Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1
**CIGRE Technical Brochure on **

IV International Conference on Lightning Protection St. Petersburg, Russia, May 27-29, 2014 CIGRE Technical Brochure on Lightning Parameters for Engineering Applications Vladimir A. Rakov Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 1

2
In April 2008, CIGRE (International Council on Large Electric Systems) formed a new Working Group C4.407, named “Lightning Parameters for Engineering Applications”. That was an initiative of Prof. C.A. Nucci (then Convener of the CIGRE Study Committee C4) and Prof. M. Ishii (Convener of the Advisory Group C4.4). The WG C4.407 was composed of 21 members from North and South America, Europe, and Asia. It was tasked to prepare a CIGRE Reference Document (Technical Brochure) on lightning parameters needed for engineering applications.

3
CIGRE WG C4.407 has completed its work on the Technical Brochure in May This Brochure (CIGRE TB 549, 2013) can be viewed as an update on previous CIGRE documents on the subject published in Electra more than three decades ago: Berger et al. (1975) and Anderson and Eriksson (1980). This lecture is largely a presentation of the Executive Summary of CIGRE TB 549 (2013), expanded to include some illustrations. Anderson, R.B., and Eriksson, A.J Lightning parameters for engineering application. Electra, No. 69, pp Berger, K., Anderson, R.B., and Kroninger, H Parameters of lightning flashes. Electra, No. 41, pp CIGRE TB 549, Lightning Parameters for Engineering Applications, WG C4.407, V.A. Rakov, Convenor (US), A. Borghetti, Secretary (IT), C. Bouquegneau (BE), W.A. Chisholm (CA), V. Cooray (SE), K. Cummins (US), G. Diendorfer (AT), F. Heidler (DE), A. Hussein (CA), M. Ishii (JP), C.A. Nucci (IT), A. Piantini (BR), O. Pinto, Jr. (BR), X. Qie (CN), F. Rachidi (CH), M.M.F. Saba (BR), T. Shindo (JP), W. Schulz (AT), R. Thottappillil (SE), S. Visacro (BR), W. Zischank (DE), 117 p., August 2013.

5
**General Characterization of Lightning**

About 80% or more of negative cloud-to-ground lightning flashes are composed of two or more strokes. This percentage is appreciably higher than 55% previously estimated by Anderson and Eriksson (1980), based on a variety of less accurate records. Roughly one-third to one-half of lightning flashes create two or more terminations on ground separated by up to several kilometers. In order to account for multiple channel terminations on ground, a correction factor of (considerably larger than 1.1 previously estimated by Anderson and Eriksson (1980)) for the ground flash density is needed. Bouquegneau et al. (2012) suggested a conservative value of 2 for lightning risk calculations recommended by the IEC Standard.

6
**Multiple Channel Terminations on Ground**

Min = 0.3 km Max = 7.3 km GM = 1.7 km Histogram of the distances between the multiple terminations of 22 individual ground flashes in Florida. The distances were determined using optical triangulation and thunder ranging. Adapted from Thottappillil et al. (1992). 6

7
**Return-Stroke Parameters Derived from Current Measurements**

Direct current measurements by K. Berger and co-workers in Switzerland remain the primary reference for both lightning research and lightning protection studies. Berger’s peak current distributions are generally confirmed by recent direct current measurements, particularly by those with larger sample sizes obtained in Japan (N=120), Austria (N=615), and Florida (N=165). From direct current measurements, the median return-stroke peak current is about 30 kA for negative first strokes and typically kA for subsequent strokes. Additional measurements are needed to determine more reliably the tails of the statistical distributions. As of today, there is no experimental evidence that peak current distributions for downward lightning significantly depends on strike-object height.

8
**Lightning Peak Current – Berger’s Distributions**

Lightning peak currents for first strokes vary by a factor of 50 or more, from about 5 to 250 kA. The probability of occurrence of a given value rapidly increases up to 25 kA or so and then slowly decreases. Statistical distributions of this type are often assumed to be lognormal. Negative first strokes Positive first strokes Negative subsequent strokes Cumulative statistical distributions of lightning peak currents, giving percent of cases exceeding abscissa value, from direct measurements in Switzerland (Berger et al. 1975). The distributions are assumed to be lognormal and given for (1) negative first strokes (N=101), (2) positive first strokes (N=26), and (3) negative subsequent strokes (N=135).

9
**Lightning Peak Current – IEEE and CIGRE Distributions**

For the CIGRE distribution, 98% of peak currents exceed 4 kA, 80% exceed 20 kA, and 5% exceed 90 kA. For the IEEE distribution, the “probability to exceed” values are given by the following equation where ΡI is in per unit, and I is in kA. This equation applies to values of I up to 200 kA. The median (50%) peak current value is equal to 31 kA. Cumulative statistical distributions of peak currents for negative first strokes adopted by IEEE and CIGRE (N = 408). Taken from CIGRE Report 63 (1991). 9

10
**- Austria (Gaisberg Tower, 100 m), **

Return-Stroke Parameters Derived from Current Measurements Direct lightning current measurements on instrumented towers should be continued. Currently, direct current measurements are performed on instrumented towers in - Austria (Gaisberg Tower, 100 m), - Brazil (Morro do Cachimbo Tower, 60 m), - Canada (CN Tower, 553 m), - Germany (Peissenberg Tower, 160 m), - Japan (Tokyo Sky Tree, 634 m), and - Switzerland (Santis Tower, 124 m), although the overwhelming majority of observed flashes (except for Brazil and possibly Japan (20 upward and 14 downward in )) are of upward type.

11
**Return-Stroke Parameters Derived from Current Measurements**

Recommended lightning current waveshape parameters are still based on Berger et al.’s (1975) data, although the current rate-of-rise parameters estimated by Anderson and Eriksson (1980) from Berger et al.'s oscillograms are likely to be significantly underestimated, due to limitations of the instrumentation used by Berger et al. Triggered-lightning data for current rates of rise (acquired using modern instrumentation) can be applied to subsequent strokes in natural lightning.

12
Parameter Description I10 10% intercept along the stroke current waveshape I30 30% intercept along the stroke current waveshape I90 90% intercept along the stroke current waveshape I100= II Initial peak of current IF Final (global) peak of current (same as peak current without an adjective) T10/90 Time between I10 and I90 intercepts on the wavefront T30/90 Time between I30 and I90 intercepts on the wavefront S10 Instantaneous rate-of-rise of current at I10 S10/90 Average steepness (through I10 and I90 intercepts) S30/90 Average steepness (through I30 and I90 intercepts) Sm Maximum rate-of-rise of current along wavefront, typically at I90 td 10/90 Equivalent linear wavefront duration derived from IF / S10/90 td 30/90 Equivalent linear wavefront duration derived from IF / S30/90 t m Equivalent linear waveform duration derived from IF / Sm QI Impulse charge (time integral of current) Description of lightning current waveform parameters. The waveform corresponds to the typical negative first return stroke. Adapted from CIGRE Document 63 (1991) and IEEE Std

13
**(base e) standard deviation PEAK (CREST) CURRENT (kA)**

Lightning current parameters (based on Berger’s data) recommend by CIGRÉ Document 63 (1991) and IEEE Std Parameters of log-normal distribution for negative downward flashes Parameter First stroke Subsequent stroke M, Median β, logarithmic (base e) standard deviation β, logarithmic (base e) standard deviation FRONT TIME (µs) td10/90 = T10/90/0.8 5.63 0.576 0.75 0.921 td30/90 = T30/90/0.6 3.83 0.553 0.67 1.013 tm=IF / Sm 1.28 0.611 0.308 0.708 STEEPNESS (kA/µs) Sm, Maximum 24.3 0.599 39.9 0.852 S10, at 10% 2.6 18.9 1.404 S10/90, 10-90% 5.0 0.645 15.4 0.944 S30/90, 30-90% 7.2 0.622 20.1 0.967 PEAK (CREST) CURRENT (kA) II, initial 27.7 0.461 11.8 0.530 IF, final 31.1 0.484 12.3 Ratio, II/IF 0.9 0.230 0.207

14
Relation between the peak value of (maximum) current rate of rise and peak current from triggered-lightning experiments conducted at the NASA Kennedy Space Center, Florida, in 1985, 1987, and 1988 and in France in The regression line for each year is shown, and the sample size and the regression equation are given. Adapted from Leteinturier et al. (1991).

15
**Return-Stroke Parameters Derived from Current Measurements **

Relatively strong correlation is observed between the lightning peak current and charge transfer and between the current rate-of- rise and current peak. Relatively weak or no correlation is observed between the current peak and current risetime and between the current peak and current duration (from 2 kA to Ip/2). (a) (b) S10/90, kA/μS Scatter plots relating return-stroke current waveform parameters for rocket-triggered lightning in Florida (1990) and Alabama (1991). (a) Current peak versus S10/90; (b) current peak versus 10-90% risetime. Adapted from Fisher et al. (1993).

16
**Peak Current Inferred from Measured Electromagnetic Field**

The field-to-current conversion procedure employed by the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) and other similar lightning locating systems has been calibrated, using rocket-triggered lightning data and tower-initiated lightning data, only for negative subsequent strokes, with the median absolute error being 10 to 20%. Peak current estimation errors for negative first strokes and for positive lightning are presently unknown. Besides systems of NLDN type, there are other lightning locating systems that are also reporting lightning peak currents inferred from measured fields, including LINET (mostly in Europe), USPLN (in the U.S., but similar systems operate in other countries), ENTLN (in the U.S. and other countries), WWLLN (global), and GLD360 (global). Peak current estimation errors for the latter three systems are presently being examined using triggered-lightning data.

17
**NLDN reported peak currents vs**

NLDN reported peak currents vs. those directly measured at Camp Blanding, Florida, for 268 negative strokes in lightning triggered in The diagonal represents the ideal situation when the NLDN-reported and directly-measured peak currents are equal to each other. Adapted from Mallick et al. (2014).

18
Continuing Currents The percentage of positive flashes or strokes containing continuing currents (CC) is much higher than that of negative flashes or strokes. Positive strokes tend to be followed by longer and more intense CC than negative strokes. Negative strokes initiating long (>40 ms) continuing currents tend to have a lower peak current (also to be preceded by higher-peak-current strokes and by relatively short interstroke intervals), while positive strokes can produce both a high peak current and a long CC.

19
Peak current (Ip) versus CC duration for 586 negative strokes and 141 positive strokes. Provided by M.M.F. Saba.

20
**Lightning Return Stroke Propagation Speed**

The lightning return-stroke speed is needed in computing lightning electromagnetic fields that cause induced overvoltages in power distribution lines. It is also explicitly or implicitly assumed in procedures to infer lightning currents from measured fields. The average propagation speed of a negative return stroke (first or subsequent) below the lower cloud boundary is typically between one-third and one-half of the speed of light. It appears that the return-stroke speed for first strokes is lower than that for subsequent strokes, although the difference is not very large (9.6 × 107 vs. 1.2 × 108 m/s).

21
**Equivalent Impedance of the Lightning Channel**

The equivalent impedance of the lightning channel, Zch, is needed for specifying the source in studies of either direct-strike or induced lightning effects. The estimates of this impedance from limited experimental data suggest values ranging from several hundred ohms to a few kiloohms. In many practical situations the impedance “seen” by lightning at the strike point is some tens of ohms or less, which allows one to assume infinitely large equivalent impedance of the lightning channel. In other words, lightning in these situations can be viewed as an ideal current source. Representation of lightning by a current source with internal impedance of 400 ohm, similar to that of an overhead wire, is probably not justified (particularly at early times).

22
**Positive and Bipolar Lightning Discharges**

In spite of the recent progress, our knowledge of the physics of positive lightning remains considerably poorer than that of negative lightning. Because of the absence of other direct current measurements for positive lightning return strokes, it is still recommended to use the peak current distribution based on the 26 events recorded by K. Berger, even though some of those 26 events are likely to be not of “classical” return-stroke type. Clearly, additional measurements for positive lightning return strokes are needed to establish reliable distributions of peak current and other parameters for this type of lightning. Bipolar lightning discharges are usually initiated by upward leaders from tall objects. However, natural downward flashes also can be bipolar.

23
Positive Lightning Lightning current parameters for positive flashes (Berger et al., 1975) 4.6 20 2.0 3.5 0.20 25 2.5x105 14 35 80 16 22 2.4 230 6.5x105 85 250 350 150 200 32 2000 1.5x107 500 24 18 5.5x105 - 26 19 21 Percent Exceeding Tabulated Value Sample Size Units Parameters 95% 50% First 5% Value for Negative First Strokes kA C μs kA/μs A2s ms Peak current (minimum 2 kA) Charge (total charge) Impulse charge (excluding continuing current ) Front Duration (2 kA to peak) Maximum di/dt Action integral ( ∫i2dt ) Flash Duration Stroke duration ( 2 kA to half peak value on the tail) 5.5 23

24
**Upward Lightning Discharges**

Tall objects (higher than 100 m or so) located on flat terrain and objects of moderate height (some tens of meters) located on mountain tops experience primarily upward lightning discharges that are initiated by upward-propagating leaders. Upward (object-initiated) lightning discharges always involve an initial stage that may or may not be followed by downward-leader/upward-return-stroke sequences. The percentage of upward flashes with return strokes varies from 20 to 50%. The initial-stage steady current typically has a magnitude of some hundreds of amperes and typical charge transfers of C, and often exhibits superimposed pulses whose peaks range from tens of amperes to several kiloamperes (occasionally a few tens of kiloamperes).

25
**Schematic current record of upward-initiated flash**

Schematic current record of upward-initiated flash. Labeled are the initial continuous current (ICC) with three superimposed ICC pulses, a period of no current flow, and two return strokes (RS). Adapted from Diendorfer et al. (2009).

26
**Geographical and Seasonal Variations in Lightning Parameters**

At the present time, the available information is not sufficient to confirm or refute a hypothesis on dependence of negative CG lightning parameters on geographical location or season. On the other hand, some local conditions may exist (for example, winter storms in Japan) that give rise to more frequent occurrence of unusual types of lightning, primarily of upward type, whose parameters may differ significantly from those of “ordinary” lightning. Further studies are necessary to clarify those conditions and their possible dependence on geographical location.

27
Percentage of flashes that produce a given number of ground contacts in Arizona, USA, and São Paulo, Brazil. The average number of ground contacts in both locations is 1.7. Adapted from Saraiva et al. (2010).

28
**Lightning Parameters Needed for Different Engineering Applications**

This chapter of the Technical Brochure was envisioned to serve as a "bridge" between the description of lightning parameters found in the preceding chapters and the existing standards and other literature on specific applications of those parameters. No attempt was made to present detailed descriptions of the various procedures in which lightning parameters are used as an input. Instead, references to the pertinent CIGRE documents, standards, and published papers are given.

29
**Negative downward leader Positive upward connecting leader (~400 m)**

A downward negative flash terminating on the 440-m Guangzhou International Finance Center, China. Adapted from Lu et al. (2013).

30
Time variation of the ratio of speeds of downward (negative) and upward connecting (positive) leaders (Vd/Vu) Assumptions on Vd/Vu in leader-progression-type models Reference Vd/Vu Eriksson [1987] 1 Rizk [1990] Dellera and Garbagnati [1990] Decreasing from 4 to 1 Mazur et al. [2000] 2 The length of the upward connecting leader was ~400 m, with the initial ~100 m being too faint for speed measurements. Adapted from Lu et al. (2013).

31
**Thank You Monte San Salvatore Tower (70 m), Lugano, Switzerland**

Courtesy of Prof. R.E. Orville, Texas A&M 31 31 31

33
**Percent Exceeding Tabulated Value**

Lightning Parameters Derived from Direct Current Measurements Parameters Units Sample Size Percent Exceeding Tabulated Value 95% 50% 5% Peak current (minimum 2 kA) First strokes Subsequent strokes kA 101 135 14 4.6 30 12 80 30 Charge (total charge) First strokes Subsequent strokes Complete flash C 93 122 94 1.1 0.2 1.3 5.2 1.4 7.5 24 11 40 Impulse charge (excluding continuing current) First strokes Subsequent strokes C 90 117 1.1 0.22 4.5 0.95 20 4 Front duration (2 kA to peak) First strokes Subsequent strokes μs 89 118 1.8 0.22 5.5 1.1 18 4.5 Maximum dI/dt First strokes Subsequent strokes kA μs-1 92 122 5.5 12 12 40 32 120 Stroke duration (2 kA to half peak value on the tail) First strokes Subsequent strokes μs 90 115 30 6.5 75 32 200 140 Action integral (∫I2dt) First strokes Subsequent strokes A2s 91 88 6.0 x 103 5.5 x 102 5.5 x 104 6.0 x 103 5.5 x 105 5.2 x 104 33

34
**Lightning-induced voltages on overhead power lines**

V = 50 kV I = kA Typical Induced Voltage at a distance of 145 m and Corresponding Stroke Current (93-05) 34

35
**Electrogeometrical Model (EGM)**

rs Capture surfaces Ng=const Illustration of capture surfaces of two towers and earth’s surface in the electrogeometrical model (EGM). rs is the striking distance defined as the distance from the tip of the descending leader to the object to be struck at the instant when an upward connecting leader is initiated from this object. Vertical arrows represent descending leaders, assumed to be uniformly distributed (Ng=const) above the capture surfaces. Adapted from Bazelyan and Raizer (2000). 35 35

36
**{ Electrogeometrical Model (EGM) I, kA rs, m**

4 3 1 2 { rs = 10 I0.65, m where I is in kA I, kA rs, m 10 45 30 91 170 282 Striking distance, rs, versus return-stroke peak current, I [curve 1, Golde (1945); curve 2, Wagner (1963); curve 3, Love (1973); curve 4, Ruhling (1972); x, theory of Davis (1962); , estimates from two-dimensional photographs by Eriksson (1978); , estimates from three-dimensional photography by Eriksson (1978). Adapted from Golde (1977) and Eriksson (1978). 36 36

37
**Electrogeometrical Model (EGM)**

Q 10-1 100 101 102 I I peak/ Q impulse neg. first strokes n=89 I = 10.6 Q0.7 For Q = 5 C I = 33 kA Finding rs = f(I) Assume leader geometry, total leader charge Q, and distribution of this charge along the channel. Assume critical average electric field between the leader tip and the strike object at the time of initiation of upward connecting leader from the object ( kV/m) Find rs = f(Q) Use an empirical relation between Q and I to find rs = f(I) Scatter plot of impulse charge, Q, versus return-stroke peak current, I. Note that both vertical and horizontal scales are logarithmic. The best fit to data, I = 10.6 Q0.7, where Q is in coulombs and I is in kiloamperes, was used in deriving rs = 10 I0.65 Adapted from Berger (1972). 37 37

38
**Lightning Attachment Process**

First optical image of upward connecting leader in rocket-triggered lightning (Wang et al. 1999a) 38

39
Wang et al. (2014) Striking distance (2 times the return-stroke initiation height) vs. return-stroke peak current derived from luminosity for 7 strokes in the anomalous flash (h = 10 m) triggered at Camp Blanding in The red curve is based on data for 14 classical triggered-lightning strokes (with directly measured currents, h = 5 m) from 2011 experiments at Camp Blanding. The blue curve is recommended for first strokes by the IEC standard.

40
**< r = 10 · I0.65 Natural flash first stroke at LOG (h < 25 m)**

Anomalous flash first stroke at CB (h = 10 m) < Subsequent strokes (h = 10 m) Striking distance (2 times the return-stroke initiation height) vs. return-stroke peak current derived from luminosity for 7 strokes in the anomalous flash (h = 10 m) triggered at Camp Blanding in The red curve is based on data for 14 classical triggered-lightning strokes (directly measured currents, h = 5 m) from 2011 experiments at Camp Blanding. The blue curve is recommended for first strokes by the IEC standard.

41
**Optical Images of Leader and Attachment Process – Triggered Lightning**

Dart-stepped leader and attachement process in rocket-triggered lightning (Sept. 17, 2008) at Camp Blanding, Florida; Photron FASTCAM SA1.1, fps (20 µs per frame); h = 17 m 2 frames before return stroke 8 1 frame before return stroke 8 56 m 16 m 25 m Biagi et al. (2009, GRL) 41

42
r = 10 I 0.65 (2009) (2009) Striking distance (2 times the total upward connecting leader length) vs. peak current for 11 classical triggered-lightning strokes from 2008 (h = 17 m) and 2009 (h = 15 m) Camp Blanding experiments (based on work of Biagi (2011)). Also shown is the IEC standard dependence.

43
CIGRE WG C4.407 Scope Evaluation of current measurements on instrumented towers Evaluation of current measurements for rocket-triggered lightning Evaluation of the procedures used to estimate lightning currents from measured fields, with emphasis on those implemented in lightning locating systems Inclusion of additional lightning parameters (e.g., characteristics of continuing currents, return-stroke propagation speed, equivalent lightning channel impedance, etc.) that are presently not on the CIGRE list, but needed in engineering applications Further characterization of positive and bipolar lightning discharges Characterization of upward lightning discharges Search for any geographical, seasonal and other variations in lightning parameters Preparation of a reference document (technical brochure) “Lightning Parameters for Engineering Applications”

45
**Return-Stroke Parameters Derived from Current Measurements**

The “global” distributions of lightning peak currents for negative first strokes currently recommended by CIGRE and IEEE are each based on a mix of direct current measurements and less accurate indirect measurements, some of which are of questionable quality. However, since the “global” distributions have been widely used in lightning protection studies and are not much different from that based on direct measurements only, continued use of these “global” distributions for representing negative first strokes is recommended, along with Berger’s distribution having a median of 30 kA, σlgI = For negative subsequent strokes and for positive lightning strokes, Berger’s peak current distributions are still recommended. For negative subsequent strokes, a log-normal distribution with median = 12 kA and σlgI = should be used. For positive lightning strokes, a log-normal distribution with median = 35 kA and σlgI = is recommended.

46
**10-to-90% and 30-to-90% Average Slopes: Triggered-Lightning Data vs**

10-to-90% and 30-to-90% Average Slopes: Triggered-Lightning Data vs. Berger’s Natural-Lightning Data 30 – 90% Average Slope (S30/90) (a) 10 – 90% Average Slope (S10/90) (b) Trigg. Natur. (a) The 10-90% average (steepness): S-10 = 0.8Ip/T-10. (b) The 30-90% average (steepness): S-30 = 0.6Ip/T-30. GM is the geometric mean and SD is the standard deviation of the logarithm (base 10) of the parameter. Adapted from Fisher et al. (1993). 46

47
**Lightning Return Stroke Propagation Speed**

There exists some experimental evidence that the negative return stroke speed may vary non-monotonically along the lightning channel, initially increasing and then decreasing with increasing height. Return-stroke speeds (×108 m/s) at different heights for five strokes in a triggered lightning flash. Adapted from Olsen et al. (2004). Height range, m Stroke order Estimated error, % 1 2 4 5 6 7 – 63 1.3 1.2 10 63 – 117 1.6 1.8 15 117 – 170 1.7 1.5 21 No data are available for stroke 3.

48
Engineering models of lightning strikes (a) to lumped grounding impedance and (b) to a tall grounded object, in which lightning is represented by the Norton equivalent circuit, labeled ‘‘source’’. Adapted from Baba and Rakov (2005).

49
**Positive and Bipolar Lightning Discharges**

Although positive lightning discharges account for 10% or less of global cloud-to-ground lightning activity, there are several situations, including, for example, winter storms, that appear to be conducive to the more frequent occurrence of positive lightning. The highest directly measured lightning currents (near 300 kA vs. a maximum of about 200 kA or less for negative lightning) and the largest charge transfers (hundreds of coulombs or more) are associated with positive lightning. Positive flashes are usually composed of a single stroke, although up to four strokes per flash have been observed. Subsequent strokes in positive flashes can occur either in a new (a more common situation) or in the previously-formed channel.

50
Examples of two types of positive lightning current waveforms observed by K. Berger: (a) microsecond-scale waveform, similar to those produced by downward negative return strokes, and a sketch illustrating the lightning processes that might have led to the production of this waveform; (b) millisecond-scale waveform and a sketch illustrating the lightning processes that might have led to the production of this current waveform. Adapted from Rakov (2003).

51
**Geographical and Seasonal Variations in Lightning Parameters**

From the information available in the literature at the present time, there is no evidence of a systematic dependence of negative cloud-to-ground lightning parameters on geographical location, except maybe for first and subsequent return-stroke peak currents, for which relatively insignificant (less than 50%), from the engineering point of view, variations may exist. It is important to note, however, that it cannot be ruled out that the observed differences in current measurements are due to reasons other than "geographical location“, with the limited sample size for some observations being of particular concern. Similarly, no reliable information on seasonal dependence is available.

52
**Number of strokes per negative flash and percentage of single-stroke flashes.**

Location (Reference) Average Number of Strokes per Flash Percentage of Single-Stroke Flashes Sample Size New Mexico (Kitagawa et al., 1962) 6.4 13% 83 Florida (Rakov and Uman, 1990) 4.6 17% 76 Sweden (Cooray and Perez, 1994) 3.4 18% 137 Sri Lanka (Cooray and Jayaratne, 1994) 4.5 21% 81 Brazil (Ballarotti et al., 2012) 883 Arizona (Saraiva et al., 2010) 3.9 19% 209 Malaysia (Baharudin et al., 2014) 4.0 16% 100

Similar presentations

OK

Statistical Methods For Engineers ChE 477 (UO Lab) Larry Baxter & Stan Harding Brigham Young University.

Statistical Methods For Engineers ChE 477 (UO Lab) Larry Baxter & Stan Harding Brigham Young University.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on national parks and sanctuaries in india Ppt on earth movements and major landforms in germany Ppt on area related to circle class 10 Ppt on area of parallelogram and triangles worksheet Download ppt on fundamental rights and duties of a citizen Ppt on javascript events onload Ppt on teacher's day messages Ppt on viruses and bacteria Java ppt on inheritance Ppt on water borne diseases in india