Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published bySheila Teasdale Modified over 2 years ago

1
Chapter 6 Demand The demand function gives the optimal amounts of each of the goods as a function of the prices and income faced by the consumer: x 1 (p 1, p 2, m) We now change the arguments in the demand function one by one. ∆x 1 /∆m > 0: good 1 is a normal good ∆x 1 /∆m < 0: inferior (depends on the income level we are talking about: bus, MRT, taxi)

2
Fig. 6.1

3
Fig. 6.2

4
Two ways to look at the same thing (1) At x 1 – x 2 space, connect the demanded bundles as the budget line gets shifted outward. This curve is called the income offer curve (IOC) or income expansion path. (2) At x 1 – m space, connect the optimal x 1 bundles as the income increases while holding all prices fixed. This curve is called the Engel curve.

5
Fig. 6.3

6
Draw a general preference to illustrate the income offer curve and the Engel curve. Perfect substitutes: p 1 p 2 and p 1 = p 2. Perfect complements: IOC (at the corner), Engel (sloped p 1 + p 2 ) Cobb-Douglas: x 1 = am/ p 1 and x 2 = (1- a)m/ p 2 so x 1 /x 2 is constant, thus IOC (line), Engel (sloped p 1 /a))

7
Fig. 6.4

8
Fig. 6.5

9
Fig. 6.6

10
In the above three cases, (∆x 1 / x 1 )/(∆m/m) = 1. They all belong to homothetic preferences. If (x 1, x 2 ) w (y 1, y 2 ), then for all t >0, (tx 1, tx 2 ) w (ty 1, ty 2 ). ( 無異曲線等 比例放大縮小 )

11
If (x 1, x 2 ) is optimal at m, then (tx 1, tx 2 ) is optimal at tm. Suppose not, then (y 1, y 2 ) is feasible at tm and (y 1, y 2 ) s (tx 1, tx 2 ). Then (y 1, y 2 ) w (tx 1, tx 2 ) and it is not the case that (tx 1, tx 2 ) w (y 1, y 2 ). However, (y 1 /t, y 2 /t) is feasible at m, so (x 1, x 2 ) w (y 1 /t, y 2 /t). By homothetic preferences, (tx 1, tx 2 ) w (y 1, y 2 ), a contradiction.

12
Reasonable? (toothpaste) Quasilinear preferences: p 1 = p 2 =1, u(x 1, x 2 ) = √x 1 + x 2 MU 1 = 1/(2 √x 1 ), MU 2 = 1, MU 1 /p 1 = MU 2 /p 2 implies x 1 = ¼ IOC: on the x-axis up to (1/4,0), then becomes vertical Engel: sloped 1 up to (1/4, 1/4), then becomes vertical “zero income effect” only after some point

13
Fig. 6.8

14
∆x 1 /∆p 1 > 0: good 1 is a Giffen good ∆x 1 /∆p 1 < 0: good 1 is an ordinary good Two ways to look at the same thing (1) At x 1 – x 2 space, connect the demanded bundles as the budget line gets pivoted outward. This curve is called the price offer curve (POC).

15
(2) At x 1 – p 1 space, connect the optimal x 1 bundles as own price increases while holding income and other price fixed. This curve is called the demand curve. Draw a general preference to illustrate the price offer curve and the demand curve.

16
Fig. 6.9

17
Fig. 6.11

18
Perfect substitutes: POC p 1 > p 2 : x 1 = 0, p 1 = p 2 : all budget line, p 1 < p 2 : x 1 = m/ p 1, draw demand curve Perfect complements: POC (at the corner), demand (m/(p 1 +p 2 )) Discrete: good 1 is in discrete amounts and u(x 1, x 2 ) = v(x 1 ) + x 2

19
Fig. 6.12

21
Suppose m is large enough in the relevant range and let x 2 be the amount of money you can spend on all other goods, then you will start to buy the first unit of good 1 when p 1 has decreased to v(0)+m = v(1)+m-p 1, so p 1 has decreased to v(1) – v(0). Similarly, you will start buying the second unit of good 1 when p 1 has further decreased to v(1)+m-p 1 = v(2)+m-2p 1, so p 1 has decreased to v(2) – v(1). (draw) Illustrate the demand curve for the quasilinear case

22
Fig. 6.14

23
∆x 1 /∆p 2 > 0: good 1 is a substitute for good 2 ∆x 1 /∆ p 2 < 0: good 1 is a complement for good 2 ( 像自己價格的改變 ) The inverse demand function x 1 = x 1 (p 1 ), given p 1, how many x 1 that a consumer wants to buy p 1 = p 1 (x 1 ), given x 1, what price of p 1 would have to be in order for the consumer to choose that level of consumption

24
Fig. 6.15

25
Cobb Douglas x 1 = am/ p 1 vs. p 1 = am/ x 1 Inverse demand has a useful interpretation |MRS 1, 2 | = p 1 / p 2 so p 1 = |MRS 1, 2 | p 2 suppose good 2 is the money to spend on all other goods, so p 2 = 1 and p 1 = |MRS 1,2 | = ∆$/∆ x 1 : how many dollars the individual would be willing to give up to have a little more of 1 (marginal willingness to pay)

26
Demand downward sloping is due to that the marginal willingness to pay decreases as x 1 increases (different from diminishing MRS along an indifference curve).

Similar presentations

OK

RL1 Review. u A decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from the affordable ones. u Budget set u Preferences (Utility) u Choice (Demand)

RL1 Review. u A decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from the affordable ones. u Budget set u Preferences (Utility) u Choice (Demand)

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

S tv do ppt online Ppt on dance steps Ppt on virtual file system Ppt on regional transport office india Ppt on power generation by speed breaker Ppt on multi sectoral approach on ncds Ppt on life history of robert hooke Ppt on seminar topic artificial intelligence Ppt on bridge construction in india Ppt on 4 stroke petrol engine