Download presentation

1
SIMPLEX METHOD FOR LP LP Model

2
**Preview of the Simplex Method**

Developed by G B Dantzig in 1947. Similar to graphical method. The optimal solution lies at an extreme corner point of the multi-dimensional figure. Simplex method examines the extreme points in a systematic manner, till we reach optimal solution. Hence iterative in nature. SIMPLEX METHOD

3
**Gauss Jordan Elimination Method**

A LP in standard form has both decision variables and slack variables. Both are admissible variables. If there are m constarint equations and n admissible variables then if m = n then a unique solution exists. if m > n then m-n equations have to be linearly dependent. if m < n then optimization is required. SIMPLEX METHOD

4
Standard LP Model The Standard LP Model shall have following characteristics: All the constraints should be expressed as equations by adding slack or surplus and or artificial variables. The right hand side of each constraint should be made non-negative, if is not, then this should be made by multiplying both sides by –1. The objective function may be maximisation type or minimisation type. An LP is in “canonical form” if it is written so that it is in standard form, and such that each constraint has a variable with a coefficient “1” and such that that variable has a 0 in all other constraints. SIMPLEX METHOD

5
SIMPLEX METHOD

6
**Major Issues of the Simplex Algorithm**

SIMPLEX METHOD ISSUES Major Issues of the Simplex Algorithm How does one get the LP into the correct starting form? How does one recognize optimality and unboundedness? How does one move to the next corner point solution SIMPLEX METHOD

7
Slack Variables Slack Variable – For constraints of type , the RHS normally represents the limit on the availability of a resource, and the LHS represents the usage of this resource by different activities. Slack represents amount of resource exceeding its usage 6x1 + 4 x2 24 is converted to following by adding slack. 6x1 + 4 x2 + s1 = 24 SIMPLEX METHOD

8
Surplus Variables Constraints of type normally set minimum specification requirements. In this case the surplus represents the excess of the LHS over the minimum requirement. For example x1 + x2 800 is mathematically equivalent to x1 + x2 –S1 = 800 SIMPLEX METHOD

9
**Unrestricted Variables**

In some cases of LP the variables may assume any real value. An unrestricted variable can then be expressed in terms of two non-negative variables by using the substitution x j = x j+ - x j- where x j+, x j- are non negative. SIMPLEX METHOD

10
**Example Express the following in standard LP Model form**

Maximise z = 2x1 + 3x2 + 5x3 subject to x1 + x2 – x3 -5 -6x1 + 7x2 –9x3 4 x1 + x2 + 4 x3 = 10 x1, x2 0 x3 unrestricted SIMPLEX METHOD

11
Solution The first constraint has a negative RHS, which needs to be converted to positive by multiplying both sides by –1. After this the equality becomes < type and hence we have to add a slack variable to first equation. Add slack s2 to second constraint No change in third equation. Substitute unrestricted x3 = x3+ - x3- in the objective and all constraints. x3+ & x3- > 0. -x1 – x2 + x3+ - x3- + s1 = 5 SIMPLEX METHOD

12
**Standard Form Maximise Subject to z = 2x1 + 3x2 + 5x3+ - 5x3-**

-x1 – x2 + x3+ - x3- + s1 = 5 - 6x1 + 7x2 - 9x3+ + 9x3- + s2 = 4 x1 + x2 + 4x3+ - 4x3- = 10 x1, x2, x3+ & x3- , s1, s2 0 SIMPLEX METHOD

13
**STEPS IN SIMPLEX Formulation of the mathematical model.**

Introduction of slack, surplus and artificial variable. Set up initial solution. Look for the basis matrix whose only principal diagonal elements are present. Test for optimality Select entering variable Select the leaving variable. Finding new solution Repeat the procedure SIMPLEX METHOD

14
**Testing for Optimality**

Calculate cj-zj for all non-basic variables. To obtain value of zj, multiply each element under (column aj of coefficient matrix) with corresponding element (coefficient of basic variables). Examine value of cj – zj. The possible solutions are If all cj – zj are 0, then the BFS is optimal. If at least one column of the coefficient matrix (ak) for which ck – zk >0 and all elements are negative (aik<0), then there exists an unbounded solution to the given problem. If at least one cj – zj > 0 and each of these has at least one positive element (ajk) for some row, then it indicates that an improvement in the value of objective function Z is possible. SIMPLEX METHOD

15
**Test for Entering & Leaving Variable**

In case of step III of optimality test, then select the variable that has the largest cj-zj value to enter into the solution. ck – zk = Max {(cj-zj); cj-zj >0} Column to be entered is called key or pivot column Test for leaving variable – The basic variable that leaves shall be the one which reaches zero early when the entering variable is increased. Mathematically the replacement ratio is selected as the minimum non-negative ratio of solution variable divided by the key column element. SIMPLEX METHOD

16
Finding new Solution Deploy Gauss Elimination method to make the key element as 1. Other elements of the key column, other than key element, are eliminated. We will again get a canonical form LP with new basic variable included. Again test the new solution for optimality and repeat till optimal solution is reached. SIMPLEX METHOD

17
EXAMPLE SIMPLEX METHOD

18
INITIAL STEPS SIMPLEX METHOD

19
Check for Optimality entering variable leaving variable Since all cj – zj > 0, j = 1, 2 &3, the current solution is not optimal SIMPLEX METHOD

20
**Entering & Leaving Variable**

Variable x2 is chosen as entering variable as c2 – z2 is the largest positive number. The value of z will increase by 5 for every unit of x2. Thus contribution of x2 is more. Thus x2 is the key column. The leaving variable is chosen based on the minimum ratio as discussed. This means that as x2 is increased which variable approaches zero very fast. We see that s1 is minimum and hence leaving variable is s1 SIMPLEX METHOD

21
Finding New Rows SIMPLEX METHOD

22
New Tableau We see from above table that the new entering variable is x3 and the leaving variable is s2. We repeat the iterations SIMPLEX METHOD

23
Next Iteration SIMPLEX METHOD

24
Next Iteration SIMPLEX METHOD

25
**Check for Optimality Notice that all cj – zj are zero.**

Hence the optimal solution is reached. The optimal value of z is The values of decision variables are x1 = 2.171 x2 = 1.22 x3 = 1.522 SIMPLEX METHOD

26
**Basic Feasible Solution**

Every basic feasible solution of a linear program in standard form is a corner point solution, and vice versa SIMPLEX METHOD

27
**Simplex Steps ( Max Problem)**

Step 0. The problem is in canonical form and bj ≥0. Step 1. If cj – zj < 0 then stop. The solution is optimal. Step 2. Choose any non-basic variable to pivot in with cj-zj > 0, e.g., ck – zk = max { (cj –zj); cj – zj > 0 }. If aik≤0 for all i, then stop; the LP is unbounded. Step 3. Pivot out the basic variable in row r, where r is chosen by the min ratio rule, that is r = min(xbi/arj:arj> 0 ). Step 4. Replace the basic variable in row r with variable xr and re-establish canonical form (i.e., pivot on the coefficient ) Step 5. Go to Step 1. SIMPLEX METHOD

Similar presentations

© 2019 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google