Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byElliot Pepper Modified over 2 years ago

1
Mathematical induction Isaac Fung

2
Announcement ► Homework 1 released ► Due on 6 Oct 2008 (in class)

3
Overview ► Induction equation divisibility inequality ► Strong induction ► Well ordering principle

4
Principle of induction ► Last time, we saw how to prove some predicate P(n) is true for all integers n by showing that P(n) is true for arbitrary n e.g. If n is any integer that is not a perfect square, then is irrational ► But this does not always work e.g. ► We may not know how to build a tower with n floors directly, yet knowing how to build the ground floor and how to build one new floor on top of it, we can build a tower with any number of floors as we like ► Advantage of induction: usually easy to build the ground floor easy to build a new floor on top of another

5
Principle of induction ► Suppose the followings are true, for what values of n is P(n) true? P(1) and P(n)=>P(n+1) P(3) and P(n)=>P(n+1) P(1) and P(n)=>P(n+2) P(1), P(2) and P(n)=>P(n+2) P(1) and P(n)=>P(2n) P(1) and P(n)^P(n+1)=>P(n+2) P(1), P(2) and P(n)^P(n+1)=>P(n+2) P(1) and P(1)^ … ^P(n)=>P(n+1) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, … 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, … 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 … 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, … 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, … 1111 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …

6
Induction (Proving equation) ► For any integer n>=0, ► Proof: ► We prove by induction on n. ► Let P(n) be the proposition that

7
► Base case, n=0: So P(n) is true for n=0. ► Inductive step: Suppose that P(n) is true for some n>=0, that is. Can we change some n to all n?

8
► Then, for n>=0, ► By induction, P(n) is true for all integers n>=0. By the inductive hypothesis

9
Induction (Proving equation) ► For any integer n>=2, ► Proof: ► We prove by induction on n. ► Let P(n) be the proposition that

10
► Base case, n=2: So P(2) is true. So P(2) is true. ► Inductive step: Suppose that P(n) is true for some n>=2. So,

11
► Then, for n>=2, ► By induction, P(n) is true for all integers n>=2. By the inductive hypothesis

12
Induction (Divisibility) ► For any integer n>=1, is divisible by 6 ► Proof: ► We prove by induction on n. ► Base case, n=1: is divisible by 6. is divisible by 6. So it is true for n=1.

13
► Inductive step: Suppose that for some n>=1, is divisible by 6 is divisible by 6 ► Then, ► Either n+1 or n+2 is even, so the last term is divisible by 6. Therefore is divisible by 6. ► By induction, is divisible by 6 for all integers n>=1 By the inductive assumption

14
Induction (Proving inequality) ► For any integer n>=4, ► Proof: ► We prove by induction on n. ► Base case, n=4: So the claim is true for n=4.

15
► Inductive step: Assume that for some n>=4 ► Then, ► By induction, for all integer n>=4. By the inductive hypothesis By assumption, n>=2 By assumption, n>=1

16
Induction (Alternative proof of infinitude of primes) ► For any integer n>=1, is divisible by at least n distinct primes ► Proof: ► We prove by induction on n. ► Base case, n=1: is divisible by 3. is divisible by 3. So the claim is true for n=1.

17
► Inductive step: Assume that for some n>=1, is divisible by n distinct prime numbers. is divisible by n distinct prime numbers. ► Then, ► Let and ► By the inductive assumption, q has n distinct prime factors. ► Also, note that the p, q differ by 2, so they can have no common factors except 2. But both of them are odd, so they are relatively prime. ► Since p has at least 1 prime factor and it is not a factor of q, p*q has at least n distinct prime factors. ► By induction, is divisible by n distinct primes for all n>=1 x 2 -1=(x+1)(x-1)

18
Strong induction ► If sequence {a n } is defined as follows then a n =1 ► Proof: ► We proceed by strong induction. ► Let P(n) be the proposition that a n <= (7/4) n Can we use weak induction?

19
► Base case, n=1, 2: By definition, a 1 = 1 <= (7/4) 1, a 2 = 3 <=(7/4) 2 ► Inductive step: Assume that P(k) is true for 1 =2 ► a n+1 = a n + a n-1 <= (7/4) n + (7/4) n-1 <= (7/4) n + (7/4) n-1 = (7/4) n-1 (7/4+1) = (7/4) n-1 (7/4+1) <= (7/4) n-1 (7/4) 2 <= (7/4) n-1 (7/4) 2 = (7/4) n+1 = (7/4) n+1 ► By the principle of strong induction, P(n) is true for all n>=1 by the inductive assumption Can we assume P(n)^P(n+1) and then derive P(n+2)? Why we can’t just check the case n=1?

20
Strong induction ► If sequence {a n } is defined as follows then for any integer n>=0 ► Proof: ► We proceed by strong induction. ► Let P(n) be the proposition that for n = 0 for n > 0

21
► Base case, n=0: By definition, a 0 = 1 ► Inductive step: Suppose that P(k) is true for 0 =0 ► Consider a n+1 ► By induction, P(n) is true for all integers n>=0 by the inductive hypothesis GP sum

22
Strong induction ► Every integer n>=1 can be expressed as the sum of distinct Fibonacci numbers ► Proof: ► We proceed by strong induction ► Let P(n) be the statement that “ n can be written as the sum of distinct Fibonacci numbers ” ► Base case, n=1: 1 is a Fibonacci number, so P(1) is true

23
► Inductive step: Assume that P(k) holds for 1 =1 ► Consider n+1. If n+1 is a Fibonacci number, then we are done If not, we have, for some m>=1 f m < n+1 < f m+1 ► This gives n+1 = f m + (n+1-f m ) ► Now n+1-f m < n+1, so by the inductive hypothesis, n + 1 - f m = f j1 + f j2 + f j3 + … for some distinct f j1, f j2, …

24
► (cont) ► Now n+1-f m < n+1, so by the inductive hypothesis, n + 1 - f m = f j1 + f j2 + f j3 + … for some distinct f j1, f j2, … ► Moreover, none of these f ji is f m as f m+1 < 2f m. If some f ji =f m, then 2f m <=n+1 and f m cannot be the largest Fibonacci number <=n+1 ► Therefore, n + 1 = f m + f j1 + f j2 + f j3 + … So P(n+1) is true. ► By the principle of strong induction, P(n) is true for all integers n>=1

25
Strong induction ► ► To divide a chocolate bar with m × n squares into unit squares, we need mn − 1 cuts ► ► Proof: ► ► Let A = m × n ► ► We prove by strong induction on A. ► ► Base case, A=1: 0 cut is needed Should we induct on m or n?

26
► Inductive step: ► Assume that a chocolate bar of area B needs B-1 cuts for 1 =1 ► Consider a chocolate bar of area A+1 ► We can cut it once and divide it into two pieces of area A 1 and A 2, where A 1 +A 2 = A+1 ► By the inductive hypothesis, we need A 1 -1 and A 2 -1 cuts to divide them. So in total, we need A 1 -1 + A 2 -1 + 1 = A cuts ► By the principle of strong induction, we ► By the principle of strong induction, we need mn − 1 cuts to divide a chocolate bar with m × n squares

27
Well ordering principle ► The equation has no non-zero integer solution ► Proof: ► Assume to the contrary that there are non-zero integers u, v, w and z satisfying this equation ► By the well ordering principle, there are non-zero integers u, v, w and z satisfying this equation, such that they do not share any common prime factors

28
► Since the left hand side is even, x is also even, i.e. x = 2k for some integer k ► This implies w is even, i.e. w = 2l for some integer l ► Repeat the same argument, we can deduce that u and v are also even ► This contradicts our assumption that u, v, x and w do not have common prime factors

29
Additional references ► http://hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu/~min/cs70/sect2/solution2a.pdf http://hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu/~min/cs70/sect2/solution2a.pdf ► http://hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu/~min/cs70/sect3/solution3.pdf http://hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu/~min/cs70/sect3/solution3.pdf ► http://www.math.northwestern.edu/~mlerma/problem_solving/putnam /training-induc.pdf http://www.math.northwestern.edu/~mlerma/problem_solving/putnam /training-induc.pdf http://www.math.northwestern.edu/~mlerma/problem_solving/putnam /training-induc.pdf ► http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Electrical-Engineering-and-Computer- Science/6-042JSpring-2005/8C9DC16C-1328-4DA2-B58E- 850E90431AE1/0/rec5.pdf http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Electrical-Engineering-and-Computer- Science/6-042JSpring-2005/8C9DC16C-1328-4DA2-B58E- 850E90431AE1/0/rec5.pdf http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Electrical-Engineering-and-Computer- Science/6-042JSpring-2005/8C9DC16C-1328-4DA2-B58E- 850E90431AE1/0/rec5.pdf ► http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Electrical-Engineering-and-Computer- Science/6-042JSpring-2005/F592ADD6-24E6-4797-800C- A12A545EB2FB/0/rec4.pdf http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Electrical-Engineering-and-Computer- Science/6-042JSpring-2005/F592ADD6-24E6-4797-800C- A12A545EB2FB/0/rec4.pdf http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Electrical-Engineering-and-Computer- Science/6-042JSpring-2005/F592ADD6-24E6-4797-800C- A12A545EB2FB/0/rec4.pdf ► http://www.math.udel.edu/~lazebnik/papers/invariants.pdf http://www.math.udel.edu/~lazebnik/papers/invariants.pdf

Similar presentations

OK

Section 1.7. Definitions A theorem is a statement that can be shown to be true using: definitions other theorems axioms (statements which are given as.

Section 1.7. Definitions A theorem is a statement that can be shown to be true using: definitions other theorems axioms (statements which are given as.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on save water save earth Ppt on fuel from plastic waste Ppt on shell structures examples Ppt on bolivian water war Pps to ppt online Ppt on area of parallelogram and triangles in real life Ppt on water conservation in hotels Ppt on mvc architecture Ppt on mind reading machine Ppt on sports day