Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byAlijah Winch Modified over 3 years ago

1
HYDROGEOLOGIE ECOULEMENT EN MILIEU HETEROGENE J. Erhel – INRIA / RENNES J-R. de Dreuzy – CAREN / RENNES P. Davy – CAREN / RENNES Chaire UNESCO - Calcul numérique intensif TUNIS - Mars 2004

2
Well test interpretation in heterogeneous media J-R De Dreuzy (1), P. Davy (1), J. Erhel (2) (1) UMR 6118 CNRS, Université de Rennes 1, France (2) IRISA/INRIA Rennes How does heterogeneity influence transient flow? Approach - Evaluation of the classical flow equation on a field experiment (Ploemeur). - Which heterogeneous media follow the same flow equation ? - Numerical simulation of transient flow in heterogeneous media What is the relevant diffusion equation (Theis, Barker, …) ?

3
A field example of heterogeneous medium Ploemeur (Brittany): Aquifer in a highly fractured zone on the contact between granite and micaschiste Granite Micaschiste

4
Well tests in Ploemeur Barker Theis

5
Generalized flow models ModelDimension exponent Anomalous diffusion exp Radius of diffusion Drawdown at the well Theis Barker (1988) Acuna and Yortsos (1995) D=2 1

6
Relevant models and exponents at Ploemeur normal fault zone contact zone Anomalous diffusion exponent d w = 2.8 Dimension exponent D=2.2 Dimension exponent D=1.6 It appears possible to define a mean equivalent flow model at least for one of the major fault zone The relevant model implies: - a fractional flow dimension - an anomalous diffusion

7
Influence of the heterogeneity on the flow equation Validity of the generalized flow equation? Sierpinski Gasket D=D 0 =1.58 d w =2.3 D 0 =2 1

8
Fractal correlation pattern : Generation D 2 =1.8D 2 =1.2D 2 =1.5 Dimension D 2 nested generation probability field C(r)~r D2 Correlation function

9
Transient flow model Darcy Law Mass conservation law Porous media h/ t + .u = f u = -k h Boundary conditions

10
Numerical simulation space and time discretisations : stiff system of ODEs scale effects : large grid size stochastic modelling : many simulations Need for high performance schemes and software

11
Finite Volume Method mass is conserved locally it can be simply extended to unstructured 2D and 3D grids the linear system to solve is positive definite the scheme is monotone number of degrees of freedom = number of nodes velocity is not accurate full tensors of permeability are not easily handled large sparse ill-conditioned linear system at each time step the ODE system is stiff BUT

12
Mixed Finite Element Method mass is conserved locally it can be simply extended to unstructured 2D and 3D grids the linear system to solve is positive definite pressure and velocity are approximated simultaneously full tensors of permeability are easily handled the scheme is non monotone number of degrees of freedom = number of faces + number of nodes large sparse ill-conditioned linear system at each time step the system is stiff BUT

13
Mass conservation law : S dP/dt + D P - R T = F Darcy law : - R T P + M T = V M large sparse ill-conditioned matrix R large sparse rectangular matrix S and D diagonal matrices Mixed Hybrid Finite Element Method

14
Simplified scheme using mass lumping Elimination of T : S dP/dt + (D - R M -1 R T ) P = F + R M -1 V Exact solution : P = exp(-t (D - R M -1 R T ) ) P 0 + P 1 Sufficient conditions for positivity : (R M -1 R T) KK ’ 0, M EE ’ 0 and R KE 0 Mass lumping : diagonal elementary matrices the scheme is monotone the matrix M is diagonal, easy to invert the system of ODE is of size N

15
Additive Runge-Kutta scheme S dP/dt + (D - R M -1 R T ) P = F + R M -1 V D 0 and R M -1 R T 0 Stiff part in D : implicit for D and explicit for R M -1 R T No sparse linear system to solve High performance compact scheme Example : ARK of order 1 (Euler) (S + dt D) P n+1 - R M -1 R T P n = dt (F n+1 + R M -1 V n+1 )

16
Numerical experiments Currently, finite volume scheme for transient computations, use of LSODES package BDF scheme and direct sparse linear solver high memory requirements for steady flow computations, use of UMFPACK solver

17
Steady flow in porous media : numerical results Lognormal distribution well test simulation

18
Steady flow in porous media : numerical results Fractal with D = 1.5 well test simulation

19
Equivalent permeability Steady flow in porous media : physical interpretation

20
Validation of the transient flow simulator Percolation network Anomalous medium K(r)~r x

21
Transient flow simulation and determination of the exponents Pattern generation D=1.5 Fit on h 0 (t) Flow simulation Fit on R 2 (t)

22
Distribution of exponents for multifractals D 0 =2 and D 2 =1.5 R 2 (t)~t^(2/d w ) h 0 (t)~t^(-D/d w ) Mean exponents : dw=2, D=D 0 =2

23
Exponent mean and stds for multifractals Conclusions =D 0 (support dimension) =2 (normal transport) Large variability around the mean D=[1.5,2.5] and dw=[1.5,3]

24
Why is the mean transport normal in multi-fractal media? Porous medium Flow =2-D 2 d w = 2-D 2 +D ? d w =2 With D?=D 2 Einstein Relation in 2D : d w =D ? +

25
Comparison between fractal and multi-fractal media MultifractalFractal Support dimensionD 0 =2D 0 =[1,2] Correlation dimensionD 2 =[1,2]D 2 =D 0 Permeability exponent =2-D 2 ? Diffusion exponentd w =2 ([1.5,3]) ? Hydraulic DimensionD=D 0 ([1.5,2.5]) ?

26
Characteristic exponents for fractal media

27
Comparison between fractal and multi-fractal media MultifractalFractal Support dimensionD 0 =2D 0 =[1,2] Correlation dimensionD 2 =[1,2]D 2 =D 0 Permeability exponent =2-D 2 =d w -D 0 Diffusion exponentd w =2 ([1.5,3]) d w =2.3 0.2 Hydraulic DimensionD=D 0 ([1.5,2.5]) D=D 0 0.1

28
Heterogeneous logK fields 1. Large exponent variability 2. d w =2 normal transport 3. =[2,2.3]

29
Conclusions The relation of Einstein is verified The average transport is normal ~2 The average hydraulic dimension is the fractal dimension and more precisely the support dimension D 0. Individual media have a large variability d w =[1.5,3] D=[1.5,2.5] Average anomalous diffusion is to be searched in medium having a highly heterogeneous structure like percolation network at threshold (d w =2.86)

Similar presentations

OK

HDR J.-R. de Dreuzy Géosciences Rennes-CNRS. PhD. Etienne Bresciani (2008-2010) 2 Risk assessment for High Level Radioactive Waste storage.

HDR J.-R. de Dreuzy Géosciences Rennes-CNRS. PhD. Etienne Bresciani (2008-2010) 2 Risk assessment for High Level Radioactive Waste storage.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To ensure the functioning of the site, we use **cookies**. We share information about your activities on the site with our partners and Google partners: social networks and companies engaged in advertising and web analytics. For more information, see the Privacy Policy and Google Privacy & Terms.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.

Ads by Google

Ppt on high voltage engineering Ppt on emotional intelligence download Ppt on intellectual property rights Ppt on disaster management project Ppt on media revolutions Tissue anatomy and physiology ppt on cells Ppt on social contract theory and declaration Ppt online open house Ppt on applied operational research consultants Ppt on vitamin b12 deficiency