Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ARCs cut definition for TEC modules Javier Fernandez Menendez Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik Karlsruhe University TEC meeting 14 th July 2004.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ARCs cut definition for TEC modules Javier Fernandez Menendez Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik Karlsruhe University TEC meeting 14 th July 2004."— Presentation transcript:

1 ARCs cut definition for TEC modules Javier Fernandez Menendez Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik Karlsruhe University TEC meeting 14 th July 2004

2 Javier Fernandez (IEKP/UniKa)2 ARCs TEC Data on the web R1: 31N + 19S from Hamburg R2: 21S + 26N from Wien (problem in 2 APVs) R3: 31 from Ka + 23 from Ham (x-check) R4: 26 modules from Zurich R5: not enough statistics yet in community… R6: 23 from Aachen R7: 24 from Strasbourg Total: ~230 modules = ~2.5Gb of data in files

3 Javier Fernandez (IEKP/UniKa)3 What cuts can be defined? PinholeOpen Healthy Noisy No statistical criteria here: tagged as bad channels anyway in DB Statistical and graphical criteria Not use APV border channels for cuts definition

4 Javier Fernandez (IEKP/UniKa)4 Methodology Noise for all modules from one geometry in one single APV mode

5 Javier Fernandez (IEKP/UniKa)5 Methodology: an example Border Channels: 1,2, 128, 129, 255, 256, 384, 385, 511, 512 Next to border channels: 127, 130, 254, 258, 383, 386 0.9 (~4  1.3 (~4  Symmetric 4  cut from mean for healthy region definition

6 Javier Fernandez (IEKP/UniKa)6 Final result of cuts 1.3 (~4  ) 0.9 (~4  ) Noisy channels perfectly tagged!!! Still room for fluctuations (4  = 99.95% probability) Healthy region

7 Javier Fernandez (IEKP/UniKa)7 Summary of noise 4  cuts ModeR1R2R3R4R6R7 Mean1.01.021.111.131.331.44  0.050.070.050.040.050.06 Plow0.800.750.900.951.101.20 Phigh1.201.30 1.551.70 Mean1.371.401.541.591.701.80  0.050.080.070.050.06 Dlow1.151.101.251.401.451.55 Dhigh1.601.701.851.801.952.05 Stereo and Normal R1 show ~equal noise values Noise and cuts increase with R#

8 Javier Fernandez (IEKP/UniKa)8 R2 modules problem Lower average noise in central APVs Effect not seen in other geometries with 6 APVs (R1 and R5)

9 Javier Fernandez (IEKP/UniKa)9 It makes distribution not gaussian Central APVs Not-central APVs contribution

10 Javier Fernandez (IEKP/UniKa)10 Not an apparent Wien test problem PIO PIOn DIO DIOn Wien Karlsruhe R2 Module 26690

11 Javier Fernandez (IEKP/UniKa)11 Not an apparent Wien test problem PIOPIOn DIO DIOn Wien Aachen R2 Module 26697

12 Javier Fernandez (IEKP/UniKa)12 Conclusions There is a clear behavior difference between: channels at the borders of the APV and channels next to channel border Noise cuts defined/confirmed for TEC mods. –Program mainAnalyzer (in DefAna package) allows to redefine them in an easy way if needed and do extensive module analysis/comparisons Noise ~equal in stereo and normal modules Statistical gaussian method: first iteration 4  symmetric criterium maybe too tight ? But 5  could be too loose in some cases…


Download ppt "ARCs cut definition for TEC modules Javier Fernandez Menendez Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik Karlsruhe University TEC meeting 14 th July 2004."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google