Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byZoe Gladden Modified about 1 year ago

1
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June DFT+U calculations of the electronic structure of perfect and defective PuO 2 Eugene Kotomin and Denis Gryaznov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics and Computer Modelling at the Institute of Solid State Physics, University of Latvia Riga, Latvia

2
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Motivation Solid solution (U,Pu)O 2 (known as MOX) is nowadays widely used as a commercial nuclear fuel. This is why understanding of the basic physical and chemical properties of MOX and parent materials (UO 2 and PuO 2 ) including radiation-induced defects is of great importance. Accurate theoretical calculations of these 5f-electron materials is a challenge due to strong electron correlation effects.

3
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June PuO 2 first principles calculations L.Petit et al, Science 301, 498 (2003) SIC LSD method, including defects R.Martin et al, Phys Rev B 76, (2007): Gaussian code + Periodic Boundary Conditions, HSE (Heyd,Scuseria, Enzerhof) hybrid functionals Jomard et al, Phys Rev B 78, (2008) GGA+U (PBE functional), ABINIT code

4
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Basic experimental data Cubic fluorite structure, a=5.396 A semiconductor, with a gap of 1.8 eV Pu shows no magnetic moment (?) 5f states dominate at the Fermi level – not reproduced in previous studies

5
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June UPS spectra T. Gouder et al, Surf Sci Lett. 601, L 77 (2007)

6
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Present study Spin-polarized GGA+U VASP calculations PAW pseudopotentials, 78 e (Pu), 2e (O) in a core a comparison of Dudarev and Liechtenstein exchange-correlation functionals: rotationally invariant U eff = U – J vs independent U, J parameters Supercells 3, 6, 12 (conventional cell) and 24 atoms, FM and AFM magnetic solutions

7
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June atom supercell Pu O

8
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June DOS for FM PuO 2 Dudarev functional for a) the cubic structure and b) the tetragonal structure. Spin-up electrons are only shown and the J-exchange parameter fixed at 0.5 eV. The Fermi level is taken as zero

9
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Dudarev E xc vs Liechtenstein: AFM structure AFM PuO 2 a) the Dudarev functional at U = 6.0 eV, J=0.5 eV, b) Liechtenstein functional for different J with fixed U = 3.0 eV. Spin-up electrons are only shown. The Fermi level is taken as zero.

10
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Optimal parameters Liechtenstein functional, U=3 eV, J=1.5 eV a=5.51 A, c=5.41 A (AFM, tetragonal str.) DOS corresponds to UPS spectra The effective (Bader) charges: 2.48 e (Pu) e (O) considerable covalency!

11
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Hybrid (PBE0) calculations

12
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Defects in PuO 2 Change of supercell volume due to Pu and O vacancies (Å**3). Positive sign means increase of volume, negative its decrease. The values correspond to the complete local structure and lattice parameter optimisation. Numbers in brackets show the defect concentration. Defect 12 atom cell 24 atom Pu vacancy (25%) (12.5%) O vacancy 4.58 (12.5%) Lattice constant variation 0.8 % (O) vs -2.6% (Pu) 0.9 % (SIC) -3.4% (SIC) (12% of defects)

13
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Local lattice, charge perturbations Pu vacancy NN O ions displaced 1.1% charge -0.95e NNN Pu e O vacancy NN Pu ions displaced 1.2 % charge 2.20 e NNN O e Charge redistribution is very local, only NN

14
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Defect formation energies, eV O vacancy GGA+U SIC O-rich 3.97 ( at.) Pu-rich O interstitial O-rich Pu-rich Pu vacancy O-rich Pu-rich

15
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Thermodynamic reference Pu-rich conditions correspond to the chemical potential for excess Pu μ(Pu) = - Ecoh(δ-Pu), μ(O)=½( - Ecoh(PuO2)- μ(Pu)); O-rich condition implies μ(O) = - ½Ecoh(O2) μ(Pu)= - Ecoh(PuO2)- 2μ(O). Defect formation energy definition: Ef = - Ecoh(PunOm) - n μ(Pu) – m μ(O).

16
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Analysis Defect formation energy deacreases 10% as concentration increases from 12 to 25% Reasonable agreement of GGA+U and SIC, discrepancy is due to difference in the reference states-cohesive energies of pure Pu, PuO 2 and O 2 molecule.

17
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June CONCLUSIONS Only use of the Liechtenstein functional within GGA+U permits to reproduce the UPS spectra Defect calculations using GGA+U and SIC agree quite well Hybrid functionals in VASP and GAUSSIAN- PBC give similar results, but this does not help! Defect migration calculations is the next step in multi-scale study of nuclear fuel long-time performance (TRANSURANUS code)

18
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Many thanks to L.Petit, A.Svane, M.Freyss, R.A.Evarestov for many stumulating discussions, as well as EC FP7 F-Bridge project for a financial support

19
CECAM workshop on Actinides, Manchester, June Thank you for your attention!

Similar presentations

© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google