Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Bibliografía 1)Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screeningand.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Bibliografía 1)Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screeningand."— Presentation transcript:

1 Bibliografía 1)Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screeningand diagnosis. Fourth edition. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publicationsof the European Communities; 2006. 2)Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, Sisney GA, Kuni CC, Cutter GR.Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.Radiology. 2001 ;218(3):873- 80. 3)John M. Lewin, Carl J. D'Orsi R. Edward Hendrick, Lawrence J. Moss, Pamela K. Isaacs, Andrew Karellas and Gary R. Cutter. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screenfilm mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR.2002;179:671-7. 4)Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald APopulation-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study. Radiology. 2003 (3):877-884 5)Skaane P, Skjennald A. Screen-film mammography versus full-fielddigital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in apopulation-based screening program--the Oslo II Study. Radiology. 2004;232(1):197-204. 6)Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A.Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology. 2007;244(3):708-717 7)Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1773-83. 8)Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Philip Chu, Diana L. Miglioretti, Chris Quale, Robert D. Rosenberg, Gary Cutter, Berta Geller, Peter Bacchetti, Edward A. Sickles, Karla Kerlikowske Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. J Natl CancerInst. 2005;97(5):358-67. 9) Smith-Bindman R, Ballard-Barbash R, Miglioretti DL, Patnick J, KerlikowskeK. Comparing the performance of mammography screening inthe USA and the UK. J Med Screen. 2005;12:50-4. 10) Castells X, Molins E, Macià F. Cumulative false positive recall rate andassociation with participant related factors in a population based breastcancer screening programme. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60:316-21.

2 Bibliografía 11)Sala M, Comas M, Macià F, Martinez J, Casamitjana M, Castells X. Implementation of digital mammography in apopulation-based breast cancer screeningprogram: effect of screening round on recall rateand cancer detection.Radiology. 2009 252(1):31-9. 12)Michael J. Schell, PhDBonnie C. Yankaskas, PhDRachel Ballard-Barbash, MD, MPHBahjat F. Qaqish, PhD,MDWilliam E. Barlow, PhDRobert D. Rosenberg,MDRebecca Smith-Bindman,MD. Evidence-based Target Recall Rates for Screening Mammography. Radiology. 2007 243(3):681-689. 13)Programa de detección precoz del cáncer de mama de Tarragona –Terre de l´Ebre. Marzo 2009. Nº 16 14) Laia Domingo Maria Sala Sonia Servitja Josep Maria Corominas Francisco Ferrer Juan Martínez Francesc Macia Maria Jesu s Quintana Joan Albanell Xavier Castells. Phenotypic characterization and risk factors for interval breast cancers in a population-based breast cancer screening program in Barcelona, Spain. Cancer Causes Contro lDOI 10.1007/s10552-010-9541-6 15)Chevalier, M, Moran P, Ten J.I. Fernández Soto M, Cepeda T Vañó E. Patien dose in digital mammography. Med Phys 31(9) 2471-8. 16)Pisano ED, Gatsonis CA, Yaffe MJ, Hendrick RE, Tosteson AN, Fryback DG, Bassett LW, Baum JK, Conant EF, Jong RA, Rebner M, D'Orsi CJ. AmericanCollege of Radiology Imaging Network DigitalMammographic Imaging Screening Trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology 2005; 236: 404–412 17) Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Averbukh A, Moran C, Berns EA, Yaffe MJ, Herman B, Acharyya S, Gatsonis C. Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trialAJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(2):362-9 18) Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, McGee MA, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom.National Breast Screening Program. Radiology 2006;241:47-53. 19). Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Maureen GC et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Eng J Med 2008; 359,16 :1675-1684


Download ppt "Bibliografía 1)Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screeningand."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google