Presentation on theme: "ACCOUNTING CHOICE AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION Marc Pontone, Ed Elzinga, Quinn Bateson, Iulia Lacau-Rodean, Landin Miller, Candice Wang."— Presentation transcript:
ACCOUNTING CHOICE AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION Marc Pontone, Ed Elzinga, Quinn Bateson, Iulia Lacau-Rodean, Landin Miller, Candice Wang
Overview Accounting Choice Definition Regression Review Research Papers Damage Awards in Oil Industry Role of accounting Conservatism Troubled Companies Initial Public Offerings Jeopardy!
Does Accounting Matter? Complete and Perfect World
Accounting Policy Choice I paint objects as I think them, not as I see them - Pablo Picasso
Change in Accounting Policy An entity is permitted to change an accounting policy only if the change: 1. is required by a standard or interpretation; or 2. results in the financial statements providing reliable and more relevant information about the effects of transactions, other events or conditions on the entity's financial position, financial performance, or cash flows. [IAS 8.14] Reference: http://www.iasplus.com/standard/ias08.htm
A Broad Definition An accounting choice is any decision whose primary purpose is to influence (either in form or substance) the output of the accounting system in a particular way, including not only financial statements published in accordance with GAAP (IFRS), but also tax returns and regulatory filings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (2001) 255–307,Empirical research on accounting choice by Thomas D.Fields, Thomas Z.Lys, Linda Vincentb - Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University
Variables explaining accounting choice Firm size and leverage are the only two significant variables explaining choices of accounting techniques - Holthausen and Leftwich What do you think?
Classification for reasons for accounting choice 1. Influence one or more of the firm’s contractual arrangements 2. Driven by information asymmetries, attempts to influence asset prices 3. To influence external parties other than actual and potential owners of the firm.
Regression Analysis as a tool Y = B 0 + B 1 X 1 + B 2 X 2 + R Y = response variable X = explanatory variable B i = regression coefficients R = Residual
Regression Analysis 1. Examine relationship between variables 2. Estimates response variable given independent variables Any result with a p-value <0.05 is significant
In statistical significance testing, the p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the one that was actually observed. when the p-value is less than 0.05. the relationship is said to be statistically significant. P-value
Coefficient the size of the coefficient for each independent variable gives you the size of the effect that variable is having on your dependent variable, and the sign on the coefficient (positive or negative) gives you the direction of the effect.
DAMAGE AWARDS Damage Awards and Earnings Management in the Oil Industry Study Authors: S. Hall & W. Stammerjohan Source: The Accounting Review, Vol. 72, No. 1 (Jan., 1997), pp. 47-65
Question Can anyone think of any examples of litigations in the oil industry? What do you think were the implications?
Damage Awards Looks at relationship between the incidence of litigating events with potentially large damage awards and Managers’ accounting choices Defendants’ management has incentive to make firm look unprofitable
Hypotheses Hypothesis 1: “Firms make income decreasing accruals during periods in which they are defendants in litigation with high potential damage awards relative to other periods” Remember from BU 231: what are punitive damages?
Damage Awards and Earnings Management Article Punitive Damages: To punish wrong doing and provide protection against future misconduct the wealthier the defendant, the larger the award of exemplary damages Can anyone think of income decreasing methods?
Manipulating Earnings Possible ways to manipulate earnings: 1. Accounting methods and estimates 2. Share repurchase 3. Retiring debt 4. Liquidating LIFO inventories 5. Selling assets 6. Asset write down 7. Manipulating accruals
Earnings Management Methods Difficult to detect: Reserves Accruals (revising estimates down; capitalising vs. expensing costs) Hypothesis 2: “Firms under-report new reserves during periods in which they are defendants in litigation with high potential damage awards relative to other periods”
Research Design Large firms always have litigation in their contingencies Study chose an industry with potential for substantially higher damage awards (oil & gas) Looking at income decreasing methods for entire term of litigation (i.e. a few years). Do you think working capital accruals are one of those methods used in the study?
Data and Method Sample: all firms in oil industry with data from 1974-1992 meeting the criteria: Have sufficient data for 20 years on sales and fixed assets Listed on the Wall St Journal Index Firm was one of the largest 20 oil firms
Litigation Events …were included in the model if: Reported possible damages >= 2% of total assets and final judgement was unfavourable to the firm 6 significant cases 2 resulted from super tanker accidents: Amoco Cadiz in France Exxon Valdez in Alaska 2 other types of environmental damages Occidental Petroleum Shell Oil Case Product liability: Diamond Shamrock Illegally interfering with contract: Texaco
Oil Reserves “Oil in Place” Total estimated amount of oil in an oil reservoir Producible and non-producible Reserves divided into two principal classifications: Proven have a reasonable certainty of being recoverable Proven Developed and Proven Undeveloped Unproven Probable – 50% confidence level of recovery Possible – less likely of being recovered (10% or so)
Capital Costs AcG-16 Oil and Gas Accounting Full cost accounting method combination of costs incurred and present value of future costs Equipment costs, development costs, etc. Future cost estimates based on development method most likely to be taken Net of salvage values
Ceiling Test Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Section 3063 Current book value vs. NPV future cash flows Specific to Oil Reserves Fair value of Proved & Probable Reserves vs. Capital Costs Carrying amount not recoverable when net amount exceeds undiscounted cash flows expected to result from use and salvage value
Depreciation, Depletion & Amortization Unit-of-Production method Capital costs depreciated Computed on basis of units of proven reserves Calculated each time FS are issued Wide array of estimations Size of reserve Future prices Future costs Salvage values Currency exchanges
Disclosure Methods used in calculating DD&A Gross or net numbers How gas and oil converted into common unit of measure Description of adjustments made to prices to arrive at revenue Prices used for ceiling test Full disclosure encouraged
Effect of Litigation Ait= total accruals in year t (working capital accrual + non- working capital accrual) CHSALES = Change in sales FIXASSETS = fixed assets at end of year t CHPRICE = Change in gasoline price CHEARN = Change in annual earnings INTERACT = Combined effect of change in price and earning TA = total asset balance at the end of year t Damage = 1 if firm I is involved in litigation in year t
Tests and Results Total accrual model is significant overall CHSALES and FIXASSETS, CHEARN significant TA moves in direction opposite of predicted. This indicate firms report lower accruals when earnings and gas price rise. DAMAGE has the predicted sign but is not statistically significant.
Summary and Conclusion Findings are consistent with hypothesis that “defendants in major litigations use non-working capital accruals to decrease earnings during the period of litigation”. Estimated reserves are under-reported incr. depletion explain results for non working capital accruals No evidence of fin. stmts. disclosure manipulation, however undisclosed manipulation is substantial
THE ROLE OF ACCOUNTING CONSERVATISM Mitigating Bondholder-Shareholder Conflicts over Dividend Policy and Reducing Debt Costs Study Authors: Anwer S. Ahmed, Bruce K. Billings, Richard M. Morton, Mary Stanford-Harris Source: The Accounting Review, Vol. 77, No. 4 (Oct., 2002), pp. 867-890
Context of Study: Dividend Policy, Earnings, and Debt Dividend payouts increase the risk of debt default Dividend policy tied to earnings Reduced earnings = fewer dividends Conservatism: Lower risk of default; cheaper debt
Hypotheses of Study H1: “Firms that face more severe bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy adopt more conservative accounting, ceteris paribus” H2: “Firms that adopt conservative accounting incur a lower cost of debt, ceteris paribus”
Conservatism CICA Handbook: “…estimates of a conservative nature attempt to ensure that assets, revenues and gains are not overstated and, conversely, that liabilities, expenses and losses are not understated” Study: considers not just conservative methods, but also the effects of conservative estimates and assumptions Study: focuses on the cumulative effects of conservatism
Two Proxies For Conservatism Market-Value-Based Conservative accounting generally reduces book value of equity relative to market value of equity Accrual-Based Conservative accounting leads to persistently negative accruals
Three Proxies for Dividend Policy Operating Uncertainty Earnings volatility causes excess dividend payments Level of Dividends (as a percentage of assets) A high level of dividends increases conflicts with shareholders Leverage Ratio of long-term debt to assets
Proxy for Cost of Debt Senior Debt Rating assigned by Standard and Poor’s
Research Design: H1 CON i = β 0 + β 1 STDROA i + β 2 DIV i + β 3 LEV i + β 4 ROA i + β 5 SIZE i + β 6 SALESGRO j + β 7 RNDADV i + Ɛ i Where CON i = One of the two measure of conservatism STDROA i = St. Dev. Of firm i’s ROA DIV i = firm i’s common dividends divided by total assets LEV i = firm i’s long-term debt divided by total assets ROA i = firm i’s net income before extny items, / total assets SIZE i = natural log of firm i’s total assets SALESGRO j = annual % change in firm i’s sales RNDADV i = firm i’s R&D plus adv. expense, / total assets
Research Design: H2 RATING i = γ o + γ 1 CON i + γ 2 ROA, + γ 3 LEV j + γ 4 SIZE j + γ 5 BETA i + γ 6 MSE j + u i Where RATING i = a numerical transformation of S&P's senior debt rating for firm i over the interval 2 through 21, where larger values correspond to a less favorable debt rating, averaged over each six-year estimation period; BETA i = the value-weighted market-model beta, obtained from market-model esti-mates over the six-year period for firm i, for firms with a minimum of 24 monthly returns MSE j = the mean squared error of the market-model residuals, obtained from mar-ket-model estimates over the six-year period for firm i, for firms with a minimum of 24 monthly returns
Results: H1 There is a strong correlation between both measures of conservatism and two of the three proxies for dividend policy conflicts The evidence on leverage, the third dividend policy proxy, is mixed Overall, the authors conclude that firms facing more severe dividend conflicts choose more conservative accounting
Results: H2 The authors conclude that firms using conservative accounting do have more favourable debt ratings and there do incur a lower cost of debt
TROUBLED COMPANIES DETERMINANTS OF ACCOUNTING CHOICES IN TROUBLED COMPANIES Study Authors: Dominic Peltier-Rivest (2000)
Details Date: 2000 Firms: 127 Characteristics Troubled firms Three consecutive years of losses, and; Reduced dividends
Methodology & Variables Methodology Multivariate Regression Model d Variables VariableDescription DA it Level of Discretionary Accruals COV it Debt Covenant Dummy Variable GOV it Government Lobbying Dummy Variable CEO it Management Change Dummy Variable UNION it Union Negotiation Dummy Variable E it Error term
Non-Current Discretionary Accruals D Proportionate effect (% of total assets) Largest Components PPE Intangibles Question What could cause these results to be inaccurate?
Firm Composition What industry would have the highest levels of NCDA (Non-current Discretionary Accruals)? Industry# of Firms% of Sample Agriculture, mining and Construction1511.8% Food and Kindred Products2519.7% Manufacturing5543.3% Transportation Services64.7% Wholesale and retail1915.0% Other Services75.5%
Hypotheses Hypothesis 1 Binding Debt Covenants (COV) Managers more likely to make income-decreasing accounting choices in the binding year Question Why would managers make income-decreasing accounting choices in the binding year?
Hypotheses Hypothesis 2 Seeks Government assistance (GOV) managers are more likely to make income-decreasing accounting choices in the year before the petition was filed and in each year prior to the investigations completion Question Why would managers make income-decreasing accounting choices if it was seeking government assistance?
Hypotheses Hypothesis 3 Non-routine change of top executive (CEO) the incoming executive is more likely to make income- decreasing accounting choices in the year of the change Question Why would incoming executives make income decreasing accounting choices in the year of change?
Question Would you expect these results to be different in Canada? How so?
Conclusion CEO Variable is significant All others show little correlation Suggesting, for troubled firms, pay-offs from COV, GOV and UNION adjustments are too low to influence managers accounting choices
Question Can you explain possible reasons the three aforementioned variables showed little correlation? COV GOV UNION
Reasoning from Study COV Sources a study by Dangelo et al (1994) Financial distress itself not covenants per se Lower earnings coupled with a dividend reduction assists mangers to get concession from third parties
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS, ACCOUNTING CHOICES AND EARNINGS MANAGEMENT Study Authors: Joseph Aharony, Chane-Jane Lin, Martin P. Loeb (1993) Source: Contemporary Accounting Research (Fall 1993)
Initial Public Offerings The study examined whether entrepreneurs systematically select accounting methods in order to inflate reported income in the periods prior to going public
Study looked at 229 industrial firms that went public between Jan 1, 1985 to Jan 1, 1987 Used an excess accruals approach Variables used: AC t – total accounting accruals in period t TA t – total assets at end of period t To calculate UAC t – unexpected standardized total accounting accruals in period t Methodology & Variables
Using the formula: If the proportion of total assets to total accruals remains unchanged between the two periods, no manipulation has occurred A significant increase between the two is indicative of earnings manipulation Variables and Data
Conclusions Most firms were not trying to increase income directly before going public Of the 229 firms tested, only 15 had a positive UAC and were found to have manipulated earnings Those that did were typically small firms or firms with financial leverage
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.