Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1M.Yıldız CURRENT MIRRORS AND THIRD GENERATION CURRENT CONVEYORS MERİH YILDIZ.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1M.Yıldız CURRENT MIRRORS AND THIRD GENERATION CURRENT CONVEYORS MERİH YILDIZ."— Presentation transcript:

1 1M.Yıldız CURRENT MIRRORS AND THIRD GENERATION CURRENT CONVEYORS MERİH YILDIZ

2 M.Yıldız2 Introduction Introduction Current Mirrors Current Mirrors –Simple current mirror (SCM) –Wilson current mirror (WSM) –Improved Wilson current mirror (IMCM) –Cascode current mirror (CCM) –Improved active feedback cascode current mirror (IAFCCM) –High Swing current mirror (HSCM) Conclusion and Future work Conclusion and Future work

3 M.Yıldız3 Introduction One of the most widely used analog building blocks is the current mirror One of the most widely used analog building blocks is the current mirror Current mirrors are commonly used in Current mirrors are commonly used in –Signal processing –analog circuits ( our target applications are current conveyors use CMs as current references and mirroring devices) So in these applications CM impact both  Noise performance  Frequency response

4 M.Yıldız4 Understanding the frequency behavior of CMs is important for designing current-mode circuits Understanding the frequency behavior of CMs is important for designing current-mode circuits Analog signal processing circuits demand Analog signal processing circuits demand –Higher bandwidths –better noise performance Current Mode techniques are adequate Current Mode techniques are adequate –Parasitic capacitances can be minimized –And their effect in system will be lower than in the case of voltage-mode circuits. [Sedra Smith 1989, Elec.Lett.] Many references can be found considering CM’s accuracy and output impedance or low-voltage applications Many references can be found considering CM’s accuracy and output impedance or low-voltage applications Fewer papers consider the effect of noise and frequency in CMs Fewer papers consider the effect of noise and frequency in CMs –Due to increasing usage at higher frequency, six most used CMs configurations are analyzed

5 M.Yıldız5 Current Mirrors Simple CM Wilson CM Improved Wilson CM Simple CM Wilson CM Improved Wilson CM Cascode CM IAFCCM High Swing CM Cascode CM IAFCCM High Swing CM

6 M.Yıldız6  The CMs were chosen regarding several aspects, namely: accuracy, simplicity, low-voltage operation and widespread usage The configuration used as reference is the simple current mirror (SCM) The configuration used as reference is the simple current mirror (SCM) When higher accuracy is demanded common circuits resort to Wilson and Cascode CMs. When higher accuracy is demanded common circuits resort to Wilson and Cascode CMs. WCM and IWCM exhibit large output impedance and high frequency response but are unsuitable for low-voltage operation WCM and IWCM exhibit large output impedance and high frequency response but are unsuitable for low-voltage operation Cascode CM is more suitable for low-voltage operation and has high output impedance Cascode CM is more suitable for low-voltage operation and has high output impedance

7 M.Yıldız7 The frequency behavior of these Six CM’s configurations are compared The frequency behavior of these Six CM’s configurations are compared –This comparison is based on the two-port representation of the CM and comprises the input impedance, the current gain, the output impedance and the reverse voltage gain Analytical Expression CM two port equivalent (with load)

8 M.Yıldız8 All transistors (except the mirroring devices- transistors M2 in all the CMs) are equal All transistors (except the mirroring devices- transistors M2 in all the CMs) are equal Transistors M2 have an aspect ratio of a Transistors M2 have an aspect ratio of a Major influence over the CM frequency response are Major influence over the CM frequency response are –the transconductance of the transistors (g m ), –the gate to source capacitance (C gs ) –the output conductance (g o ) –the configured aspect ratio of transistors M2 (a)

9 M.Yıldız9 Frequency response of several current mirrors configuration

10 M.Yıldız10  Maximizing bandwidth in CM relies on three design strategies Raising the quiescent current Raising the quiescent current decreasing both W and L decreasing both W and L Decreasing a Decreasing a Special care must be taken if current accuracy is also a design goal because Special care must be taken if current accuracy is also a design goal because –Decreasing L and raising I D also promotes on the output impedance, thus affecting current accuracy

11 M.Yıldız11  Load Effect Connecting a load to the output of a CM affects the frequency response of the system, but not the maximum bandwidth [Luis Nero Alves, Rui L. Aguar,2002] Connecting a load to the output of a CM affects the frequency response of the system, but not the maximum bandwidth [Luis Nero Alves, Rui L. Aguar,2002] Typical load impedance consisting of admittance G L in parallel with capacitance C L, introduces in the frequency response one zero and one pole, as expressed Typical load impedance consisting of admittance G L in parallel with capacitance C L, introduces in the frequency response one zero and one pole, as expressed

12 M.Yıldız12 Depending on the magnitude of the G L and C L this zero and pole can appear inside the system bandwidth causing a “kind of step” behavior Depending on the magnitude of the G L and C L this zero and pole can appear inside the system bandwidth causing a “kind of step” behavior Besides this middle frequency, the upper cutoff frequency remains unchanged Besides this middle frequency, the upper cutoff frequency remains unchanged Frequency response A i (s) (middle frequencies)

13 M.Yıldız13 Simulation Results To test the six proposed CMs we used a reference input current source. To test the six proposed CMs we used a reference input current source. A capacitor C L in parallel with a resistance R L was used as load A capacitor C L in parallel with a resistance R L was used as load The CM’s output port also tied to a fixed voltage V DC sufficient to grant the saturation condition in all the output transistors The CM’s output port also tied to a fixed voltage V DC sufficient to grant the saturation condition in all the output transistors Default value for W/L ratio is 20  m/2  m, except transistors M2 that were designed with ratio a (a=1 as default) Default value for W/L ratio is 20  m/2  m, except transistors M2 that were designed with ratio a (a=1 as default) The default current I D was 20  The default current I D was 20 

14 M.Yıldız14 Simulation Results are graphically summarized in figures Bandwidth versus W Bandwidth versus L Bandwidth versus I D Bandwidth versus a

15 M.Yıldız15  Improved Active Feedback Cascode Current Mirror (IAFCCM) IAFCCM was proposed to IAFCCM was proposed to –Increase the output voltage swing –Output impedance and matching accuracy IAFCCM g m : Transconductance of the transistors r ds : Output impedance of the transistors

16 M.Yıldız16  Simulation Results Output and Input Currents Output voltage Swing

17 M.Yıldız17  Conclusion Theoretical demonstrations pointed that CMs frequency response is dominated by the relationship between g m, C gs and g o in their transistors Theoretical demonstrations pointed that CMs frequency response is dominated by the relationship between g m, C gs and g o in their transistors Simulation results showed good agreement with the analysis carried out Simulation results showed good agreement with the analysis carried out High performance Third generation current conveyors will be investigated by using these six CMs High performance Third generation current conveyors will be investigated by using these six CMs  Future Work

18 M.Yıldız18 THANK YOU Merih YILDIZ Doğuş University-İSTANBUL-TURKEY


Download ppt "1M.Yıldız CURRENT MIRRORS AND THIRD GENERATION CURRENT CONVEYORS MERİH YILDIZ."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google