2Dallas Horseshoe Project Overview MargaretMcDermottBridgesProposed ConstructionUpgrade roadway geometryReplace I-30 and I-35E bridges over Trinity RiverConstruct additional lanesConstruct Margaret McDermott Bridges
3Ranked the 7th most congested Weekday volume exceeds 460,000 Purpose and NeedRanked the 7th most congestedroadway in Texas in 2011 –Weekday volume exceeds 460,000MargaretMcDermottBridgesProposed Construction
4Purpose and Need Bridge Deterioration Proposed Construction Margaret McDermottBridgesProposed Construction
5Horseshoe Project Configuration ExistingProposed(Eastbound at Jefferson Street)Existing LanesFrontage RoadCollector-DistributorHOV LanesGeneral Purpose LanesRampProposed LanesPlus the Calatrava-designed Margaret McDermott Bicycle/Pedestrian BridgesRamp
8Procurement History December 9, 2011 – RFQ released January 9, 2012 – Industry WorkshopMarch 29, 2012 – Three firms shortlistedJuly 3, 2012 – Final RFP issued to shortlisted firmsMay 23 – August 17, 2012 – One-on-One meetingsSeptember 25, 2012 – Technical Proposals receivedOctober 8, 2012 – Financial Proposals received
9Shortlisted Proposers Dallas Horseshoe Solutions:Equity MembersGranite Construction CompanyCH2M Hill Engineers, Inc.Traylor Bros., Inc.Non-equity MembersInfrastructure Corporation of AmericaExcelsis, Inc.Pavetex Engineering and Testing, Inc.Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc.Cobb Fendley & Associates, Inc.Alliance Geotechnical EngineeringStructural Engineering AssociatesLandtech Consultants, Inc.Summit Engineering, Inc.VAK Construction Engineering Services, LLC
12Evaluation of Proposals TxDOT implemented a pre-established and rigorous evaluation procedure to select the proposal that offers the best valueSeparate pass/fail, technical and financial evaluationsEvaluation subcommittees provided scoring recommendations to Evaluation Selection Recommendation Committee (ESRC)ESRC provided scoring recommendations to Project Steering Committee
13Scoring of Proposals Component Point Value Price 70 Best Value scoring based on price, schedule, and technical factors:Component Point ValuePrice 70(includes discount for early completion)Technical Solutions 15Project Management Plan 12Quality Management Plan 3Total 100Maximum of 100 points per proposal:Maximum of 70 points based on pricePrice for project excluding Margaret McDermott BridgesDiscount for early substantial completion (excluding Margaret McDermott Bridges)Price for Margaret McDermott BridgesMaximum of 30 points based on qualitative technical evaluationQualitative technical evaluation of Proposer’s project Development Plan based upon:Technical Solutions (15 pts)Project Management Plan (12 pts)Quality Management Plan (3 pts)
14Detailed Evaluations were completed resulting in………. ResultsDetailed Evaluationswere completedresulting in……….
15Pegasus Link Constructors Results (cont.)Pegasus Link ConstructorsFluor Enterprises, Inc.Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.is recommended to the Texas Transportation Commission as providing the best value
16Results (cont.) Pegasus Link Constructors ……………91.72 pts Fluor Enterprises, Inc.Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.Dallas Horseshoe Solutions …….……86.50 ptsGranite Construction CompanyCH2M Hill Engineers, Inc.Traylor Bros., Inc.NorthGate Horseshoe ….…………… ptsKiewit Infrastructure Group Inc.Zachry Construction Corporation
17Best Value Price Design & Construction $718,741,351 Capital Maintenance (years 1-5) $ 11,641,090Capital Maintenance (years 6-15) $ 23,208,005Total Contract $753,590,446
18Estimated Best ValueDesign-Build $738.8M $718.8MRow/Utilities/Etc. $ 79.2M $ 79.2M$818.0M $798.0M
19Next Steps Negotiate final terms of DBA and CMA FHWA concurrence with awardExecution of the DBA and CMAStart construction in early 2013Complete construction in approximately 4 years
2051 people participated in the Evaluation 29 – TxDOT Staff TxDOT Evaluation51 people participated in the Evaluation29 – TxDOT Staff22 – Consultant / AdvisorsFHWAParticipants:
21QuestionsStaff recommends and requests your approval of this minute order.