Presentation on theme: "USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program & Benthic Overview"— Presentation transcript:
1USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program & Benthic Overview Karl E. Brown, Vegetation Mapping Program Mgr Natural Resource Program CenterBiological Resources Management DivisionBenthic Habitat Mapping Workshop June 3-5, 2008
2Outline and Overview Background Approach, Process & Products USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program OverviewOutline and OverviewBackgroundApproach, Process & ProductsPresent Program StatusHybrid TechniquesAvailable Data / WebsiteSuggestions to the Benthic Habitat Mapping Effort
3What is it? High priority requirement of the NPS I&M Program BackgroundWhat is it?High priority requirement of the NPSI&M ProgramNational (Service Wide) ProgramBegins long term vegetation monitoringprogramHas many short term immediateapplications
4NPS I&M Program Base Cartographic Soils Geology Vegetation BackgroundNPS I&M ProgramBase CartographicSoilsGeologyVegetationBibliographiesSpecies listsAir qualityWater quality
5NPS vegetation mapping projects BackgroundNational ProgramDiffers from otherNPS vegetation mapping projects270 park units (full park coverage)minute USGS quadranglesNational scopeParticipation of multiple agenciesConsistency in detail and accuracy between parksProduces digital products available on WWWCoordination at multiple levels
6Standards NPS management policies, standards & guidelines BackgroundStandardsNPS management policies, standards & guidelinesFederal Geographic Data Committee standardsmetadata, transfer, classification etc.Nationally consistent, hierarchical, classification schemeNational Map Accuracy StandardsThematic accuracy >80% per classScale of 1:24,000Minimum mapping unit of 0.5 hectare
7Major Steps for each Park Data IssuesMajor Steps for each ParkScoping meetingData reviewData acquisitionField samplingClassification characterizationPhoto interpretation, mapping and automationAccuracy assessmentFinal product reviewThese are the basic steps that are required for each park unitData review - there are usually a lot of data avalaible for each unit, and it takes time and coordination to bring them togetherThe field sampling should ideally take place when the photo interpreters are doing their field work, so there can be coordination between what the ecologists classifiy and what the intepreters identifyThe accuracy assessment should ideally be done when the mapping is complete so we can design a stratified random sample, but for efficiency’s sake, we often do accuracy assessment at the same time as the original field sampling
8Products from the Program Data IssuesProducts from the ProgramAerial photography/ imagery (hardcopy / digital, some new DOQQs)Field data (hardcopy and database)Classification report (Description and Key)Photo interp report (Description and Key)Accuracy reportVegetation map data (digital coverage)All appropriate metadata
9FGDC National Vegetation Classification System 2006 Data IssuesFGDC National Vegetation Classification System 2006A. PHYSIOGNOMYDivision/Order - Tree Dominant (dominant life form)Class - Woodland (spacing & height of dominant form)Subclass - Evergreen Woodland (morphological & phenological similarity)Group - Temperate Evergreen Needle-leaved (climate, latitude, growth form, leaf form)Formation - Evergreen Needle-leaved Woodland with Rounded Crowns (mappable units)B. FLORISTICSAlliance (Cover Type) - Douglas Fir Woodland (dominant species)Association (Community) - Douglas Fir / Snowberry Woodland (subdominant or associated species)The system is hierarchical which allows it to be used for many different levels of analysis and study - from National to regional to each Park to each site.It is also standard - so we do not have to reinvent the wheel for each park, although a lot of development work has to be done for each park.
11Present Status Data Issues Approximately 165 projects in process 30 Parks started ( )29 Park projects started in 200111 Park projects started2005 completed 11 more parks, continued 73 ongoing projects, and initiated 24 new starts39 Parks completed for web accessmore completed soon; 62 AA stage completed62 FY 05; 80 FY 06; 116 FY 07; 146 FY 08Alaska: 6 parks complete in 2003; 3 in 2004; 3 new ongoing in 2005; 4 more completed ; 3 more startsUSGS partnering on funding, 3 methods, archiving contract, collaborative fire and fuels datasets, variability analysis and surface model developments
19USGS-USFWS Vegetation Mapping Projects Program StatusUSGS-USFWS Vegetation Mapping ProjectsOuray NWRLacreek NWRWe are just getting started with FWS. We are working with Region 6 out of Denver to start 2 refuges – Ouray and Lacreek. There are close to 150 refuges in Region 6 and over 500 refuges nationwide covering 92 million acres of land and water.Region 6 is taking the lead for the Agency on this effort – we have really not had national support to date, but I think with the completion of these two projects will really show the agency the value of these products – consistent, useful for practical on-the-ground management, yet scientifically sound.
20New Models “New/other” technologies Sister Bureau hybrid techniques High Resolution Remote SensingeCognition segmentationLaser Rangefinder Remote GPS positioningSister Bureau hybrid techniquesFWS Lower cost Vegetation Map “Light”Savings from reduced field collectionBLM / USFS vegetation cross walks ROMO/GRSAField Vegetation Guides – VOYANetwork strategy / plans PACN & MOJN
21Cabrillo is working with State, Corps, and US Navy to figure out jurisdiction of the park acres.
22Multiresolution Segmentation Hybrid TechniquesMultiresolution SegmentationLevels can be used to compare results of segmentation based on different scale parameters and homogeneity criterion.Layers can be weighted. Weights determine to which degree the information is used during the process of object generation.
23Hybrid techniques – summary of current efforts Mixed imagery and Sister Bureau eCog segmentation and skeleton polygon sampling (GRSA)PI / eCog linework and model verification (MEVE) / ground reference; add attributes (field & automation savings)Classical accuracy assessment (AA) or small park methodology (census of GRKO, LIBI, KNRI, FOUN)Verify eCog gradient test against completed AA (ROMO)Machine classification and PI field sample verification (LAVO)
24National Park / Environs – data successes Summary & Partnerships 1National Park / Environs – data successesConsider areas of interest for small park methodologyEvaluate sparse vegetation sampling need and plot sizesFire and fuels protocols may integrate fuels stratification in sample designDevelop fuel model polygons from NVCS vegetation polygons / photosOther fire and monitoring program data needs…
25NPS / Environs – fire data summary Summary & Partnerships 2NPS / Environs – fire data summaryPark Fire Management team field verify / photo reference fuel model typesEvaluate LANDFIRE data potential; AA of EVT layersHow map classes improve Landfire and other modelsResearch partnering for a hybrid approach, as neededFire fuel classes / typesFuel loadings (1/10/100 hr…)Fire Regime Condition ClassLANDFIRE update as appropriate and as supported by partnership
26Summary of Efforts in 2007-8 Fund $4M ongoing projects in 25+ networks Summary & Partnerships 3Summary of Efforts inFund $4M ongoing projects in 25+ networksProvide technical support and planning assistance to parks, networks, and regionsPrioritize candidate projects with VMP teamFacilitate new planning based on park and network leveraged funding using hybrid innovations; new starts in ~Action plan for creation / migration of NPS data, and USGS-NPS archivingDevelop and serve planning templates on the web and a PLOTS 3.0 database update
27Suggestions to Benthic Efforts Benthic Partnerships 1Suggestions to Benthic EffortsStabilize the mapping standard, even a draft for NPS Marine ParksWork the 3 prototype parks, networks, and regional candidate areasEvaluate candidate projects against the draft standardGrow / update from the prototypes
28Benthic Habitats of Florida Bay, Florida, 1991-1995 Source: NOAA Coastal Services Center
29Suggestions to Benthic Efforts Benthic Partnerships 2Suggestions to Benthic EffortsLearn the USGS business model and facilitate joint papers on standards innovationsRegional Executive partnership on Green Book budget development, and USGS-NPS archivingDevelop and serve planning templates on the web and a draft 1.0 (geo?) database container