We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNelson Crozier
Modified over 3 years ago
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Draft Interoperability Proposal Terry Davies SRNWP Meeting October 8-11, 2007
Page 2© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Flow chart
Page 3© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Interoperability deliverables D1-D3 D1: A report documenting the standard output format and including a list of parameters for which the standard output format is applied. D2: A report documenting the standard observational data format. D3: Requirements Specification for the adaptor software: This document includes the identification of the methods that can be used for implementing the adaptors, and for maintenance of the software in connection with the consortia. It must be agreed by all groups involved.
Page 4© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Interoperability deliverables D4-D6 D4: Four adaptors that transform the output from every LAM to the standard output format. This includes the software as well as the documentation D5: Enhancements to existing software tools that enable all LAMs to process data from the four available GMs. This includes the software as well as the documentation. D6: Enhancements to existing software tools that enable all LAMs to process data from the other LAMs. This includes the software as well as the documentation.
Page 5© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Not submitted because: D1, D2 and D3 require consultation between the consortia to reach agreement on formats and specifications. D4, D5 and D6 are best carried out by each of the consortia working to the agreed specifications. In this case there is a better chance of achieving success if the consortia work together through the WG and for each consortium to find its own staff resources to do the actual work.
Page 6© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Draft proposal for UK as RM Aim to deliver D1 to D4 within 2 years of commencement. As RM the UK will provide a Programme Manager at between 0.25 and 0,5 of a FTE – figure to be confirmed once further work has been completed into scope. The PM will coordinate and manage the technical work and produce reports required by Council. Each NWP consortium will carry out its own work for D4 under the coordination of the PM. (options for funding are given later).
Page 7© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Draft proposal for UK as RM Deliverables D5 and D6 would effectively allow any NWP model to use any other to provide lateral boundary conditions. The UK has some doubts over the desirability and achievability of these deliverables in a relatively short time scale. They are not as straightforward as D4 and it is felt that more work needs to be done to resolve the scope of the work. In particular, C-SRNWP members can provide valuable input into considering how sophisticated such a system need be. For instance, would a simple reversal of the systems to convert model output to a standard format suffice? There is also a question over the responsibility for maintenance of conversion systems as models change. And should the owners of global modelling systems be responsible for maintaining those models in a way that allows users of their lateral boundary conditions to carry on unaffected by change?
Page 8© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Draft proposal for UK as RM Many of these issues will require work to be done at individual nation level, not just by consortia. The UK feels that firm proposals for this developments required to deliver D5 and D6 should be deferred until there has been further examination of the size and complexity of the task.
Page 9© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Funding options Option 1 To provide the same level of funding as previously envisaged (€100K per annum). €30K to go to RM (€20K for 0.25 FTE plus €10K for travelling expenses) and the rest to be shared equally between NWP consortia (Unified Model, Hirlam, COSMO, Aladdin and ECMWF). Option 2 To reduce funding to €30K for the RM and ask the consortia to fund the technical work themselves.
Page 10© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Questions
ISeries Skip Upgrade External Sales Presentation September,2005.
Testing Relational Database
System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
© Crown copyright Met Office SRNWP Interoperability Workshop, ECMWF January 2008 SRNWP Interoperability Alan Dickinson Met Office.
ICT Class System Life Cycle. Large systems development projects may involve dozens of people working over several months or even years, so they cannot.
CSC271 Database Systems Lecture # 18. Summary: Previous Lecture Transactions Authorization Authorization identifier, ownership, privileges GRANT/REVOKE.
1 Software Design Introduction The chapter will address the following questions: How do you factor a program into manageable program modules that can.
System Analysis (Part 1)
What is Software Design? Introduction Software design consists of two components, modular design and packaging. Modular design is the decomposition.
Copyright Irwin/McGraw-Hill Software Design Prepared by Kevin C. Dittman for Systems Analysis & Design Methods 4ed by J. L. Whitten & L. D. Bentley.
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS June 21, 2010
System Design and Analysis
Project Workshops Assessment. 2 Deadlines and Deliverables No later than 16:00 on Tuesday, Week 21 in the Easter Term (second Tuesday) This is a hard.
ALADIN view of the way forward J.-F. Geleyn, ALADIN PM (also for F. Bouttier, C. Fischer and M. Janoušek) EUMETNET SRNWP Interoperability Workshop, Reading,
Unit Five – Transforming Organizations
© Crown copyright Met Office SRNWP Interoperability Workshop, ECMWF, January 2008 SRNWP Interoperability Terry Davies Met Office.
Info1409 De Montfort University1 Requirements Modelling Systems Analysis & Design Academic Year 2008/9 Info 1409 Lecture 7.
Chapter 1 Assuming the Role of the Systems Analyst
© Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Business Consulting Services Agenda Discussion: Management Reports Discussion: Project Reports Discussion: Engagement Proposal Upcoming Events Review Project.
© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.