We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKylan Farrell
Modified about 1 year ago
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on the Role of Bone-Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - The guideline update - resources Executive Summary– JCO publication (http://jco.ascopubs.org/misc/specialarticles.dtl) Full Text Guideline (www.asco.org/guidelines/bisphosbreast) Clinical Tools & Resources (www.asco.org/guidelines/bisphosbreast)
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - INTRODUCTION ASCO guideline on bisphosphonates for people with breast cancer was published in 2000 Previously updated in 2003 For 2011 update, scope was made specific to people with metastatic breast cancer Use of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) for adjuvant treatment will be addressed in a separate guideline
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Guideline Methodology: Systematic Review The Update Committee completed a review and analysis of the medical literature available from January 2003 to July Additional searches were conducted in November Databases searched: Medline Cochrane Collaboration Library
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Study Quality and Limitations of the Literature The definition of skeletal-related events (SREs) was not uniform across all studies; for example, some excluded hypercalcemia of malignancy. In addition, different efficacy endpoints were used in different trials. There is a low incidence of some adverse events.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - The Bottom Line Intervention: Bone-modifying agents (BMAs), including bisphosphonates Target Audience: Medical Oncologists, Radiation Oncologists, Surgical Oncologists, Palliative Care Providers Key Recommendations: BMAs are recommended for patients with metastatic breast cancer with evidence of bone destruction Denosumab, 120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks; IV pamidronate, 90 mg over no less than 2 hours every 3-4 weeks; or IV zoledronic acid, 4 mg over no less than 15 minutes every 3-4 weeks One bone-modifying agent is not recommended over another In patients with creatinine clearance > 60 mL/min, no change in dosage, infusion time or interval is required; monitor creatinine level with each i.v. bisphosphonate dose In patients with creatinine clearance <30 mL/min or on dialysis who may be treated with denosumab, close monitoring for hypocalcemia is recommended The Role of Bone-Modifying Agents (BMAs) in Metastatic Breast Cancer
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - The Bottom Line, cont’d Key Recommendations, continued: All patients should have a dental exam and preventive dentistry prior to using a BMA At onset of cancer bone pain, provide standard of care for pain management and start BMAs Use of biochemical markers to monitor BMA use is not recommended for routine care Methods: Systematic review of medical literature and analysis of the medical literature by the Update Committee of an Expert Panel Additional Information The recommendations, clinical questions, and a brief summary of the literature and discussion are in the Executive Summary published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology The full guideline, with comprehensive discussions of the literature, methodology, full reference list, evidence tables, and clinical tools and resources, can be found at
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Clinical Questions 1.What are the indications for using bone-modifying agents to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with metastatic breast cancer? When is the best time to initiate treatment with bone- modifying agents? 2.What is the role of bone-modifying agents in the presence of extra-skeletal metastases without evidence of bone metastases? 3.What are the prominent safety concerns of bone- modifying agent therapy? 3A. Renal safety concerns? 3B. Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) concerns?
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Clinical Questions 4. What is the optimal duration of bone-modifying agent therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer? 5. What are the best intervals between dosing? 6. What is the role of bone-modifying agents in control of pain secondary to bone metastases?
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Clinical Questions 7. What is the role of biochemical markers of bone turnover to guide initiation of therapy in patients without a prior skeletal event, predict treatment response, guide adjustments to bone-modifying agent therapy, or independently predict future fractures?
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Note: For each of the recommendations, clinical judgment should also take into consideration the patient’s general performance status and overall prognosis
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 1: Indications and time of initiation For patients with breast cancer, who have evidence of bone metastases, denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, IV pamidronate 90 mg delivered over no less than 2 hours, or zoledronic acid 4 mg over no less than 15 minutes every 3 to 4 weeks is recommended. Starting bone-modifying agents in women with an abnormal bone scan and an abnormal CT scan or MRI showing bone destruction, but normal plain radiographs, is considered reasonable by Panel consensus based on the findings in women with lytic or mixed lytic/blastic changes on plain radiographs.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 1, cont’d Starting bone-modifying agents in women with only an abnormal bone scan but without evidence of bone destruction on radiographs, CT scans, or MRI is not recommended outside of a clinical trial. There is insufficient evidence relating to efficacy to support one bone- modifying agent over another.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 2: Role of bone-modifying agents in the presence of extra-skeletal metastases (unchanged in substance from 2003) Starting bone-modifying agents in women without evidence of bone metastases even in the presence of other extraskeletal metastases is not recommended. This clinical situation has been inadequately studied using IV bisphosphonates or other bone-modifying agents and should be the focus of new clinical trials.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 3A: Renal safety concerns In patients with a calculated serum creatinine clearance > 60 mL /min, no change in dosage, infusion time, or interval of pamidronate or zoledronic acid administration is required. Use of bone-modifying agents among patients with reduced renal function has been incompletely assessed. The packet insert of zoledronic acid provides guidance for dosing when baseline serum creatinine clearance is ≥30 and <60 mL/min.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 3A, cont’d Infusion times less than 2 hours with pamidronate or less than 15 minutes with zoledronic acid should be avoided. The Panel recommends that serum creatinine should be monitored prior to each dose of pamidronate or zoledronic acid, in accordance with FDA-approved labeling. Serum calcium, electrolytes, phosphate, magnesium, and hematocrit/hemoglobin should also be monitored regularly.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 3A, cont’d The risk of hypocalcemia with denosumab dosed at 120 mg every 4 weeks has not been evaluated in patients with a creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min or receiving dialysis. Monitor for hypocalcemia in patients with impaired creatinine clearance. There is no evidence to guide the interval for monitoring serum calcium, electrolytes, phosphate, magnesium, and hematocrit/hemoglobin with denosumab, pamidronate, or zoledronic acid.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 3B: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is an uncommon but potentially serious condition associated with the use of bone-modifying agents. The Update Committee concurs with the revised FDA label for zoledronic acid and pamidronate and the FDA label for denosumab and recommends that all patients with cancer receive a dental examination and necessary preventive dentistry prior to initiating therapy with inhibitors of osteoclast function unless there are mitigating factors which preclude the dental assessment.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 3B, cont’d These recommendations should be observed whenever possible. While receiving inhibitors of osteoclast function, patients should maintain optimal oral hygiene and, if possible, avoid invasive dental procedures that involve manipulation of the jaw bone or periosteum. While most cases of ONJ have occurred in patients treated with IV bisphosphonates and bone-modifying agents who underwent an invasive dental procedure, cases have occurred spontaneously and have been reported in patients treated with other bone-modifying agents, including oral bisphosphonates and direct osteoclast inhibitors.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 4: Optimal Duration (unchanged in substance from 2003) The Panel suggests that once initiated, bone-modifying agents be continued until evidence of substantial decline in a patient’s general performance status. The Panel stresses that clinical judgment must guide what constitutes a substantial decline. There is no evidence addressing the consequences of stopping bone- modifying agents after one or more adverse skeletal- related events.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 5: Optimal intervals between dosing For patients with breast cancer who have evidence of bone destruction on plain radiographs, denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, IV pamidronate 90 mg delivered over 2 hours or zoledronic acid 4 mg over 15 minutes every 3 to 4 weeks is recommended.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 6: Role of bone-modifying agents in pain control The Panel recommends that the current standards of care for cancer bone pain management be applied at the onset of pain, in concert with the initiation of bone- modifying agent therapy. This is required by good clinical practice. The standard of care for pain management includes the use of nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory agents, opioid and non-opioid analgesics, corticosteroids, adjuvant agents, interventional procedures, systemic radiopharmaceuticals, local radiation therapy, and surgery.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 6, cont’d Bone-modifying agents are an adjunctive therapy for cancer-related bone pain control and are not recommended as first-line treatment for cancer-related pain. IV pamidronate or zoledronic acid may be of benefit for patients with pain caused by bone metastases and contribute to pain relief when used concurrently with analgesic therapy, systemic chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and/or hormonal therapy. Bone-modifying agents have been associated with a modest pain control benefit in controlled trials.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Recommendations Recommendation 7: The role of biochemical markers (unchanged in substance since 2003) The use of the biochemical markers to monitor bone- modifying agent use is not recommended for routine care.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Special Commentary on the Role of Vitamin D Deficiency and Bisphosphonates Trials of bone-modifying agents have included supplementation of calcium and vitamin D as part of the treatment regimen Insufficient data to support recommendation on optimal concentrations Based on expert consensus, in absence of definitive data: –If no contraindications –Use doses and schedules like those used in the clinical trials of the bone-modifying agents
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Suggestions for Future Research The Update Committee suggests research be conducted in the areas of: –Duration –Intervals –Role of bone-modifying agents for those with extra-skeletal metastases –Subgroups (e.g. sex, ER/PR status, HER2 status, ethnic and racial status) –Biomarkers
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Suggestions for Future Research, cont’d. –Role of Vitamin D –Comparative Effectiveness –Role of bone-modifying agents integrated with other therapies –Completion of research on other bone-modifying agents
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Guideline Methodology: Update Committee Members Update Committee MembersAffiliation/Institution Catherine H. Van Poznak, MD, Co-ChairUniversity of Michigan Jamie H. Von Roenn, MD, Co-ChairNorthwestern University William E. Barlow, PhDCancer Research and Biostatistics J. Sybil Biermann, MDUniversity of Michigan Linda D. Bosserman, MD, FACPWilshire Oncology Medical Group Cindy GeogheganY-ME National Breast Cancer Organization Bruce E. Hillner, MDVirginia Commonwealth University Nora A. Janjan, MD, MPSA, MBA, FACP, FAC National Center for Policy Analysis Richard L. Theriault, DOUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Gary C. Yee, PharmDUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center Dan S. Zuckerman, MDMountain States Tumor Institute
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - Additional ASCO Resources The Executive Summary, Full Text guideline, this slide set, and additional clinical tools and resources can be found at: A patient guide, “What to Know” about this guideline, is available at:
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved - ASCO Guidelines This resource is a practice tool for physicians based on an ASCO® practice guideline. The practice guideline and this presentation are not intended to substitute for the independent professional judgment of the treating physician. Practice guidelines do not account for individual variation among patients and may not reflect the most recent evidence. This presentation does not recommend any particular product or course of medical treatment. Use of the practice guideline and this resource is voluntary. The full practice guideline and additional information are available at Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology®. All rights reserved.
Renal Safety of Zoledronic Acid in Patients With Breast Cancer.
Efficacy and Safety of Continued Zoledronic Acid every 4 Weeks versus every 12 Weeks in Women with Bone Metastases from Breast Cancer: Results of the OPTIMIZE-2.
CON - 1 Conclusions C David R. Parkinson Vice President, Global Head, Clinical Research and Development Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 The Role of Bisphosphonates in Multiple Myeloma: 2007 Update Clinical Practice Guideline.
IN-1 Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Bethesda, Maryland January 31, 2002 C.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on the Use of Chemotherapy Sensitivity and Resistance Assays.
P Sylvester (MBBS),D Narinesingh (MBBS,MMed,FCRadOnc)
FACULTY OF MEDICINE The use of Cochrane breast cancer reviews by guideline developers and Cochrane (public) users Cochrane Breast Cancer Group, NHMRC Clinical.
Effect of Denosumab versus Zoledronic Acid Treatment in Patients with Breast Cancer and Bone Metastases: Results from the Extended Blinded Treatment Phase.
REGULATORY HISTORY of ZOMETA and AREDIA JAW OSTEONECROSIS (ONJ) Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee March 4, 2005 Nancy S. Scher, M.D.
British Association of Urological Surgeons Metastatic Prostate Cancer Guidelines.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of the Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Practice Guideline on Adjuvant Ovarian Ablation (OA) in the Treatment.
Bondronat achieves better outcomes in metastatic bone disease Ingo Diel CGG-Klinik GmbH Mannheim, Germany.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved. Extended RAS Gene Mutation Testing in Metastatic.
Participation Requirements for a Patient Representative.
Palliative care Emergencies Guidance for General Practice Western Area 2. Hypercalcaemia October Western Trust Primary Palliative Care Team Foyle.
Bone Health Secondary Breast Cancer Dr Yoland Antill Cabrini Health Frankston Hospital.
Introducing... Reproduced and modified from a presentation produced by Zoë Debenham from the original presentation created by Kate Light, Cochrane Trainer.
Treatment Regimens of HER2+ Adjuvant Patients (Actuals) Source: Genentech ASCO 2005 (data release) Nov 2006 (Approval)
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel PGIN Representative.
The Effect of Zoledronic Acid (ZOL) on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Letrozole:
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Co-Chair.
Finding the Best Evidence Literature for Evidence Based Health Care.
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Neutropenic Adult Oncology Outpatients ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline.
Bisphosphonates – A review. Bisphosphonates 1 st generationEtidronate 1 st generationEtidronate 2 nd generationClodronate, Pamidronate 2 nd generationClodronate,
CR-1 Clinical Benefit of Bisphosphonates for Cancer Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease James R. Berenson, MD Medical & Scientific Director Institute.
Julie R. Gralow, MD Professor, Medical Oncology University of Washington School of Medicine Director, Breast Medical Oncology Seattle Cancer Care Alliance.
Advances in the Management of Skeletal Related Events/Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer Robert Dreicer, M.D., M.S., FACP, FASCO Chair Dept of Solid Tumor.
Denosumab in bone metastasis of cancer and hypercalemia Supervisor: 趙大中 大夫 Reporter: 郭政裕 總醫師.
Sarah Kunin, MD Princeton Baptist Medical Center Baptist Health Systems Alabama Multiple Myeloma: Treatment with Bisphosphonates.
CC10-1 ZOMETA ® in Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma: Pamidronate-Controlled Trial (010) James Berenson, MD Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California.
Figure 1. Hazard ratios for progression-free survival analyzed with fixed effect model. Table 1: Relevant trials Table 2. Methodological quality Conclusions.
Oral Bisphosphonate and Breast Cancer: Prospective Results from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Chlebowski RT et al. SABCS 2009; Abstract 21.
Accessing Sources Of Evidence For Practice Introduction To Databases Karen Smith Department of Health Sciences University of York.
ClinicalTrials.gov Stephen Kiyoi
Determining Acceptable Waiting Times for the Surgical Treatment of Solid Organ Malignancies - A Systematic Review CIHR Grant: Toward Canadian Benchmarks.
Slideset on: Terpos E, Morgan G, Dimopoulos MA, et al. International myeloma working group recommendations for the treatment of multiple myeloma-related.
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women with Hormone Receptor- Positive Breast Cancer Clinical Practice Guideline Update.
FOLLOW-UP CARE, SURVEILLANCE PROTOCOL, AND SECONDARY PREVENTION MEASURES FOR SURVIVORS OF COLORECTAL CANCER Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Member.
Kit for the Preparation of Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid Injection For Subcutaneous, Intraperitoneal, Intravenous and Oral Use For Diagnostic Use by.
SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY FOR PATIENTS WITH EARLY-STAGE BREAST CANCER Clinical Practice Guideline Update
©American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008 Clinical Practice Guideline Update: Use of Chemotherapy and Radiation.
Clinical Oncology Patient Transfer Summary Ballot Development Spring Ballot Clinical Oncology Treatment Plan and Summary, Release 1 Ballot for May 2013.
Presented by Susan Honig, M.D. at the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting on June 7, 1999.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Overall and subgroup analysis If the OVERALL results show highly significant evidence of a worthwhile effect of treatment, but a few subgroups of the overview.
©American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved. Adjuvant.
Radiotherapy versus carboplatin for stage I seminoma: Updated analysis of the MRC/EORTC randomized trial Authors: Oliver et al,
Evidence-Based Public Health Practice: Using Research and Data to Improve Your Programs Week 3: Literature Searches Helena VonVille Library Director University.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.