Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A Study Of The Apostle Paul’s Letter To The Hebrews Don’t drift away! Don’t neglect your salvation! Don’t Depart! Don’t fall away! Don’t cast away your.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A Study Of The Apostle Paul’s Letter To The Hebrews Don’t drift away! Don’t neglect your salvation! Don’t Depart! Don’t fall away! Don’t cast away your."— Presentation transcript:

1 A Study Of The Apostle Paul’s Letter To The Hebrews Don’t drift away! Don’t neglect your salvation! Don’t Depart! Don’t fall away! Don’t cast away your confidence! Don’t harden your heart! How can we neglect so great a salvation? ~ Hebrews 2:3

2 Hebrews: Christ Is Superior! Superior Person (1:1—4:13) Superior to Prophets (1:1-3) Superior to Angels (1:4—2:18) Superior to Moses (3:1-19) Superior to Joshua (4:1-13) Superior Priest (4:14—7:28) Superior to Aaron (4:14—6:12) Superior to Melchizedek (6:13—7:10) We’ll only get to 6:13-20 today. Superior to Levi (7:11-28)

3 Hebrews: Christ Is Superior! Superior Pact to Moses’ (8:1—10:18) Superior Promises (8:1-13) Superior Sanctuary (9:1-15) Superior Sacrifice (9:16-28) Superior Results (10:1-18) Superior Principle (Faith) to Moses’ (10:19—13:25) Superior Things (10:19-39) Superior Actions (11:1-40) Superior Relationship (12:1-29) Superior Way of Life (13:1-25)

4 In our study of, we found Paul writing about the impossibility of being saved without Christ, which is what they would’ve been hoping for by going back to the Old Law. This is why in Paul brought up the idea of inheriting the promises made to Abraham, promis- es that could and would only be fulfilled in Christ—the One they were leaving behind; so he was urging them to imi- tate those like Abraham who, through faith and perseverance, were experi- encing the fulfillment of the promises. In our study of 6:4-12, we found Paul writing about the impossibility of being saved without Christ, which is what they would’ve been hoping for by going back to the Old Law. This is why in 6:12 Paul brought up the idea of inheriting the promises made to Abraham, promis- es that could and would only be fulfilled in Christ—the One they were leaving behind; so he was urging them to imi- tate those like Abraham who, through faith and perseverance, were experi- encing the fulfillment of the promises.

5 For when God made a promise to Abraham, be- cause He could swear by no one greater, He swore by Himself… Hebrews 6:13 

6 For when God made a promise to Abraham, be- cause He could swear by no one greater, He swore by Himself… Because they were becoming discour- aged by the long de- lay of Christ’s com- ing (for, as Peter indi- cated, they were look- ing for Him in their generation, ), Paul alluded to fath- er Abraham’s faith & perseverance.   Because they were becoming discour- aged by the long de- lay of Christ’s com- ing (for, as Peter indi- cated, they were look- ing for Him in their generation, 2 Pet. 3:4), Paul alluded to fath- er Abraham’s faith & perseverance.  

7 In & we read,. In 11:9-10 & 39 we read, By faith he (Abe) sojourned in the land of promise as in a foreign country, dwelling in tents with Isaac & Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise; for he waited for the city which has foundations, whose builder and maker is God…. All these, having obtained a good testimony thru faith, did not receive the promise.

8 The emphasis of, which is often referred to as The Hall of Faith, is the long outlook of true faith—involving patient waiting and endurance. The ex- ample of Abraham demonstrated that the promise of God is certain; i.e., You think you’ve had a long wait—just think of poor father Abraham who has yet to receive the fulfillment of the promises that were made directly to him! The emphasis of Hebrews 11, which is often referred to as The Hall of Faith, is the long outlook of true faith—involving patient waiting and endurance. The ex- ample of Abraham demonstrated that the promise of God is certain; i.e., You think you’ve had a long wait—just think of poor father Abraham who has yet to receive the fulfillment of the promises that were made directly to him!

9 For when God made a promise to Abraham, be- cause He could swear by no one greater, He swore by Himself… God swearing here means that He con- firmed His promise ( cf. ); and this oath was made on Himself since He is the Top-Banana : in God said,, which is probably similar to saying, I give you my word of honor. God swearing here means that He con- firmed His promise ( cf. v. 17 ); and this oath was made on Himself since He is the Top-Banana : in Genesis 22:16 God said, By Myself I have sworn, which is probably similar to saying, I give you my word of honor. Incidentally…  

10 For when God made a promise to Abraham, be- cause He could swear by no one greater, He swore by Himself… It’s interesting to note that this oath was made to Abra- ham after Isaac was about 25 years old, so it didn’t include Isaac’s birth, but all the blessings which would flow through him.

11 …saying, “Surely blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply you.” Hebrews 6:14 

12 …saying, “Surely blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply you.” This type of repeti- tious saying is a fig- ure of speech meant to emphasize; i.e., God was telling Ab- raham that He was going to greatly bless & multiply him and his offspring.

13 This same idea is found of Jesus when He is said to be the and (), meaning that Jesus is the kingliest king and the lord- liest lord! It’s also found in the phrase ( & in Darby & Holman versions ), meaning, as the NKJV puts it, () or (). This same idea is found of Jesus when He is said to be the King of kings and Lord of lords ( Rev. 19:16 ), meaning that Jesus is the kingliest king and the lord- liest lord! It’s also found in the phrase the holy of holies ( Heb. 9:3 & 12 in Darby & Holman versions ), meaning, as the NKJV puts it, the holiest of all ( 9:3 ) or the most holy place ( 9:12 ).

14 …saying, “Surely blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply you.” The blessing of the promise was not only that Abe’s faith would be accounted to him for righteous- ness, but also that the faith of his seed would be accounted to them for righte- ousness: in Paul wrote about how that… The blessing of the promise was not only that Abe’s faith would be accounted to him for righteous- ness, but also that the faith of his seed would be accounted to them for righte- ousness: in Gal. 3:8 Paul wrote about how that…. God, forseeing that He would bless the nations by faith, preached the Gospel to Abraham before- hand, saying, In you all the nations shall be blessed.

15 And so, after he had patiently en- dured, he obtain- ed the promise. Hebrews 6:15 

16 And so, after he had patiently en- dured, he obtain- ed the promise. The term for here is the same root word as trans- lated in, both refer- ring to perseverance (something active), not mere patience (something passive— the way we usually understand it today). The term for endured here is the same root word as trans- lated patience in verse 12, both refer- ring to perseverance (something active), not mere patience (something passive— the way we usually understand it today).

17 And so, after he had patiently en- dured, he obtain- ed the promise. Since the term for here car- ries with it the idea of something merely lighting on a person, it indicates that Abe didn’t personally re- ceive the entire ful- fillment of the pro- mise, only a touch of it, such as in the birth of Isaac and some of his progeny. However…    Since the term for obtained here car- ries with it the idea of something merely lighting on a person, it indicates that Abe didn’t personally re- ceive the entire ful- fillment of the pro- mise, only a touch of it, such as in the birth of Isaac and some of his progeny. However…   

18 Another way to look at it is this: Just as multiplying Abraham referred to his de- scendants, so his reception of the pro- mise was fulfilled through them. Still… Another way of looking at this can be found in : Jesus said, ; more than likely this means that Abraham saw the Messiah by the eye of faith ( as referred to in that we’ll read momentarily ). By the way…  Another way of looking at this can be found in John 8:56: Jesus said, Your father Abraham … saw My day and was glad; more than likely this means that Abraham saw the Messiah by the eye of faith ( as referred to in Hebrews 11:13 that we’ll read momentarily ). By the way… 

19 And so, after he had patiently en- dured, he obtain- ed the promise. To is to do the opposite of (). To patiently endure is to do the opposite of becoming slug- gish ( v. 12 ).

20 For men indeed swear by the great - er, and an oath for confirmation is for them an end of all dispute. Hebrews 6:16 

21 Paul was illustrating the certainty and security of God’s promise by alluding to His oath: God’s aim was to push aside any reason for doubt by confirming His promise with an oath. Why bring this up? Because…  For men indeed swear by the great - er, and an oath for confirmation is for them an end of all dispute.

22 Since time immemorial, mankind has em- ployed the use of oaths upon those greater than he ( usually God or His Word ) in order to settle any matter; oaths, therefore, have become solemn. Oaths cause people to say, OK, as long as you swear, I can ex- pect nothing more. So… The point is this: If people feel like they can bank on what a man says under oath to God, surely he should not only accept what God Himself says in oath, but he should also be able to feel total security in doing such!

23 Abraham did, and he didn’t even live long enough to see the entirety of the promise fulfilled! In fact, Paul said that he (). Abraham did, and he didn’t even live long enough to see the entirety of the promise fulfilled! In fact, Paul said that he died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off was assured of them ( Heb. 11:13 ). Unlike Abraham though, these brethren were on the verge of finally experienc- ing the fulfillment of these long-await- ed promises! As a side-note…    As a side-note…   

24 What’s the difference between an oath and a promise? In a promise a simple claim is made, while in an oath some- one’s character publicly & solemnly sup- ports the claim. In a promise we look at words, while in an oath we look at the person ( whether he be the oath-taker or the oath-supporter ). Such reminds me of when Paul called on God as witness (,,, & ). What’s the difference between an oath and a promise? In a promise a simple claim is made, while in an oath some- one’s character publicly & solemnly sup- ports the claim. In a promise we look at words, while in an oath we look at the person ( whether he be the oath-taker or the oath-supporter ). Such reminds me of when Paul called on God as witness ( Rom. 1:9, 2 Cor. 1:23, Php. 1:8, & 1 The. 2:5 ).

25 Thus God, deter- mining to show more abundantly to the heirs of [the] promise the immutability of His counsel, con- firmed it by an oath… Hebrews 6:17 

26 Thus God, deter- mining to show more abundantly to the heirs of [the] promise the immutability of His counsel, con- firmed it by an oath… In other words, ac- cording to our own universal custom, God complied with mankind’s own ac- cepted tradition of oath-taking.

27 Thus God, deter- mining to show more abundantly to the heirs of [the] promise the immutability of His counsel, con- firmed it by an oath… Paul was saying that God disregarded the implied distrust in His Word alone and took the oath; He just couldn’t make it on any other than Himself. See…  

28 Men make oaths on someone greater than himself ( such as God ) because he’s in essence saying that if he’s lying, he acknowledges the right of this greater one to punish him. But since there’s none above God to punish Him if He were lying, He did all He could possibly do, taking an oath on the very same person that men do—Himself; so if they trust themselves to make an oath on God, surely they can trust God to make an oath on Himself!

29 Thus God, deter- mining to show more abundantly to the heirs of [the] promise the immutability of His counsel, con- firmed it by an oath… This word simply means unchange- ableness; God want- ed Abraham and all his heirs (physical & spiritual) to know that He isn’t a turn- coat.

30 Thus God, deter- mining to show more abundantly to the heirs of [the] promise the immutability of His counsel, con- firmed it by an oath… To Timothy Paul suc- cinctly said that God (), and James said of God that in Him (). To Timothy Paul suc- cinctly said that God cannot deny Himself ( 2 Tim. 2:13 ), and James said of God that in Him is no variation or [even a] shadow of turning ( 1:17 ).

31 Thus God, deter- mining to show more abundantly to the heirs of [the] promise the immutability of His counsel, con- firmed it by an oath… The term for refers to a pro- posal based on one’s desire; i.e., God pro- posed or promised certain things to Ab- raham based on His desires for mankind, then He took an oath to fulfill them. The term for coun- sel refers to a pro- posal based on one’s desire; i.e., God pro- posed or promised certain things to Ab- raham based on His desires for mankind, then He took an oath to fulfill them.

32 Thus God, deter- mining to show more abundantly to the heirs of [the] promise the immutability of His counsel, con- firmed it by an oath… The term for is different than the one for in : this one means to pledge oneself as surety. I.e….   The term for con- firmed is different than the one for con- firmation in verse 16: this one means to pledge oneself as surety. I.e….  

33 Thus God, deter- mining to show more abundantly to the heirs of [the] promise the immutability of His counsel, con- firmed it by an oath… Since God couldn’t take an oath on any- one greater, He in essence, by taking an oath on Himself, became the securi- ty-deposit for the sake of this promise. Similarly, Jesus is the surety for the New Covenant (). Interestingly…  Since God couldn’t take an oath on any- one greater, He in essence, by taking an oath on Himself, became the securi- ty-deposit for the sake of this promise. Similarly, Jesus is the surety for the New Covenant ( 7:22 ). Interestingly… 

34 Since Paul was heading back into his discussion of Christ’s high priesthood according to the order of Melchizedek, there’s a very distinct possibility that this verse about the oath of God to Ab- raham and his descendants includes His oath concerning Jesus’ priesthood. In he brought up again where God spoke of swearing that Jesus will be a priest forever. Since Paul was heading back into his discussion of Christ’s high priesthood according to the order of Melchizedek, there’s a very distinct possibility that this verse about the oath of God to Ab- raham and his descendants includes His oath concerning Jesus’ priesthood. In 6:20 he brought up Psalm 110:4 again where God spoke of swearing that Jesus will be a priest forever. You know what?    You know what?   

35 For Paul, this really is a very smooth transition: moving from an allusion to in to a warning against apostasy in to Abra- ham as an example of faithfulness due to his trust in God in then back to about Jesus and Melchi- zedek and Abraham’s connection to him () is masterfully accomplished. For Paul, this really is a very smooth transition: moving from an allusion to Psalm 110:4 in 5:6-10 to a warning against apostasy in 5:11—6:12 to Abra- ham as an example of faithfulness due to his trust in God in 6:13-19 then back to Psalm 110:4 about Jesus and Melchi- zedek and Abraham’s connection to him ( 6:20 ) is masterfully accomplished. Anyway, on to…   

36 …that by two im- mutable things, in which it is impos- sible for God to lie, we might have strong consola- tion who have fled for refuge to lay hold of the hope set before us. Hebrews 6:18 

37 …that by two im- mutable things, in which it is impos- sible for God to lie, we might have strong consola- tion who have fled for refuge to lay hold of the hope set before us. This either refers to two oaths (the one to Abraham and the one about Jesus’ priest- hood) or, as most be- lieve, to God’s and His (). This either refers to two oaths (the one to Abraham and the one about Jesus’ priest- hood) or, as most be- lieve, to God’s pro- mise and His oath ( v. 17 ).

38 …that by two im- mutable things, in which it is impos- sible for God to lie, we might have strong consola- tion who have fled for refuge to lay hold of the hope set before us. reads, (NLT). Numbers 23:19 reads, God is not a man that He should lie…. Has He ever promised and not carried it through? (NLT).

39 …that by two im- mutable things, in which it is impos- sible for God to lie, we might have strong consola- tion who have fled for refuge to lay hold of the hope set before us. This might be better understood as a for- tress of encourage- ment, because the word for refers to a barrier against resistance, while the word for refers, of course, to en- couragement result- ing in consolation. This might be better understood as a for- tress of encourage- ment, because the word for strong refers to a barrier against resistance, while the word for consolation refers, of course, to en- couragement result- ing in consolation.

40 Peter once said, (); & this was right after he wrote about those who expected Him to come back and deliver them in their generation and were complaining that He wasn’t fulfilling His promise (). Peter once said, The Lord isn’t really being slow about His promise as some think ( 2 Pet. 3:9 ); & this was right after he wrote about those who expected Him to come back and deliver them in their generation and were complaining that He wasn’t fulfilling His promise ( v. 4 ). So because God made a promise, took an oath, and cannot lie, they really had no excuse for not being highly motivat- ed and moving forward, no matter what they were enduring!

41 …that by two im- mutable things, in which it is impos- sible for God to lie, we might have strong consola- tion who have fled for refuge to lay hold of the hope set before us. This is the same as in the Septuagint version of where it speaks of fleeing to a city of refuge. (There were three on each side of the Jordan.) This is the same as in the Septuagint version of Deu. 4:42 where it speaks of fleeing to a city of refuge. (There were three on each side of the Jordan.)

42 …that by two im- mutable things, in which it is impos- sible for God to lie, we might have strong consola- tion who have fled for refuge to lay hold of the hope set before us. These brethren had accepted Jesus as the Messiah, so they were headed for the eternal city of God’s refuge, obeying John the Baptist who warned them to (). These brethren had accepted Jesus as the Messiah, so they were headed for the eternal city of God’s refuge, obeying John the Baptist who warned them to flee from the wrath to come ( Mat. 3:7 ).

43 This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which enters the presence behind the veil… Hebrews 6:19 

44 This word is from the term ankuran ; so, as you can see, our word “anchor,” like our word “baptism” is actually a transli- teration ( a Greek word in English letters ). This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which enters the presence behind the veil…

45 Paul was telling them that their hope was their —some- thing found on an- cient coins as an em- blem of hope. Paul was telling them that their hope was their anchor—some- thing found on an- cient coins as an em- blem of hope. This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which enters the presence behind the veil…

46 This means that it was totally secure in that the chain could not break, and the anchor could not slip off its mooring. This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which enters the presence behind the veil…

47 And where did Paul say this anchor and its chain—hope— extended into?, or more literal- ly, the place behind the veil—the most holy place. Think about this:    And where did Paul say this anchor and its chain—hope— extended into? The presence behind the veil, or more literal- ly, the place behind the veil—the most holy place. Think about this:    This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which enters the presence behind the veil…

48 The veil of the temple represented Jesus (), so when He died this veil was torn in two to signify His death (); but not only that, for man through Jesus is now invited into God’s presence—behind the veil, something that was forbidden before! Listen to :    The veil of the temple represented Jesus ( Heb. 10:19-20 ), so when He died this veil was torn in two to signify His death ( Luke 23:45 ); but not only that, for man through Jesus is now invited into God’s presence—behind the veil, something that was forbidden before! Listen to Hebrews 10:19-23:   

49 Therefore, brethren, having boldness to enter the holiest by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way which He con- secrated for us, through the veil, that is, His flesh. And having a high priest over the house of God, let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience & our bodies washed with pure water. Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without waver- ing, for He who promised is faithful. However…    However…   

50 Since the full glories of that invitation wouldn’t be realized until Christ’s high priestly work was completed, then the veil of the tabernacle also signified the transition Christ was making from one covenant to another ( from the covenant of sin and death to the covenant of reconci- liation and life ). In other words…  

51 By AD 70, after a generation of grace for the Jews, everything connected with the Old Law was totally and finally removed by Christ, thereby completing the plan of redemption. So… Paul was telling them that because their Messiah, through His death and resur- rection, was in God’s presence preparing their (), they, based on God’s promises and oaths, had no good reason to forsake their confession of Jesus (). Anyway, one more verse:  Paul was telling them that because their Messiah, through His death and resur- rection, was in God’s presence preparing their place ( John 14:1ff ), they, based on God’s promises and oaths, had no good reason to forsake their confession of Jesus ( 4:14 ). Anyway, one more verse: 

52 …where the fore- runner has enter- ed for us, even Jesus, having be- come High Priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek. Hebrews 6:20 

53 …where the fore- runner has enter- ed for us, even Jesus, having be- come High Priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek. This phrase in the Greek is literally A forerunner ( we’ll no- tice the significance of this momentarily ). Je- sus was a forerun- ner, and He there- fore was the rock or mooring to which their hope was tied.

54 …where the fore- runner has enter- ed for us, even Jesus, having be- come High Priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek. This is true for at least two reasons in- dicated here. Firstly, and what’s obvious, Melchizedek’s priest- hood (as opposed to Aaron’s priesthood) is without end; as Paul said in, Melchi- zedek was. This is true for at least two reasons in- dicated here. Firstly, and what’s obvious, Melchizedek’s priest- hood (as opposed to Aaron’s priesthood) is without end; as Paul said in 7:3, Melchi- zedek was without father or mother … having neither be- ginning of days or end of life.

55 …where the fore- runner has enter- ed for us, even Jesus, having be- come High Priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek. Secondly & implied, the Levitical high priests were never thought of as fore- runners (which is why Paul didn’t place the word the before ). Rather… Secondly & implied, the Levitical high priests were never thought of as fore- runners (which is why Paul didn’t place the word the before fore- runner). Rather…

56 …where the fore- runner has enter- ed for us, even Jesus, having be- come High Priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek. They (wearing twelve gems on their vests for the twelve tribes of Israel) were merely representatives of the individuals who couldn’t even come near the tabernacle, much less enter its holy and most holy places!

57 Even the priests weren’t allowed to fol- low the high priest into the most holy place of God’s presence, reminiscent of when High Priest Jesus told His disci- ples, (). Why? Be- cause the new and living way wouldn’t be completely paved until AD 70. But once it was, then, as Jesus went on to say, (). See…    Even the priests weren’t allowed to fol- low the high priest into the most holy place of God’s presence, reminiscent of when High Priest Jesus told His disci- ples, Where I am going you cannot follow Me now ( John 13:36 ). Why? Be- cause the new and living way wouldn’t be completely paved until AD 70. But once it was, then, as Jesus went on to say, You shall follow Me afterward ( John 13:36 ). See…   

58 He went on to tell them, (). I.e., once His high priestly work was finished in Heaven (the real holy of holies), which included the total and once-for- all removal of the Old Law of sin and death, then they’d be fully accepted into God’s presence as heavenly citi- zens. This helps us to understand that… He went on to tell them, Since I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself, that where I am you may be also ( John 14:3 ). I.e., once His high priestly work was finished in Heaven (the real holy of holies), which included the total and once-for- all removal of the Old Law of sin and death, then they’d be fully accepted into God’s presence as heavenly citi- zens. This helps us to understand that…

59 At one time, if anyone besides the high priest entered the holy of holies, he’d die (, cf. & ); but now, because of Christ, we can live in God’s presence, meaning that through forgiveness our relationship to Him has been restored, giving us reconciliation and eternal life. At one time, if anyone besides the high priest entered the holy of holies, he’d die ( Exo. 28:5, cf. 28:43 & Num. 18:1ff ); but now, because of Christ, we can live in God’s presence, meaning that through forgiveness our relationship to Him has been restored, giving us reconciliation and eternal life.


Download ppt "A Study Of The Apostle Paul’s Letter To The Hebrews Don’t drift away! Don’t neglect your salvation! Don’t Depart! Don’t fall away! Don’t cast away your."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google