Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byJarrod Coffey Modified over 2 years ago

1
2 DFA VERSUS N ORMAL DFA Pavan Kumar Akulakrishna (M.Tech, SERC) SR No: 06-02-01-10-51-12-1-09469 Under Guidance of : Prof. Deepak D’souza.

2
F UNDAMENTAL Q UESTION Is 2 way DFA more powerful than a one way DFA? “OR” Does the ability to do multiple scans on the tape gives rise to an increase in ‘ POWER ’ of the 2DFA? Not Intuitively clear! Need to develop a formal model.

3
U NDERSTANDING THE 2DFA B EHAVIOR Consider a String w: which is broken down into two parts say x and z. Right to Left Q Left to Right P If next time Right to Left Q, then Left to Right will be P. i.e., T x (Q)=P If never emerges? Let T x (Q) = ┴ The first time it emerges from x without having been to z. Call the state T x (. ). xz

4
C ONSTRUCTING A T ABLE T x (q) depends only on x and q. Write down T x (q) for all possible states q T: (Q U {. }) (Q U {┴}) Possible such tables taking |Q| = k are, (k+1)^(k+1). Hence, a finite information can be passed. Q1Q2…….Qk┴ Q1√ Q2√ ……√…….. Qk√. √

5
U SING M YHILL N ERODE T HEOREM If there are tables T x == T y and M accepts xz. Then, yz is also said to be accepted. Let L(M) denote the language accepted by the machine. Define a Equivalence relation on strings x and y: If T x = T y, x ≡ L(M) y.

6
P ROPERTIES OF ≡ L(M) Right congruence, x ≡ L(M) y then xa ≡ L(M) ya Refines L(M) If T x = T y, either both x and y accepted or rejected. Finite Index No. of Equivalence classes = No. of Unique Tables [i.e., (k+1)^(k+1)]. Hence, by Myhill-Nerode theorem, L(M) is a Regular Language.

7
I NFERENCES D RAWN A 2DFA is NO more powerful than a normal DFA We can construct a one way DFA equivalent to a 2 DFA viz. Indentify equivalence classes. Use construction defined by ≡ M ≡

8
C ONSTRUCTING E QUIVALENT DFA Formally, a DFA equivalent to 2 DFA looks as: D=(Q’,S’,Σ U{├, ┤}, δ,F’) Q’ = { T: (Q U {. }) (Q U {┴}) } S’ = T ε δ (T x, a) = T xa F’ = {T x | x Є L(M) }

9
A DVANTAGES O F 2 DFA A 2DFA is more compact than a DFA i.e., L(M)= {x Є {a, b}* | #a(x) is multiple of 7 and #b(x) is multiple of 5} Normal DFA would have 35 states. 2 DFA can be constructed using 14 states, including the accept and reject states (t, r). A 2DFA has single accept and reject states Whereas, a DFA may have multiple final states. E.g. L(M) = {x Є {a, b}* | #a(x) is multiple of 7 or #b(x) is multiple of 5}. Normal DFA has 12 final states.

10
C ONCLUSIONS 2 way DFA is a convenient representation for some regular languages, much like NFA Converting it to a normal DFA can be tedious as it involves constructing and identifying identical tables.

Similar presentations

OK

MYHILL NERODE THEOREM By Anusha Tilkam. Myhill Nerode Theorem: The following three statements are equivalent 1.The set L є ∑* is accepted by a FSA 2.L.

MYHILL NERODE THEOREM By Anusha Tilkam. Myhill Nerode Theorem: The following three statements are equivalent 1.The set L є ∑* is accepted by a FSA 2.L.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on second law of thermodynamics pdf Ppt on real estate sector in india Ppt on traffic light controller using fpgas Ppt on types of parallelograms pictures Convert pdf to ppt online free download Ppt on event planning and management Ppt on the greatest dictator of the world Ppt on index numbers youtube Ppt on pricing policy template Free ppt on save girl child