Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byKhalid Heye Modified over 2 years ago

1
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Temperature Simulation DCCT at PETRA III D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg

2
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Problem Two cases of operation with different temperatures at the current monitor observed Case 1: I1=85 mA, N=160 Bunches gives about 70°C Case 2: I2=65 mA, N=40 Bunches gives about 130°C Questions: Why case 2 higher temperature? Why temperature high?

3
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Answer Problem 1 Power P = I Q k loss I is mean beam current Q is charge = I t t is bunch distance = t / N t is PETRA III revolution time = 7.685 µs k loss is voltage loss per charge for a structure Result in P = I 2 t k loss / N P1/P2 = 0.43 Because P2 is higher the temperature is higher! Compare: P E-XFEL,max /P2=0.0001

4
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Setup DCCT PEEK AlMg3 µ-metal Stainless Steel CuBe Iron ceramic In CST imported model from Annette Brenger

5
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Inner Setup Bellow shielded, but results in a resonator Ceramic coated with Molybdenum. When a charged particle moves through DCCT, it looses energy due to gap=8.2 mm!

6
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Simulation 1.Wakefield simulation with beam: get energy loss 2.Eigenmode of setup: get field distribution of loss 3.Thermal: input power and field distribution, get temperature distribution

7
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Wakefield Simulation Mesh cells around bellow and ceramic: Simulation tool can not resolve bellow and coating perfect! Anyhow: k loss =39.1 V/nC ->P1=13.6 W, P2=31.7 W

8
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Eigenmode Simulation Field distribution between bellow and shielding Setup: only vacuum part Field distribution

9
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Temperature Distribution P2 Included: heat conductivity of all materials and heat radiation No special cooling available, next is 4.2 m away. Therefore cooling applied at the end of both beam pipes at 2.1 m No cooling in x and y Here maximum temperature of 107 °C

10
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Temperature distribution shortened P2 Here the distance to cooling is only 200 mm, T max =106°C, because heat radiation along pipe acts like a cooling, therefore this shortened model can be used Measured 130°C; Simulation underestimates temperature by 18%, reason: mesh, perhaps higher loss factor in reality

11
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Temperature distribution P2 with airflow Here the simulation box increased with cooling at x min,max and y min,max, T max reduces from 106°C to 87.5 °C

12
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Temperature distribution P1 Airflow switched off. Lower Temperature because of lower power Measured 70°C, simulation lower by 16%

13
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Antenna in hollow space Similar antenna in space simulation applied to compare energy Results in Voltage vs Time, calculated in power and integrated gives energy between shielding and bellow: E i1 between bellow and iron: E o1 Here only relative values to compare energy in each space: E i1 /E o1 = 194 That means only a fraction of lossed energy contribute to signal from DCCT

14
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Setup: smaller gap Smaller gap = 1.7 mm should reduce energy loss Gap near chamfer to result in good energy transmission K loss = 15.1 V/nC

15
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Eigenmode distribution Field amplitude near gap

16
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Temperature distribution P2 Maximum temperature reduced from 106 °C to 55°C (remember: simulation underestimates temperature)

17
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Results with smaller gap E i2 /E o2 = 0.33 because antenna in chamfer leewards E o2 /E o1 = 0.35 because lower energy loss of beam and oscillation contributes to signal

18
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Setup without coating gap = 1.7 mm symmetrically below ceramic Ceramic without coating to result in higher energy transmission K loss = 26.6 V/nC, because gap is deeper without coating

19
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Eigenmode distribution Field has poor accuracy, because space between bellow and iron included; highest amplitude near left gap

20
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Temperature distribution P2 Maximum temperature reduced from 106 °C to 85°C (remember: simulation underestimates temperature)

21
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Results: transmission E i1 /E o1 = 194available design E i2 /E o2 = 0.33 best energy transfer E i3 /E o3 = 47 more energy in resonator E o2 /E o1 = 0.35 but low signal amplitude E o3 /E o1 = 0.82 better amplitude

22
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Setup: with coating and add shielding gap = 8.2 mm like origin, coating actives Shielding of resonator K loss reduced to 4.4 V/nC, because influence of resonator avoided No resonance found below cutoff (2.44 GHz)

23
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Temperature distribution P2 Maximum temperature reduced from 106 °C to 31°C (remember: simulation underestimates temperature)

24
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Results: transmission E i1 /E o1 = 194available design E i2 /E o2 = 0.33 best energy transfer E i3 /E o3 = 47 more energy in resonator E i4 /E o4 = 11should be zero, but meshing not perfect E o2 /E o1 = 0.35 but low signal amplitude E o3 /E o1 = 0.82 better amplitude E o4 /E o1 = 8.15 10 -8 almost no signal

25
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg; 27.08.2010 Summary Simulated temperature distribution Temperature underestimated, but trend is in agreement Smaller gap and shielding of resonator reduces temperature Suggestion: smaller gap and/or close space between bellow and shielding origin

Similar presentations

OK

6 July 2010 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Sabrina Appel | 1 Micro bunch evolution and „turbulent beams“

6 July 2010 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Sabrina Appel | 1 Micro bunch evolution and „turbulent beams“

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on p&g products india Ppt on earth moon and sun Ppt on asian continent animals Ppt on bluetooth device Ppt on central administrative tribunal new delhi Ppt on traction rolling stock trading Ppt on density based traffic light control Ppt on eco friendly agriculture factors Ppt on self awareness activity Ppt on beer lambert law absorbance