Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® SOC 2 Reports – A Third Party Risk Management Tool for Cloud Providers August 2014.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® SOC 2 Reports – A Third Party Risk Management Tool for Cloud Providers August 2014."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® SOC 2 Reports – A Third Party Risk Management Tool for Cloud Providers August 2014

2 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 2 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Agenda  Overview of Cloud Computing  Importance of Third Party Risk Management  SOC Reports – A Method of Third Party Risk Management  Alignment of Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) Cloud Control Matrix (CCM) and SOC 2 Trust Services Principles (TSP)  Summary and Conclusion  Q&A

3 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 3 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance What is Cloud Computing  Cloud computing is a model for enabling convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources.  Networks, servers, storage, applications, and services that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction.  This cloud model promotes availability and is composed of five essential characteristics, three service models, and four deployment models.

4 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 4 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance What is Cloud Computing

5 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 5 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Opportunities  Cost savings – Customers pay for only the computing resources used. There are no physical space requirements or utility costs. All dollars are expensed (that is, receive a U.S. tax benefit).  Speed of deployment – The time to fulfill requests for computing power and applications can change from months to weeks, weeks to days, and days to hours.  Scalability and better alignment of technology resources – Companies can scale up or down their capacity without capital expenditures.  Decreased effort in managing technology – Cloud computing provides the organization more time to focus on core purpose and goals; more consistent technology upgrades; and expedited fulfillment of IT resource requests.  Environmental benefits – Significant adoption of cloud computing should yield less overall power consumption, carbon emissions, and physical land use.

6 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 6 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Risks  Some of the typical risks associated with cloud computing are:  Disruptive force  Residing in the same risk ecosystem as the cloud service provider (CSP) and other tenants of the cloud  Lack of transparency  Reliability and performance issues  Vendor lock-in and lack of application portability and interoperability  Security and compliance concerns  Creation of high-value cyber-attack targets  Risk of data leakage  IT organizational changes  Viability of the CSP

7 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 7 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Changes in the Operating Environment With Cloud Computing  Risks and other cloud computing effects should be incorporated in ERM programs.  Organizations can engage cloud computing solutions while bypassing normal management oversight controls.  Cloud computing solutions are: a) easily adopted within a short period of time, b) require a small monetary investment, and c) involve very few personnel.

8 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 8 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Shared Control Environment

9 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 9 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Risk Levels – Shared Control Environment

10 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 10 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Shared Control Environment  Risk Profile Impact of CSPs and fellow cloud tenants  Using cloud computing converts an organization’s internal environment into a combination of its own internal environment and the internal environment of the contracted CSP.  Why Both?  Data and processes are hosted in a shared environment with other cloud tenants.  Behavior and events of the CSP and fellow tenants could have a direct impact on the organization.

11 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 11 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Cloud Governance  Cloud governance” refers to the controls and processes in place for cloud planning and strategy, vendor selection, contract negotiation, implementation, operation, monitoring and possible termination and transition of cloud services.

12 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 12 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Investing in Third Party Risk Management – Disruption of Service

13 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 13 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Investing in Third Party Risk Management – Data Breach “On average, third party errors increased the cost of data breach by as much as $43 per record in the US” Source: “2013 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis”, Sponsored by Symantec, May 2013, Ponemon Institute

14 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 14 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Third-Party Risk Management Concerns Source: "Closing the Gaps in Third-Party Risk Management, Defining a Larger Role for Internal Audit,” December 2013, Sponsored by Crowe Horwath LLP

15 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 15 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Third Party Risk Management Activities  Vendor management activities performed should be based on risk associated with the vendor  In order to ensure the risks with outsourcing cloud services are properly addressed organizations should consider performing the following activities:  Review cloud provider’s policies and procedures  Request cloud provider respond to internal control questionnaires  Perform an onsite review of cloud provider operations  Review a Service Organization Control (SOC) Report  Organizations can use SOC reports to obtain a level of comfort over a cloud provider’s controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy controls.

16 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 16 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Service Organization Controls (SOC) Reports – Overview  AICPA created separate reports on internal controls over financial reporting and reports on other types of controls.  The AICPA has added additional reporting options. The three reporting options now are:  SOC 1  SOC 2  SOC 3

17 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 17 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Types of SOC Reports SOC 1 Internal controls related to financial reporting SOC 2 Trust Services Principles Restricted Use Report SOC 3 Trust Services Principles General use report SSAE 16/ AT 801 AT 101

18 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 18 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Who May Need to Issue a SOC 2 Report?  Organizations that need to demonstrate how they process transactions and/or data on behalf of their customers  Organizations that need to demonstrate how their security controls operate  Organizations that need to demonstrate how their controls related to system availability function  Organizations that need to demonstrate how their controls related to data privacy or confidentiality operate  A Cloud Service Provider Fits These Characteristics!

19 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 19 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Trust Services Principles Security – The system is protected against unauthorized access (both physical and logical). Availability – The system is available for operation and use as committed or agreed to. Processing Integrity – System processing is complete, accurate, timely, and authorized. Confidentiality – Information designated as confidential is protected as committed or agreed to. Privacy – Personal information is collected, used, retained, disclosed, and destroyed in conformity with the commitments in the entity’s privacy notice and with criteria set forth in generally accepted privacy principles (GAPP) issued by the AICPA and the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA).

20 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 20 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Relationship Between Principles, Criteria and Controls PrincipleCriteriaControls

21 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 21 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Example Criteria and Illustrative Controls Security Principle - Criteria 3.3  Procedures exist to restrict physical access to the defined system including, but not limited to, facilities, backup media, and other system components such as firewalls, routers, and servers. Illustrative Controls:  Physical access to the computer rooms, which house the entity's IT resources, servers, and related hardware such as firewalls and routers, is restricted to authorized individuals by card key systems and monitored by video surveillance.  Physical access cards are managed by building security staff. Access card usage is logged. Logs are maintained and reviewed by building security staff.  Requests for physical access privileges to the entity's computer facilities require the approval of the manager of computer operations.  Documented procedures exist for the identification and escalation of potential physical security breaches.  Offsite media are stored in locked containers in secured facilities. Physical access to these containers is restricted to facilities personnel and employees authorized by the manager of computer operations.

22 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 22 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Example Criteria and Illustrative Controls Security Principle - Criteria 3.4  Procedures exist to protect against unauthorized access to system resources. Illustrative Controls:  Login sessions are terminated after three unsuccessful login attempts. Virtual private networking (VPN) software is used to permit remote access by authorized users. Users are authenticated by the VPN server through specific "client" software and user ID and passwords.  Firewalls are used and configured to prevent unauthorized access. Firewall events are logged and reviewed daily by the security administrator.  Unneeded network services (for example, telnet, ftp, and http) are deactivated on the entity's servers. A listing of the required and authorized services is maintained by the IT department. This list is reviewed by entity management on a routine basis for its appropriateness for the current operating conditions.  Intrusion detection systems are used to provide continuous monitoring of the entity's network and early identification of potential security breaches.  The entity contracts with third parties to conduct periodic security reviews and vulnerability assessments. Results and recommendations for improvement are reported to management.

23 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 23 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance SOC Report Sections SOC 2 Report Sections Service Auditor’s Opinion Management’s Assertion Description of Systems Test Results Complementary Controls Other Information

24 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 24 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Cloud Control Matrix (CCM)  Developed by the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA)  Establishes a controls framework for cloud providers to follow  Based on industry accepted control frameworks such as ISO 27001/27002, ISACA COBIT and NIST  Provides guidance in the following domains: 1.Application and Interface Security 2.Audit Assurance and Compliance 3.Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience 4.Change Control & Configuration Management 5.Data Security & Information Lifecycle Management 6.Datacenter Security 7.Encryption and Key Management 8.Governance and Risk Management 9.Human Resources 10.Identify and Access Management 11.Infrastructure & Virtualization Security 12.Interoperability & Portability 13.Mobile Security 14.Security Incident Management, E-Discovery & Cloud Forensics 15.Supply Chain Management, Transparency and Accountability 16.Threat and Vulnerability Management

25 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 25 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance CCM Controls Map to SOC 2 Criteria CCM - Change Control and Configuration Management  Control Specification:  Policies and procedures shall be established, and supporting business processes and technical measures implemented, to ensure the development and/or acquisition of new data, physical or virtual applications, infrastructure network and systems components, or any corporate, operations and/or datacenter facilities have been pre-authorized by the organization's business leadership or other accountable business role or function.  SOC 2 TSP Criteria:  (S3.10.0) Design, acquisition, implementation, configuration, modification, and management of infrastructure and software are consistent with defined system security policies.  (S3.12.0) Procedures exist to maintain system components, including configurations consistent with the defined system security policies.  (S3.13.0) Procedures exist to provide that only authorized, tested, and documented changes are made to the system.

26 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 26 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance CCM Controls Map to SOC 2 Criteria CCM – Datacenter Security  Control Specification:  Physical access to information assets and functions by users and support personnel shall be restricted.  SOC 2 TSP Criteria:  (S3.4.0) Procedures exist to restrict physical access to the defined system including, but not limited to, facilities, backup media, and other system components such as firewalls, routers, and servers.

27 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 27 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance SOC Report Review Organizations should obtain and formally review SOC reports. The review should focus on the following:  Report Type  Type 1 or Type 2  Areas of Coverage/Scope  Opinion  Unqualified or Qualified  Subservice Organizations  Description of Systems Content  Test Results/Impact of Exceptions Noted  Evaluation of User Control Considerations

28 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 28 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Summary and Conclusion

29 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 29 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Questions

30 The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP 30 Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance Crowe Horwath LLP is an independent member of Crowe Horwath International, a Swiss verein. Each member firm of Crowe Horwath International is a separate and independent legal entity. Crowe Horwath LLP and its affiliates are not responsible or liable for any acts or omissions of Crowe Horwath International or any other member of Crowe Horwath International and specifically disclaim any and all responsibility or liability for acts or omissions of Crowe Horwath International or any other Crowe Horwath International member. Accountancy services in Kansas and North Carolina are rendered by Crowe Chizek LLP, which is not a member of Crowe Horwath International. © 2014 Crowe Horwath LLP For more information, contact: Jeff Palgon Direct


Download ppt "The Unique Alternative to the Big Four ® SOC 2 Reports – A Third Party Risk Management Tool for Cloud Providers August 2014."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google