Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Seismic hazard analysis in Santo Domingo City Team 4 Report.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Seismic hazard analysis in Santo Domingo City Team 4 Report."— Presentation transcript:

1 Seismic hazard analysis in Santo Domingo City Team 4 Report

2 Study area Geological setting HVSR technique ReMi, Masw and Spac techniques Final discussion Outline

3 Team Members PabloRocioFernando Venezuela Honduras Dominican Rep.

4 Team Members Junior Haiti Lidia Honduras Norberto Puerto Rico Heriberto Dominican Rep.

5 Study Area Profile 1 Profile 2 Profile 3 Profile 4 Profile 5 Profile 6

6 Geological setting of Santo Domingo Stratigraphic column

7 HVSR technique

8 H/V data acquisition

9 Geology (Team 4 HVSR study area)

10 H/V station deployments

11 H/V Results: 2.60 s Station SD03_p2-p3 (1508_9282_202) 4.02 s Station SD06_p3-p4 (1526_92F1_202) ? ? ?

12 H/V Results: Station SD02_p3-p4 (1349_92F1_202) Station SD03_p3-p4S (1410_949A_202) 4.32 Secs 3.70 Secs ? ?

13 H/V Results: Station SD07_p3-p4 (1550_949A_202) Station SD04_p2-p3 (1532_950C_202) 3.71 Secs 2.38 Secs ? ? ?

14 H/V Results: Station SD01A_p3-p4 (1300_92F1_202) Station SD01B_p3-p4 (1308_949A_202) 0.28 Hz 3.58 Secs 0.27 Hz 3.70 Secs ? ?

15 Isoperiods Map (seconds)

16 ReMi and Masw techniques

17 ReMi and Masw data acquisition

18 Location for ReMi, Spac and Masw surveys Mirador sur Av. Mirador del Sur park Remi and Masw Line 1 Remi Line 2 Spac 1 Spac 2 Remi Line 3

19 Remi velocity model Line 2

20 Dispersion model Line 2

21 Soil Characterization near to ReMi 2

22 Soil Classification DR Seismic Code

23 727 m Remi Model Line 3

24 Dispersion curve for Line 3

25 65.5 m Last 13.5 m Limestone! Borehole S-4 Vs = 2083 m/s Vs = 1261 m/s Vs = 978 m/s Vs = 795 m/s Dispersion curve RMS error: m/s Vs = m/s IBC class site B Line 3 Remi Model

26 MASW Line 1 results

27

28 Spac technique

29 Location for Spac survey No. 2 Mirador sur Av. Mirador del Sur park Remi and Masw Line 1 Remi Line 2 Spac 1 Spac 2 Remi Line 3

30 Spac survey No. 2 ground model

31 HVSR results have a good relationship with the geological environment of deposition (alluvial fal, prodelta), that is the reason because we got high predominant period peaks. Remi, Masw and Spac techniques revealed a high velocity layering structure, validated by 8 boreholes drilled near from the team’s study site. Remi line 2 could be defined as a Class C site ( m/s, Stiff Soil- standard designs - NERHP). Remi lines 3 could be defined as a Class B site ( m/s, Soft Rock- low-hazard design - NERHP). Conclusions

32 Thanks you so much!


Download ppt "Seismic hazard analysis in Santo Domingo City Team 4 Report."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google