Presentation on theme: "Central California Center for Health and Human Services California State University, Fresno Donna DeRoo, MPA, ABD, Fresno State Allison Hensleit, MBA,"— Presentation transcript:
Central California Center for Health and Human Services California State University, Fresno Donna DeRoo, MPA, ABD, Fresno State Allison Hensleit, MBA, Fresno State Sara Bosse, Fresno County Department of Public Health Ashley Hart, Fresno State
San Joaquin Valley Public Health Consortium San Joaquin Valley Public Health Departments Participating Counties: ◦ Fresno, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, Tulare California Department of Public Health Center for Disease Control and Prevention National Network of Public Health Institutes (NNPHI) Open Forum December 2012 2
Participants will increase their understanding and knowledge of the process and lessons learned in implementing a performance management system. Participants will increase their understanding and knowledge of a performance management system’s utilization as it relates to: ◦ Departments Strategic Plan ◦ Community Health Improvement Plan ◦ Quality Improvement Plan ◦ Public Health Accreditation 3
4 2012 2013 2014 PMPM PMPM QI Attended First Open Forum Charlotte, NC Fresno County [2 Divisions] & Madera County Merced County [Training] Fresno County Madera County Merced County [All Divisions] & Tulare County San Joaquin County [2 Divisions] Fresno County San Joaquin County [2 Divisions] San Joaquin County Tulare County [All Division]
We chose this one … 1-on-1 Training Webinars Conference Calls 7 Robust discussion Team building Highly collaborative Pulse read of activities Accommodates flexible schedules Easily accessible Accommodates flexible schedules Remote accessibility
Met with Senior Leadership Met with ALL managers & supervisors Met with Divisions/Sectors/ Programs Performance Management System Tool Delivered! 8 Background & general PMQI overview M1: Brainstorm Aims, & Goals M2: Prioritize Aims, Brainstorm Goals & Performance Measures M3: Prioritize Goals & Performance Measures, Draft Targets, Timing, Responsibility, Data sources M4: Presentation of Performance Management System Tool Draft User Guide M1: 1 st Meeting M2: 2 nd Meeting M3: 3 rd Meeting M4: 4 th Meeting
Review overall department aims and how they relate to the division or unit. Articulate how the division or unit contributes to accomplishing department aims. Develop specific aims for the division. Review and adjust aims to reflect accurate assessment of division resources and scope of authority. 10 Dept. Mission, Vision, Values Dept. Strategic Aims Division Strategic Aims Division Standards/Goals Division Performance Measures
S.M.A.R.T Specific ◦ Action oriented; providing clear direction; easily understood Measureable ◦ Quantifiable and/or verifiable Aggressive, but Attainable ◦ Challenging and realistic Results-Oriented ◦ Focused on outcomes; not methods Time Bound ◦ Having a reasonable, yet aggressive, time frame 11
Performance measures are the quantitative data elements that let us know: How well we are doing If our processes are functioning efficiently If we are meeting our goals If and where improvements are necessary If our customers are satisfied 12 Capacity Measure Process Measure Outcome Measure
A target is the desired end of the year performance outcome which is typically determined by past performance. What needs to be in place before setting targets? ◦ Aim Statements ◦ Goal statements ◦ Performance Measures/Indicators 13
How do I determine what should be the target? 14 Performance Indicator Funding Source Sets Target Is this doable? Yes Apply target or set one higher No Set interim targets that bridge the gap Organization Sets Target Do we have the data? Yes Evaluate your history and set benchmark year No Extrapolate to build initial target Leverage other program targets as starting point Leverage expert input
In addition to annual targets, Red Line targets are just as important because they help determine the minimum level of acceptability. Red line targets are unacceptable outcomes at any point and time that require immediate program or organizational attention and intervention. Setting redline targets is essential, and often left out, to help your organization gauge and prioritize your program improvement efforts. 15 Achieved or Exceeded Target Fell on or Short of Red Line Target Performed Above Red Line & Short of Annual Target Red Line TargetAnnual Target
“Kick the tires and light the fires” Implement it – IMMEDIATELY. Allow your teams to become comfortable navigating through the system. Embed the process such that it involves all employees within an organization. Set a date from which all designated performance measure data will be inserted into the performance management system. 16
Performance Management System Implementation 19
Cohesive system Increased communication Increased cross-division projects Integration aims, goals, and measures into Department strategic planning Increased accountability More information available for reports and presentations to the Board of Supervisors 20
Complex scheduling coordination Requires more time than LDHs anticipated Right leaders in the room Fear of change Fear of accountability given reduced resources Marathon not a sprint Don’t bite off more than you can chew Strategic plans may need to be refreshed Not for the faint of heart – requires commitment 22
Built community of practice New collaborations Improved internal awareness Potential for maximization of resources Asking the right questions to propel their community impact forward Ownership in the performance management system 23
We would have expanded the implementation timeline to allow the LHDs a month of piloting the performance management tool Basic level of Microsoft Excel experience was much lower than anticipated Underestimated the amount of time required to facilitate the journey from strategic Aims to Performance Measures and Targets Essential to have the groups working together in a room to discuss and collaborate with one another Requires a cultural change from the top down 24
29 TermDefinitionExample AIM Statement A clearly articulated aim statement provides both the foundation and the focus of the problem-solving effort. AIM statements answer the question: “What are we trying to achieve?” Increase the means of communication between management and staff Increase opportunities for staff to work cohesively together as a team. Performance Standard/Goal Objective standards or guidelines that are used to assess an organization’s performance. “What approaches will we utilize to achieve our Aim?” One epidemiologist on staff per 100,000 population served. 80 percent of all clients who rate health department services as “good” or “excellent.” Performance Measure Quantitative measures of capacities, processes, or outcomes relevant to the assessment of a performance standard/goal. “What quantitative data do we have available to measure our progress against our goals?” Number of trained epidemiologists available to investigate Percentage of clients who rate health department services as “good” or “excellent.” Performance Targets Specific and measureable goals related to agency or system performance. “What is he end of year performance we are trying to achieve? Targets may be the same as, exceed, or be an intermediate step toward the measure.
It’s the New Year and for 2014 you want to live a healthier lifestyle. During your annual physical, your doctor recommends that you lose weight. To determine a reliable indicator of healthy weight, you look at Body Mass Index (BMI) tables and identify the normal weight range for your height. With that standard in mind, you decide to measure weekly weight loss, with a target of losing 2 pounds per week. You also decide to measure caloric intake and physical activity, with a daily target of limiting your calories to 1800 and walking a mile. You monitor your weight weekly using your bathroom scale and report (to yourself!) your weight on a spreadsheet. After tracking weight loss for four weeks, you find that you have only lost an average of one pound per week, so you decide to test an improvement, which involves adding an additional mile of walking per day. Four weeks later, you find that you are meeting your goal of losing an average of two pounds per week. 31 Source: MPHI Office of Accreditation and Quality Improvement
Performance Standard/Goal Reduce BMI to 27 Performance Measure WeightCaloric Intake Physical Activity Performance Target Two lbs per week <1800 calories per day 1 mile walk Reporting Recording weight Recording calories Recording Physical Activity Quality Improvement Test add’l physical activity 32 When target weight loss was not being met AIM: Live a more healthy lifestyle in 2014.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.