Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMalakai Hache Modified over 2 years ago

1
1 1 Dissecting Dark Energy Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

2
2 2 Our Tools Expansion rate of the universe a(t) ds 2 = dt 2 +a 2 (t)[dr 2 /(1-kr 2 )+r 2 d 2 ] Einstein equation (å/a) 2 = H 2 = (8 /3) m + H 2 (z) = (8 /3) m + C exp{ dlna [1+w(z)]} Growth rate of density fluctuations g(z) = ( m / m )/a Poisson equation 2 (a)=4 Ga 2 m = 4 G m (0) g(a)

3
3 3 Tying HEP to Cosmology Accurate to 3% in EOS back to z=1.7 (vs. 27% for w 1 ). Accurate to 0.2% in distance back to z lss =1100! Klein-Gordon equation + 3H = -dV( )/d ¨ ˙ Linder Phys.Rev.Lett. 2003 following Corasaniti & Copeland 2003 w(a) = w 0 +w a (1-a)

4
4 4 All w, All the time Suppose we admit our ignorance: H 2 = (8 /3) m + H 2 (z) Effective equation of state: w(z) = -1 + (1/3) d ln( H 2 ) / d ln(1+z) Modifications of the expansion history are equivalent to time variation w(z). Period. Time variation w´ is a critical clue to fundamental physics. Alterations to Friedmann framework w(z) gravitational extensions or high energy physics Linder 2003

5
5 5 The world is w(z) Don’t care if it’s braneworld, cardassian, vacuum metamorphosis, chaplygin, etc. Simple, robust parametrization w(a)=w 0 +w a (1-a) Braneworld [DDG] vs. (w 0,w a )=(-0.78,0.32) Vacuum metamorph vs. (w 0,w a )=(-1,-3) Also agree on m(z) to 0.01 mag out to z=2

6
6 6 Revealing Physics Some details of the underlying physics are not in w(z). N eed an underlying theory - ? beyond Einstein gravity? Growth history and expansion history work together. w 0 =-0.78 w a =0.32 Linder 2004 cf. Lue, Scoccimarro, Starkman Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 124015 for braneworld perturbations

7
7 7 Questions How does a(t) teach us something fundamental (beyond w(z))? Benchmarks: à la energy scale for inflation models; rule out theories tying DE to inflation; scalar tensor 2 ; slow roll parameters of V( ) like linear potential Predictive power: Albrecht-Skordis-Burgess w(z); naturalness constraints ; flatness and w(z) w<-1: Crossing w=-1 with hybrid quintessence Other tools: astronomy (strong gravity, solar system), accelerator, tabletop experiments

8
8 8 Lambda, Quintessence, or Not? Many models asymptote to w=-1, making distinction from difficult. Can models cross w=-1? (Yes, if w<-1 exists.) All models match CMB power spectrum for CDM

9
9 9 Naturalness and w´ Consider the analogy with inflation. Tilt n=1 (Harrison-Zel’dovich) is roughly predicted; profound if n=1 exactly (deSitter, limited dynamics). Same: w=-1 exactly is profound, but w≈-1 maybe not too surprising. Small deviation w -1 important so precision sought. However, while n=0.97, constant without running, is possible, w=-0.97 constant is almost ridiculous. Thus, searching for w´ is critical even if find w very near -1.

10
10 Predictions & Benchmarks Linear potential [Linde 1986] V( )=V 0 + leads to collapsing universe, can constrain t c a t curves of Would like predictions of w(z) - or at least w´. In progress for Albrecht-Skordis-Burgess model V( ) = (1+ /b + /b 2 ) exp(- )

11
11 Predictions & Benchmarks Extensions to gravitation E.g. scalar-tensor theories: f/2 - ( ) ; ; -V Take linear coupling to Ricci scalar R: f/ = F R Allow nonminimal coupling F=1/(8 G)+ 2 R-boost (note R 0 in radiation dominated epoch) gives large basin of attraction: solves fine tuning yet w ≈ -1. [Matarrese,Baccigalupi,Perrotta 2004] But growth of mass fluctuations altered: S 0 since G 1/F.

12
12 Questions How does a(t) teach us something fundamental (beyond w(z))? Benchmarks: à la energy scale for inflation models; rule out theories tying DE to inflation; scalar tensor 2 ; slow roll parameters of V( ) like linear potential Predictive power: Albrecht-Skordis-Burgess w(z); naturalness constraints ; flatness and w(z) w<-1: Crossing w=-1 with hybrid quintessence Other tools: astronomy (strong gravity, solar system), accelerator, tabletop experiments

Similar presentations

OK

Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct. 24-26 K.Y. ， Bassett, Nichol,

Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct. 24-26 K.Y. ， Bassett, Nichol,

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on amazon web services Download ppt on covalent and ionic bonds Ppt on pre ignition damage Ppt on world environment day pictures Ppt on security features of atm Ppt on industrial development in gujarat ahmedabad Ppt on telephone etiquettes Ppt on cd/dvd rental Ppt on types of pollution download Ppt on marketing strategy of nokia and samsung