Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Robot Control Independent joint control Lyapunov Theory Multivariable PD control and Lyapunov Theory Inverse Dynamic Control Robust Inverse Dynamic Control.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Robot Control Independent joint control Lyapunov Theory Multivariable PD control and Lyapunov Theory Inverse Dynamic Control Robust Inverse Dynamic Control."— Presentation transcript:

1 Robot Control Independent joint control Lyapunov Theory Multivariable PD control and Lyapunov Theory Inverse Dynamic Control Robust Inverse Dynamic Control Monday 12 Sept 2005

2 Feedforward Compensation – Independent Joint + + -

3 Chain Rule:

4

5

6

7 , will be positive definite if and only if the matrix P is positive definite matrix, that is, has all eigenvalues positive., equivalently the quadratic form, is said to be positive definite if and only if

8 Positive Definite Functions

9 The null solution of is asymptotically stable if there exists a Lyapunov function candidate V such that is negative definite along solution trajectories, that is, Theorem:

10 A Non-rigorous Proof

11 Example

12

13

14

15 Given the system suppose a Lyapunov function candidate V such that along solution trajectories Then the above system is asymptotically stable if does not vanish identically along any solution of the above system other than the null solution, that is, the system is asymptotically stable if the only solution of the system satisfying is the null solution. LaSalle’s Theorem:

16 Example: V-dot is zero when x 2 is zero. When x 2 is zero (in steady- state) then its rate of change also must be zero so x 1 has to be identically zero from the second equation. So finally the rate of change of x 1 should be zero from the first equation hence V is identically zero only along the equilibrium solution (0,0) of the system. Hence according to LaSalle’s Theorem the system is asymptotically stable.

17 From a previous slide (30 Aug 2005 Lecture)

18 Independent joint PD-control Scheme Simplify V-dot. Is this sign definite?

19 Theorem (p. 143 of the textbook) Define the matrix Then is skew symmetric, that is, the components Proof: Since the inertia matrix D(q) is symmetric, it is not difficult to see that N is skew symmetric.

20 Independent joint PD-control Scheme 1.We neglect the gravity terms or add an extra term g(q) in the input u. 2.We choose K D such that K D +B is positive definite. 3.This makes V-dot negative semi-definite.

21 When V-dot is identically equal to zero then it implies that q-dot and q-double dot are both identically equal to zero. But this doesn’t imply that the error is zero, i.e., q- desired may not equal q. But from we see that when v-dot is zero we must have LaSalle’s Theorem then implies that the system is asymptotically stable. To account for the gravity torque we can either have the position gains Kp very large or modify the input expression as

22 Inverse Dynamics or Computed Torque

23

24 Robust compensator Trajectory planner Nonlinear interface Plant Inner loop Outer loop Nominally linear system

25 Example (page 226)

26 Trajectory Interpolation Solve for (a,b,c,d,e).

27

28 Example (page 226)

29 //(1) trajectory planning //(2) simulation of inverse dynamic control of one link manipulator //I*theta-double dot+MgL*sin(theta) = u //10 Sept 2005 //Go to the directory where you keep this file and then to run it //exec('invdynpendulum.sce') clear t0 t1 t2 t I Ihat Mglhat k0 k1 dt abcde pos speed acc x1 x2 z m traj t0=0; t1=0.5; t2=1; I=5;Mgl=10;Ihat=5;Mglhat=5; k0=10;k1=10;dt=0.01; //theta=a+b*t+c*t^2+d*t^3+e*t^4 traj=[0;1;1;0;0];//position at t=t0, t=t1, t=t2; speed at t=t2; acceleration at t=t2 m=[1,t0,t0^2,t0^3,t0^4;1,t1,t1^2,t1^3,t1^4;1,t2,t2^2,t2^3,t2^4;0,1,2*t2,3*t2^2,4*t2^3;0,0,2,6*t2,12*t2^2]; abcde=inv(m)*traj; t=[0:dt:1]; pos=abcde'*[ones(size(t,1),size(t,2));t;t.*t;(t.*t).*t;(t.*t).*(t.*t)]; speed=abcde'*[zeros(size(t,1),size(t,2));ones(size(t,1),size(t,2));2*t;3*(t.*t);4*(t.*t).*t]; acc=abcde'*[zeros(size(t,1),size(t,2));zeros(size(t,1),size(t,2));... 2*ones(size(t,1),size(t,2));6*(t);12*t.*t]; x1(1)=pos(1); x2(1) = speed(1); z=[x1(1);x2(1)]; //initial conditions for k = 2:size(t,2), z(1)=z(1)+z(2)*dt; z(2)=z(2)+(-Mgl*sin(z(1))+Ihat*(acc(k)+k1*(speed(k)-z(2))+k0*(pos(k)-z(1)))+Mglhat*sin(z(1)))*(dt/I); x1(k)=z(1);x2(k)=z(2); end; f1=scf(1);clf(f1,'reset'); plot2d(t,pos,1);plot(t,x1,2); xgrid;xtitle('Theta', 'Time (s)','Angle (rad)');

30 k 0 =1, k 1 =2k 0 =10, k 1 =10I = 5, MgL = 10 desired

31 Implementation and Robustness Issues Define:

32

33 We need to choose the control such that

34 This is not likely because of the zero elements of the upper left quarter of the matrix. This means we have to try another Lyapunov function candidate. Find

35

36 This should be possible. So choose the P matrix and K 0 and K 1 such that Q is negative definite.

37

38

39

40

41

42 Example (page 226)

43

44

45 //(1) trajectory planning //(2) simulation of inverse dynamic control of one link manipulator //I*theta-double dot+MgL*sin(theta) = u //10 Sept 2005 //Go to the directory where you keep this file and then to run it //exec('invdynpendulum.sce') clear t0 t1 t2 t I Ihat Mglhat k0 k1 dt abcde pos speed acc x1 x2 z m traj Q1 t0=0; t1=0.5; t2=1; I=5;Mgl=10;Ihat=7.5;Mglhat=7.5; k0=1;k1=2;dt=0.01; alpha=0.5;Mbar=0.2; phi=2.5;p11=1;p12=1;p21=11;p22=1; //theta=a+b*t+c*t^2+d*t^3+e*t^4 traj=[0;1;1;0;0];//position at t=t0, t=t1, t=t2; speed at t=t2; acceleration at t=t2 m=[1,t0,t0^2,t0^3,t0^4;1,t1,t1^2,t1^3,t1^4;1,t2,t2^2,t2^3,t2^4;0,1,2*t2,3*t2^2,4*t2^3;0,0,2,6*t2,12*t2^2]; abcde=inv(m)*traj; t=[0:dt:1]; pos=abcde'*[ones(size(t,1),size(t,2));t;t.*t;(t.*t).*t;(t.*t).*(t.*t)]; speed=abcde'*[zeros(size(t,1),size(t,2));ones(size(t,1),size(t,2));2*t;3*(t.*t);4*(t.*t).*t]; acc=abcde'*[zeros(size(t,1),size(t,2));zeros(size(t,1),size(t,2));... 2*ones(size(t,1),size(t,2));6*(t);12*t.*t]; Q1=max(acc);

46 x1(1)=pos(1); x2(1) = speed(1); z=[x1(1);x2(1)]; //initial conditions for k = 2:size(t,2), etheta=z(1)-pos(k); espeed=z(2)-speed(k); rho=(1/(1- alpha))*(alpha*Q1+alpha*sqrt(k0*k0+k1*k1)*sqrt(etheta*etheta+espeed*espeed)+Mba r*phi); if abs(z(2)+z(1)) > then delv=-rho*(etheta+espeed)/abs((etheta+espeed)); else delv=0; end; z(1)=z(1)+z(2)*dt; z(2)=z(2)+(-Mgl*sin(z(1))+Ihat*(acc(k)+k1*(speed(k)-z(2))+k0*(pos(k)- z(1))+delv)+Mglhat*sin(z(1)))*(dt/I); x1(k)=z(1);x2(k)=z(2); end; f1=scf(1);clf(f1,'reset'); plot2d(t,pos,1);plot(t,x1,2); xgrid;xtitle('Theta', 'Time (s)','Angle (rad)');

47 k 0 =1, k 1 =2I = 5, MgL = 10 desired


Download ppt "Robot Control Independent joint control Lyapunov Theory Multivariable PD control and Lyapunov Theory Inverse Dynamic Control Robust Inverse Dynamic Control."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google