Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Buried cone, buried layer Titan, August 2008 ShotDpthEnrgy HOPG Imager # (um)main (J) pp requested (mJ) Pp measured ASE//Spike (mV) Integra ted MaxBkgnd.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Buried cone, buried layer Titan, August 2008 ShotDpthEnrgy HOPG Imager # (um)main (J) pp requested (mJ) Pp measured ASE//Spike (mV) Integra ted MaxBkgnd."— Presentation transcript:

1 Buried cone, buried layer Titan, August 2008 ShotDpthEnrgy HOPG Imager # (um)main (J) pp requested (mJ) Pp measured ASE//Spike (mV) Integra ted MaxBkgnd - foil Bkgnd - image Radius fwhm Itnegrated over foil 14s // s // e66.8 e28.2 e25.5 e24.8 e13.9 e7 20s // e63.0 e24.6 e22.3 e25.4 e13.3 e7 21s //04.2 e62.8 e24.8 e22.5 e25.4 e13.2 e7 21s N//a6.4 e64.3 e25.1 e22.5 e25.7 e13.8 e7 21s (2ns)// e62.1 e23.2 e21.6 e25.3 e12.1 e7 21s Bad trigger 1.3 e68.6 e12.6 e21.7 e25.6 e11.1 e7 21s //105.8 e67.7 e26.8 e24.3 e23.4 e13.4 e7 21s //08.1 e66.7 e26.4 e22.7 e24.9 e14.8 e7 21s //75.6 e68.8 e17.2 e24.2 e22.8 e13.8 e7

2 Buried cone buried layer comments Is it possible laser didn’t hit bottom every time? –Intrinsic prepulse -- 19s7, 21s5 - the latter has very well defined peak. Former much broader. – 50 mJ prepulse -- 21s3, 21s6, 21s7 have -- peak definition improves with later shots. Some of the well-defined spots weren‘t in the center of the foil. The foils don’t seem to be offset that much - see 21s5,7. Need to work out relationship of x-radiographs to target images to check. Foil is not much larger than peak - but checked measuring routine against lineouts, and find results OK.

3 19s7 Bur 50  m #1 Target #1 Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement. Foil 350  m across => 1 pixel = 3  m Images 460 pixels across Lineout suggests bkgnd 8 e2 5 pixel blur30 pixel blur FWHM Profile X-radiograph

4 20s6 Bur 100  m #1 Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement. Foil 350  m across => 1 pixel = 3  m Images 460 pixels across Edge is noticeably lit up, but doesn’t have a significant number of counts Linout suggests bkgnd 5.5 e2 5 pixel blur30 pixel blur FWHM Profile X-radiograph

5 21s1 Bur 50  m #2 Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement. Foil 350  m across => 1 pixel = 3  m Images 460 pixels across Lineout suggests 5 e2 bkgnd 5 pixel blur30 pixel blur FWHM Profile X-radiograph

6 21s2 Bur 50  m #3 Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement. Foil 350  m across => 1 pixel = 3  m Images 460 pixels across Lineout suggests bkgnd 5 e2 5 pixel blur30 pixel blur FWHM Profile X-radiograph

7 21s3 Bur 50  m #4 Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement. Foil 350  m across => 1 pixel = 3  m Images 460 pixels across Lineout suggests bkgnd 3 e2 5 pixel blur30 pixel blur FWHM Profile X-radiograph

8 21s4 Bur 50  m #5 Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement. Foil 350  m across => 1 pixel = 3  m Images 460 pixels across Lineout shows 3 e2 foil intensity 5 pixel blur30 pixel blur FWHM Profile X-radiograph

9 21s5 Bur 50  m #6 Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement. Foil 350  m across => 1 pixel = 3  m Images 460 pixels across Lineout suggets bkgnd 7 e2 5 pixel blur30 pixel blur FWHM Profile X-radiograph

10 21s6 Bur 50  m #7 Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement. Foil 350  m across => 1 pixel = 3  m Images 460 pixels across Lineout suggests bkgnd 6.5 e2 5 pixel blur30 pixel blur FWHM Profile X-radiograph

11 21s7 Bur 50  m #8 Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement. Foil 350  m across => 1 pixel = 3  m Images 460 pixels across Lineout suggests bkgnd 7 e2 5 pixel blur30 pixel blur FWHM Profile X-radiograph


Download ppt "Buried cone, buried layer Titan, August 2008 ShotDpthEnrgy HOPG Imager # (um)main (J) pp requested (mJ) Pp measured ASE//Spike (mV) Integra ted MaxBkgnd."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google