Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Adaptive Planning & Execution (APEX). 2 The Problem The 24-month deliberate planning cycle – too long (think speed) Plans “static” and difficult to.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Adaptive Planning & Execution (APEX). 2 The Problem The 24-month deliberate planning cycle – too long (think speed) Plans “static” and difficult to."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Adaptive Planning & Execution (APEX)

2 2 The Problem The 24-month deliberate planning cycle – too long (think speed) Plans “static” and difficult to adapt – need flexibility and periodic updating to stay relevant (think flexibility) Plans one-dimensional – need multiple options Too little SECDEF influence, too late in planning cycle Feasibility analysis time consuming and too late in the process No technology to support ongoing collaboration – horizontally and vertically Traditional deliberate planning is insufficiently responsive and relevant to the demands of today’s dynamic security environment

3 3 Adaptive Planning and Execution DoD initiative to transform the way we plan and execute Joint Operations :  Better plans, with more options, more quickly; more SecDef interaction with planning  Keep plans relevant in a rapidly changing environment; adapt plans for execution  Leverage technology to maximize planner intellectual effort (art) and minimize the labor intensive effort (science) The joint capability to create and revise situationally relevant plans rapidly and to a high level of quality, as circumstances require

4 4 Go from here…. To here…. Near-parallel planning across echelons Continual collaboration in virtual space Sequential planning by echelon Periodic collaboration in physical space Detailed Feasibility Analysis Done Late in Process Detailed Feasibility Analysis Done Early in the Process Process jump-started by detailed, clear guidance – up frontProcess jump-started by detailed, clear guidance – up front Planning benefits from iterative discussions between SECDEF and combatant commandersPlanning benefits from iterative discussions between SECDEF and combatant commanders tt Transforming The Way We Plan (speed)

5 5 Go From Here... Base Plan (1 COA) OPLAN 9999 Single Course of Action with One or Two Branches Branch Plan 1 Branch Plan 2 Multiple Courses of Action with Multiple Branches …To Here OPLAN 9999A OPLAN 9999B OPLAN 9999C Threat/Forces-BasedCapabilities-Based Transforming The Way We Plan (flexibility)

6 6 Transform Operational Planning EXECUTIONEXECUTION EXECUTIONEXECUTION Deliberate Planning Crisis Action Planning Contingency Planning Crisis Action Planning Common AP process and collaborative tools Adaptive Planning Seamless, “End-to-End” Planning & Execution Common AP process, collaborative tools, databases, and info grid Contingency Planning Crisis Action Planning

7 7 Background ADAPTIVE PLANNING ROADMAP II (Focused on implementation was issued Feb 2008)

8 8 CJCSM J3 Publishes CJCSM A, Joint Operation Planning and Execution System (JOPES) Volume I (Planning Policies and Procedures, 29 September 2006 Introduces Adaptive Planning –Changes Deliberate Planning to Contingency Planning –Outlines Process and Procedures

9 9 Contingency and Crisis Action Planning Operational Activities Planning Functions Products Situational Awareness Planning Execution Strategic Guidance Concept Development Plan Development Plan Assessment (Refine, Adapt, Terminate, Execute) Deployment Order Execute Order Alert Order Planning Order Warning Order Approved Mission Approved Plan Approved Concept Concept Plan (CONPLAN) Base Plan (BPLAN) Six Month Review Cycle Operation Order Operation Plan (OPLAN) Operational Activities Planning Functions Products Situational Awareness Planning Execution Strategic Guidance Concept Development Plan Development Plan Assessment (Refine, Adapt, Terminate, Execute) Strategic Guidance Concept Development Plan Development Plan Assessment (Refine, Adapt, Terminate, Execute) Deployment Order Execute Order Alert Order Planning Order Warning Order Approved Mission Approved Plan Approved Concept Concept Plan (CONPLAN) Base Plan (BPLAN) Six Month Review Cycle Operation Order Operation Plan (OPLAN) IPR

10 10 RAT – E R efine A dapt T erminate E xecute JOINT APEX PROCESS

11 11 Goal Joint Staff J-3 oversight (in concert with JS J-7 and coordination with Joint Planning and Execution Community (JPEC) ) of Adaptive Planning Roadmap 2007  Adaptive Planning (AP) Roadmap (Version 2 ~ 2007) defines Adaptive Planning Implementation Stage - Based on Contingency Planning achieving “Living Plan” vision outlined in AP Roadmap 2005 {AP Roadmap 2005 defines the Initiation Stage} - Implementation Stage “... focuses on achieving seamless transition between deliberate Contingency Planning (CP) and Crisis Planning” - “This transition will establish processes, procedures, and doctrine to facilitate the hand-off between deliberate contingency and crisis planning.” * - “As a goal of the Implementation Stage, Military Departments and Joint schools will begin producing a steady stream of officers, trained and educated in AP.” * - “The revised Roadmap will describe modifications and changes to P3T {Process, Products, People and Tools} identified in Initiation Stage.” * In course of transition, Crisis Action Planning (CAP) with no plan initiation must be addressed * Source document: Adaptive Planning Roadmap 2005, page 10, subparagraph 3.3, “The Implementation Stage”

12 12 What’s Been Done (from Log AP perspective) Formal standup of APEX Logistics Working Group Logistics Governance Structure APEX POAM complete Planning Joint Logistics Support Pub –Documents agreed upon process Tools in development –Joint Force Toolkit (demo videotaped and on the CoP) –Joint Medical Analysis Tool –Joint Engineering Planning and Execution System –Joint Logistics Analysis Tool (demo later in conference) –Way-ahead is for tools to reside in GCSS-J Logistics Planning Module

13 13 SUP CON ENG FHP DIST MAINT L-SVC APEX Joint Logistics Planning Process Planning Detail Level (2 / 4 / 6) Increases as Planning Level Increases (1-4) IPR AIPR CIPR F Step I – Strategic GuidanceStep II – Concept Development Step III – Plan Development Theater Log Overview / Preferred Forces Draft Dist Network Matrix Frameworks Sourced Forces LSA Plan COLS Validation Log Sync Matrix TDP CSA Spt Plans CON Spt Plans TPFDD Refinement Log C2 Integrated Estimate Force Flow COA COLS Refinement LSA Framework Log Sync Matrix Framework Log Capability Shortfalls Draft RFF TPFDD Development JOA-Focused Msn Analysis Initial Modeling GEF / GDF JSCP Mob + Log Anx Infrastructure HNS Agreements PLANORD Apportioned Forces Theater Logistics Analysis Theater Log Overview Draft Distro Network Logistics CCIR Inputs Process Outputs Collaboration JOA-Focused Msn Analysis / Modeling Concept of Logistics Support (COLS) Development Log C2 Laydown Integrated Functional Est Force Flow Strawman Integrated Estimate of Concept of Logistics Support J2 / 3 / 5 / 7 AOR Situational Awareness J2 / 3 / 5 Inform Execution J2 / 3 / 5

14 14 Complete Planning Joint Logistics Support (PJLS) Pub All 6 Logistics JCAs incorporated/integrated in order to develop a Joint Concept of Logistics Support Theater Distribution Plan Theater Logistics Overview Logistics Supportability Analysis Logistics Synchronization Matrix Contractor Support Plan Conduct Gap Analysis/Implementation Plan Develop an objective matrix to rate tools Align Doctrine-process-tasks Still to be done

15 15

16 16 Sustained Logistics Readiness Required resources at the right time & place Integrated Logistics Capabilities Logistics expanding operational opportunities Shared Resources Most effective delivery of logistics at best value Freedom of Action for the Joint Force Commander Readiness as a Central Logistics Metric

17 17 Readiness is having the capability to do something! What is Readiness? Assigned Mission or METL as viewed from COCOM-Level JTF-Level Service-Level Unit-Level Platform-Level USAUSAFUSNUSMC

18 18 RetailSystems WholesaleSystems ServicesLogisticsSystems MSC SDDC AMC TRANSCOM AlliedIntel TheaterIntel Nat’lIntel Defense Logistics Logistics Systems Systems DefenseTransportationSystem Global Force Force Mgmt Mgmt DefenseReadinessSystem DefenseIntelligenceSystem SecDefStrategicDirection COCOM “Living Plans” POTUS NationalSecurityStragy DefenseStrategy USAirForce USMarineCorps USNavy USArmy APEX Envisions a Continual Readiness Assessment GCSS - ? Process InvestigatedProcess Investigation Initiated Process Investigation Not Initiated OCS


Download ppt "1 Adaptive Planning & Execution (APEX). 2 The Problem The 24-month deliberate planning cycle – too long (think speed) Plans “static” and difficult to."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google