Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2D vs. 3D Grade Control Systems Presenters Name. 2D vs. 3D Grade Control Systems  2D (Conventional) –Laser / sonic / sensor guidance –Program elevation/cross-slope.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "2D vs. 3D Grade Control Systems Presenters Name. 2D vs. 3D Grade Control Systems  2D (Conventional) –Laser / sonic / sensor guidance –Program elevation/cross-slope."— Presentation transcript:

1 2D vs. 3D Grade Control Systems Presenters Name

2 2D vs. 3D Grade Control Systems  2D (Conventional) –Laser / sonic / sensor guidance –Program elevation/cross-slope from cab –Manually adjust design elevation increments –Simple designs  3D –GPS or UTS guidance –Design loaded into cab from site design –Automatically adjusts to position of machine on site –Capable of complex designs

3 Trimble GCS900 2D  Contractors and owner operators with basic grade control needs  Provides flexibility to grow –Invest today in GCS900 2D –Upgrade later to GCS900 3D

4 GCS900 2D - Applications  A wide range of applications –Small to large pads –Small to large commercial building sites –Sports fields & tennis courts –General site elevation control –Rough grading to finish grading –Road construction & maintenance –Rail installation & maintenance

5 GCS900 3D - Applications  A wide range of applications, including: –Road & highway building –Large commercial –Residential development –Complex grading designs –Land reclamation –Landfill installation –Rail installation & maintenance –Airport construction

6 PCS - Applications  A wide range of applications, including: –Projects with stringent compaction requirements –Road & highway building –Large Commercial & residential development –Complex paving designs –Landfill installation –Rail installation & maintenance –Airport construction

7 Trimble GCS Family Benefits  Get the job done right the first time –Faster completion –Less re-work –Less staking –Less checking –Lower costs –Improved material yields  Faster job cycles and lower operating costs  Improving productivity… adding up to a stronger bottom line for your company

8 LR410 1 or 2 VM4XX LB400 (3) PM400 AS400 GCS900 2D Dozer Components CB460CB450-or-

9 GCS900 3D Dozer Components LB400 x3 PM400 SNM930 - or - MS992 1 or 2 MT900- or - MS992 SR300 AS400VM4xx SNRx10 CB460CB450-or- SNM940 - and / or-

10 GCS900 2D Grader Components RS400 SR300 1 or 2 LR410 1 or 2 AS400 x2 ST400 1 or 2 - or - PM400 VM4xx CB460CB450-or- LB400 x3

11 GCS900 3D Grader Components ST400 Optional MS992 1 or 2 MT900 AS400 x2 MS992 SR300 - or - PM400 VM4xx LB400 x3 CB460CB450-or- SNM930 - or - SNM940 - and / or-

12 CCS900 Compactor Components MS992 1 on cab - or - 1 or 2 on drum LB400 AS400 CM310 MT900 - or - Printer CB460 CB450 -or- SNM930 - or - SNM940 - and / or-

13 Trimble 3D GCS900 Excavator MS992 1 or 2 AS460 AS450 Tilt bucket (optional) CB450 CB460 LB400 x3 AS455 Roto-Tilt (optional) - or - AS450 SNRx10 SNM940 - or - MT900 -or-

14 PCS400 Paver Components AS200 *Sonic Averaging Beam ST200 CB440 Single - or - Dual * Depicted is the European sonic averaging beam, the North American version has a different design - or - ST200 CS200 - or -

15 PCS900 Paver Components *AS200 *ST200 MT900 SNR2410 * The 2D Components (CB440, AS200 and ST200) can be replaced by a MOBA-Matic or Cat branded 2D system AS450 and *CB440 Single - or - Dual **Sonic Averaging Beam ** Depicted is the European sonic averaging beam, the North American version has a different design CB460 and

16 GCS900 Milling Components AS400 MT900 VM420 PM400 (optional) SNRx10 SNM940 - and / or- CB460CB450-or- Interface Box

17 Thank you


Download ppt "2D vs. 3D Grade Control Systems Presenters Name. 2D vs. 3D Grade Control Systems  2D (Conventional) –Laser / sonic / sensor guidance –Program elevation/cross-slope."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google