Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byKailyn Kirkbride Modified over 2 years ago

1
SCCDFTB as a bridge between MM and high-level QM. Jan Hermans University of North Carolina 1

2
1. SCCDFTB better than MM a.Examples Simulation of crambin (Haiyan Liu) Simulation of “dipeptides” (Hao Hu) b. But why? Concerted changes of geometry in N-methyl acetamide Hydrogen bonding between two N-methyl acetamide molecules More flexible 2. Develop and test MM force fields From QM to MM via SCCDFTB 2

3
Simulation of crambin (Haiyan Liu; 2001) Liu, HY, Elstner, M, Kaxiras, E, Frauenheim, T, Hermans, J, & Yang, W. Quantum mechanics simulation of protein dynamics on long time scale. Proteins, 44: 484-489, 2001. Improved agreement of backbone geometry in folded state From QM to MM via SCCDFTB Simulation of “dipeptides” (Hao Hu; 2002) Hu, H, Elstner, M., Hermans, J. Comparison of a QM/MM force field and molecular mechanics force fields in simulations of alanine and glycine "dipeptides" (Ace-Ala-Nme and Ace-Gly-Nme) in water in relation to the problem of how to model the unfolded peptide backbone in solution. Proteins, 50, 451-463 (2003). Improved agreement of backbone geometry in solution 3

4
amber, charmm, gromos, opls-aa vs. each other and vs. SCCDFTB SCCDFTB Ace-Ala-Nme in explicit water Hao Hu, 2002 4

5
Why better accuracy with SCCDFTB? SCCDFTB reproduces concerted changes of geometry charge fluctuations hydrogen bond geometry example: N-methyl acetamide 5

6
6 Concerted changes of geometry in N-methyl acetamide, CH 3 -NH-CO-CH 3 Recipe: 1. Twist about NH-CO bond 2. Minimize the energy (with SCCDFTB) H-N-C C-N-CA2 H-N-CA2 tetrahedral planar

7
7 Fluctuation of charge in N-methyl acetamide Fluctuations of charges and geometry are coupled atom:CONHN 180 º (energy minimum) 0.4911-0.5082-0.25040.1879 = 90 º (saddle point) 0.5255-0.4257-0.33430.1749

8
8 Non-spherical electron distribution: C=O interacts with H-N Non-linear N-H … O=C hydrogen bonds NHO prefers 180º HOC likes 130º Cf. Side chain hydrogen bonds in proteins and by ab initio QM: Morozov, Kortemme, Baker

9
SCCDFTB MM force field 9 SCCDFTB favors bent arrangement Simple Point Charge model of MM favors linear structures Distribution of COH in dimers of N-methyl acetamide. Hermans, J. Hydrogen bonds in molecular mechanics force fields. Adv. Protein Chem. 72, 105-119, 2006.

10
1. Correlation of DFT (B3LYP/631G*) and SCCDFTB energies 10 But … SCCDFTB is too flexible: 1000 conformations from 1 ns MD simulation with SCCDFTB

11
2. Energy profile for internal rotation in butane 11 SCCDFTB is too flexible: DFT B3LYP/631G*: eclipsed: E =±120 = 3.35 gauche: E = ±60 = 0.83 cis: E =0 = 5.69 SCCDFTB: eclipsed: E =±120 = 2.57 gauche: E = ±60 = 0.45 cis: E =0 = 3.80 (relative to trans, = 180) MP2: eclipsed: E =±120 = 3.31 gauche: E = ±60 = 0.62 cis: E =0 = 5.51

12
End of part 1

13
Molecular mechanics energy function: how to improve it? 1. How precise is this expansion? 2. How accurate is this model? 3. How accurate are the implementations (amber, charmm, … 13 intramolecular non-bonded

14
Assume a high-level QM method as “REALITY”: DFT (B3LYP/631G*) Try to reproduce its energy. (can always choose a higher level of QM.)

15
The slope is very close to 1 The RMS deviation is 0.07 kcal/mol (mean E pot = 3) 15 * By minimizing the RMS deviation Recipe STEP 1: 1. Simulate (1 ns with SCCDFTB) 2. Save 1000 conformations Example: methane, CH 4 Recipe STEP 2: 3. Compute E pot with B3LYP/631G* 4. Fit* a new MM forcefield 5. Compute E pot with the new MM force field

16
What are the most important energy parameters for methane? Parametervalue rmsd 10 2 K l, C-H 3531.4361.6 2 K , H-C-H 33.20.2220.26 3 K l, C-H -8030.15726 3 K , H-C-H -7.80.1530.55 K l,l, C-H, C-H -22.80.1520.77 2 K d,H·H 20.50.0660.69 rms residual Standard quadratic MM terms include these terms (not needed in simulations with fixed bond lengths) not very useful 16 precision

17
Systems studied to date (manuscript): “rigid” molecules methane, benzene, water molecules with internal rotation ethane, propane, butane, methyl-benzene Non-bonded interactions methane…methane, ethane…ethane water…methane, water…water Some results and some conclusions …. 17

18
Geometric parameters agree well. Transferability between related molecules Compared with “standard” force fields LESSONS LEARNED: 18

19
Nonbonded interactions 19 with independent values according to mean ESP charges with charge neutrality with one fixed value System C free C ESP C neutral C fix 1 H 2 O, H 2 O 1.004200 ‑ 105 48.1 1.3360.65(215) (-108) (54) 1.2100.2298 -149 75.5 1.004(215) -102 46.5 CH 4, CH 4 0.166190 -49 12.7 0.171-0.1(95) (-23.75) (5.94) Lowest From ESP charges Results of different fits for Coulomb interactions acceptable =

20
Coulomb interactions:(we skipped a slide) (Water: Fixed Point charges based on ESP inadequate) Methane and ethane: ESP charges can be used Parametermethane dimer (1) methane dimer (2) ethane dimer 12 B C,C 1,200,000 1,110,000 12 B C,H 60,00062,00052,000 12 B H,H 1,100700840 Methane and ethane: Lennard-Jones repulsive parameters Conclusion: Nice agreement

21
Geometric parameters agree well. Fixed point charge (FPC) model for Coulomb energy is poor for water … water and water … methane LESSONS LEARNED: 21

22
Geometric parameters agree well. Fixed point charge (FPC) model for Coulomb energy is poor for water … water and water … methane Intermolecular parameters for methane and ethane are similar (and FPC model is OK). LESSONS: 22 LESSONS LEARNED:

23
Geometric parameters agree well. Fixed point charge (FPC) model for Coulomb energy is poor for water … water and water … methane Intermolecular parameters for methane and ethane are similar (and FPC model is OK). Exponent of L-J repulsive term = 12 is good. LESSONS: 23 LESSONS LEARNED:

24
Butane: “intrinsic” torsion term non-bonded interactions (1/r 12 and 1/r) 1-4 C,C1-5 and 1-4 C,H 1-6, 1-5, 1-4 H,H * In the SCCDFTB simulation forced 360º rotation about C 2 -C 3, = 14 kcal/mol * Fit several MM models: A0* has 38 parameters, = 0.441 A5 has 12 parameters, = 0.598 24 CC HH

25
Butane: Fit for model A5 25

26
Butane: 26 Critical tests: * Re-calculate DFT (B3LYP/631G*) energies * Compare energies at minima and barriers DFT vs. A5 (and 2 others) * Simulate butane with A5 force field (and 2 others) Calculate PMF for torsion about C 2 -C 3

27
red curve = MM energy black dots = DFT energy black curve = PMF DFT energy is systematically high 27 Simulation with A5 force field

28
Slope of best fit is 1.04 28

29
modelnpnp E = 120 E = 60 E =0 A = 120 A = 60 A =0 slopermsd A0h323.880.765.813.870.866.081.020.700 A1233.850.725.833.890.866.171.020.696 A5123.710.675.633.650.805.911.040.734 DFT3.350.835.69 With more parameters (n p ) in the MM force field: The slope goes down to 1.02 The PMF becomes a little bit sharper Energies and free energies at minima and maxima (relative to minimum at = 180º) Slope and rmsd of correlation between DFT and MM energies 29

30
Geometric parameters agree well. Fixed point charge (FPC) model for Coulomb energy is poor for water … water and water … methane Intermolecular parameters for methane and ethane are similar and FPC model is OK. Exponent of L-J repulsive term = 12 is good. Torsion in ethane, propane, butane: omit terms in 1/r “messy” set of 1-4, 1-5 and 1-6 repulsive terms LESSONS: 30 LESSONS LEARNED:

31
Why is SCCDFTB important in this project: (1)Fast to run (2)Easy to set up (need only coordinates) (3)Equilibrium geometry agrees well with DFT (4)Slightly more flexible: do not miss anything

32
Thanks to Weitao Yang Hao Hu (coauthor of paper) Future work: I hope so 32

Similar presentations

OK

Newman Projections and Conformational Isomers. Newman Projections Is a way to draw chemical conformations and views a carbon - carbon chemical bond from.

Newman Projections and Conformational Isomers. Newman Projections Is a way to draw chemical conformations and views a carbon - carbon chemical bond from.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on information technology industry Ppt on principles of peace building and development Opening ppt on ipad Can keynote read ppt on iphone Download ppt on new invention of computer technology Ppt on success after failure Ppt on save our earth Liquid crystal on silicon display ppt on tv File type ppt on cybercrime law Ppt on carbon monoxide poisoning