Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCarter Butte Modified over 9 years ago
1
Construction Law Update March 6, 2003
2
AGENDA GOOD MORNING! ARE YOU ASKING FOR IT? (TEN TIPS FOR INEFFECTIVE CEOs) CHOOSING A PROCESS WHEN, HOW, WHAT TO CLAIM LITIGATION PRIMER
3
Are You Asking For It?
4
Top 10 Tips For Highly IneffectiveCEOs
5
Tip # 10 Develop a Culture of Fault (seek out & punish the innocent)
6
Tip # 9 Ignore the Maxim: Think Lots; Say Little; Write Less. (especially in the age of e-mail!)
7
Tip # 8 Be “Penny Wise & Pound Foolish” (don’t train staff; don’t pay to have someone look over the contract documents; wait ‘til its too late)
8
Tip # 7 Put Personalities Ahead of Practicalities (silverbacks in the Ruwensori; “I don’t care what it costs” mentality)
9
(try to be somewhere in between)
10
Tip # 6 Plan to Make Your Money at the Back End, Not the Front (forget the bid, just get the job; make profit on extras)
11
Tip # 5 Draw Lines in the Sand, Early & Often (encourage a culture of confrontation & withdrawal)
12
Tip # 4 Rely on Ambiguity & Assumption (i.e. b.s. baffles brains)
13
Tip # 3 Choose Volume over Quality of Business
14
Tip # 2 Ignore “Credibility” as a Corporate Asset (look ahead, examine industry leaders. What is their chief asset? Capital or Credibility?)
15
Tip # 1 Give all your Profit to Lawyers & Consultants
16
10. Develop a Culture of Fault (seek out & punish the innocent) 9. Ignore the Maxim: Think Lots; Say Little; Write Less 8. Be “Penny Wise & Pound Foolish” (don’t train staff; don’t pay to have someone look over the documents) 7.Put Personalities Ahead of Practicalities (silverbacks in the Ruwensori; “I don’t care what it costs” mentality) 6.Plan to Make Your Money at the Back End, Not the Front (forget the bid, just get the job; make profit on extras)
17
5. Draw Lines in the Sand, Early & Often (culture of confrontation & withdrawal) 4. Rely on Ambiguity & Assumption 3. Choose Volume over Quality (TCA program) 2.Ignore “Credibility” as a Corporate Asset (look ahead, pick industry leaders. What is their chief asset? Capital? Credibility?) 1.Give all your Profit to Lawyers & Consultants
18
Keeping Your Options Open
19
Charge of the Light Brigade A British cavalry charge during the battle of Balaclava (present day Ukraine) in the Crimean War in October, 1854. A misunderstanding led to British cavalry being committed to an attack up a valley strongly held on three sides by Russian troops. Of 673 men, less than 200 returned from the misdirected charge.
20
When to Claim
21
How to Claim
22
What to Claim
23
Early Claims Resolution Strategies
24
Choosing a System
25
Perfect Procedural Fairness (if the process is right, the result doesn’t matter) Perfect Outcomes (if the result is right, the process doesn’t matter) “Your Case” (individual outcome) “Big Picture” (- societal outcome -fair exchange of values -fair balancing of risks) Golden Rule: “Do unto others etc.”
26
Divine Justice Perfect Procedural Fairness Perfect Outcomes Your Case Big Picture Utopian IdealJustice Circles Coin Toss / Lottery Trend of Courts Trend of ADR (Faith in System) (Faith in person)
27
Choosing A Process
28
CCDC 40 CCDC 40 was developed for use with CCDC 2 -1994, Stipulated Price Contract Provides rules for mediation and arbitration, depending on contract Mediation: entirely voluntary, no-risk process Arbitration: most formal ADR procedure, binding outcome
29
Dispute Review Boards Parties select DRB panelists at outset of contract More formal than jobsite negotiations, less formal than arbitration No discoveries, but full documentary backup DRB first meets after exchange of documents By the time the claim reaches the DRB, DRB should be partially familiar with the claim DRB conducts “meetings”, not “hearings” DRB issues detailed written recommendation for resolution of dispute Any party dissatisfied with outcome can litigate
30
Mediation Non-binding method of dispute resolution Parties select mutually acceptable mediator Parties voluntarily reach their own mutually acceptable solution or settlement Dispute is not translated into legal issues Process is not a litigation look-alike Mediation is usually conducted without prejudice to the parties’ legal positions If mediation does not result in a solution, parties are free to commence litigation
31
Arbitration Binding process of dispute resolution Parties choose one or more neutral arbitrators (panel) Evidence is presented to panel Panel renders award in form of damages or other equitable relief Limited right to appeal binding and final award Enforcement mechanisms under provincial Arbitration Acts
32
Pros and Cons
33
Arbitration Pro Summary in smaller cases Access to expertise on panel It’s all confidential. No-one ever needs to know Con Ends up looking & costing like litigation in bigger cases You end up paying for 3 judges and a courtroom No precedent value – the law stagnates
34
Mediation Pro It works People go in committed to settlement It is not necessary to do production and discoveries Con It works The built-in assumption, going in, is that there is a not payor, not payee People can lie in mediation and get away with it
35
Litigation ProDecisive Coerces settlement Adversary system gets to heart of matter Specialty courts shape an industry, take “big picture view” ConExpensive Investment at point of settlement can be high So do other systems, if done right Little or nothing ever goes to trial anyway
36
Litigation # 2 “He saw a lawyer killing a viper, on a dunghill hard by his own stable. And the Devil smiled, for it put him in mind of Cain and his brother, Abel.” – Coleridge “For, as thou urgest justice, be assured thou shalt have justice, more than thou desirest”. – Merchant of Venice IV, I, 315
37
The Lost Art of Settlement
38
Example: Settling a Lien Claim Preliminary Points: It is not necessary to settle every issue to settle the lien issue Interim or partial settlements are perfectly fine Issues in rem may be separated from issues in personam
39
Settling a Lien Claim II Solicitor’s Role: Bring parties together in such a way that they are likely to reach mutually satisfactory terms Know the parties, be aware of state of various lien claims, status of pleadings and particulars, status of productions and discoveries
40
Settling a Lien Claim III Three essential tools for reaching settlement: Good spreadsheets Good mathematics Good communications
41
Settling a Lien Claim VI For more detail: D.W. Glaholt, Conduct of a Lien Action (to be published by Carswell later this year)
42
When All Else Fails LITIGATE
43
Litigation Primer
44
4. To calculate costs: witness x 2 x 5- 10,000 = trial cost; trial cost x 2 = total cost 3. If it goes to trial, it will cost each side the amount in issue, before you get a judgment 2. Your first loss is your best loss 1.A bad settlement is better than a good lawsuit any day of the week Golden Rules
45
Day # 1 -500K (Claim) Net Gain Net Loss $500,000 Claim Goal: Get to Zero
46
6-12 Months From Day # 1 -650K (- 500K claim -150K accrued costs) Net Gain Net Loss A dozen or so letters; two case management conferences; some production; some discoveries
47
12-18 Months From Day # 1 - $250,000 settlement -500K (- 500K claim -250K accrued costs +250K settlement) Net Gain Net Loss More discoveries; more motions; a successful mediation
48
18-24 Months From Day # 1 - $500,000 Judgment -200K Net Gain Net Loss
49
Loss 18-24 Months From Day # 1 -1,300K (- 500K claim -500K accrued costs - 300K to successful defendant) Net Gain Net Loss
50
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.