Presentation on theme: "Summer 2005 Early Nuclear Strategy, 1945-52 Now that the U.S. military had the atomic bomb, what was its value? –Truman to Army Secretary Kenneth Royall."— Presentation transcript:
Summer 2005 Early Nuclear Strategy, 1945-52 Now that the U.S. military had the atomic bomb, what was its value? –Truman to Army Secretary Kenneth Royall (July 1948): “You have got to understand that this isn’t a military weapon. It is used to wipe out women and children and unarmed people, and not for military uses.”
Summer 2005 Was the Bomb the “winning weapon” or an empty threat? Was the Soviet test in August 1949 more important than Trinity?
Summer 2005 Changing Military Strategy A common debate – did nuclear weapons make conventional army/navy obsolete? Gradually, there was shift toward deterrence – emphasis not on fighting and winning a war but in preventing one.
Summer 2005 Gradual ascendancy of the US Air Force and the air-atomic strategy. By 1947 – the Bomb had become the central pillar of American security.
Summer 2005 US National Security Infrastructure 1947 – Truman’s National Security Act passed. Also (in 1946) creates a separate new branch of the military – the United States Air Force Strategic Air Command (SAC) emerges as most powerful part of USAF.
Summer 2005 The Big Picture: Crises of 1949-1950 Communists take over China Soviet A-bomb test Klaus Fuchs revealed as spy for USSR January 1950 Korean War summer 1950 Holy Sh*t!!!
Summer 2005 Overview of US Policies Overall Goal: Containment of Soviet expansion. Policies in support of containment (Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan) NSC-68
Summer 2005 AEC Chairman David Lilienthal recalls a visit to Los Alamos in 1947: “Probably one of the saddest days of my life was to walk down that chicken-wire enclosure at Los Alamos; [the nukes] weren’t even protected, what gimmicks they were... You can hardly exaggerate the unreadiness of the US military at this time.”
Summer 2005 Initial military views of the Bomb’s value were limited and cautious. Air Force – especially the younger officers – was most enthusiastic about the new atomic weapons.
Summer 2005 The Air Force’s New Doctrine The Army Air Force wished to apply the “lessons” from WW2 to the postwar world “The Sunday punch”
Summer 2005 November 1945 military report: –Future security of the US depended on making it “apparent to a potential aggressor that an attack on the United States would be immediately followed by an immensely devastating air-atomic attack on him.” “Air-atomic” = new synthesis of two technologies
Summer 2005 Gen. Curtis LeMay and the Birth of SAC LeMay – creator of the air strategy against Japan; champion of the air-atomic strategy. SAC formed 1946; LeMay was its leader from 1948-1957. SAC = a “cocked weapon”
Summer 2005 SAC’s Mission? “Be prepared to conduct long-range offensive operations in any part of the world, either independently or in co- operation with land and naval forces…to provide combat units capable of intense and sustained combat operations employing the latest and most advanced weapons…”
Summer 2005 SAC’s tools until mid-1950s – at first, long-range B-29’s armed with nuclear bombs. Later, jet-powered B-47 Stratojets.
Summer 2005 What was the purpose of SAC? –“In a war with the USSR, is our purpose to destroy the Russian people, industry, the Communist party, the Communist hierarchy, or a combination of these…? Nov. 1947; Gen. Hoyt Vandenberg No consensus on when/where Bomb would be used.
Summer 2005 By the end of 1948, the Joint Chiefs of Staff had agreed to the SAC plan. –“…the highest priority target system is that system constituted by the major Soviet urban-industrial concentrations.” –“Killing a Nation” strategy The air-atomic strategy had won out.
Summer 2005 Who set the strategy? –President and National Security Council (NSC) –Military planners (Joint Chiefs of Staff) –USAF (i.e. SAC)
Summer 2005 Emergence of “Overkill” What happens when “capabilities” takes over? Our capabilities USSR’s capabilities
Summer 2005 A Vicious Cycle? SAC increases its target list Truman orders massive expansion of nuclear weapons production (1949, 1950, 1952) SAC gets more planes and resources (some 40% of military budget)
Summer 2005 War in Europe was basically seen as reply of WW2 with a nuclear prelude. Difference before and after the more powerful hydrogen bomb. The Next War?
Summer 2005 Deterrence Emerges as US Strategy What is deterrence? Deterrence became the principal function of American military power.
Summer 2005 In deterrence, what your enemy thinks you will do is key. Before August 1949, this played to US strengths. Before 1949, was the Bomb a “wasting asset”?
Summer 2005 Problems with deterrence strategy? Many…
Summer 2005 Emergence of the “defense intellectual” RAND (R and D) Corporation in Santa Monica – leading “think-tank” for military strategy.
Summer 2005 Most influential early RAND analyst – Bernard Brodie The Absolute Weapon by Brodie in 1946 Brodie: The planners “simply expected the Soviet Union to collapse as a result of the bombing campaign…People kept talking about the Sunday Punch.” Brodie et al. tried to encourage more rational and selective approach
Summer 2005 Nonetheless, by 1955, SAC’s plans called for using hundreds of nuclear bombs to destroy over 100 Russian cities. As one observer remarked, “Virtually all of Russia would be nothing but a smoking, radiating ruin at the end of two hours.”
Summer 2005 U.S. Strategy After Its Atomic Monopoly Broken After Joe-1 revealed, Truman orders complete re- analysis of American strategy. Truman also ups the ante January 1950 w. H- bomb program
Summer 2005 NSC-68 Important document presented in spring of 1950 to the National Security Council. Analyzed the current and future world situation.
Summer 2005 One solution… “Atomic Annie” 1953 test of atomic cannon (15 kilotons)
Summer 2005 US now defending Europe…US troops as the “trip wire” A new situation emerging – US and USSR forces are mutually deterring each other with threat of a counterstrike. Result – US defense budget triples after 1950.
Summer 2005 Nuclear War Planning During Truman Years Framework for nuclear strategy established Targets emphasized preempting Soviet nuclear capability…1 st strike. SAC had a major voice in selecting targets Did Truman ever understand the dilemma posed by Soviets having the Bomb?
Summer 2005 Situation c. 1952 United States definitely less secure than it was before 1949. Arms race poised to enter a much more dangerous phase with new technologies.
Summer 2005 Epilogue Curtis LeMay retired from the Air Force in 1965. He never questioned his belief in large-scale strategic bombing. –“That beautiful devilish pod underneath, clinging as a fierce child against its mother's belly…
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.