Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byCraig Engram Modified over 2 years ago

1
Reinforcement for Plates Course CT4150 Lecture12 5 Jan. 2010

2
Normal forces in concrete plates Only rebars in the x and y directions Equilibrium of a plate part

3
Equations Design Choose such that n sx +n sy is minimal (lower bound theorem)

4
Solution

5
Example 1 Situation n xx =1200, n yy =-200, n xy =-400 kN/m f y = 500 N/mm², f’ c = 30 N/mm² Thickness = 100 mm Reinforcement n sx = 1200+400 = 1600 kN/m n sy = -200+400 = 200 Concrete n c = -2x400 = -800 kN/m

6
A sx =1600/500 = 3.20 mm = 3200 mm²/m 2 12–280 = 2 /4x12²x1000/280 = 3231 OK A sy =200/500 = 0.40 mm = 400 mm²/m 2 6–500 = 2 /4x6²x1000/500 = 452 OK c = 800/100 = 8 N/mm² < f’ c OK (safety factors omitted)

7
Example 2 Deep beam 4.7x7.5 m, 2 supports, opening 1.5x1.5 m, point load 3000 kN, f cd = 16.67 N/mm², f yd = 435 N/mm²

8
Forces n xx, n yy, n xy (linear elastic analysis) Principal stresses

9
Reinforcement requirements (software)

11
Reinforcement (engineer)

12
Moments in concrete plates Only rebars in the x and y directions Equilibrium of a plate part Result (Yield contour)

14
Example 3 Moments in a point m xx = 13, m yy = -8, m xy = 5 kNm/m Moment capacities m px = 17, m py = 0, m’ px =0, m’ py = 10 Is the capacity sufficient? Yes

15
Design of moment reinforcement Carry the moments with the least amount of reinforcement. So, minimize m px + m py + m’ px + m’ py 5 constraints m px, m py, m’ px, m’ py ≥ 0 Solution 1 (Wood-Armer moments) Crack direction 45º to the reinforcing bars

16
Solution 2 (when m px would be < 0) Solution 3 (when m py would be < 0)

17
Solution 4 (when m’ px would be < 0) Solution 5 (when m’ py would be < 0)

18
Solution 6 (when m px and m py would be < 0) Solution 7 (when m’ px and m’ py would be < 0)

19
Example 4 Moments in a point (as in example 1) m xx = 13, m yy = -8, m xy = 5 kNm/m Moment capacities m px = 13+5²/8 = 16.13m’ px = 0 m py = 0m’ py = 8+5²/13 = 9.92 Amount of reinforcement is proportional to 16.13+0+0+9.92 = 26 Amount of reinforcement in example 3 17+0+0+10 = 27 (larger, so not optimal)

20
Example 5 Plate bridge, simply supported 4 x 8 m, point load 80 kN, thick 0.25 m

21
Example 5 continued Decomposition of the load

22
Example 5 Torsion moment

23
Example 5 All moments Moments in the bridge middle Moments at the bridge support

24
Example 5 FEM moments

27
Example 5 Reinforcement Middle Support Designed

28
Example 5 Upper bound check Result > 1OK

29
Computed requirements

33
Conclusions The design procedure used is 1 Compute the force flow linear elastically 2 Choose the dimensions plastically The reason for the linear elastic analysis in the first step is that it shows us how an as yet imperfect design can be improved. A plastic (or nonlinear) analysis in step 1 would shows us how the structure would collapse; but that is not what we want to know in design. This procedure is applied to design many types of structure for the ULS.

Similar presentations

OK

Linear Programming Old name for linear optimization –Linear objective functions and constraints Optimum always at boundary of feasible domain First solution.

Linear Programming Old name for linear optimization –Linear objective functions and constraints Optimum always at boundary of feasible domain First solution.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on regional trade agreements advantages Ppt online open world Ppt on computer software and languages Ppt on causes of 1857 revolt pictures Ppt on laser power transmission Ppt on acid-base titration equation Ppt on care of public property information Ppt on role of individual in conservation of natural resources Female reproductive system anatomy and physiology ppt on cells Ppt on sea level rise due