Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMariana Glave Modified over 2 years ago

1
Assortative mating (Falconer & Mackay: chapter 10) Sanja Franic VU University Amsterdam 2012

2
- ‘like with like’ - reflected in a phenotypic correlation between mated individuals - mating in human populations is assortative with respect to many characteristics, such as stature and IQ - how does assortative mating affect the estimation of heritability?

3
Plomin, R., DeFries, J.C., Roberts, M.K. (1977). Assortative mating by unwed biological parents of adopted children. Science, 196(4288), 449-450.

4
- degree of assortative mating: correlation r of the phenotypic values of the mated individuals

5
- degree of assortative mating: correlation r of the phenotypic values of the mated individuals - the genetic consequences, however, depend on the correlation m between the breeding values of the mates

6
- degree of assortative mating: correlation r of the phenotypic values of the mated individuals - the genetic consequences, however, depend on the correlation m between the breeding values of the mates - r: observed, m: not

7
- degree of assortative mating: correlation r of the phenotypic values of the mated individuals - the genetic consequences, however, depend on the correlation m between the breeding values of the mates - r: observed, m: not - the relationship between r and m depends on what governs the choice of mates (phenotypic, genetic, or environmental resemblance)

8
- degree of assortative mating: correlation r of the phenotypic values of the mated individuals - the genetic consequences, however, depend on the correlation m between the breeding values of the mates - r: observed, m: not - the relationship between r and m depends on what governs the choice of mates (phenotypic, genetic, or environmental resemblance) - primary phenotypic resemblance: m = rh 2 (h 2 = heritability of the character with respect to which the mates are chosen)

9
- degree of assortative mating: correlation r of the phenotypic values of the mated individuals - the genetic consequences, however, depend on the correlation m between the breeding values of the mates - r: observed, m: not - the relationship between r and m depends on what governs the choice of mates (phenotypic, genetic, or environmental resemblance) - primary phenotypic resemblance: m = rh 2 (h 2 = heritability of the character with respect to which the mates are chosen) - this is how assortative mating is applied in breeding programmes (but NB: in man, assortative mating probably seldomly arises only in this way)

10
- degree of assortative mating: correlation r of the phenotypic values of the mated individuals - the genetic consequences, however, depend on the correlation m between the breeding values of the mates - r: observed, m: not - the relationship between r and m depends on what governs the choice of mates (phenotypic, genetic, or environmental resemblance) - primary phenotypic resemblance: m = rh 2 (h 2 = heritability of the character with respect to which the mates are chosen) - this is how assortative mating is applied in breeding programmes (but NB: in man, assortative mating probably seldomly arises only in this way) - the consequences to be described are restricted to primary phenotypic resemblance as cause of assortative mating

11
Primary genetic or primary environmental resemblance of mates:

12
- occurs e.g. in groups that are genetically or environmentallly differentiated from each other

13
Primary genetic or primary environmental resemblance of mates: - occurs e.g. in groups that are genetically or environmentallly differentiated from each other - this is probably how much of assort. mating in man arises

14
Primary genetic or primary environmental resemblance of mates: - occurs e.g. in groups that are genetically or environmentallly differentiated from each other - this is probably how much of assort. mating in man arises - e.g., SES groups as environmentally differentiated groups: - environment within each group is relatively homogenous with respect to SES → mates within each group are more similar on SES to each other than to rest of the population

15
Primary genetic or primary environmental resemblance of mates: - occurs e.g. in groups that are genetically or environmentallly differentiated from each other - this is probably how much of assort. mating in man arises - e.g., SES groups as environmentally differentiated groups: - environment within each group is relatively homogenous with respect to SES → mates within each group are more similar on SES to each other than to rest of the population - if primary correlation is wholly environmental (m = 0) → no genetic consequences of assortative mating

16
Primary genetic or primary environmental resemblance of mates: - occurs e.g. in groups that are genetically or environmentallly differentiated from each other - this is probably how much of assort. mating in man arises - e.g., SES groups as environmentally differentiated groups: - environment within each group is relatively homogenous with respect to SES → mates within each group are more similar on SES to each other than to rest of the population - if primary correlation is wholly environmental (m = 0) → no genetic consequences of assortative mating - environmental correlation may be the basis of assortative mating on IQ in man - Rao, Morton, & Yee, 1976: r =.5 explained by people choosing a spouse with a similar family background

17
Primary phenotypic resemblance of mates: m = rh 2 cov A1A2 = cov(h 2 P 1, h 2 P 2 ) = h 4 cov(P 1,P 2 ) = h 4 rV P (because r=cov/V → cov=rV) = h 4 rV A /h 2 (because h 2 =V A /V P → V P =V A /h 2 ) = rh 2 V A cov A1A2 = mV A (because m=cov A1A2 /V A ) so that: rh 2 V A = mV A m = rh 2

18
- the correlation m between the breeding values causes an increase of the additive genetic variance, and consequently of the heritability - why?

19
- the correlation m between the breeding values causes an increase of the additive genetic variance, and consequently of the heritability - why? because an increased covariance within groups implies an increased variance between groups (last lecture)

20
- the correlation m between the breeding values causes an increase of the additive genetic variance, and consequently of the heritability - why? because an increased covariance within groups implies an increased variance between groups (last lecture) - the correlations between relatives, however, are increased by more than one would expect from increased heritability alone

21
- the correlation m between the breeding values causes an increase of the additive genetic variance, and consequently of the heritability - why? because an increased covariance within groups implies an increased variance between groups (last lecture) - the correlations between relatives, however, are increased by more than one would expect from increased heritability alone - therefore, 2 meanings of h 2 under assortative mating: - determination of the resemblance betwen relatives (eq. 10.5: h 2 = b/r or t/r) - ratio of variance components (V A /V P )

22
- the correlation m between the breeding values causes an increase of the additive genetic variance, and consequently of the heritability - why? because an increased covariance within groups implies an increased variance between groups (last lecture) - the correlations between relatives, however, are increased by more than one would expect from increased heritability alone - therefore, 2 meanings of h 2 under assortative mating: - determination of the resemblance betwen relatives (eq. 10.5: h 2 = b/r or t/r) - ratio of variance components (V A /V P ) - the two are not the same under assortative mating! - here, we retain the latter definition

23
By how much is h 2 increased? Additive variancePhenotypic varianceHeritability 1 generation V A1 = V A0 + 1/2m V A0 V A1 = V A0 (1 + 1/2m) V P1 = V P0 + 1/2mh 2 V P0 V P1 = V P0 (1 + 1/2mh 2 ) h 1 2 = V A1 /V P1 h 1 2 = V A0 (1+1/2m) / V P0 (1+1/2mh 2 ) h 1 2 = h 0 2 (1 + 1/2m) / (1+ 1/2mh 2 ) EquilibriumV A0 = V A (1 – m) V A = V A0 / (1 - m) V A = (1-m) -1 V A0 V P0 = V P (1 – mh 2 ) V P = V P0 / (1 – mh 2 ) V P = (1 – mh 2 ) -1 V P0 h 2 = h 0 2 (1 - m) / (1 + mh 2 )

24
Change in variance components under assortative mating: V A0 =.5 V P0 = 1 → h 2 0 =.5 m =.4 h 2 n =.67 n

25
Change in variance components under assortative mating: V A0 =.5 V P0 = 1 → h 2 0 =.5 m =.5 h 2 n =.75 n

26
Change in variance components under assortative mating: V A0 =.5 V P0 = 1 → h 2 0 =.5 m =.6 h 2 n =.875 n

27
Change in variance components under assortative mating: V A0 =.5 V P0 = 1 → h 2 0 =.5 m =.6 h 2 n =.875 V A0 =.5 V P0 = 1 → h 2 0 =.5 m =.5 h 2 n =.75 V A0 =.5 V P0 = 1 → h 2 0 =.5 m =.4 h 2 n =.67

28
Change in variance components under assortative mating: V A0 =.5 V P0 = 1 → h 2 0 =.5 m =.4 h 2 =.17 n

29
Change in variance components under assortative mating: V A0 =.6 V P0 = 1 → h 2 0 =.6 m =.4 h 2 =.16 n

30
Change in variance components under assortative mating: V A0 =.7 V P0 = 1 → h 2 0 =.7 m =.4 h 2 =.14 n

31
Change in variance components under assortative mating: V A0 =.7 V P0 = 1 → h 2 0 =.7 m =.4 h 2 =.14 V A0 =.6 V P0 = 1 → h 2 0 =.6 m =.4 h 2 =.16 V A0 =.5 V P0 = 1 → h 2 0 =.5 m =.4 h 2 =.17

32
Questions?

Similar presentations

OK

Family/Kinship Studies Compare individuals with different degrees of genetic relatedness on a specific characteristic or behavior – Exs: adoption studies,

Family/Kinship Studies Compare individuals with different degrees of genetic relatedness on a specific characteristic or behavior – Exs: adoption studies,

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on aditya birla retail Ppt on nokia company profile Ppt on product advertising slogan Ppt on plants and trees Download ppt on oxidation and reduction examples Ppt on chapter 3 atoms and molecules worksheets Ppt on mobile phone based attendance tracking system Ppt on space complexity Ppt on various means of transport and communication and their uses Ppt on company act 1956 provisions