface tangent frame – Bump normal = mean of off-center distribution
Bumps vs. Surface Frame Surface-frame Beckmann Bump-frame Beckmann
LEAN Data Normal (for diffuse) Bump center in tangent frame Second moments
LEAN Use Pre-process – Seed textures with, and – Build MIP chain Render-time – Look up with HW filtering – Reconstruct 2D covariance – Compute diffuse & specular per light
Sub-facet Shading What about base specularity? – Given base Blinn-Phong exponent, – Base Beckmann distribution One of these at each facet = convolution – Gaussians convolve by adding ’s – Fold into, or add when reconstructing
LEAN Map features Seamless replacement for Blinn-Phong Specular bump antialiasing Turns directional bumps into anisotropic microfacets
Bump Layers Uses – Bump motion (ocean waves) – Detail texture – Decals Our approach – Conceptually a linear combination of heights – Equivalent to linear combination of Even from normal maps
Bump Layers: The Tricky Part What about ? – – Expands out to,, and terms – terms are in, terms are in – terms are new: – Total of four new cross terms
Layering Options 1.Generate single combined LEAN map – Mix actual heights, or use mixing equations – Time varying: need to generate per-frame – Decal or detail: need high-res LEAN map 2.Generate mixing texture – One per pair of layers – Decal or detail: need high-res LEAN mixture maps 3.Approximate cross terms – Use rather than a filtered mixing texture
Performance Single LayerTwo Layers Blinn-PhongLEANPer-frameMix textureApprox ATI Radeon HD 5870 1570 FPS1540 FPS917 FPS1450 FPS1458 FPS D3D Instructions30 ALU 1 TEX 42 ALU 2 TEX 50 ALU 3 TEX 54 ALU 5 TEX 54 ALU 4 TEX 1600 x 1200, single full screen object
Converting Blinn-Phong Data So fast could be done at load time float3 tn = tex2D(normalMap, coord); float3 N = float3(2*tn.xy-1, tn.z); float2 B = N.xy/(ScaleFactor&N.z); float3 M = float3(B.x*B.x + 1/s, B.y*B.y + 1/s, B.x*B.y) Output.lean1 = float4(tn,.5*M.z +.5) Output.lean2 = float4(.5*B +.5, M.xy)
Texture Compression and Precision Normal maps get big, painful to compress Lean MAPs require 5 fields x,y, x^2, xy, y^2 Caveat: The precision matters. Unlike other techniques, we are using the normal filtering hardware
Typical strategy Remember that our is stored power is 1/s Simple normalized texture, pow 32 = 4 bits precision, pow 128 = 2 bits! Can renormalize range, to capture some bits If we want to use very high powers, e.g. 10,000+, really need 16 bits precision
Water For Civilization V Lots of background, but why did we do this? Needed to make water that worked at a distance, not a smooth reflection And, wanted a realistic wave combing effect Does not use a reflection map, high powers let us use an analytic model istead
Civ 5’s water Linear combination of 4 moving bump maps Allows us to accurate wave directions
Can we make a cheaper version? CLEAN Mapping – An extension to LEAN mapping developed after paper published – Common art problem: Went to 5 values, hard to drop into most pipelines, and need more precision – Can we make it use less values CLEAN mapping Cheap Linear Efficient Antialiased Normal Mapping.
Dropping Anisotropy Cool feature of LEAN maps, but efficiency might be more important Let’s examine the Beckmann distribution again Be really nice if we could make only 1 value instead of 3
Dropping Terms Can just approximate the covariance matrix with a diagonal matrix Then store just X^2 + Y^2 in addition to X,Y
CLEAN Mapping Now we have only 3 terms to store. X, Y, X^2 + Y^2, can store in 3 values Then, calculating the variance: