Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Rare Charm Decays Recent Results from FOCUS (+Theory) Will E. Johns (for the FOCUS collaboration) FPCP5 (05/17/02) SM MSSM Exotics.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Rare Charm Decays Recent Results from FOCUS (+Theory) Will E. Johns (for the FOCUS collaboration) FPCP5 (05/17/02) SM MSSM Exotics."— Presentation transcript:

1 Rare Charm Decays Recent Results from FOCUS (+Theory) Will E. Johns (for the FOCUS collaboration) FPCP5 (05/17/02) SM MSSM Exotics

2 Recent Results from FOCUS Concentrate on Background Effects In the Confidence Limit Calculation Background Fluctuations Treat like a nuisance parameter? Include as a systematic? Include in likelihood: Rolke-Lopez [hep-ph v2]

3 Probability of finding a signal rate  and a background rate b given x events in a signal region and y events in background sidebands. Where  is the ratio of the number of background events(using MC!) in the sideband regions to the signal region:

4 And it’s not just my P.O.V. … A reminder during “Journeys of an Accidental Statistician” [Gary Feldman, Fermilab conference on CL, March 2000] from the 1998 PDG [Euro. Phys. J. C3(1998)]: “…we suggest that… a measure of sensitivity should be reported whenever expected background is larger or comparable to the number of observed counts.”

5 In the Event Selection Too! Optimizing a cut grid in the presence of background can still bias You can easily choose a downward fluctuation in the background and produce (you hope) an over-conservative limit. Approach: BOOTSTRAP (two ways) Best Limits, Optimizing Sensitivity (Dual) Best Limit, Optimizing Cuts w/Sensitivity (as a check on the Dual Bootstrap) (Bootstrap = Sample with replacement)

6 Dual Bootstrap (NIM article in draft from Rolke-Lopez)

7 Cut Bootstrap (Developed by Dan Engh for his thesis)

8 Data from run of FOCUS Over 1,000,000 Reco’d. Charm Excellent: -Vertex Resolution -Particle ID -Momentum Res. -Lots of Pubs… FOCUS Detector References: [NIM A320(1992) 519] [NIM A329(1993) 62] [hep-ex/ ] [hep-ex/ ] [hep-ex/ ]

9

10 Look at decays with 2 or more muons Cut Grid, based on vertexing, Particle ID L/  – vary from >5-21 L pp ss ISO1 – CL DK’s in prim (vary <0.1 –0.001) Vary Cerenkov cuts for  ’s and K’s (likelihood differences) DCL – CL of DK vertex (>1 -- 4%) MuCL – CL for Muon ID (>1 – 10%) Cut on  P, (bigger MCS, more h-  at low P)

11 Normalize Rare modes to Golden/Silver modes Ds+  +-+Ds+  +-+ D+  -+-D+  -+- Goal (loosest cuts)

12 After 1 st Bootstrap After 2 nd Bootstrap Raw Cut Grid Sensitivities D +   +  +  - Dual Bootstrap Results Preliminary

13 D +   +  +  - Dual Bootstrap Results Raw Branching Ratios (All Cuts) 2 nd Bootstrap Branching ratios Remember: Cuts chosen by optimizing Sensitivity (Box Closed) in the 1 st Bootstrap Preliminary

14 D +   +  +  - Dual Bootstrap Results Preliminary Sensitivity vs. Branching Ratio (as promised…)

15 And in case you’re curious… Rolke-Lopez compare to Unified (Feldman-Cousins) Preliminary D+  ++-D+  ++- (sorry, using mean values here…)

16 Why Bother? MSSM R-Parity Violating Terms Boost Rates [hep-ph/ v2] (SM calcs are SO low…) -Look for new Physics!- (Burdman, Golowich, Hewett, Pakvasa) (Away from poles!)

17 Acceptance is important! Monte Carlo relative efficiencies for events generated flat across the dalitz surface 1 2 3

18 Decay Mode Dual Bootstrap Sys. Error Result W/sys Sensitivity W/sys Single Cut(w/sys) Previous (E791) D+ ++-D+ ++- 9.1x % 9.2x x x x10 -5 D+ -++D+ -++ 1.3x % 1.3x x x x10 -5 D+ ++-D+ ++- 8.8x % 8.8x x x x10 -5 D+ -++D+ -++ 4.9x % 4.8x x x x10 -5 Ds+ ++-Ds+ ++- 3.3x % 3.6x x x x10 -4 Ds+ -++Ds+ -++ 1.3x % 1.3x x x x10 -4 Ds+ ++-Ds+ ++- 2.4x % 2.6x x x x10 -4 Ds+ -++Ds+ -++ 2.6x % 2.9x x x x10 -4 (E687) Dominated by PDG rate to normalizing mode All other modes, nearly final (still preliminary) FOCUS results (Many thanks to Dan Engh for all his work!)

19 Decay Fraction Result W/sys MSSM R-Parity SM-1SM-2 D+ ++-D+ ++- 9.2x x10 -9 D+ -++D+ -++ 1.3x10 -5 D+ ++-D+ ++- 8.8x x x x10 -6 D+ -++D+ -++ 4.8x10 -6 Ds+ ++-Ds+ ++- 3.6x x10 -8 Ds+ -++Ds+ -++ 1.3x10 -5 Ds+ ++-Ds+ ++- 2.6x x10 -6 Ds+ -++Ds+ -++ 2.9x10 -5 All other modes, nearly final (still preliminary) FOCUS results Compared to recent Theory [hep-ph/ v1] [hep-ph/ v2] Sets New Limit!

20 Not quite ready for prime time from FOCUS D0 +-D0 +- Preliminary! FOCUS Sensitivity: 1.2x10 -6 Theory R-Parity MSSM: 3.5x10 -6 SM1: 3.0x PDG:<4.1x10 -6 Expect D +   +  +  - soon (Hugo Hernandez UPR) (from Dan Engh too)

21 Wrap-Up FOCUS results will set new limits (x10 in some cases) New Limit on R-Parity Violating MSSM Bootstrapping gives you more info when calculating limits More results coming soon from FOCUS Room for x10 stats before SM kicks in


Download ppt "Rare Charm Decays Recent Results from FOCUS (+Theory) Will E. Johns (for the FOCUS collaboration) FPCP5 (05/17/02) SM MSSM Exotics."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google