Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

New York City PBIS Technical Assistance Center Update: Adaptation, Alignment, and Integration National PBIS Leadership Forum Satish Moorthy, NYC PBIS Chicago:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "New York City PBIS Technical Assistance Center Update: Adaptation, Alignment, and Integration National PBIS Leadership Forum Satish Moorthy, NYC PBIS Chicago:"— Presentation transcript:

1 New York City PBIS Technical Assistance Center Update: Adaptation, Alignment, and Integration National PBIS Leadership Forum Satish Moorthy, NYC PBIS Chicago: October, 2011

2 NYC PBIS Big Ideas for Today Learn about our Progress and Expansion Learn about our Integrative Implementation Demonstrations Systems alignment: A Global Perspective on Implementation (Federal, State, City)

3 The Big Picture in the Big Apple 9 years of PBIS in New York City >200 schools trained (12.5% of NYC public schools) Training at all 3 Tiers of PBIS Success in Implementation of PBIS is dependent on INTEGRATION with District and School-based Policies and Initiatives. Focus for 2011: Capacity building in Districts/Networks

4 Big 5 PBIS “Commitments” for Student Achievement (at school, city, state levels) Commitment to Coordinated (Cross- Functional) Teams Commitment to Capacity-Building Commitment to Sustainability Commitment to Policy Alignment and Coherence (INTEGRATION) Commitment to Ongoing Progress Monitoring (FIDELITY)

5 School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Build a continuum of supports that begins with the whole school and extends to intensive, wraparound support for individual students and their families.

6 Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions 1-5% Individual students Assessment-based High intensity 1-5%Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions Individual students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Tier 2/Secondary Interventions 5-15% Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Small group interventions Some individualizing 5-15%Tier 2/Secondary Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Small group interventions Some individualizing Tier 1/Universal Interventions 80-90% All students Preventive, proactive 80-90%Tier 1/Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive School-Wide Systems for Student Success: A Response to Intervention (RtI) Model Academic Systems Behavioral Systems Illinois PBIS Network, Revised May 15, Adapted from “What is school-wide PBS?” OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Accessed at

7 Schools adopting SWPBIS by year 14,325 Schools Adopting School-wide PBIS 14,325 Schools Adopting School-wide PBIS

8 Schools adopting SWPBIS (Feb, 2011) 11 states with over 500 schools 3 states with over 1000 schools NYC at 200 schools (19 th overall) 11 states with over 500 schools 3 states with over 1000 schools NYC at 200 schools (19 th overall) Illinois FloridaTexasMaryland New York NYC

9 PBIS Schools by Type and Year: New York City Schools Trained: Cumulative by year Yr Yr Yr Yr Yr Yr Yr Yr Yr 9 ES K K MS/JR H MS/HS HS Alternat ive NYC Total

10 New York City-PBIS Schools Regional Expansion / Sustainability Number Schools Trained and Active Cumulative Yr 1: Yr 2: Yr 3: Yr 4: Yr 5: Yr 6: Yr 7: Yr 8: Yr 7:

11 NYC PBIS Schools by Borough Manhattan: 28 Bronx: 105 Brooklyn: 81 Queens: 58 Staten Island: 17

12 What is School-wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports? School-wide PBIS is: – A systems framework for establishing the social culture and behavioral supports needed for a school to be an effective learning environment for ALL STUDENTS.

13 Urban Challenges for PBIS Poverty and Health Disproportional Rates of Suspensions of SWD by Race/Ethnicity How do we move from reactive approaches to the “problem”, to preventative (e.g., culturally responsive) How can we prevent? How do we include diverse communities, within school and in our neighborhoods?

14 The Urban Context NYC Population: 8,214,426 (Census Est. 2006) (42.5% of total NY State population) Urban Population Density (2006): – NYC: 26,402 per sq. mile – Chicago: 12,750 per sq. mile – Los Angeles: 7,877 per sq. mile

15 The Context: New York City 9.5% Unemployment Rate 2009 (from 4.5% in May ‘08) (nyc.gov) 35.9% of residents foreign born (2000 Census) 47.6% language other than English spoken at home (2000 Census) Estimated 170 languages spoken

16 NYC by Ethnicity (2000 Census) Population: 8,214,426 (Census Est. 2006) 35.1% White 27.0% Hispanic/ Latino 24.5% African American 9.8% Asian

17 Under 18: % Poverty and % Uninsured –NYC U.S. <18 Poverty Rate 18.5% U.S. <18 Uninsured Rate 11.9%

18 NYC Public Schools: Quick Facts Key Facts: 1.1 million students 1,600+ schools 335 new schools since ,000 teachers $21 billion annual budget Source: schools.nyc.gov

19 NYC Schools Ethnic Demographics 1.1 million students 39.4% Hispanic 32.8% African-American 14.3% White 13.6% Asian/ Pacific Islander 4% Native American

20 Student Demographics Students Receiving DOE Special Education Services (includes all public, non-public, pre-school & school age): 161,820 English Language Learners: 146,132 Students Eligible for Free/Reduced Lunch: 784,963 (76.3%)

21 Scaling Up Challenges Competing Demands on Educators, Administrators, Districts – Improving Low-Performing Schools – Providing Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) in the Least Restrictive Environment, – Safe and Supportive Schools, – Supporting Systems of Care for At-Risk Students – Disproportionality in SpEd and Suspensions (African American Students)

22 Four Areas for NYC PBIS Integration 1) Response to Intervention and Universal Design for Learning (FAPE and Common Core) IDEA 2) Systems of Care and Wraparound Social Services – Safe and Drug Free Schools 3) Culturally Responsive Positive Behavioral Support Systems – Civil Rights Act 4) Bully Prevention and Safe Schools – ESEA, Safe and Drug Free Schools

23 Integrative PBIS Domain #1 1) Response to Intervention and Universal Design for Learning (FAPE and Common Core, FBA- BIP and MDR)

24 Number, percentage and difference from national baseline of students Ages 6 through 21 receiving special education outside the regular class more than 60 percent of the school day 49. New York 126, Virgin Islands Guam Hawaii IDEA Part B Comparison of State Level LRE Data (Fall 2004) 24 State Performance Plan Indicator 5: Least Restrictive Environment – School Age

25 Percent of students, ages 6 through 21, receiving special education services outside the regular class setting more than 60 percent of the school day. IDEA Part B Comparison of State Level LRE Data (DAC- IDEA Data, 2008) State% Students in MRE Settings Vermont 0 Puerto Rico 5.84 North Dakota 8.33 Alabama 9.41 South Dakota 10.5 West Virginia 10.5 Oklahoma Nebraska Wyoming Idaho Kansas Iowa Kentucky Texas Oregon 13.7 Montana Colorado Connecticut 14.1 Wisconsin Minnesota Nevada 15 Pennsylvania Mississippi Tennessee 15.6 Alaska Missouri Washington Maine Arkansas 16.8 North Carolina Arizona Indiana Georgia Louisiana Utah Ohio Virginia Michigan 21.3 New Mexico Rhode Island Florida Massachusetts South Carolina Delaware 23.3 Maryland Illinois 25.5 California Hawaii New Jersey New Hampshire New York District of Columbia Hawaii New Jersey New Hampshire New York District of Columbia State Performance Plan Indicator 5: Least Restrictive Environment – School Age This definition includes students with disabilities in public schools, separate alternative schools, residential facilities. parentally placed in private schools, correctional facilities, and home or hospital environments.

26 Universal Design Developed into… Ramps and curb cuts Automatic door-opening devices Accessible toilets Fire alarm systems with lights Closed-captioning Texting 26 Origins in Architecture Division of Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners (DSWDELL)

27 NYC Special Education Reform Four Components Academics & Instructional Supports: e.g., ELA, Math, Social Studies, Science, Arts, Social, Emotional and Behavioral Development: e.g., Classroom Management Strategies, School-Wide Systems, Individual Interventions School Operations: e.g., Scheduling, Staffing, Budget & Funding, Data Systems, Compliance Long Term Planning: e.g., Transition Planning, Graduation Planning, Articulation Planning

28 Timeline for PBIS and Special Ed Reform Phase 1 Response to Intervention Pilot for 25 schools. 10 School Support Networks and 250 schools participating in Phase 1 ( ). All 60 School Support Networks and 1700 schools will be participating in

29 Integrative PBIS Domain #2 2) Systems of Care – New York Promise Zones

30 Integrating PBIS Promise Zones for Urban Education Systems of Care Pilot funded by NY State Office of Mental Health Endorsed by State Commissioners of all child- serving agencies Key features: – An External Change Partner – The School Support Team and Social Worker – A Community Services Support Network

31 “Could someone help me with these? I’m late for math class.”

32 PBIS and Systems of Care – School-wide PBIS as a foundation (5 high-needs schools in the Bronx) – Community Mental Health Partner (State funded) – Capacity-building for Tier 3 team (Pupil Personnel Team) – Connecting to community-based agencies and supports for at-risk youth and families

33

34 2011 Promise Zone and PBIS 5 PBIS schools in the Bronx are the pilot All have student poverty level of 75% or higher School-based wraparound teams serve as local technical assistance Process measures: referrals to services, completion, team functioning, staff development Outcome measures: suspensions, referrals to special education, attendance, academic achievement

35 2 Common School Team Needs 1) school staff’s ability to understand and identify severe mental health issues in their students, and 2) school teams ability to connect and interface with a wide range of existing agencies and services including child welfare, foster care, mental health outpatient, domestic violence support, housing assistance, and services for formerly incarcerated parents.

36 Systems of Care Evaluation Process and/or Implementation Evaluation – Replicability of model for collaborative planning and service delivery Student Outcome Evaluation – Increased Positive Engagement in the Instructional Process

37 Evaluation Timelines January- June 2011 – BASELINE for both Process and Outcomes September June 2012 – Ongoing Data Collection

38 Integrative PBIS Domain #3 3) Safe and Supportive Schools - Bully Prevention

39 Safe and Supportive Schools Integration » In 2010: SW-PBIS is now Recommended Discipline Policy in NYC!!!

40 Reducing School Violence and Suspensions Of 14 NYC PBIS schools cited as Persistently Dangerous by the State: – 11 showed increases in attendance – 12 showed decreases in violent incidents – 9 showed significant decreases in total suspensions – 12 were removed from the Persistently Dangerous List Of 16 cited in 2008 by the State for Disproportional Rates of Suspensions of Students with Disabilities (SPP #4) that have been in NYS PBIS for more than a year: – 14 (or 88%) saw either significant reductions in suspensions (9) or no increase (5)

41 PBIS/ School Safety Implementation Training Youth Development Staff (in charge of Safety and Suspensions) in PBIS Half-Day Modules: – Basic Principles of ABA/ Behavior – Competing Behavior Pathway – School-wide PBIS Youth Development Staff attend PBIS along with school-based teams

42 Integrative PBIS Domain #4 4) Culturally Responsive PBIS Systems – Addressing Disproportionality in Suspensions (SPP 4B)

43 Addressing Disproportionality Focus: Disproportional Rates of Long-Term Suspensions (>10 days) of Black or African- American Students with Disabilities, where Black and African American Students are more than 2 times as likely to be suspended than other students with IEPs Action: PBIS has been identified as a recommended approach to address disproportionality

44 Digging Deeper Deeper analysis shows 91 schools with the highest disproportionality – Where risk of suspension of Black or African American student with disabilities is more the 2 times as likely as that of all other students with disabilities – 2.0 Relative Risk threshold is set by the State (shows over 330 schools)

45 PBIS/ Culturally Responsive Integration Collaboration with New York University TAC for Disproportionality – 2 Levels of Intervention (Culturally Responsive Schools) School-Based (8 schools in pilot) Leadership training and capacity building

46 11 PBIS Schools with the highest rates of Disproportionality in Rates of Long-term Suspensions by Race/Ethnicity SPPI 4B Comparison of to Suspensions Reduction81.8% Increase18.2% Initial Referrals Reduction45.5% No change18.2% Increase36.4% Attendance Increase90.9% Reduction9.1% N=11

47 Comparison within 91 NYC Schools with the highest levels of Disproportionality in Suspensions of Students with Disabilities N=11 Suspensions Percent of PBIS SchoolsPercent of Non-PBIS Schools Initial Referrals N=80

48 Systems Alignment: A Global Perspective on PBIS Implementation

49 NYC PBIS Technical Assistance Center Funding Visibility Political Support TrainingCoachingEvaluation Active Coordination with Children First Networks Local School Teams/Demonstrations Alignment Policy PBIS Implementation Logic Behavioral Expertise

50 RSE-TASC PBIS PBIS DSWDELL D75 Statewide PBIS TAC National PBIS TAC PBIS Schools

51 Systems Change NY State Education NYC DOE Schools Teachers/ Staff Effective Practices ALIGNMENT Federal Departments Implementation Teams FORM FOLLOWS FUNCTION

52 RSE-TASC PBIS PBIS DSWDELL D75 Statewide PBIS TAC National PBIS TAC PBIS Schools

53 NYC PBIS Coordination NYC PBIS provides: (1) research-based professional development for school-based teams (all 3 tiers including FBA- BIP), (2) technical support and implementation assistance, and (3) training on data collection and progress monitoring of PBIS practices. (4) internal and External Coach Networking

54 CFNs NYC DOE PBIS Schools Cluster District 75 CFNs Schools

55 NYC PBIS External TA Coach Funding Trends Central Funding: Tax Levy, IDEA, Race to the Top Local Funding: Tax Levy, IDEA, Race to the Top

56 SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Decision Making Supporting Student Behavior Positive Behavior Support OUTCOMES Social Competence & Academic Achievement

57 Implementation with Fidelity Means Stronger Student Outcomes!!! PBIS Outcome Data School Year 40% 84% 60% 66% 37% 70% 14% 62% 36% 44% 31% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40 % 50% 60 % 70% 80 % 90% Reduction in No. of Students in Self contained Classes Fully Implementing Partially Implementing Reduction in BOTH Principal and Superintendent Suspensions Reduction in no. of ELLs With IEPs Improvement in Attendance Met Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP ) 30% Reduction of Students in Self-Contained Classes Met Universal Standards N=

58 Finding External Partnerships that Support School Improvement State and City agencies (Health, Mental Health, Parent Centers, Juvenile Justice, Child Welfare, Career Development, Substance Abuse Prevention) Department of Education Divisions/ Offices (DSWDELL, DAPS, School and Youth Development, School Health/Mental Health) Institutions of Higher Education (University Research Centers, Institutes, NYU and Columbia) Community organizations (Mental Health)

59 Scaling Up and Drilling Down NYC PBIS TAC Five–Year Action Plan - Coordinated Citywide Management System - Increased Training and Coaching Capacity - Streamlined Implementation Evaluation - Alignment of Outcome Indicators with Federal, State, and City Guidelines - Diversified Funding for PBIS Activities (RTTT, IDEA) - Visibility through Demonstrations (Pilots) - Political Support and Collaborative Advocacy with related institutions, agencies


Download ppt "New York City PBIS Technical Assistance Center Update: Adaptation, Alignment, and Integration National PBIS Leadership Forum Satish Moorthy, NYC PBIS Chicago:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google