Presentation on theme: "T1: Rocket Science To extend our reach to the stars above! Video."— Presentation transcript:
T1: Rocket Science To extend our reach to the stars above! Video
Introduction Goals: Predict apogees Rocket equation Simulation Build/Test Rockets Different models, masses, engines, etc. Analyze/compare results Apogee vs. mass Acceleration vs. mass Apogee vs. engine type
Forces On A Rocket cg cp weight drag lift thrust
Rocket Equations Tsiolkovsky Our Theory Newton’s Second Law
Experimental Problems Malfunctioning batteries Shock-cord snap Rocket explosion Nose cone explosion during descent Rocket with altimeter stuck in tree for 4 days
Data: Mass vs. Apogee
Analysis: Mass vs. Apogee Results show Our rockets Can fly Kind of high Exemplifying a negative and nonlinear Trend
Data: Mass Vs. Acceleration Video
Data: Mass Vs. Acceleration
Data: Engine Type vs. Apogee
Conclusion Mass vs. apogee → exponential, negative Engine vs. apogee → logarithmic, positive Mass vs. acceleration → cubic polynomial To optimize model rocket flight, rocket mass must be minimized while still maintaining the center of gravity above the center of pressure. Additionally, upgrading the engine class makes the rocket go higher. These graphs present the optimal conditions for highest apogees.
Videos Launch Close-Up
References 1.Barrowman J Stability of a Model Rocket in Flight [Internet]. Phoenix(AZ):Centuri Engineering Company; [cited 2014 Jul 28]Barrowman J Stability of a Model Rocket in Flight [Internet]. Phoenix(AZ):Centuri Engineering Company; [cited 2014 Jul 28] 2.Kenzie, Patrick. Rocket Components Canuck Designs. Rocket Componenets. Web. 28 July 2014.Kenzie, Patrick. Rocket Components Canuck Designs. Rocket Componenets. Web. 28 July 2014.
Acknowledgements John and Laura Overdeck NJGSS Alumni and Parents Drew University State of New Jersey Independent College Fund Novartis AT&T Bayer Healthcare Johnson & Johnson Actavis Celgene