Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byKiley Luther Modified over 2 years ago

2
PHANTOM GRAPHS PART 1. Philip Lloyd Epsom Girls Grammar School Web site: www.phantomgraphs.weebly.comwww.phantomgraphs.weebly.com

3
We often say that “Solutions of a quadratic are where the graph crosses the x axis”. y = x 2 – 4x + 3 y = x 2 – 2x + 1 y = x 2 – 2x + 2 1 3 1 1 Crosses twice Crosses once Does not cross at all so x 2 – 4x + 3 = 0 so x 2 – 2x + 1 = 0 so x 2 – 2x + 2 = 0 has 2 (real) solutions has 1 (real) solution has no (real) solutions (or 2 equal solutions)

4
But then we say that this last equation has “complex” or “imaginary” solutions. We can find where y actually CAN equal zero by “completing the square” : x 2 – 2x + 2 = 0 x 2 – 2x = – 2 x 2 – 2x + 1 = – 2 + 1 (x – 1) 2 = – 1 x – 1 = ± i x = 1 + i and x = 1 – i

5
Clearly, the graph does not actually cross the x axis at these points. It does not cross the x axis at all! So, physically, where are these “imaginary” solutions?

6
It is probably better to consider a simpler case using just y = x 2 For positive y values : we get the usual points… ( ± 1, 1) ( ± 2, 4) ( ± 3, 9) etc But we can also find negative, real y values even though the graph does not seem to exist under the x axis: If y = – 1 then x 2 = – 1 and x = ± i If y = – 4 then x 2 = – 4 and x = ± 2 i If y = – 9 then x 2 = – 9 and x = ± 3 i -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 941941

7
The big breakthrough is to change from an x AXIS ….… Real y axis Real x axis

8
Real y axis Real x axis Unreal x axis Complex x plane or “Argand plane” (Instead of just an x axis) The big breakthrough is to change from an x AXIS ….… to an x PLANE !

9
This produces another parabola underneath the usual y = x 2 but at right angles to it! (A sort of phantom parabola “hanging” from the usual y = x 2 graph)

10
Real y x (real) x (imaginary) THE GRAPH OF y = x 2 with REAL y VALUES. Normal parabola Phantom parabola at RIGHT ANGLES to the normal one.

11
There are still only two variables, x and y but, even though x values may be complex, y values are always REAL.

12
AUTOGRAPH VERSION. y = x² y = x²

13
Going back to y = x 2 – 2x + 2 ……. This can be written as: y = (x – 1) 2 + 1 Normally we say the MINIMUM VALUE of y is 1 But the REAL Minimum value of y is not 1! We just showed y can be 0 ! (ie when x = 1 + i and x = 1 – i ) (1,1)

14
In fact y can equal any real value! Suppose y = – 3 So ( x – 1) 2 + 1 = – 3 ( x – 1) 2 = – 4 x = 1 + 2 i and x = 1 – 2 i Similarly if y = – 8 ( x – 1) 2 + 1 = – 8 ( x – 1) 2 = –9 x = 1 + 3 i and x = 1 – 3 i

15
In fact there is NO MINIMUM REAL y VALUE because all complex x values of the form x = 1 ± K i will actually produce more REAL VALUES of y to – ∞. These values are all in the same PLANE at right angles to the basic graph. No other complex x values will produce real y values. The result is another parabola “hanging” from the vertex of the normal graph.

16
So, instead of saying … “Solutions of quadratics are where the graph crosses the x AXIS ” we should now say … “Solutions of quadratics are where the graph crosses the x PLANE”.

17
x = 1 + i x = 1 – i

18
AUTOGRAPH VERSION. y = (x - 1)² + 1 y = (x - 1)² + 1

19
y = (x + 4)(x + 2 y = (x – 2) 2 y = (x – 6) 2 + 1

20
x = 2 x = 6 + i x = 6 – i x = - 2 x = - 4

22
AUTOGRAPH VERSION. 3 parabolas 3 parabolas http://autograph-maths.com/activities/philiplloyd/phantom.html

23
Now consider y = x 4 For positive y values we get the usual points ( ± 1, 1), ( ± 2, 16), ( ± 3, 81) but equations involving x 4 such as : x 4 = 1 or x 4 = 16 have 4 solutions not just 2. (This is called the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra.)

24
If y = 1, x 4 = 1 so using De Moivre’s Theorem: r 4 cis 4θ = 1cis (360n) r = 1 and 4θ = 360n θ = 0, 90, 180, 270 x 1 = 1 cis 0 = 1 x 2 = 1 cis 90 = i x 3 = 1 cis 180 = – 1 x 4 = 1 cis 270 = – i

25
If y = 16, x 4 = 16 so using De Moivre’s Theorem: r 4 cis 4θ = 16cis (360n) r = 2 and 4θ = 360n θ = 0, 90, 180, 270 x 1 = 2 cis 0 = 2 x 2 = 2 cis 90 = 2 i x 3 = 2 cis 180 = – 2 x 4 = 2 cis 270 = – 2 i

26
This means y = x 4 has another phantom part at right angles to the usual graph. y Real x Unreal x Phantom graph Usual graph

27
BUT WAIT, THERE’S MORE !!! The y values can also be negative. If y = –1, x 4 = –1 Using De Moivre’s Theorem: r 4 cis 4θ = 1cis (180 + 360n) r = 1 and 4θ = 180 + 360n θ = 45 + 90n x 1 = 1 cis 45 x 2 = 1 cis 135 x 3 = 1 cis 225 x 4 = 1 cis 315

28
Similarly, if y = –16, x 4 = –16 Using De Moivre’s Theorem: r 4 cis 4θ = 16cis (180 +360n) r = 2 and 4θ = 180 + 360n θ = 45 + 90n x 1 = 2 cis 45 x 2 = 2 cis 135 x 3 = 2 cis 225 x 4 = 2 cis 315

29
This means that the graph of y = x 4 has TWO MORE PHANTOMS similar to the top two curves but rotated through 45 degrees.

31
AUTOGRAPH VERSION. y = x^4 y = x^4

32
Consider a series of horizontal planes cutting this graph at places such as : y = 81 So we are solving the equation: x 4 = 81 The result is a series of very familiar Argand Diagrams which we have never before associated with cross sections of a graph.

33
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 4 = 81 -3 -2 -1

34
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 4 = 16 -3 -2 -1

35
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 4 = 1 -3 -2 -1

36
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 4 = 0.0001 -3 -2 -1

37
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 4 = 0 -3 -2 -1

38
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 4 = –0.0001 -3 -2 -1

39
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 4 = –1 -3 -2 -1

40
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 4 = –16 -3 -2 -1

41
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 4 = –81 -3 -2 -1,

42
y = x 4 ordinary form of the equation z = (x + iy) 4 form of the equation for “Autograph” z = x 4 + 4x 3 yi + 6x 2 y 2 i 2 + 4xy 3 i 3 + y 4 i 4 z = x 4 + 4x 3 yi – 6x 2 y 2 – 4xy 3 i + y 4 Re(z) = x 4 – 6x 2 y 2 + y 4 Im(z)= 4yx(x 2 – y 2 ) If Im(z) = 0 then y = 0 or x = 0 or y = ±x Subs y = 0 and Re(z) = x 4 ( basic curve ) Subs x = 0 and Re(z) = y 4 ( top phantom ) Subs y = ±x and Re(z) = – 4 x 4 ( bottom 2 phantoms) y x z

44
Next we have y = x 3 Equations with x 3 have 3 solutions. If y = 1 then x 3 = 1 so r 3 cis 3θ = 1cis (360n) r = 1 θ = 120n = 0, 120, 240 x 1 = 1 cis 0 x 2 = 1 cis 120 x 3 = 1 cis 240

45
Similarly, if y = 8 then x 3 = 8 so r 3 cis 3θ = 8cis (360n) r = 2 θ = 120n = 0, 120, 240 x 1 = 2 cis 0 x 2 = 2 cis 120 x 3 = 2 cis 240

46
Also y can be negative. If y = –1, x 3 = –1 r 3 cis 3θ = 1cis (180 +360n) r = 1 and 3θ = 180 + 360n θ = 60 + 120n x 1 = 1 cis 60 x 2 = 1 cis 180 x 3 = 1 cis 300

47
The result is THREE identical curves situated at 120 degrees to each other!

49
AUTOGRAPH VERSION. y = x³ y = x³

50
Again consider a series of horizontal Argand planes cutting this graph at places such as : y = 27 So we are solving the equation: x 3 = 27 The result is a series of very familiar Argand Diagrams which we have never before associated with cross sections of a graph.

51
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 3 = 27 -3 -2 -1

52
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 3 = 8 -3 -2 -1

53
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 3 = 1 -3 -2 -1

54
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 3 = 0.001 -3 -2 -1

55
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 3 = 0 -3 -2 -1

56
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 3 = – 0.001 -3 -2 -1

57
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 3 = –1 -3 -2 -1

58
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 3 = –8 -3 -2 -1

59
1 2 3 Real x Unreal x Solutions of x 3 = –27 -3 -2 -1

61
Now consider the graph y = (x + 1) 2 (x – 1) 2 = (x 2 – 1)(x 2 – 1) = x 4 – 2x 2 + 1 Any horizontal line (or plane) should cross this graph at 4 places because any equation of the form x 4 – 2x 2 + 1 = “a constant ” has 4 solutions. (Fundamental Theorem of Algebra) – 2 – 1 1 2 1

62
y = (x + 1) 2 (x – 1) 2 = x 4 – 2x 2 + 1 We can find “nice” points as follows: If x = ± 2 then y = 9 so solving x 4 – 2x 2 + 1 = 9 we get : x 4 – 2x 2 – 8 = 0 so (x + 2)(x – 2) (x 2 + 2) = 0 giving x = ± 2 and ± √ 2 i – 2 – 1 1 2 (2,9)(-2,9)

63
y = (x + 1) 2 (x – 1) 2 Similarly if x = 3 then y = 64 so solving x 4 – 2x 2 + 1 = 64 x 4 – 2x 2 – 63 = 0 (x + 3)(x – 3) (x 2 + 7) = 0 giving x = ± 3 and ± √7 i

64
Using this idea to find other “nice” points: If y = 225, x = ± 4 and ± √14 i and if y = 576, x = ± 5 and ± √23 i The complex solutions are all 0 ± n i This means that a phantom curve, at right angles to the basic curve, stretches upwards from the maximum point.

65
However if y = – 1 then x 4 – 2x 2 + 1 = – 1 (x 2 – 1) 2 = – 1 x 2 – 1 = ±i x 2 = 1 ± i To solve this we change it to polar form. so x 2 = √2cis(45 0 + 360n) or √2cis(315 0 + 360n) Using De Moivre’s theorem again: x 2 = r 2 cis 2θ = √2 cis(45 or 405 or 315 or 675) x = 2 ¼ cis(22 ½ or 202½ or 157½ or 337½) If y = – 1, x = – 1.1 ± 0.46 i, 1.1 ± 0.46 i

66
If y = – 2, x = – 1.2 ± 0.6 i, 1.2 ± 0.6 i If y = – 4, x = – 1.3 ± 0.78 i, 1.3 ± 0.78 i Notice that the real parts of the x values vary. This means that the phantom curves hanging off from the two minimum points are not in a vertical plane as they were for the parabola.

69
AUTOGRAPH VERSION. y = (x - 1)²(x + 1)² y = (x - 1)²(x + 1)²

70
END of PART 1 Please check out the Web site: www.phantomgraphs.weebly.com

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

11.4 Roots of Complex Numbers

11.4 Roots of Complex Numbers

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on different types of dance forms Ppt on law against child marriage statistics Ppt on main bodies of uno rules Ppt on acute coronary syndrome symptoms Ppt on hunter commission Ppt on operating system of mobile Ppt on standing order act Ppt on culture of goa Jit ppt on manufacturing processes Pdf to ppt online nitro