Presentation on theme: "Social Psychology “an attempt to understand and explain how the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of individuals are influenced by the actual, imagined,"— Presentation transcript:
Social Psychology “an attempt to understand and explain how the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of individuals are influenced by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others” (Allport, 1954)
Journals Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP) Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (PSPB) Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (JESP) Psych Bull, Psych Review, PSPR, AESP
Societies Society for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP) Society of Experimental Social Psychologists (SESP)
Brief history of Social Psychology Greek philosophers Psychology begins in 1800s 1864 Cattaneo uses “social psych” for group emergence 1871 mentioned in Linder’s textbook 1876 Ringlemann study 1898 Triplett study
First textbooks—1908 (McDougall, Ross) Floyd Allport’s text in 1924 Experiments are king—The psychology of groups is the psychology of the individuals Journal of Abnormal Psych becomes J of Ab Psych and Social Psych in 1921
More history vs. behaviorism and psychoanalysis WW2 and Nazis –Gestalt psych –Practical applications Kurt Lewin GI Bill, boom time for social psychologists First handbook 1954 Leon Festinger—experimental revolution
1947 SPSP starts, 1965—JPSP and JESP 70’s cognitive revolution –Paper and pencil are king! 70’s crisis of confidence –Gergen, social psych as history –McGuire—need more diverse methods –IRBs, better data analysis techniques 80’s new topics like love and relationships, evolutionary psychology 90’s decade of the brain
80’s new topics like love and relationships, evolutionary psychology 90’s decade of the brain –Evolutionary psych –Social neuroscience 00’s influence of culture –Multidisciplinary –Nonconscious approaches –internet
00’s and beyond Broadening 5 ways “You can never have too many social psychologists.”
Broadening the discipline Social neuroscience Emphasis on culture and how it evolves Spatial analyses Links to other areas (business, law, health…) More multidisciplinary research
Broadening perspectives Evolutionary psychology Social identity theory Terror management theory Dynamical systems
Broadening methods Advanced statistics, going beyond ANOVA Computer simulation Internet data collection
Broadening globally Influencing and being influenced by other social psychologies (European = more sociological) Growth! 2800 to >7000 members of SPSP in less than 20 yrs from all over world
Controversies and resolutions Social psych continues to respond to zeitgeist Construal vs. behaviorism Basic vs. applied Person vs. situation Evolution vs. culture Still going on: IAT, free will, how to give psych away
McGuire’s (1973) koan We put too much emphasis on testing hypos, not enough on generating them We need to get away from simple, linear models We need to remember that data come from people We need to put together more data archives and do more longitudinal studies We should use ANOVAs less and other techniques that let us deal with messier data more. See the advantages of decreased funding (get more personal with your research, think about it more) It’s okay that some of these recommendations conflict with each other.
Analysis from leaders in the field Don’t build enough Shouldn’t only build Need more activism Too narrow Need more links to other fields/ cultures Blame it on social cognition Need bigger theories (cog, evo, soc ident) Too negative and problem-focused Not enough emphasis on time
Other criticisms Ellsworth Henrich et al. –Sears Why are things this way?
Theories What makes a good theory? What do theories do for us? At what level should we theorize? Theory-driven research vs. HARKing
Public Skepticism Is it a problem? If so, why is it? 6 myths –Psych is common sense –Psych doesn’t use scientific methods –Can’t generalize b/c everyone is unique –Psych doesn’t yield replicable results –Psych can’t make precise predictions –Psych not useful to society
Why are people skeptical? We do some bad stuff. Our public face isn’t necessarily scientific See psych as another helping profession Hindsight bias in findings Think they are experts too Look for biological explanations Explain results they don’t like as nonscientific Don’t see value in basic research
What should we do differently? Communicate better w/ the public Don’t look down on “popularizers” Explain why it’s not just obvious Use evidence-based practice Organizations should promote more, show what against
Climate change How can (social) psych contribute to this area? Do we have an ethical obligation to do so? What are some particular problems with getting into applied areas such as this?
B/F “persons” Consistency seeker Self-esteem maximizer Terror manager Info seeker Foolish mistake maker Nondifferent individual Impression manager Naturally selected animal Cultural animal Group member Benighted layperson