Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byNyah Camel Modified over 2 years ago

1
Dr. Ron Lembke

2
All-Time Average To forecast next period, take the average of all previous periods Advantages: Simple to use Disadvantages: Ends up with a lot of data Gives equal importance to very old data

3
4/7/2009 Opening day 2010 Farm Angels: Ty 1.000 (first 6 at-bats)

4
MLB-Long-Run More Representative Best season-ending (or to date) averages, active MLB players MLB nothing changes over time. We want increasing sales 2010 Farm Angels: Noah 0.823, Ty 0.767, Aidan 0.531

5
Moving Average Compute forecast using n most recent periods Jan Feb MarAprMayJunJul 3 month Moving Avg: June forecast: F Jun = (A Mar + A Apr + A May )/3 If no seasonality, freedom to choose n If seasonality is N periods, must use N, 2N, 3N etc. number of periods

6
Moving Average Advantages: ▫ Ignores data that is “too” old ▫ Requires less data than simple average ▫ More responsive than simple average Disadvantages: ▫ Still lacks behind trend like simple average, (though not as badly) ▫ The larger n is, more smoothing, but the more it will lag ▫ The smaller n is, the more over-reaction

7
Simple and Moving Averages

8
Centered MA CMA smoothes out variability Plot the average of 5 periods: 2 previous, the current, and the next two Obviously, this is only in hindsight FRB Dalls graphs

9
Centered Moving Average Take average of n periods, Plot the average in the middle period Not useful for forecasting More stable than actuals If seasonality, n = season length (4wks, 12 mo, etc.)

10
CMA - # Periods to Average What if data has 12-month cycle? Ja F M Ap My Jn Jl Au S O N D Ja F M Avg of Jan-Dec gives average of month 6.5: (1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12)/12=6.5 Avg of Feb-Jan gives average of month 6.5: (2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13)/12=7.5 How get a July average? Average of other two averages

11
Stability vs. Responsiveness Responsive ▫Real-time accuracy ▫Market conditions Stable ▫Forecasts being used throughout the company ▫Long-term decisions based on forecasts ▫Don’t whipsaw those folks

12
Old Data Comparison of simple, moving averages clearly shows that getting rid of old data makes forecast respond to trends faster Moving average still lags the trend, but it suggests to us we give newer data more weight, older data less weight.

13
Weighted Moving Average F Jun = (A Mar + A Apr + A May )/3 = (3A Mar + 3A Apr + 3A May )/9 Why not consider: F Jun = (2A Mar + 3A Apr + 4A May )/9 F Jun = 2/9 A Mar + 3/9 A Apr + 4/9 A May F t = w 1 A t-3 + w 2 A t-2 + w 3 A t-1 Complicated: Have to decide number of periods, and weights for each Weights have to add up to 1.0 Most recent probably most relevant, gets most weight Carry around n periods of data to make new forecast

14
Weighted Moving Average Wts = 0.5, 0.3, 0.2 F 4 = 0.5*14+ 0.3*12+ 0.2*10 = 12.6

15
Setting Parameters Weighted Moving Average ▫Number of Periods ▫Individual weights Trial and Error ▫Evaluate performance of forecast based on some metric

16
Exponential Smoothing A t-1 Actual demand in period t-1 F t-1 Forecast for period t-1 Smoothing constant >0, <1 Forecast is old forecast plus a portion of the error of the last forecast. Formulas are equivalent, give same answer F 10 = F 9 + 0.2 (A 9 - F 9 ) F 10 = 0.8 F 9 + 0.2 (A 9 - F 9 )

17
Exponential Smoothing Smoothing Constant between 0.1-0.3 Easier to compute than moving average Most widely used forecasting method, because of its easy use F 1 = 1,050, = 0.05, A 1 = 1,000 F 2 = F1 + (A 1 - F 1 ) = 1,050 + 0.05(1,000 – 1,050) = 1,050 + 0.05(-50) = 1,047.5 units BTW, we have to make a starting forecast to get started. Often, use actual A1

18
Exponential Smoothing Alpha = 0.3

19
Exponential Smoothing Alpha = 0.5

20
Exponential Smoothing We substitute the formula for F11 into F12, etc. Older demands get exponentially less weight

21
Choosing Low : if demand is stable, we don’t want to get thrown into a wild-goose chase, over-reacting to “trends” that are really just short-term variation ▫ = 0 F 10 = F 9 = F 8 – F never changes High : If demand really is changing rapidly, we want to react as quickly as possible = 1 F 10 = A 9 – F is just the naïve – very responsive

22
Summary All-Time average – too stable Moving average – more responsive, still lags the trend ▫Centered Moving average – just FYI Weighted Moving average ▫How many periods to use? Weights to be set Exponential Smoothing – most popular ▫Easy to implement, one parameter to set

Similar presentations

OK

Part II – TIME SERIES ANALYSIS C3 Exponential Smoothing Methods © Angel A. Juan & Carles Serrat - UPC 2007/2008.

Part II – TIME SERIES ANALYSIS C3 Exponential Smoothing Methods © Angel A. Juan & Carles Serrat - UPC 2007/2008.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on yoga and aerobics Ppt on pricing policy example Difference between lcd and led display ppt online Ppt on bank management system in c++ Book review ppt on wings of fire Properties of matter for kids ppt on batteries Ppt on schottky diode operation Ppt on business planning process Funny ppt on human resource management Ppt on companies act 2013 vs companies act 1956