Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byChance Skeens Modified over 2 years ago

1
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 K charged status report DE/Dx development vs PiD (next talk by E.De Lucia) →K e3 studies: initial design of efficiency measurement from data →K l4 analysis skeleton →K ± ± analysis refinement Improvement of kk by means of K ± ± (already presented by M.Dreucci on Friday) K studies: kk by means of K ± and Br(K )/Br(K ) (very early stage yet) P.Branchini, E.De Lucia, P.De Simone, E.Gorini, A.Ferrari M.Martemianov, L.Passalacqua, M.Primavera, B.Sciascia, A.Ventura, R.Versaci, V.Patera

2
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 K e3 analysis steps : K decay vertex 0 in EMC Triggering tag on one side e ± id : ToF,Kin,De/Dx The first and the third steps have been studied in the context of the KK and K ± ± 0 0 analysis. We started to develop methods to extract efficiency and systematics for the other steps (possibly from the data)

3
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 K e3 :tracking & vertex efficiency We study a method to measure on data the efficiency to identify a K charged decay in the DC: decay = track K x track daughte r x vert in different kinematical region of the Ke3 spectrum using other K ± decay with overlapping spectrum p(MeV/c) K l3 ( segnale ) K + K + 0 0 K + 0 fit tracce + vertice The aim is to select a sample of events where the vertex in the DC can be detected by means of ECAL quantities. We select a sample of tagged events and look at the other side

4
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 K e3 : decay @ low charged momentum by meand of ’s Tof (K ± 00 00 K tag tt tt tt 00 00 tt tt tt tt ±± In the K ± 0 0 decay, the times of the 4 clusters from 2 0 give the decay vertex position with fair accuracy The method has been successfully used in K analysis but has low efficiency and gives only the integrated decay on the low end of k e3 spectrum few pb r vertex (cm) Dx vertex (cm)

5
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 00 tt tt ±± tt K tag tt pKpK pKpK K e3 : decay @ high momentum with K momentum extrapolation (K ± From the tag side by means of extrapolation of the Kaons momentum with we obtain: Timing of the signal K in the DC Position of the signal K in DC Momentum of the signal K in the DC Only events with 4 clusters and E cl > 50 MeV The 4 ’s Tof method cannot be applied to the high end of the K e3 → only one 0 ! We are exploring the possibility to use the info from the tag side. A REFINED DE/DX (!!) is required by K crossing the DC wall and BP. t0t0

6
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 K e3 : decay & K momentum extrapolation position resolution ~ 4 pb -1 ; 2002 data < 1 cm Dx at first hit (cm) Dr at first hit (cm) The check on the resolution achieved on the extrapolated position of the signal K has been made on double tag event (K → -K → 0 ). The extrapolation from the tag side is compared with the fitted position and momentum of the signal ( 0 ) kaon at first hit in DC. Tails are expected mainly due to Landau fluctuations in dc wall energy loss K e3 : decay & K momentum extrapolation position resolution

7
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 K e3 : decay & K momentum extrapolation momentum resolution The extrapolation can be further optimized. Up to now it has been made using solenoidal constant B field… Must be taken into account that errors on signal K momentum and position are correlated. Dp at first hit (MeV/c) Dpx at first hit (MeV/c) D at first hit (deg) = 6 Mev/c = 4 Mev/c tt Ehm.. failed fit with 2 gaussian !!

8
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 K e3 : decay & K momentum extrapolation: vertex resolution The unknown decay path of the signal K along the extrapolated helix can be found imposing the consistency on the 0 invariant mass, on the K and s tof. Found the vertex, the cluster energy and position gives the 0 momentum. Then, with the K momentum at the vertex we obtain the ± momentum. Dr vertex (cm) Dx vertex (cm) Z (cm) R (cm) Vertex position

9
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 K e3 : decay & K momentum extrapolation: ± momentum resolution The results obtained are based on a toy 2 evaluation without using the info from the charged cluster: Starting point for a fit constrained. good resolution on p ± is needed to: Correctly evaluate the decay with respect of charged pion momentum Reject the k l3 decay using the position and the time of the 4th cluster ( should be the charged one…) Dpx ± (Mev/c) 00 tt tt ±± tt K tag tt pKpK pKpK p0p0 p ± = p K - p 0 To be continued…..

10
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 K e3 : possible Pid for e ± P* (MeV/c) Mass from ToF (Mev**2) Possible strategies for electron ID relies on kinematic cuts, Tof, De/dx, different behaviour in ECAL ( see M.Testa talk) or a mixture of some of them. The approach is to use an ECAL based separation method to extract the signal and a DC driven separation method to check systematics, or vice versa with no use of MC. For more details on possible use of DE/Dx I refer to Erika presentation.

11
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 BR(K 0 0 ) Update of BR(K 0 0 ) analysis The work done until December 2002 (112 pb –1 ) was reported in full detail in KLOE Memo # 279 Referee’s comments have brought to revise some of the requirements/techniques used in the analysis. A larger data sample (all 2001-02 statistics) has been used 1) to improve final uncertainty ; 2) to avoid statistical correlations between control samples. Now 240 out of 411 pb-1 are now used for the control samples and the rest for the signal measurement. The control sample for estimating K has been redefined to better take into account the effect of nuclear interactions.

12
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 Results and conclusions BR(K 0 0 ) = ( 1.781 0.013 stat 0.016 syst )% KLOE Memo # 279 KLOE Note # 187 A preliminary version of the draft is ready PDG fit 2002: (1.73 0.04)% Event yield N ’ ( 0 tag ) =30798±100, N °tag =(1275±4) 10 3 N ’ ( tag ) =52253±230, N tag =(1992±4) 10 3 L int = 441 pb –1

13
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 The K e4 ’ decay analysis PDG PDG: BR = (2.1 0.4) 10 –5 Ljung 73 2 evts /K e3 + Bolotov 8625 evts /K e3 – Barmin 8810 evts /K + all Very preliminary The Ke4’ BR can be measured using the absolute t’ BR obtained at KLOE and measuring the Ratio: (K e4 ’) / ( ’) K e4 ’ K e 0 0 e ’ K 0 0

14
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 Trigger: EMC + Cosmic Veto Event Classification: kpmstream (all the 5 algo’s) A 2-track vertex V in DC volume with a K track t2v<50 cm Helix distance between the two tracks’ first/last hit and V: t2v<50 cm 4 “ontime” neutral clusters with E i >15 MeV, such that: t ij | t i –t j –(r Vi –r Vj )/c |<4 t (E i,E j ) t ij <10 ns t ij | t i –t j –(r Vi –r Vj )/c |<4 t (E i,E j ) i,j=1,..,4 and t ij <10 ns Pairing of the two 0 ’s by minimizing ij [ (m ij – m ° )/ m ° ] 2 80 MeV < m 12, m 34 < 190 MeV 4 LEVEL Preselection : 4 LEVEL 0000 Ch track

15
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 ’ ’ selection |p dau | < 135 MeV |p dau | < 135 MeV in K ± frame 450 MeV < m 3 < 540 MeV KPP0P0FIT based on 6 contributions: E, p, s 0. 2 ’ /6 < 5 2 ’ /6 < 5 s 0 (s 1 +s 2 +s 3 )/3, s i (p K – p i ) 2 K e4 ’ K e4 ’ selection A cluster associated to the daughter track |s 0 ( ’ hyp.) – 10 5 MeV 2 | < 8 10 3 MeV 2 KEP0P0NUFIT based on: E conservation in mass hypothesis, missing mass 0, daughter: p/E 1, daughter: t.o.f. compatible 2 e4’ /4 1

16
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 Measuring BR(K e4 ’) N obs = selected events in the final K e4 ’ sample N bckg = background events expected in the final data sample N ’ = finally selected ’ events ’ = background contamination in ’ events 4 LEVEL trig, filt, K, vtx, clu = “ 4 LEVEL ” efficiencies for K e4 ’ and ’ events ’ 135 = cut |p dau |<135 MeV in K frame, m hyp. ’ K e4 ’ ac = e ± track-to-cluster efficiency K e4 ’ fit x = kinematic fit efficiency x = ’, K e4 ’ BR( ’) = ( 1.781 0.013 stat 0.016 syst )% KLOE note # 187 From ’ ~ 1 at %1 (MC check) new

17
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 Data : 441 pb –1 (June 2001 – September 2002) Data and Monte Carlo samples MC : 2.6 10 7 all (~9 pb –1 ) 2.0 10 5 K + K –, K ± e ± 0 0 e,K Ŧ all (~3.2 fb –1 ) 2.0 10 7 K + K –, K ± ± 0 0,K Ŧ all (~380 pb –1 ) 1.2 10 7 K + K –, K ± e ± 0 e,K Ŧ all (~82 pb –1 ) 1.2 10 7 K + K –, K ± 0, e 0 e, 0 (~100 pb –1 )

18
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 K e4 ’ K e4 ’ efficiencies Kinematic fit (MC) e track to cluster association = 0.359 0.011 = 0.359 0.011 ac (p e ) obtained from K e3 and integrated over p e distribution in K e4 ’’ fit e4’ = 0.237 0.006 Systematics include the choices of the 2 e4’ cut and definitions. The efficiency includes the effect of the s 0 cut (in ’ hyp.) : (98 1)%

19
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 Background evaluation In 441 pb –1 the following contaminations from K + K – are expected (MC) : Additional bckg from K 2 K l3 5 K 2 and K l3 : 5 evts ’ = 0.6 0.1 % ’ = 0.6 0.1 % K2K2 – K2K2 – 10 7 ––– K e3 – 3333 – 6464 K3K3 –<3– 9595 <4 ’’ 43 1019 6424216 511 5 2.2 1.5 K2K2 K2K2 K e3 K3K3 ’’ N bckg = 120 17 N bckg = 152 18 N bckg ( ’) = 117 15 (MC and Data) N bckg (non- ’) = 35 9 (MC and Data)

20
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 Preliminary results tot ’ / tot e4’ = 4.80 0.03 BR(K e4 ’) = (2.43 0.20 stat 0.22 syst ) 10 –5 PDG fit PDG fit: (2.1 0.4) 10 –5 Barmin 88 Barmin 88: (2.54 0.89) 10 –5 N obs = 407 20 N bckg = 152 18 N ’ = 899020 950 6300 N sig = 255 27 VERY PRELIMINARY NO DE/Dx applied !!!

21
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 Summary and ’ analysis finalized K e3 analysis started K l4 analysis on the way Help from DC ADC’s can be there The K → sector must still be exploited K = 12.8 ns PDG = 12.4ns Tof K (ns) K ± → ± 0 vertex 3 pb -1 sample Capri analysis

22
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 Perspectives Increase Monte Carlo generation to improve the knowledge of background Perform data-extracted efficiencies to correct the MC predictions A KLOE memo will be ready by summer 2003 PhD thesis Analysis status will be reported (July) in PhD thesis Studies on the charged kaon decays K 0 0 and K e 0 0 e ( e ) with the KLOE experiment –

23
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 4 LEVEL 4 LEVEL efficiencies (I) Trigger (Data) Event Classification (MC) filt ’ / filt e4’ = 1.006 0.011 trig ’ / t rig e4’ = 1.02 0.02 0.01 MC Kaon identification (MC) K ’ / K e4’ = 0.992 0.013 trig ’ / trig e4’ |1 – trig ’ / trig e4’ | < selftrig ’ / selftrig e4’ |1 – selftrig ’ / selftrig e4’ |

24
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 4 LEVEL 4 LEVEL efficiencies (II) Vertexing (MC) Clustering (MC) vtx ’ / vtx e4’ = 1.016 0.005 clu ’ / clu e4’ = 1.007 0.007 Small dependence of vtx on the angle between K and daughter’s directions The efficiencies of “ontime” and m cuts have been checked to coincide at % level for ’ and Ke4’’

25
KLOE GM Capri 23-25 May 2003 ’ ’ efficiencies 135 = 0.972 0.002 |p dau |<135 MeV requirement Kinematic fit (Data and MC) fit ’ = 0.403 0.002 Computed on data at 4 LEVEL ( 99.3% ’ ) Includes the cut on m 3 Already studied for ’ in KLOE Note # 187

Similar presentations

OK

Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005 the 2002 data sample and available MC sets trigger efficiency.

Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005 the 2002 data sample and available MC sets trigger efficiency.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on electricity from waste Ppt on operations with complex numbers Ppt on carbon and its compounds for class Ppt on bluetooth with slides Ppt on rational numbers for class 8th Ppt on paintings and photographs related to colonial period in america Ppt on inhabiting other planets similar Ppt on computer malwarebytes anti-malware Ppt on data handling for class 7th math Ppt on interchange of sentences