Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byViviana Larcher Modified over 3 years ago

1
#3224 Sat 17 th November Restored an “AP” set-up with some measurement of Twiss. – The idea was to take some BPM data with a known twiss set-up to see how the bunch-to- bunch position variation correlates with the Twiss. Took BPM data in AR1. Scanned AR1-Q1/4 to close dispersion Scanned AR1-Q1/4 to make isochronous.

2
#3224 Twiss AP set up from #3139 See \\Dlfiles03\alice\Analysis\Period 14 data\AP_period13and14\transversemodel\31 39\\Dlfiles03\alice\Analysis\Period 14 data\AP_period13and14\transversemodel\31 39 Repeated the same scans to compare Twiss repeatability. ST1-Q1 scan Q2 = 0.6 A Q3/4 = 0 A ST1-Q2 scan (0-1.4A) with Q1 = 0.40A.

3
ST1-Q1 scan Q2 = 0.6 A Q3/4 = 0 A, beamsize measured on ST1-4 Yuri original meas’t on #3139 #3224. Position of minimum looks similar but curve much shallower My analysis of #3139

4
ST1-Q2 scan (0-1.4A) with Q1 = 0.40A. beamsize measured on ST1-4 No plot available from Yuri’s file My analysis of #3139 My analysis of #3224

5
Twiss Calculation γ.εx (μm) αx(m)βx (m)γ.εy (μm) αy(m)βy(m) #3149 YMS evaluation 8.521.077.43.1-2.3122.3 #3149 My evaluation 9.519.075.7Not done #3224 My Evaluation 6.511.440.7Not done Uses parabolic fit to σ^2 vs k.l Constrain parabola vertical offset to smallest beamsize measurement

6
Twiss Conclusions NB: I didn’t go to divisor 20 like Yuri did. But I would expect the result (if any) of this would be to make my beamsizes on #3224 larger due to increased beam loading. However, my beamsizes are smaller. I set up phases “accurately” to match #3224 60pC; BC=-10/+15deg; Lc = crests. Pb=1.2kW. Comparison of the quad scan data suggests optics are not highly repeatable. Two months gap between measurements being compared. Maybe this is too long a gap.

7
Model vs Measure #3224 ST1-3 AR2-1 ST2-1 ST2-2 Model/measure agreement not too bad

8
Bunch intra-train variation/jitter compared with β function x-plane AR1-BPM-01 AR1-BPM-03 AR1-BPM-04AR1-BPM-06 Plot sqrt(β) (~ beamsize) vs rms x position with the train, for each BPM trace. The β at each BPM comes from model on previous slide. There does seem to be strong correlation, perhaps expected. AR1-BPM-06 AR1-BPM-01 AR1-BPM-03 AR1-BPM-04

9
AR1 STUDIES After Twiss evaluation, restore the #3139 “AP” set up and study dispersion and R56 of AR1

10
AR1 Dispersion Measured on AR1- BPM-06 Each plot is BPM x position vs beam energy Vary AR1-Q1/4 from 1.9 to 2.4 in 8 steps Dispersion (mm) vs AR1-Q1/4 current

11
AR1 R56 measured on AR1-BPM-06 Each plot is BPM relative path length vs beam energy Vary AR1-Q1/4 from 1.9 to 2.4 in 8 steps R56 (mm) vs AR1-Q1/4 current AR1-Q1/4 current

12
Summary R16 R56 Isochronous + zero dispersion condition at AR1-Q1/4 = 2.18 A AR1-Q1/4 current

Similar presentations

OK

Tools in CTF3 Simona Bettoni for the CTF3 operation team.

Tools in CTF3 Simona Bettoni for the CTF3 operation team.

© 2019 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google