We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCameron Gyles
Modified about 1 year ago
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com End point PCR The primer pair LeptoF/LeptoR was designed according to the WSCB COI sequence available on GenBank (Accession N° JQ996145.2), using Beacon Designer 7.5 software (Table 2). First, the primers were tested on PCR assays carried out using as template genomic DNA from WCSB specimens from all four sites (A, B, C, D). The primer specificity was assessed using as putative negative controls the genomic DNA of the 5 above- mentioned insect control species, as well as stone pine DNA. The sensitivity of this PCR- based protocol was also evaluated, using as template (2 µl/25 µl reaction) different amounts of WCSB DNA (from 100 pg to 10 fg/µl). The presence of WCSB DNA inside its saliva was also verified by this PCR assay. HRM analysis The primer pair LeptoRTF/LeptoRTR was also designed on a WCSB COI sequence (Accession N° JQ996145.2), expected to produce a shorter amplicon (171 bp), and to be used in Real Time PCR. Melting curves of PCR amplicons were obtained with temperatures ranging from 60°C to 95°C. Data acquisition was performed for every 0.2°C increase in temperature, with a 10 s step. Each sample was tested in three independent experiments, and analyzed by High-Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.), which automatically clusters the samples according to their melting profiles and assigns a confidence score to each sample. The confidence level threshold for a sample to be included in a cluster was 99.5%. Amplicon specificity was evaluated on WCSB DNA as template, on DNA from the 5 control species, and from stone pine. Sensitivity was assessed by Real Time PCR, using as template (2 µl/25 µl reaction) different amounts of WCSB DNA (from 100 pg to 1 fg/µl), in presence or not of spiked stone pine DNA. As cycle threshold we referred to water (negative control), taking into account its 35 cycles above which amplification was not considered as reliable. In planta assays Diagnostic trials were carried out using both WCSB specific primer pairs to detect traces of WCSB DNA in attacked stone pine seeds. PCR samples included the DNA extracted from seeds fed on by the WCSB during force-feeding sessions. As control DNA extracted from sound seeds was used. Moreover, DNA samples were also extracted from seeds externally contaminated with WCSB excrements. The western conifer seed bug (WCSB) Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann (Hemiptera: Coreidae) was accidentally introduced in Italy in 1999 then it spread to most of Europe within a decade (Figure 1). Known as a pest of coniferous tree seed orchards in North America, it may also play a role in stone pine conelet abortion and abscission for North American conifers . For this reason it is also considered to be a major factor in the losses of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) nut production in the Mediterranean region , however more research is needed regarding the WCSB impact on stone pine fructification in Europe, since all known WCSB diagnostic tools refer to North American conifers and may be ineffective on stone pine. INTRODUCTION Based on the assumption that WCSB DNA may be present in salivary residues inside attacked tissues, a PCR-based approach was set up having as a target the available WCSB COI nucleotid sequences. The WCSB molecular detection is essential to specifically ascertain the damage occurring on stone pine cones and seeds, and caused by this pest. This study would thus contribute to widen the spectrum of DNA barcoding applications in entomology. The aim of this study was to develop highly specific PCR-based methods for the sensitive detection of WCSB DNA, whose efficacy as a diagnostic on WCSB attacked stone pine seeds was here assessed as well. An effective diagnostic tool is still needed to help assessing the role of the WCSB in the loss of stone pine nut production. Since some conelet mortality as well as loss of seed set can also be due to natural causes an effective diagnostic marker is necessary to discern the real percentage of fructification specifically damaged by the WCSB. Both primer pairs implemented during this study showed high specificity. In fact, only WCSB COI DNA was targeted by the primers, never interfering with other DNAs extracted from pine cone-associated insects. No interference occurred even when the DNA from P. prasina was used to test marker specificity (i.e. the species most closely related to the WCSB among those we used as controls, and occasionally observed feeding on pine cones during our field samplings). End Point PCR sensitivity of 100 fg/µl was enough to confirm our hypothesis that WCSB DNA could be detected inside the insect saliva. However, End Point PCR was not able to identify seed samples fed on by the WCSB. Even the higher sensitivity granted by the Real Time PCR (10 fg/µl) was not enough to unambiguously detect WCSB DNA into attacked seed samples. However, our markers granted the identification of all seed samples contaminated with WCSB excrements. Thus, the sensitivity of our DNA based markers may find other applications in identifying, surveying, and monitoring of the WCSB. For example, these diagnostic tools could be applied in seed storages to verify the presence of the WCSB by detecting small insect traces on harvest samples, thus assessing also its abundance. Moreover, this study showed for the first time how DNA barcoding knowledge can be useful in pest diagnostics, even when only insect excrements are available. Finally, our study revealed how HRMA can be a promising tool for detecting intraspecific differences among insect populations. In fact, our methodology may find applications in phylogenetics, allowing preliminary screening of DNA samples from different populations, even before sequencing. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS  Bates S. L., Strong W. B., Borden J. H., 2002b. Abortion and seed set in lodgepole and western white pine conelets following feeding by Leptoglossus occidentalis (Heteroptera: Coreidae). Environmental Entomology, 31: 1023-1029.  Bracalini M., Benedettelli S., Croci F., Terreni P., Tiberi R., Panzavolta P., 2013. Cone and Seed Pests of Pinus pinea: Assessment and Characterization of Damage. Journal of Economic Entomology, 106: 229-234.  Campbell B. C., Shea P. J., 1990. A simple technique for assessing feeding damage by Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on cones. The Canadian Entomologist, 122: 963-968.  Schowalter T. D., Sexton J. M., 1990. Effect of Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on seed development of Douglas-fir at different times during the growing season in western Oregon. Journal of Economic Entomology, 83: 1485-1486.  Bates S. L., Borden J. H., Kermode A. R., Bennet R. G., 2000. Impact of Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on Douglas-fir seed production. Journal of Economic Entomology, 93: 1444-1451.  Lait C. G., Bates S. L., Kermode A. R., Morrisette K. K., Borden J. H., 2001. Specific biochemical marker-based techniques for the identification of damage to Douglas-fir seed resulting from feeding by the western conifer seed bug, Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 31: 739-746  Lait C. G., Bates S. L., Morrissette K. K., Kermode A. R., Borden J. H., 2001. Biochemical assays for identifying seeds of lodgepole pine and other conifers, that were fed on by Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Canadian Journal of Botany, 79: 1349-1357.  Bates S. L., Lait C. G., Borden J. H., Kermode A. R., 2002. Measuring the impact of Leptoglossus occidentalis (Heteroptera: Coreidae) on seed production in lodgepole pine using an antibody-based assay. Journal of Economic Entomology, 95: 770-777.  Lait C. G., Miller D. R:, Bates S. L., Borden J. H., Kermode A. R., 2003. Biochemical assay detects feeding damage to loblolly pine seeds by the Leaffooted pine seed bug (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Journal of Entomological Science, 38: 644-653.  Madhusadhan V. V., Taylor G. S., Miles P. W., 1994. The detection of salivary enzymes of ohytophagous Hemiptera: a compilation of methods. Annals of Applied Biology, 124: 405-412. Ward R. D., Zemlak T. S., Innes B. H., Last P. R., Hebert, P. D. N., 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360: 1847-1857. REFERENCES The primer pair LeptoF-LeptoR proved to be a specific molecular marker for WCSB DNA. Amplicons of the expected length (658 bp) were obtained only when WCSB DNA was used as template in PCR tests. In no case DNA from other species, from both stone pine and the five control insects, interfered with the primers (Figure 2). Concerning sensitivity, the theoretical threshold was verified to be as low as 100 fg/ µl WCSB DNA (Figure 3). The presence of WCSB DNA in its saliva was confirmed by positive results in PCR reactions (Figure 4), although WSCB genomic DNA extracted from its saliva and used as template could not be observed on electrophoretic gel images. The primer pair LeptoRTF-LeptoRTR also proved to be a specific molecular marker for WCSB DNA, and no aspecific signals were obtained using the other five insect species and stone pine DNA. Real Time PCR resulted ten times more sensitive in amplifying WCSB DNA (threshold of 10 fg/µl) (data not shown). Moreover, sensitivity did not vary whether or not stone pine DNA was added as a spike to WCSB DNA. Furthermore, HRM analysis underlined some differences among WCSB DNA samples. More specifically, WCSB samples from all but one site (Site B) clustered during HRMA melting profiling (Figure 6). Sequencing verified these results, showing three SNPs differing among obtained clusters (data not shown). CONTACT firstname.lastname@example.org Department of Agri-Food Production and Environmental Sciences (DISPAA) University of Florence, Italy Matteo Bracalini, Matteo Cerboneschi, Francesco Croci, Tiziana Panzavolta, Riziero Tiberi, Stefania Tegli DNA based markers to characterize insect pest damage: diagnostic trials on Leptoglossus occidentalis (Hemiptera: Coreidae) OBJECTIVES MATERIAL AND METHODS Specimens DNA from several WCSB specimens, as well as that from other control species, was extracted. WCSB adult specimens were collected in four areas as reported in Table 1. WCSB laboratory rearings were established to provide constant availability of specimens to be used during force feeding sessions. Five other insect species were used as negative control: Palomena prasina (L.) (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae, Pentatominae), Ernobius impressithorax Pic, Ernobius parens (Mulsant and Rey) (Coleoptera, Ptinidae, Ernobinae), Pissodes validirostris (Sahlberg) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Molytinae), and Dioryctria mendacella (Staudinger) (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae, Phycitinae). Force feeding Stone pine seed samples (10 mg each) were supplied to WCSB adults, during force- feeding sessions in the laboratory. At the end of each session, seed samples were collected, distinguished in two categories (sound and pierced), and finally stored separately at –20°C. In addition, seed samples contaminated by WCSB excrements were also separately collected and stored. Molecular biology techniques Genomic DNA was obtained from insect and seed tissues using the Puregene ® Solid Tissue protocol (Gentra Systems Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.). Hind femora and/or thorax were used to extract DNA from larger adult insects (WCSB, P. validirostris, P. prasina), while whole specimens were used for adults of Ernobius and D. mendacella. Liquid saliva was extracted from WCSB live specimens, using a parasympathomimetic drug . PCR amplicons were purified from agarose gel using NucleoSpin® Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co, Düren, Germany), and cloned with InsTAclone ® PCR Cloning Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Sequencing was performed by Eurofins MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany. Staining, radiographic and biochemichal techniques have been used to assess WCSB damage to seeds of North American conifers [3-5]. However, the specificity of these techniques is questionable. For instance, a polyclonal antibody raised against salivary glands extracted from the WCSB detects the presence of residual salivary proteins in attacked seeds of several American conifers [6-8], but it gave positive results also with seeds fed on by another hemipteran (Leptoglossus corculus Say) . These techniques have never been tested on stone pine seeds, nor have found application for the stone pine in Europe yet. Hence, a specific diagnostic tool to assess WCSB damage on stone pine fructification is still to be implemented, in the efforts of monitoring this pest as well as evaluating future control programs. Primer nameSequence (5’-3’)Amplicon Lenght (bp)Accession N° LeptoFTACCCTTTACTTTATTTTTG 658JQ996145.2 LeptoRAAATAAATGCTGATATAAAATAG LeptoRTFAGAAGAAGTAGAAGTGCTGTAATACC 171JQ996145.2 LeptoRTRAGCCTCTGTTGATTTAGCCATT Figure 1 – Adult of the Western Conifer Seed Bug (WCSB), Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann. Sampling area CoordinatesRegionCountry A N 43°47'15", E 11°44'33" TuscanyItaly B N 44°03'32", E 10°54'59" TuscanyItaly C N 45°50'17", E 11°49'46" VenetoItaly D N 47°33'30", E 21°38'22" Hajdú-BiharHungary Figure 5 – Diagnostic test on Stone pine seeds using COI PCR primers. Lanes: R) Ruler; 1) Sound seed; 2) WCSB Attacked seed; 3) Seed contaminated by WCSB excrements; 4) WCSB DNA; 5) Water. Figure 2 – Specificity test using COI PCR primers. Lanes: R) Ruler; 1) Sound stone pine seed; 2-6) control insect species; 7-10) WCSB from site A, B, C, D; 11) Water; 12) Laboratory reared WCSB. End Point PCR failed to detect WCSB DNA in attacked seed samples (Figure 5). However, this protocol allowed to identify all seed samples which were contaminated with WCSB excrements. Similarly, Real Time PCR could not unequivocally detect WCSB DNA in attacked seed samples. In fact, DNA from both sound and WSCB attacked seeds gave amplification signals over the 35 th cycle, though the sound seed showed a different melting temperature when compared with the other samples (Figure 7). This difference in melting temperatures needs to be more deeply investigated in order to definitely assess its diagnostic value. Once again, seeds stained with WCSB excrements showed enough WCSB DNA content to give significant and specific Real Time PCR signals (Figure 7). Figure 3 – Sensitivity test on COI PCR primers, using as template (2 µl/25 µl reaction) different amounts/µl of WCSB DNA. Lanes: R) Ruler; 1) 100 pg; 2) 10 pg; 3) 1 pg; 4) 100 fg; 5) 10 fg; 6) Water. Table 2 – Primers designed and used in this study. Table 1 – Details of sampling areas for WCSB specimens. 1000 bp 500 bp Figure 4 – WCSB DNA detected inside the insect’s liquid saliva. Lanes: R) Ruler; 1) WCSB saliva; 2) Water; 3) WCSB specimen. Figure 6 – Difference plot obtained in HRM assay, performed in three replicates using the LeptoRTF/LeptoRTR primer pair on WCSB DNA samples from all sites. Green cluster: Site A, C, and D; red cluster: Site B. RFU: Relative Fluorescence Units. Figure 7 – Melting temperature analysis performed using the LeptoRTF/LeptoRTR primer pair on genomic WCSB DNA (green curve) and seed samples: seed contaminated with WCSB excrements (red), seed fed upon by the WCSB (blue), sound seed (pink). 500 bp 1000 bp 500 bp 1000 bp
Logo Introduction To investigate if white 96-well plates allow better fluorescence detection of PCR products during QPCR assays than natural 96-well plates.
HRM Assay and Optimization 1. DNA Quality 2. Amplicon LengthAmplicon lengths of 100–300 bp 3. Primer Selection 4. Dye Selection 5. MgCl2 Concentration.
A RAPID AND INNOVATIVE METHOD FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE COMMONEST G6PD ITALIAN MUTATIONS A. Minucci, L. Gentile, S. Rocchetti, C. Zuppi, B. Giardina.
DNA Extraction PCR Gel Electrophoresis Not Like the Other Miscellaneous $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 Fish DNA Barcoding Game! A Jeopardy-Style Quiz Game Jeopardy.
HRM REAL TIME PCR Presented by: Dadkhah Fahimeh SNP genotyping by HRM REAL TIME PCR.
Module 1 Section 1.3 DNA Technology AS Biology. Specification.
Amplification of Genomic DNA Fragments OrR. Amplification To get particular DNA in large amount Fragment size shouldn’t be too long The nucleotide sequence.
Amplifying DNA. The Power of PCR View the animation at
Rajan sharma. Polymerase chain reaction Is a in vitro method of enzymatic synthesis of specific DNA sequences. This method was first time developed.
Variants of PCR Lecture 4. Colony PCR Multiplex PCR Nested PCR Reverse transcriptase PCR Quantative PCR Hot Start PCR Touch down PCR.
Chapter 08 Author: Kelly Elkins © 2013 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved.
KEYS Lab Training – DNA Barcoding: Identification of Species Pipetting: Measuring Volumes Accurately DNA Extraction PCR and Gel Electrophoresis Sequencing.
Yaron Fireizen, Vinay Rao, Lacy Loos, Nathan Butler, Dr. Julie Anderson, Dr. Evan Weiher ▪ Biology Department ▪ University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire From.
Development of a BRCA2 screening service – Introduction of high resolution MELT analysis A Grade Trainee Project Nick Camm Yorkshire Regional Genetics.
Human Genomics. Writing in RED indicates the SQA outcomes. Writing in BLACK explains these outcomes in depth.
Introduction to DNA. The Central Dogma of Biology.
Something to Smile About: DNA Barcoding of St. John’s Wort Herbal Supplements Authors: Justin Rubino, Gus Moody Mentor: Vanaja Zacharopoulos, PhD Friends.
Tools for Molecular Biology Amplification. The PCR reaction is a way to quickly drive the exponential amplification of a small piece of DNA. PCR is a.
François Ancien Sascha Kretzschmann Olivier Suplis Genotyping Errors Causes, Consequences and Solutions Genotyping Errors.
Open field host range tests of Ceratapion basicorne (Illiger) (Coleoptera: Apionidae), a candidate for the biological control of Centaurea solstitialis.
Manipulation of DNA. Restriction enzymes are used to cut DNA into smaller fragments. Different restriction enzymes recognize and cut different DNA sequences.
IMBB 2013 Genomic DNA purification. Why purify DNA? The purpose of DNA purification from the cell/tissue is to ensure it performs well in subsequent downstream.
PUC 19 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ PCR -I pUC 19 specific primers Amplicon purification PCR -II 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ 5’ 3’ Composite pUC 19 primers.
Rapid detection of pathogenic bacteria in surface water by bacteria universal primer The increase of urban population often results in higher percentage.
Research Techniques Made Simple: Polymerase Chain Reaction Lilit Garibyan 1 and Nidhi Avashia 2 1. Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital.
PCR With PCR it is possible to amplify a single piece of DNA, or a very small number of pieces of DNA, over many cycles, generating millions of copies.
Success criteria - PCR By the end of this lesson we will be able to: 1. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a technique for the amplification ( making.
Chapter 10: Genetic Engineering- A Revolution in Molecular Biology.
Background Gregory Fischer Julie Anderson Daniel Herman Department of Biology University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Heterologous expression of MBP1 from.
Molecular identification of fish species. Traditional fish taxonomy based on external morphological features, including body shape, pattern of colors,
DNA contamination can often occur in quantitative reverse transcription – polymerase chain reactions (QRT-PCR), and should be removed in order to avoid.
RFLP, RAPD & AFLP Arun Kumar. B M.Sc 1 st Year Biotechnology SSBS.
Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Notes. IB Assessment Statement 4.4.1Outline the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to copy and amplify minute.
Objective 2: TSWBAT describe the basic process of genetic engineering and the applications of it.
© Clinical Chemistry Journal Club Extreme PCR: Efficient and Specific DNA Amplification in 15–60 Seconds J.S. Farrar and C.T. Wittwer.
We thank the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for supporting this research, and Learning & Technology Services for printing this poster. An Approach.
Our ongoing study has been to survey local deer tick populations in a mile radius of Eau Claire for the presence of Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria.
Susceptibility to Ranavirus Through Frogs and Salamanders Using q-PCR For Detection and Quantification Thomas Brigman Department of Biology, York College.
DNA Fingerprinting Catalyst: What are polymorphisms? What is “junk” DNA? How do you think it is used?
Forensic Science: Fundamentals & Investigations, Chapter 7 1 Chapter 7 DNA Fingerprinting By the end of this chapter you will be able to: explain how crime.
Using museum specimens to identify MOTUs in larval scarab beetles Andrew Mitchell, NSW DPI Kelly Rigg, Charles Sturt University Gus Campbell, NSW DPI Tom.
Recombinant DNA Technology……….. BTEC3301. DNA Libraries How do you identify the gene of interest and clone only the DNA sequence you are interested? Read.
Reading the Blueprint of Life. Human Genome Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Genomics and Its Impact on Medicine and Society: A 2001 Primer, 2001.
Probes can be designed in an evolutionary hierarchy.
Introduction Biodiversity is important in an ecosystem because it allows the species living in that ecosystem to adapt to changes made in the environment.
General Genetics. PCR 1.Introduce the students to the preparation of the PCR reaction. PCR 2.Examine the PCR products on agarose gel electrophoresis.
PCR, Gel Electrophoresis, and Southern Blotting By: D.D.
The LightScanner ® System Achieve High Throughput Mutation Discovery and Genotyping.
What do these terms mean to you? You have 5 min to discuss possible meanings and examples with your group! DNA sequencing DNA profiling/fingerprinting.
Construction, Transformation, and Prokaryote Expression of a Fused GFP and Mutant Human IL-13 Gene Sequence Lindsay Venditti, Department of Biological.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.