Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals By Dr. M. Ehi Ayewoh, The Lincoln University\ Mr.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals By Dr. M. Ehi Ayewoh, The Lincoln University\ Mr."— Presentation transcript:

1 Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals By Dr. M. Ehi Ayewoh, The Lincoln University\ Mr. Theodore Callier, Dillard University Dr. Omar Faison, Virginia State University Mrs. Dana Hector, Howard University Dr. Kenneth Koroma, Grambling State University ___________________________ 19th Annual NSPAA Technical Assistance Workshop & Training, Marriott Hotel, Charleston, SC., June 4, 2014 1

2 Conversations Objectives:
Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals Conversations Objectives: q Theoretical Framework – based on Attribution Theorem of the Impact of Locus of Control Factors in Predicting & Actualizing Sponsored Programs and related Outcomes. q Conducting Personal Audit, based on the ‘Sankofa’ principle of Reflective Practice - to Discover & Describe Individual Capability Profile. q “TRIPP” Approach to Enhancing Positive Self for Positive Sponsored Programs Productivity Indices based on the following three Domains of Learning Outcomes: Affective, Cognitive, & Psychomotive . q Q & A “TRIPP” = Theory Into Practice, Research, Practice ______________________________________________________ NSPAA, 2014 © Ayewoh, M.E., REMS Associates,

3 Theoretical Model: Ŷ = +X1 +X2 +X1.X2;
Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals Theoretical Model: Ŷ = +X1 +X2 +X1.X2; Whereby, Ŷ represents Predicted Sponsored Research/Faculty Development Outcomes or Grants Productivity Index; +X1 represents positive or negative Self or Internal Locus of Control (ILC) of a Stakeholder; +X2 represents positive or negative External Locus of Control (ELC) or Environmental impact or influence; +X1.X2 represents positive or negative interaction effects Between ILC & ELC. NSPAA, 2014 © Ayewoh, M.E., REMS Associates,

4 Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals Conducting Personal Audit to Develop a Positive Self for Desired Grants’ Outcomes: Attitude, Knowledge & Skills (+ X1) ‘Sankofa’ Influence Appreciative Inquiry (“AI”) NSPAA, 2014 © Ayewoh, M.E., REMS Associates,

5 Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals Conducting Personal Audit to Develop a Positive Self for Desired Grants’ Outcomes: Cognitive, Psychomotive & Affective Domains (+ X1) DESIRED OUTCOMES COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE PSYCHO- MOTIVE NSPAA, 2014 © Ayewoh, M.E., REMS Associates,

6 AFFECTIVEDOMAIN (Attitude)
Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals Developing Appropriate Affective Domain (Attitude) for Sustained Success in Grantsmanship (+ X1) In your humble, honest, & realistic opinion, what is your current state of affairs regarding the following: q Self Efficacy? q Self Actualization? q Self Esteem? q Personal Motivation? q Success? q Failure? Attitude, explicit or implicit, is “ the way you think and feel about [yourself], someone or something --- a feeling or way of thinking that affects --- [your] behavior ---” and overall outcomes. Merriam-Webster Dictionary “The problem is not the problem. The problem is your attitude about the problem” Captain Jack Sparrow. AFFECTIVEDOMAIN (Attitude) “Your current condition should not be the conclusion ---”. “Design to Shine”. Rev. Darnell Montgomery, Sr. NSPAA, 2014 © Ayewoh, M.E., REMS Associates,

7 Developing Appropriate Cognitive Domain (Knowledge) for
Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals Developing Appropriate Cognitive Domain (Knowledge) for Sustained Success in Grantsmanship (5-10 minutes) (+ X1) In your humble, honest, & realistic opinion, what is Your Current Knowledge of the following: q Sources of external funding opportunities – public & private? q The New OMB Uniform Guidance – to be effective December 26, 2014? q Preparing comprehensive Federal government grant & related proposals? Preparing comprehensive private/corporate/foundation grants & contracts? Campus support systems that are available and accessible to support your pre and post award sponsored programs’ activities? Processes in identifying & successfully negotiating systems that drive public and private extramural funding opportunities? The FACT that extramural funds are awarded to the institution and not the Principal Investigator of the proposed project? “It’s Not Your Money!” COGNITIVE DOMAIN (Knowledge) NSPAA, 2014 © Ayewoh, M.E., REMS Associates,

8 Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals Employing Appropriate & Adaptive Knowledge, Skills & Attitude To Map and Successfully Achieve Desired & Sustained Outcomes: (“ TRIPP” Approach) (+ X1) Have Burning Idea(s) for Pragmatic Action? Conduct Appropriate Prospect Research Develop Concept Paper or Letter of Inquiry PSYCHO- MOTIVE DOMAIN (Skills) Develop Complete & Strong Grant Proposal Receive & Successfully Manage Funded Grants Successfully Submit Complete Proposal NSPAA, 2014 © Ayewoh, M.E., REMS Associates,

9 Have Burning Idea(s) for Pragmatic Action?
Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals Employing Appropriate & Adaptive Knowledge, Skills & Attitude To Map and Successfully Achieve Desired & Sustained Outcomes: (“ TRIPP” Approach) (+ X1) Have Burning Idea(s) for Pragmatic Action? Every prospective project, research, or creative activity investigator has a burning idea that is influenced by his/her personal belief systems, training, experiences, or past & prevailing situations & circumstances. He/She wants to do something positive about a problem or challenge with other peoples’ money; with realistic, reasonable, & transparent strings attached therein. NSPAA, 2014 © Ayewoh, M.E., REMS Associates,

10 Active Audience Engagement (Q & A)
Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals Active Audience Engagement (Q & A) NSPAA, 2014 © Ayewoh, M.E., REMS Associates,

11 Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals Thank You M. Ehi Ayewoh, Ph.D., CALD ( ) Mr. Theodore Callier, Dillard University ( ) Dr. Omar Faison, Virginia State University ( ) Mrs. Dana Hector, Howard University ( ) Dr. Kenneth Koroma, Grambling State University ( ) 19th Annual NSPAA Technical Assistance Workshop & Training, Marriott Hotel, Charleston, SC., June 4, 2014


Download ppt "Effectively Engaging Individual Faculty in Developing & Managing Competitive & Award Winning Proposals By Dr. M. Ehi Ayewoh, The Lincoln University\ Mr."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google