Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byAndres Eyre Modified over 2 years ago

1
EAR2 simulation update Collaboration board meeting 06.10.2011 Christina Weiss & Vasilis Vlachoudis

2
Outlook 1.Introduction 2.Results Neutron Fluence Resolution Charged Particle Fluence & γ Background Collimation Implemented Beam Dump Neutron Fluence for Irradiation (@ 1.5 m) 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR22

3
INTRODUCTION 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR23

4
Latest simulations Geometry in the simulations match the design of the CE plans EAR2 @ 18.4 m Implemented Collimator: 1.2m Fe: conical shape 2.1m PE borated: straight with 8 cm diameter Simulations have been performed for a setup: 1.Without additional moderator at the bottom of the neutron tube (97e+6 primaries) 2.With Moderator at the bottom of the tube (52e+6 primaries) : Polyethylene (d min = 1 cm) 6 October 20114FLUKA Simulation for EAR2

5
RESULTS Neutron Fluence 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR25

6
Neutron Fluence 6 October 20116FLUKA Simulation for EAR2 In total the neutron fluence is reduced by about 32 % when using an additional moderator for EAR2

7
Neutron Fluence Comparison to EAR1 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR27 Energy Interval EAR1EAR2 Without Moderator Gain [ n / cm 2 / pulse ] Error [%] [ n / cm 2 / pulse ] Error [%] 0.1 – 10 eV5.11e40.38.01e52.615.7 0.01 – 1 keV4.07e40.31.09e61.826.8 1 – 100 keV5.03e40.21.39e61.727.6 0.1 – 10 MeV1.77e50.12.95e61.116.7 10 – 100 MeV2.64e40.34.03e52.715.2 > 100 MeV4.71e40.38.76e45.9 1.9 Total Energy Range 4.68e50.087.82e60.916.7 Reference for EAR1 : FLUKA Simulations with fission collimator (d = 8 cm)

8
RESULTS Resolution 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR28

9
Time – Energy Relation 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR29

10
Time – Energy Relation 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR210

11
Resolution in comparison with EAR1 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR211 Neutron EnergyEAR1EAR2 No Moderator EAR2 With Moderator FWHM [cm] 1 eV342 1 keV5.187 1 MeV34.13836 Neutron Fluence is reduced by about 32 % if a Moderator in this form is used Neutron EnergyEAR1: 187.5 mEAR2: 18.9 m No Moderator EAR2: 18.9 m With Moderator ΔE / E 1 eV3.0e-44.3e-32.2e-3 1 keV5.4e-48.5e-37.5e-3 1 MeV3.6e-34.1e-23.9e-2

12
RESULTS Charged Particle Fluence 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR212

13
Charged Particle Fluence 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR213

14
Magnet 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR214 p max = 1.205 [GeV/c] protons B = 0.2 [Tm] Collimator h = 4.60 [m] Possible Position for a magnet: Assumed magnet length: l = 1 [m]

15
Photon Fluence EAR2EAR1 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR215

16
Arrival Time EAR2EAR1 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR216

17
RESULTS Collimation 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR217

18
Neutron Beam Profile 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR218 Collimator: 1.2m Fe: conical shape 2.1m PE borated: straight with 8 cm diameter

19
RESULTS Beam Dump – Backscattered Neutrons 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR219

20
Beam Dump Backscattered Neutrons 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR220 1.5 m of Fe surrounded by 40 cm of borated PE 1 mm of Cd at the entrance

21
RESULTS Neutron Fluence at 1.5 m from the target center – Material Irradiation 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR221

22
Neutron Tube has 32 cm diameter at 1.5 m from the target center Neutron Fluence for Irradiation 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR222 Total: 2.5e10 n / cm^2 / 7e12 ppp

23
Thank you for your attention! 6 October 2011FLUKA Simulation for EAR223 Energy IntervalEAR1EAR2 Without Moderator Gain [ n / cm 2 / pulse ] Error [%] [ n / cm 2 / pulse ] Error [%] 0.1 – 10 eV5.11e40.38.01e52.615.7 0.01 – 1 keV4.07e40.31.09e61.826.8 1 – 100 keV5.03e40.21.39e61.727.6 0.1 – 10 MeV1.77e50.12.95e61.116.7 10 – 100 MeV2.64e40.34.03e52.715.2 > 100 MeV4.71e40.38.76e45.9 1.9 Total Energy Range 4.68e50.087.82e60.916.7 Reference for EAR1 : FLUKA Simulations with fission collimator (d = 8 cm) Neutron Fluence Comparison

Similar presentations

OK

Christos Lamboudis HEP 17-20 April. Athens Study of MDT response to neutrons and possible ageing effects Do we really need to worry about neutrons? Do.

Christos Lamboudis HEP 17-20 April. Athens Study of MDT response to neutrons and possible ageing effects Do we really need to worry about neutrons? Do.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on javascript events load Pituitary gland anatomy and physiology ppt on cells Ppt on fire alarm project Ppt on vitamin d deficiency Ppt on cartesian product sql Ppt on dc power supply Ppt on recycling of waste materials Ppt on different types of birds Ppt on indian cricket history Ppt on oxidation and reduction for class 10