Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byUlises Dillow Modified over 3 years ago

1
A NEW CTE PHOTOMETRIC CORRECTION FORMULA FOR ACS Marco Chiaberge TIPS meeting 05/16/2012

2
CHARGE TRANFER EFFICIENCY (CTE) per pixel Defined as CTE = 1 - Q/Q = 1 - CTI For an ideal CCD CTE = 1.0 For real CCDs CTE < 1 Manufacturing imperfections in the crystalline lattice Radiation damage (increasing with time) CTE on ACS was not 1.0 at lunch! The total CTE is CTE N significant effect for large CCDs CTE depends on flux, sky level, # of transfers

3
The effect of CTE on stellar photometry is to reduce the measured flux A significant fraction (all?) of the “lost” flux goes into the “tail”

4
Timeline of ACS CTE corrections Time dependent formula based on 3 epochs March 2003 – Feb 2004 Riess & Mack ISR 2004-006 Revised formula Chiaberge et al. ISR 2009-01 New approach for data analysis, 4 epochs Increased accuracy mag = 10 A SKY B FLUX C Y/2000 (MJD-52333)/365 Linear in log mag v log flux and log sky! Anderson & Bedin 2010 pixel-based CTE correction Included in the new CALACS

5
WHY DO WE STILL NEED A PHOTOMETRIC CORRECTION FORMULA? We need to keep monitoring the time dependence and make sure that photometry is correctly recovered Some users may prefer to use a correction formula. The correction formula may be more accurate for some regions of the parameter space What should we use for extended sources?

6
Photometric test WFC B A D C Y1 Y2 Y Transfers= Y=Y1-Y2 For y=1024 Y=0 mag=0

7
Post-SM4 Observations Programs: CAL/ACS 11880, 12385, 12730 FILTERS: F606W, F502N EXP TIMES: Between 30s and 400s 5 Background levels between ~0.1 and 40e - Low sky CR-REJECTION, no dithering 1 epoch/cycle Target: 47 Tuc (7’ off center) Cycle 19: + pointing 3’ south of 47Tuc center for the lowest sky level 9 external orbits

8
47 Tuc 7’ off center ~ 2000 stars 47 Tuc 3’ off center ~ 7000 stars

9
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE (semi-automatic, thanks to Pey Lian!) 1 Generate “clean”, deep, drz image using all data 2 Identify saturated pixels and mark them on the DQ extension of FLT files 3 Mask out area around the saturated stars 4 Find stars on the deep mosaic, then measure flux of all stars that are detected on (both of) the single_sci files (aperture phot) 5 Fit mag vs # of transfers for different bins of flux (rejecting outliers with iterative sigma clipping) 6 Find the best fit model parameters to reproduce the dependence of mag y=2000 on Sky and Flux levels

10
A linear fit is performed for each bin of flux (red lines) Rms errors on the slope are estimated (yellow lines) At y = 2000 Mag loss of 0.56 ± 0.07 mag F502N 30s November 2011

11
CTE Correction formula assumed dependence on flux mag = 10 A SKY B FLUX C Y/2000 (MJD-52333)/365 Cycle 17 0.3e - 32e - Cycle 19 0.6 e - Y=2000 2 problems: CTE improves at low Signal levels??? Large deviations from the assumed linear dependence

12
Photometry with different detection thresholds: 3 and 10

13
100e - 50e - Far from amplifiersClose to amplifiers Detection threshold N Flux mag Average flux I measure in that bin BUT THIS IS WHAT USERS NORMALLY DO!

14
CTE Correction formula assumed dependence on flux mag = 10 A SKY B FLUX C Y/2000 (MJD-52333)/365 Cycle 17 0.3e - 32e - Cycle 19 0.6 e -

15
Cycle 19 0.6 e - mag = Log flux + sky), sky) 14e - Much better represented by a linear relation in mag v Log sky

16
mag = [ Log(flux) + y/2000 p Log(sky) + q = p’ Log(sky) + q’ mag = p Log(sky) Log(flux) + q Log(flux) + p’ Log(sky) + q’ p, q, p’, q’ = p(t), q(t), p’(t), q’(t)

17
mag = p Log(sky) Log(flux) + q Log(flux) + p’ Log(sky) + q’ p, q, p’, q’ = p(t), q(t), p’(t), q’(t) Linear fit using “R”, for each epoch The new time dependence does not assume CTE = 1 at T = T launch T – T launch (d)

18
Comparison with pixel-based CTE correction CTE formula is more accurate than the pix-CTE correction at the lowest background levels

19
FUTURE WORK (from TIPS 2009) New observations after SM4 using CR-REJ and possibly dithering Procedures should be made automatic (or semi-automatic) Formula for different aperture radii Better data might lead to a better characterization Different form of the formula? FUTURE WORK Better estimate of the errors on the coefficients Formula for different aperture radii Extended sources? Webpage for correction Thanks to Jay, Linda, Roberto and Pey Lian RESULTS A new accurate CTE photometric correction formula is now available The accuracy is comparable to (or better than!) the pix-cte correction Does not depend on the assumption of CTE = 1 at T = T launch

20
Photometric test Allows to measure the total flux lost and provides correction formulae for photometry. Stars are positioned at different distance from the readout amplifier thus changing the number of transfers and therefore the impact of CTE. WFC D B C A

21
47 Tuc F606W 40s exp

22
Long vs short: find stars in F606W 400s Measure the flux of all stars in F502N 30s

23
No correction Corrected i in F606W 400s

Similar presentations

OK

HLA WFPC2 Source List Photometric Quality Checks Version: August 25, 2008 Brad Whitmore 1.Introduction 2.Comparison with Ground-based Stetson Photometry.

HLA WFPC2 Source List Photometric Quality Checks Version: August 25, 2008 Brad Whitmore 1.Introduction 2.Comparison with Ground-based Stetson Photometry.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google