Presentation on theme: "THE FOUR FORCES THAT INFLUENCE THE QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE PROVISION SERVICES: Re-Thinking Engineering Education through a Law-Professor’s lenses Ben Koo,"— Presentation transcript:
THE FOUR FORCES THAT INFLUENCE THE QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE PROVISION SERVICES: Re-Thinking Engineering Education through a Law-Professor’s lenses Ben Koo, Tsinghua University John Cha, Beijing Jiaotong University Edward Crawley, MIT
Designing a Learning Organization Is about … – To support a miniature society By providing various functional services such as… – Knowledge Aggregation, Dissemination, and Creation Using effective forces to improve service qualities Not only about … – Individual performance – Statistical metrics of individual performance
Creator of the Four forces Lawrence Lessig: – Law Professor at Stanford University – Author of the following books: And most recently: REMIX email@example.com
What are the four forces Architecture/Law <> Pre/Post Constraints Market/Norm <> Pull/Push forces 4 Law Learning Organization Architecture Market Norm Modified from Lessig’sCode v2.0
Architecture A Pre-Emptive Force: – The stable properties of a system that constraints the activities of its inhabitants BEFORE they act. Example: The Great Wall of China Courtesy: Dr. Nan Tu
Law Enforceable consequences AFTER certain rules are broken … http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Roundabout_(Swindon) http://www.darkroastedblend.com/2008/03/worlds-worst-intersections-traffic-jams.html - Only if it can be enforced.
Market A force of enticement, attraction, pull … – “For 5 bucks an hour, you may ask me to believe in anything you want!” » Winston Zeddemore applying for a Ghost Buster position (played by Ernie Hudson) Source: Wikipedia on Ernie Hudson and Ghostbusters
Norm A force that expels or pushes agents to act in conformity. – It can be embarrassing to be different, even just a little bit. http://www.faithdoubt.com/be-a-little-different
How do we use these forces? If we treat schools as miniature societies … – We may use “the forces” to improve the performance of engineering schools as service agencies. but, what are the goals of our schools? – Providing knowledge? Nurturing engineering culture? Then, how do we start testing these ideas? – Start with two consecutive courses at THU IE Dept. Data Structures and Algorithms Database Concepts
Conceiving a Service Product Goals of our Knowledge Provisioning Service – Knowledge Aggregation Aggregate people and resources Aggregate experience and traditions Aggregate momentum/interests – Knowledge Dissemination Disseminate to fellow students Disseminate to other dept/schools Disseminate to the society – Knowledge Creation Create knowledge based on incremental aggregation Create knowledge based on cross-pollination Create knowledge based on innovation
A Pact with the students The goal/requirements were developed with iterative inputs from students All students are informed in the beginning of the course, that our collective goal is – not to just get a passing grade on one course, – but to exercise our rights and responsibilities to benefit-from and contribute-toknowledge provisioning services. They are encouraged to integrate any content knowledge from other courses and their life experience.
The first bit of Remix Let’s meet the students at the beginning of the semester… – Establishing a vocabulary amongst the students – They are relatively shy and not so well prepared… How do we communicate with the students in their “local” language? – The first bit of Remix » Video excerpts from Prison Break
Goal-oriented architectural plans Technical Architectures – Choosing between various dialects of scientific languages to express the technical content Organizational Architectures – One instructor lectures to many students – Many students prepare lectures to help others – Team-based structures to facilitate co-opetition Workflow Architectures – How do we choose between different format of student/instructor interactions to enforce learning? Weekly lectures, recitations, homework submission standards, …
Some Technical Decisions Under Tsinghua IE’s environmental context: – We require students to use at least two languages, and use as many complementary tools as possible. Most students will need least 5 languages, many learned close to 30 different new languages and tools in one semester. All students has a series of required homework, create an executable programming language from scratch. All homework are managed using networked version control systems (SubVersioN, a.k.a. SVN)SubVersioNSVN – Computational literacy is the key, the more they learn, the faster and easier it gets.
Technologies enables new possibilities A quick demonstration of technical possibilities…
Organizational Decisions To instill a societal context, all students are considered a member of the “Knowledge City”. Teams’ headcount cannot exceed 9, and each team is divided into three functional sub-teams. – Model for Data Management – View for Human-Machine Interactions – Controller for algorithm/process definition The organizational policy is modeled after the practice of Extreme Programming®Extreme Programming
2007 Teams’ labor division MODEL CONTROLLER VIEW
Workflow Decisions Classroom is a venue for “Town Hall” meetings – Students are to actively demonstrate their learning progress, not just to passively listen to some lecturers. Stringent requirements for student-prepared lectures. At least two rehearsals before they go- live. Afterwards, a review lecture must be prepared and presented the following week. All teams might be randomly selected to present theirweekly progress.
Content Direction Outline Initial Draft Rehearsal In-Class Lecture Performance Performance Review Tuesday Thursday Saturday Tuesday Thursday Quality Control Process 19 / 36 19 A short video demonstrating a typical workflow in class.
The Pre-Emptive Forces Technical Architecture: – The vocabulary, grammar, and the application context of a scientific language, pre-determines the cognitive scope of students’ technical knowledge. Organizational Architecture: – Effective interaction mechanisms amongst students/lecturers could pre-emptivelyeliminate communication bottlenecks Workflow Architecture: – Creates learning experiences that can be reproduced and managed in prescribedprocess patterns
Laws that complements Architectures Laws should specify the consequences of policy violation. – The ability to enforce the law, as well as – The strength of punishment Example: – Late assignments are: Punishable by point deduction – Plagiarism are: Manual/Automatically detected?
Points of Law Execution Weekly Lecture Ends Weekly Lecture Starts Second Rehearsal First Rehearsal SVN Version Control Service Student Lecture Student Progress Reports Quiz Review Video Production
The Power of Law The Power of Reasoning – Are students aware of the consequences? Their technical vocabulary helps them to effectively describe what they might have violated. Their organizational structure may help them filter the illegal intellectual content/activities Their workflow patterns will further reduce the unnecessary mistakes, and identify the differences between aggregation, dissemination, and creation – The process of claiming a creation requires iterative and community-based reasoning.
Market and Intellectual Currencies There are many currencies in the marketplace Three currencies are discussed here: – Student Grades Who gets higher grades? How to motivate students by grades? – Student feedback on teaching Is this a fair exchange? – Time as a currency Time spent on improving the learning organization?
Norm and Peer Pressure The right to be different A shared value across knowledge city – Why is “sharing” good? – Share the vision of contributing “free” knowledge. – The effect of “free” to the infrastructure and architecture of “Knowledge City”. How to instill an engineering culture? – Find/Create one’s own voice… – Stephen Covey’s 8 th habit “Find your voice and inspire others to find theirs.”
A bit of Remix Lessig’s latest book, Remix, talks about the civil rights and case studies on the “Remix” copy-righted intellectual material. Let’s watch a 3 min. video of “Remix” at Tsinghua. – The lecture was on “Applications of Data Structures and Algorithms.” – A typical in-class workflow is illustrated in the video
The whole is greater than the sum of its parts! Law Learning Organization Architecture Market Norm Modified from Lessig’sCode v2.0
Balance and Symmetry Designing organizations is about checks and balances! The four forces are balanced in their complementary directions. Before/After, Pull/Push, makes it rather complete to cover all angles of social dynamics. The four force framework is symmetrical, becauseapplies to a broad range of scales and types of social dynamics it explains. Its basic principles would apply to a small engineering class, or a large engineering school. – This framework was originally conceived by Lessig, for the explanation of the entire Internet-infested society.
How can we apply it? The four forces can be used as a shared vocabulary to describe the dynamic properties of learning organizations. A curriculum design workflow may be deduced from the four forces: – Choose architectures to fit the learning goals – Define rules based on architectural capabilities – Choose fair grading policies to encourage learning (Market) – Establish a norm that values knowledge sharing
Conclusion One or two courses may not be considered a curriculum, – but it could have a tipping effect of students’ overall learning behavior. – A good starting point to implement CDIO, without too much political uphill battle. We might learn a few tricks from a lawyer, (Lawrence Lessig), who cares about the philosophy and new civil rights primarily established by a great engineer, Richard Stallman.
Acknowledgement Thanks go to Wang TianJu, who created many diagrams in this presentation. We must also thank the students and other participants in this Tsinghua-CDIO experiment, who truly dedicated their time, and creative energy to push the envelop on many fronts. Welcome to join us at the Knowledge City during 2009 Summer Time.