# MAP: Basics Overview Jenny McEvoy and Page Powell.

## Presentation on theme: "MAP: Basics Overview Jenny McEvoy and Page Powell."— Presentation transcript:

MAP: Basics Overview Jenny McEvoy and Page Powell

What is MAP? Un-timed computerized tests Reading and Mathematics Map data is useful to develop targeted instructional strategies Provides the instructional level of the student Helps teachers make data driven decisions Provide road map for determining where each student is performing in relation to local and state standards.

MAP Experience When students sit down to take the MAP test, the computer selects questions that are appropriate for the student’s grade level. Depending on the student’s responses, the computer will select questions based upon their performance on previous questions.

The MAP score Is given in RIT (Rausch Unit) Measures student achievement and growth Equal interval scale like feet and inches Follow students’ scores from year to year

DesCartes: A continuum of Learning Orders specific skills and concepts by achievement level in math and reading The skills align to goal structures and content from the IL State Standards The Descartes may be accessed from www.nwea.org by clicking in the Reports Site. www.nwea.org

What is the Typical growth for reading? Low performing and high performing standards don’t tend to grow at the same rate. Reading RIT Status Norms for the beginning of the year median score is: Grade 8: 220 Grade 9: 222 Grade 10: 226 Grade 11: 227

What is the typical growth for math? Math RIT Status Norms for the beginning of the year median score is: Grade 8: 230 Grade 9: 233 Grade 10: 237 Grade 11: 239

Resources www.nwea.org  For class reports  For the DesCartes skills and concepts  Dynamic reports  Glossary  Crystal reports  Guides for parents

Example of present level using MAP data He took the MAP test in the fall of 2009. His RIT score for reading was a 203 (Norm group average was 220 and the district average was 215). He took the MAP in the spring of 2010, his RIT score for reading was a 209 (norm group average 231.6, district average n/a). This was a 6 point increase, which demonstrates significant growth in the area of reading for him. He took the MAP test in the fall of 2010 and his RIT score was a score 199, lexile 482-632. This score is lower than his previous MAP testing scores. His reading scores are consistent with his placement in special education as well as his performance. He continues to require specialized support in reading.

Example of present level using MAP data He is currently enrolled in a CIC, instructional, reading comprehension class. His biggest area of weakness tends to be in the area of organization and handing in things in a timely fashion. He has excellent comprehension and performs at a high level on his weekly vocabulary tests. Please note that for the Fall MAP testing, he received a RIT scores of 228. Typical students at the ninth grade level receive a RIT score of 220 (according to 2008 reading status norms). In the beginning of the school year, he was assessed using the Burns Roe Informal Reading Inventory. Here he scored at the instructional seventh grade level. The questions that he had the most miscues in were: sequencing, vocabulary, and cause/effect. Thus, he is responding to intervention in this area. He should be encouraged to take more general education classes as he has the reading levels required to be successful.

Example of present level using MAP data Student is currently enrolled in a departmentalized special education English and reading class. His current MAP scores for Fall, 2009 were a RIT score of 216 (6th grade level). Typical ninth graders in the Fall receive a RIT score of 222. His RIT scores can be broken down into the following categories: Word Analysis/Vocabulary: 210-223 Reading Strategies/Comprehension: 208-221 Literature: 204-217 Literary Works: 216-231 Word analysis and literary works was an area of strength for student. Student was also assessed in class using the Burns Roe Reading Inventory. A miscue analysis was done of his comprehension abilities and decoding abilities. He did not have many decoding errors. He had a difficult time answering inferential questions, cause and effect, and main idea questions. His scores were the same as on his MAP testing. It should be noted that Student's vocabulary abilities were higher than his reading comprehension skills. Here he scored a grade equivalent of 7.5.