Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMoises Booke Modified over 3 years ago

1
1 Markov Chains: Transitional Modeling Qi Liu

2
2 content Terminology Transitional Models without Explanatory Variables Transitional Models without Explanatory Variables Inference for Markov chains Data Analysis :Example 1 (ignoring explanatory variables)Example 1 Transitional Models with Explanatory Variables Data Anylysis: Example 2 (with explanatory variables)Example 2

3
3 Terminology Transitional models Markov chain K th-order Markov chain Tansitional probabilities and Tansitional matrix Tansitional probabilities and Tansitional matrix

4
4 Transitional models {y0,y1,…,yt-1} are the responses observed previously. Our focus is on the dependence of Yt on the {y0,y1,…,yt-1} as well as any explanatory variables. Models of this type are called transitional models.

5
5 Markov chain A stochastic process, for all t, the conditional distribution of Yt+1,given Y0,Y1, …,Yt is identical to the conditional distribution of Yt+1 given Yt alone. i.e, given Yt, Yt+1 is conditional independent of Y0,Y1, …,Yt-1. So knowing the present state of a Markov chain,information about the past states does not help us predict the future P(Yt+1|Y0,Y1, … Yt)=P(Yt+1|Yt)

6
6 K th-order Markov chain For all t, the conditional distribution of Yt+1 given Y0,Y1,…,Yt is identical to the conditional distribution of Yt+1,given (Yt,…,Yt-k+1) P(Yt+1|Y0,Y1,…Yt)=P(Yt+1|Yt-k+1,Yt-k+2,….Yt) i.e, given the states at the previous k times, the future behavior of the chain is independent of past behavior before those k times. We discuss here is first order Markov chain with k=1.

7
7 Tansitional probabilities

8
8 Transitional Models without Explanatory Variables At first, we ignore explanatory variables. Let f(y0,…,yT) denote the joint probability mass function of (Y0,…,YT),transitional models use the factorization: f(y0,…,yT) =f(y0)f(y1|y0)f(y2|y0,y1)…f(yT|y0,y1,…,yT-1) This model is conditional on the previous responses. For Markov chains, f(y0,…,yT) =f(y0)f(y1|y0)f(y2|y1)…f(yT|yT-1) (*) From it, a Markov chain depends only on one-step transition probabilities and the marginal distribution for the initial state. It also follows that the joint distribution satisfies loglinear model (Y0Y1, Y1Y2,…, YT-1YT) For a sample of realizations of a stochastic process, a contingency table displays counts of the possible sequences. A test of fit of this loglinear model checks whether the process plausibly satisfies the Markov property.

9
9 Inference for Markov chains

10
10 Inference for Markov chains(continue)

11
11 Example 1 (ignoring explanatory variables) A study at Harvard of effects of air pollution on respiratory illness in children. The children were examined annually at ages 9 through 12 and classified according to the presence or absence of wheeze. Let Yt denote the binary response at age t, t=9,10,11,12. 1 wheeze;2 no wheeze y9y10y11y12coun t y9y10y11y12count 111194211119 111230211215 1121 212110 112228212244 121114221117 121212221242 122112222135 1222632222572

12
12 Code of Example 1 Code of 11.7 data breath; input y9 y10 y11 y12 count; datalines; 1 1 1 1 94 1 1 1 2 30 1 1 2 1 15 1 1 2 2 28 1 2 1 1 14 1 2 1 2 9 1 2 2 1 12 1 2 2 2 63 2 1 1 1 19 2 1 1 2 15 2 1 2 1 10 2 1 2 2 44 2 2 1 1 17 2 2 1 2 42 2 2 2 1 35 2 2 2 2 572 ; proc genmod; class y9 y10 y11 y12; model count= y9 y10 y11 y12 y9*y10 y10*y11 y11*y12 /dist=poi lrci type3 residuals obstats; run; proc genmod; class y9 y10 y11 y12; model count= y9 y10 y11 y12 y9*y10 y9*y11 y10*y11 y10*y12 y11*y12 y9*y10*y11 y10*y11*y12/dist=poi lrci type3 residuals obstats; run; proc genmod; class y9 y10 y11 y12; model count= y9 y10 y11 y12 y9*y10 y9*y11 y9*y12 y10*y11 y10*y12 y11*y12 /dist=poi lrci type3 residuals obstats; run; data breath_new;set breath; a=y9*y10+y10*y11+y11*y12; b=y9*y12+Y10*y12+y9*y11; proc genmod; class y9 y10 y11 y12; model count= y9 y10 y11 y12 a b /dist=poi lrci type3 residuals obstats; run;

13
13 Data analysis The loglinear model (y9y10,y10y11,y11y12) a first order Markov chain. P(Y11|Y9,Y10)=P(Y11|Y10) P(Y12|Y10,Y11)=P(Y12|Y11) G²=122.9025, df=8, with p-value<0.0001, it fits poorly. So given the state at time t, classification at time t+1 depends on the states at times previous to time t.

14
14 Data analysis (cont…) Then we consider model (y9y10y11, y10y11y12),a second-order Markov chain, satisfying conditional independence at ages 9 and 12, given states at ages 10 and 11. This model fits poorly too, with G²=23.8632,df=4 and p-value<0.001.

15
15 Data analysis (cont) The loglinear model (y9y10,y9y11,y9y12,y10y11,y10y12,y11y12) that permits association at each pair of ages fits well, with G²=1.4585,df=5,and p-value=0.9178086. Parameter Estimate Error Limits Square Pr > ChiSq y9*y10 1.8064 0.1943 1.4263 2.1888 86.42 <.0001 y9*y11 0.9478 0.2123 0.5282 1.3612 19.94 <.0001 y9*y12 1.0531 0.2133 0.6323 1.4696 24.37 <.0001 y10*y11 1.6458 0.2093 1.2356 2.0569 61.85 <.0001 y10*y12 1.0742 0.2205 0.6393 1.5045 23.74 <.000 y11*y12 1.8497 0.2071 1.4449 2.2574 79.81 <.0001

16
16 Data analysis (cont) From above, we see that the association seems similar for pairs of ages1 year apart, and somewhat weaker for pairs of ages more than 1 year apart. So we consider the simpler model in which It also fits well, with G²=2.3, df=9, and p-value= 0.9857876.

17
17 Estimated Conditonal Log Odds Ratios

18
18 Transitional Models with Explanatory Variables

19
19

20
20 Data Anylysis Example 2 (with explanatory variables) At ages 7 to 10, children were evaluated annually on the presence of respiratory illness. A predictor is maternal smoking at the start of the study, where s=1 for smoking regularly and s=0 otherwise.

21
21 Child ’ s Respiratory Illness by Age and Maternal Smoking

22
22 Data analysis (cont)

23
23 Code of Example 2 data illness; input t tp ytp yt s count; datalines; 8 7 0 0 0 266 8 7 0 0 1 134 8 7 0 1 0 28 8 7 0 1 1 22 8 7 1 0 0 32 8 7 1 0 1 14 8 7 1 1 0 24 8 7 1 1 1 17 9 8 0 0 0 274 9 8 0 0 1 134 9 8 0 1 0 24 9 8 0 1 1 14 9 8 1 0 0 26 9 8 1 0 1 18 9 8 1 1 0 26 9 8 1 1 1 21 9 8 1 0 0 26 9 8 1 0 1 18 9 8 1 1 0 26 9 8 1 1 1 21 10 9 0 0 0 283 10 9 0 0 1 140 10 9 0 1 0 17 10 9 0 1 1 12 10 9 1 0 0 30 10 9 1 0 1 21 10 9 1 1 0 20 10 9 1 1 1 14 ; run; proc logistic descending; freq count; model yt = t ytp s/scale=none aggregate; run;

24
24 Output from SAS Deviance and Pearson Goodness-of-Fit Statistics Criterion DF Value Value/DF Pr > ChiSq Deviance 8 3.1186 0.3898 0.9267 Pearson 8 3.1275 0.3909 0.9261 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Standard Wald Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Intercept 1 -0.2926 0.8460 0.1196 0.7295 t 1 -0.2428 0.0947 6.5800 0.0103 ytp 1 2.2111 0.1582 195.3589 <.0001 s 1 0.2960 0.1563 3.5837 0.0583

25
25 Analysis

26
26 The model fits well, with G²=3.1186, df=8, p- value=0.9267. The coefficient of is 2.2111 with SE 0.1582, Chi- Square statistic 195.3589 and p-value <.0001,which shows that the previous observation has a strong positive effect. So if a child had illness when he was t-1, he would have more probability to have illness at age t than a child who didn’t have illness at age t-1. The coefficient of s is 0.2960, the likelihood ratio test of H0 :=0 is 3.5837,df=1,with p-value 0.0583. There is slight evidence of a positive effect of maternal smoking.

27
27 Interpratation of Paramters ß

28
28 Thank you !

Similar presentations

OK

1 STA 617 – Chp9 Loglinear/Logit Models Loglinear / Logit Models Chapter 5-7 logistic regression: GLM with logit link binomial / multinomial Chapter.

1 STA 617 – Chp9 Loglinear/Logit Models Loglinear / Logit Models Chapter 5-7 logistic regression: GLM with logit link binomial / multinomial Chapter.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google